Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Layer-adaptive Structured Pruning Guided by Latency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14403 v1 pith:CSPINKIB submitted 2023-05-23 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords pruninglatencysp-lampscorestructurednetworkaccuracycifar10
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Structured pruning can simplify network architecture and improve inference speed. Combined with the underlying hardware and inference engine in which the final model is deployed, better results can be obtained by using latency collaborative loss function to guide network pruning together. Existing pruning methods that optimize latency have demonstrated leading performance, however, they often overlook the hardware features and connection in the network. To address this problem, we propose a global importance score SP-LAMP(Structured Pruning Layer-Adaptive Magnitude-based Pruning) by deriving a global importance score LAMP from unstructured pruning to structured pruning. In SP-LAMP, each layer includes a filter with an SP-LAMP score of 1, and the remaining filters are grouped. We utilize a group knapsack solver to maximize the SP-LAMP score under latency constraints. In addition, we improve the strategy of collect the latency to make it more accurate. In particular, for ResNet50/ResNet18 on ImageNet and CIFAR10, SP-LAMP is 1.28x/8.45x faster with +1.7%/-1.57% top-1 accuracy changed, respectively. Experimental results in ResNet56 on CIFAR10 demonstrate that our algorithm achieves lower latency compared to alternative approaches while ensuring accuracy and FLOPs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools