Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.14397 v3 pith:CVAWS2CN submitted 2022-06-29 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fairnesshealthcarelearningmachinebiasesconcernsdisparitiesequal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The digitization of healthcare data coupled with advances in computational capabilities has propelled the adoption of machine learning (ML) in healthcare. However, these methods can perpetuate or even exacerbate existing disparities, leading to fairness concerns such as the unequal distribution of resources and diagnostic inaccuracies among different demographic groups. Addressing these fairness problem is paramount to prevent further entrenchment of social injustices. In this survey, we analyze the intersection of fairness in machine learning and healthcare disparities. We adopt a framework based on the principles of distributive justice to categorize fairness concerns into two distinct classes: equal allocation and equal performance. We provide a critical review of the associated fairness metrics from a machine learning standpoint and examine biases and mitigation strategies across the stages of the ML lifecycle, discussing the relationship between biases and their countermeasures. The paper concludes with a discussion on the pressing challenges that remain unaddressed in ensuring fairness in healthcare ML, and proposes several new research directions that hold promise for developing ethical and equitable ML applications in healthcare.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Maximizing Predictive Performance for Small Subgroups: Functionally Adaptive Interaction Regularization (FAIR)

    stat.AP 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A weighted linear interaction model with per-group lasso penalties improves small-subgroup prediction accuracy while staying interpretable.

Pith tools