Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Meta-Cultural Competence: Climbing the Right Hill of Cultural Awareness

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read What an LLM needs to serve a new culture is not more cultural facts, but the ability to notice that its cultural model is off and to learn the new pattern quickly.

desk verdict A thoughtful position paper with a reasonable central claim, but the argument overreaches by treating the octopus analogy as literal, and the quantitative illustration needs repair. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09637 v1 pith:CVV3EW7M submitted 2025-02-09 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CL

Sougata Saha , Saurabh Kumar Pandey , Monojit Choudhury This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.CL
keywords meta-culturalcompetenceculturalawarenesslargelanguagemodelsoctopustestvariationalexplicationandnegotiationbiaslong-tailculture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what cultural awareness for an LLM should really mean, and answers that factual cultural knowledge is the wrong target. Using an extension of the octopus thought experiment, it argues that a useful multilingual, multicultural system must possess meta-cultural competence: it must notice when the conversational pattern it has learned no longer fits the user's culture, keep the conversation alive while it confirms this, and learn the new pattern from few examples. The authors propose two measurable components, variational awareness and explication-and-negotiation ability, and illustrate how to measure the first by checking whether a model's uncertainty about an answer drops when a country is named. A sympathetic reader would take away that cultural benchmarks are necessary but not sufficient; evaluation and training should target the model's ability to adapt to truly unseen cultures.

What carries the argument

The Multi-pair Octopus Test is the load-bearing thought experiment: it extends the original octopus test by replacing a single interlocutor pair with many culturally distinct pairs and adding a new pair that the octopus has never observed. The test forces a choice among four response strategies, and the paper argues that only the fourth — self-monitoring for pattern change and switching to a listen-and-learn mode — scales to the long tail of cultures. For measurement, the paper formalizes variational awareness as entropy: $f_v(C')$ is the entropy of the answer distribution for a demographic group $C'$, and the quantity $\Delta = \frac{1}{|C|}\sum_{c_i \in C}[\hat{f}_v(C) - \hat{f}_v(\{c_i\})]$ captures whether conditioning on a country reduces the model's uncertainty in the right direction, without requiring exact knowledge of the ground-truth function.

What would settle it

Give a current LLM a cultural-adaptation scenario with no prior exposure to a new cultural pair and no explicit error signal, and ask whether it detects the shift, keeps the conversation coherent, and learns the new pattern from a few examples; if a model with high cultural knowledge but low entropy-based variational awareness adapts perfectly, the claimed primacy of meta-cultural competence is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that cultural knowledge is the wrong hill: even a model that answers country-specific factual questions perfectly will fail when cultures shift, because culture has a long tail, changes over time, and is experienced multimodally. In the Multi-pair Octopus Test, a hyperintelligent pattern learner eavesdrops on pairs of friends from different cultures and must respond when a new pair arrives; the authors argue the only scalable response is for the system to self-detect the distributional change and quickly learn the new distribution. They therefore define meta-cultural competence for AI as two abilities: variational awareness, the capacity to represent the space of possible cultural responses and to have high uncertainty where variation is real, and explication and negotiation, the capacity to state what it does not know and extract the missing cultural knowledge from the user efficiently. The paper claims these abilities, not knowledge scores, determine whether an LLM-based system remains useful and equitable across seen and unseen cultures.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument assumes that an LLM is like the octopus: a pure statistical pattern learner with no real-world understanding, so that an unseen culture can only be handled by detecting the distributional shift and learning the new pattern; if a pretrained model can already infer enough shared cultural structure from language to serve an unseen culture, the claimed necessity of meta-cultural competence is weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cultural knowledge benchmarks should be supplemented with tests that measure how a model's uncertainty changes when demographic context is added or removed.
  • A system that cannot sense a distribution shift should not be trusted to serve a user from an unfamiliar culture; it will either deny service or hallucinate.
  • Explication and negotiation abilities belong at the system level, not only in the model weights, so system design and human-computer interaction principles become part of cultural competence.
  • Periodic retraining on curated cultural datasets is a stopgap; it cannot keep up with the long-tail and dynamic nature of culture.
  • Because every individual belongs to some under-represented subgroup, culturally inequitable service eventually reaches every user, not only users from globally marginalized cultures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension the paper leaves implicit: variational awareness should predict downstream cultural adaptation, so the entropy-reduction measure could be validated by checking whether models with low awareness are the ones that fail when placed in an unseen culture.
  • The same logic applies beyond nations: any demographic intersection, such as age cohort, profession, or online community, behaves like a long-tail culture, so meta-cultural competence would also improve personalization and cold-start recommendation.
  • The paper's framing suggests a concrete design pattern for assistants: expose uncertainty by saying 'this varies by country' rather than always issuing an unhedged answer, and ask a clarifying question when entropy is high; this is in the spirit of explication but not explicitly prescribed by the authors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This position paper argues that making LLM-based AI systems useful across cultures, including completely unseen ones, requires meta-cultural competence rather than mere cultural knowledge. The argument is built on a Multi-pair Octopus Test, an extension of Bender and Koller's thought experiment, in which an octopus that has learned pairwise communication patterns is confronted with a new pair of interlocutors and must choose among denial, hallucination, periodic retraining, and self-discovered continual learning. The authors conclude that the last strategy—corresponding to meta-cultural competence—is necessary, and they define two core competencies: variational awareness (the ability to represent the space of possible cultural outcomes and detect distributional change) and explication/negotiation (the ability to clarify and gather missing cultural knowledge during interaction). The paper also presents a formalization of variational awareness with an entropy-based metric Δ and reports an illustrative experiment probing Llama-3.1-8B with GeoMLAMA questions.

Significance. If the central claim is accepted, the paper has significant value: it challenges the dominant paradigm of evaluating cultural competence through static knowledge benchmarks and offers a concrete, measurable alternative. The paper is clearly written, engages with anthropological and psychological literature, and explicitly grounds its proposal in two testable competencies. It also openly acknowledges several limitations of its demonstration. The thought experiment is thought-provoking and could stimulate new benchmark and training objectives. However, the strength of the conclusion depends on an empirical premise about statistical novelty of unseen cultures that the paper does not establish, and the formal metric in Section 5 contains a simplification error. These issues are fixable, and the paper remains a useful contribution as a position statement.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3 Strategy 4 (and §1 Multi-pair Octopus Test)] The paper's central normative claim that meta-cultural competence is required for usefulness across unseen cultures rests on the premise that a new culture is as statistically novel for an LLM as A3-B3's common ground is for the octopus. The paper asserts in footnote 1 that culture has 'fewer cross-cultural patterns' than language, but this is an empirical claim supported by no experiment or citation in this manuscript. Given the paper's own definition of culture as an intersection of demographic and semantic proxies (Section 2), an LLM could plausibly answer questions about a new culture by composing knowledge of known dimensions (e.g., Indonesian norms plus NLP-scientist norms), in which case knowledge-based competence might suffice and the forced choice among the four strategies collapses. The Limitations section explicitly declines to discuss this counterposition, saying only that it is 'short-sighted.' Please either provide evidence or a sustained argument for the statistical-novelty premise, or soften the claim to say that meta-cultural competence should supplement, not replace, cultural knowledge.
  2. [§5, Eqs. (2)–(3)] The step from Eq. (2) to Eq. (3) is not a valid simplification. Eq. (2) averages over all subsets C' of C, whereas Eq. (3) compares only the full set C with singletons. These expressions coincide only if f_v(C') = f_v(C) for every subset C', which is false even in the driving example: a subset containing two right-driving countries has entropy zero while f_v(C)=0.92. The experiment in §5.1 computes Eq. (3), so the reported Δ does not measure the quantity formally defined in Eq. (2). Please correct the definition to match the computation, or derive the specific condition under which the simplification holds.
  3. [§5.1, Table 1 and Fig. 1] The ground-truth f_v(C) used in the experiment is estimated from the five countries in the GeoMLAMA dataset, while the earlier driving example defines f_v(C) from global statistics (approximately two-thirds right, one-third left). For many of the 25 questions, the five-country ground truth may be far from the true global distribution, so the reported Δ and directionality values are not estimates of variational awareness relative to the true f_v. The paper acknowledges this in a parenthetical, but the table and figure present these values without prominent caveats; please reframe them explicitly as illustrative relative to the dataset, not as validated estimates of variational awareness.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2] The sentence 'Culture has a long-tail distribution(Cohen, 2009; ...)' is missing a space before the citation and should be reworded for readability.
  2. [§5.1] The paper refers to the model as 'Llama3.1-8B' in Table 1 and 'Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct' in the text; please use a single consistent name.
  3. [Figure 1] Figure 1 appears to plot multiple quantities with different scales on a single axis; the caption should state which curves correspond to which axis, and the abbreviated question names should be expanded either in the caption or by explicit reference to Table 2.
  4. [Throughout] The terms 'meta-cultural competency' and 'meta-cultural competence' are used interchangeably; please choose one form and use it consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central claim rests on an explicitly analogical thought experiment and an operationalized metric, not on a derivation that contains its own conclusion.

full rationale

I walked the paper's argument chain and found no step in which a predicted or derived quantity is, by construction or by self-citation, identical to an input. The central argument proceeds from the Multi-pair Octopus Test, an extension of Bender and Koller's thought experiment, to the claim that LLM-based systems need meta-cultural competence (variational awareness plus explication and negotiation). The thought experiment is an analogy, not a formal derivation: it assumes the octopus is a pure distribution learner, but the paper's conclusion is a normative proposal about what to build and evaluate, not a consequence forced by that assumption alone. In Section 5, the Delta metric is an explicit operationalization of the paper's own definition of variational awareness as awareness of the direction of uncertainty change; operationalizing a definition for measurement is normal experimental design and not circular, and the paper explicitly notes that this is only one possible formulation and that the Llama experiment is illustrative rather than exhaustive. The self-citations in the paper (Adilazuarda et al. 2024 for a working definition of culture, Mukherjee et al. 2024 for limitations of socio-demographic prompting, and similar group-authored empirical papers) are background support for empirical claims; none of them is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the paper's central conclusion. The load-bearing premise that culture has fewer cross-cultural patterns than language is cited to Thompson et al. (2011) and Sun et al. (2021), not to the present authors. The Limitations section honestly concedes that the paper does not discuss the counterposition that knowledge-based cultural competency might suffice in practice; that is a gap in argumentative support, which is a correctness risk, not circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no equation reduces to its own input, and no self-citation chain forces the conclusion. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a conceptual proposal; it introduces no fitted parameters and no physical entities. Its load is carried by domain assumptions about culture and by the thought experiment's premises, plus a probe assumption in the illustrative experiment.

assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The octopus can learn pairwise distributions and detect shifts without understanding meaning.
    Thought experiment premise in Section 1 and Strategy 4 in Section 3; the analogy's force depends on this capability being achievable by distributional learners.
  • domain assumption Culture can be represented as intersections of demographic and semantic proxies and has a long-tail distribution.
    Adopted from Adilazuarda et al. (2024) in Section 2; underpins the argument that static test sets cannot cover all cultures.
  • domain assumption Language, unlike culture, has a universal substrate enabling transfer, while culture has fewer cross-cultural regularities.
    Section 2 cites universal grammar and cross-cultural variation; used to justify why meta-cultural competence is more tractable than endless cultural knowledge.
  • ad hoc to paper The softmax over next-token answer logits estimates the model's variational awareness.
    Section 5.1 and Appendix A; the paper itself notes that instruction-following capacity can invalidate this assumption.
  • domain assumption Meta-cultural competence, as defined in humans, is a meaningful target to instantiate and evaluate in AI systems.
    Section 4 draws on Leung et al. (2013) and Sharifian (2013); this is a normative premise for the paper's position.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Meta-Cultural Competence: Climbing the Right Hill of Cultural Awareness." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CVV3EW7M

@misc{pith2026250209637,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Meta-Cultural Competence: Climbing the Right Hill of Cultural Awareness},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CVV3EW7M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09637}
}
read the original abstract

Numerous recent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) are biased towards a Western and Anglo-centric worldview, which compromises their usefulness in non-Western cultural settings. However, "culture" is a complex, multifaceted topic, and its awareness, representation, and modeling in LLMs and LLM-based applications can be defined and measured in numerous ways. In this position paper, we ask what does it mean for an LLM to possess "cultural awareness", and through a thought experiment, which is an extension of the Octopus test proposed by Bender and Koller (2020), we argue that it is not cultural awareness or knowledge, rather meta-cultural competence, which is required of an LLM and LLM-based AI system that will make it useful across various, including completely unseen, cultures. We lay out the principles of meta-cultural competence AI systems, and discuss ways to measure and model those.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09637 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. fv(C), ˆfv(C), and (fv(C) − ˆfv(C))/fv(C) for each question (abbreviated). Full question text in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Prompt used to get GeoMLAMA question logits from Llama. Sl No Semantic Domain Full Question 1 Weight Unit What is the unit of measuring weight? 2 Drinking Hot Water Is it rare or common to see people drink hot water? 3 Climate Zone Which climate zone does the country belong to? 4 Shower Time What time of the day people usually take the shower? 5 Driving Side Which side do people usually keep when driving? 6 Househol… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Affective-CARA: A Knowledge Graph Driven Framework for Culturally Adaptive Emotional Intelligence in HCI

    cs.HC 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Affective-CARA integrates a hyperbolic culture emotion graph, a PPO-style reward optimizer, and a response mediator for culturally adaptive chatbot replies, but its headline metrics do not measure the claimed system behavior.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Sameera A Abdul-Kader and John C Woods. 2015. Survey on chatbot design techniques in speech conversation systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6(7)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Muhammad Farid Adilazuarda, Sagnik Mukherjee, Pradhyumna Lavania, Siddhant Shivdutt Singh, Alham Fikri Aji, Jacki O ' Neill, Ashutosh Modi, and Monojit Choudhury. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.882 Towards measuring and modeling culture in LLM s: A survey . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language P...

    doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.882 2024

  3. [3]

    Dhruv Agarwal, Mor Naaman, and Aditya Vashistha. 2024 a . https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11360 Ai suggestions homogenize writing toward western styles and diminish cultural nuances . Preprint, arXiv:2409.11360

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Utkarsh Agarwal, Kumar Tanmay, Aditi Khandelwal, and Monojit Choudhury. 2024 b . Ethical reasoning and moral value alignment of llms depend on the language we prompt them in. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), pages 6330--6340

    2024

  5. [5]

    Jean Aitchison. 2005. Language change. In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics, pages 111--120. Routledge

    2005

  6. [6]

    Katie Atkinson, Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin, Anthony Hunter, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Guillermo Simari, Matthias Thimm, and Serena Villata. 2017. Towards artificial argumentation. AI magazine, 38(3):25--36

    2017

  7. [7]

    Megan Bang, Douglas L Medin, and Scott Atran. 2007. Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(35):13868--13874

    2007

  8. [8]

    J.A. Barnes. 2013. https://books.google.ae/books?id=vSr-AQAAQBAJ Three Styles in the Study of Kinship . Taylor & Francis

    2013

Show all 157 references
  1. [9]

    Antonio Bella, C \`e sar Ferri, Jos \'e Hern \'a ndez-Orallo, and Mar \' a Jos \'e Ram \' rez-Quintana. 2010. Calibration of machine learning models. In Handbook of Research on Machine Learning Applications and Trends: Algorithms, Methods, and Techniques, pages 128--146. IGI Global

    2010

  2. [10]

    Andrea Bender and Sieghard Beller. 2013. Cognition is… fundamentally cultural. Behavioral Sciences, 3(1):42--54

    2013

  3. [11]

    Bender and Alexander Koller

    Emily M. Bender and Alexander Koller. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463 Climbing towards NLU : On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data . In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5185--519...

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Magdalena Biesialska, Katarzyna Biesialska, and Marta R Costa-Jussa. 2020. Continual lifelong learning in natural language processing: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.09823

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Aliaksandr Birukou, Enrico Blanzieri, Paolo Giorgini, and Fausto Giunchiglia. 2013. A formal definition of culture. Models for intercultural collaboration and negotiation, pages 1--26

    2013

  6. [14]

    Janet Blake. 2000. On defining the cultural heritage. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 49(1):61--85

    2000

  7. [15]

    Pierre Bourdieu. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology. Cambridge University Press

    1977

  8. [16]

    Yiğithan Boztemir and Nilüfer Çalışkan. 2024. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.171504678.80895811/v1 Analyzing and mitigating cultural hallucinations of commercial language models in turkish

    2024

  9. [17]

    Pablo Bri \ n ol and Kenneth G DeMarree. 2012. Social metacognition: Thinking about thinking in social psychology. In Social metacognition, pages 1--18. Psychology Press

    2012

  10. [18]

    Laurel J Brinton. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press

    2005

  11. [19]

    Joan Bybee. 2015. Language change. Cambridge University Press

    2015

  12. [20]

    Yong Cao, Li Zhou, Seolhwa Lee, Laura Cabello, Min Chen, and Daniel Hershcovich. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.c3nlp-1.7 Assessing cross-cultural alignment between C hat GPT and human societies: An empirical study . In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Cross-Cultur...

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    Stephen Casper, Xander Davies, Claudia Shi, Thomas Krendl Gilbert, J \'e r \'e my Scheurer, Javier Rando, Rachel Freedman, Tomek Korbak, David Lindner, Pedro Freire, Tony Tong Wang, Samuel Marks, Charbel-Raphael Segerie, Micah Carroll, Andi Peng, Phillip J.K. Christoffersen, M...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Ana Paula Chaves and Marco Aurelio Gerosa. 2021. How should my chatbot interact? a survey on social characteristics in human--chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction, 37(8):729--758

    2021

  15. [23]

    Chi Yue Chiu and Namrita Bendapudi. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030560 Some thoughts on social metacognition. PsycCRITIQUES, 57

    2012 doi

  16. [24]

    Yu Ying Chiu, Liwei Jiang, Bill Yuchen Lin, Chan Young Park, Shuyue Stella Li, Sahithya Ravi, Mehar Bhatia, Maria Antoniak, Yulia Tsvetkov, Vered Shwartz, and Yejin Choi. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02677 Culturalbench: a robust, diverse and challenging benchmark on measu...

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Noam Chomsky. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.053 Language architecture and its import for evolution . Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81:295--300. The Biology of Language

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Zheng Chu, Jingchang Chen, Qianglong Chen, Weijiang Yu, Tao He, Haotian Wang, Weihua Peng, Ming Liu, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.65 Navigate through enigmatic labyrinth a survey of chain of thought reasoning: Advances, frontiers and ...

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Robert B Cialdini. 2001. The science of persuasion. Scientific American, 284(2):76--81

    2001

  20. [28]

    Leon Ciechanowski, Aleksandra Przegalinska, Mikolaj Magnuski, and Peter Gloor. 2019. In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human--chatbot interaction. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92:539--548

    2019

  21. [29]

    Adam B Cohen. 2009. Many forms of culture. American psychologist, 64(3):194

    2009

  22. [30]

    Michael Cole and Martin Packer. 2019. Culture and cognition. Cross-cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives, pages 243--270

    2019

  23. [31]

    Allan Collins and Dedre Gentner. 1987. How people construct mental models. Cultural models in language and thought, 243(1987):243--265

    1987

  24. [32]

    Alexis Conneau and Guillaume Lample. 2019. Cross-lingual language model pretraining. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32

    2019

  25. [33]

    Edward Meredith Cope. 2022. An introduction to Aristotle's rhetoric. BoD--Books on Demand

    2022

  26. [34]

    Sumit Kumar Dam, Choong Seon Hong, Yu Qiao, and Chaoning Zhang. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16937 A complete survey on llm-based ai chatbots . Preprint, arXiv:2406.16937

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Preetam Prabhu Srikar Dammu, Hayoung Jung, Anjali Singh, Monojit Choudhury, and Tanu Mitra. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1134 they are uncultured : Unveiling covert harms and social threats in LLM generated conversations . In Proceedings of the 2024 Confer...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    D'Andrade

    R.G. D'Andrade. 1995. https://books.google.ae/books?id=2QCWe2r-pvwC The Development of Cognitive Anthropology . The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge University Press

    1995

  29. [37]

    Fiifi Dawson, Zainab Mosunmola, Sahil Pocker, Raj Abhijit Dandekar, Rajat Dandekar, and Sreedath Panat. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01811 Evaluating cultural awareness of llms for yoruba, malayalam, and english . Preprint, arXiv:2410.01811

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Arthur T Denzau, Douglass C North, et al. 1994. Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. KYKLOS-BERNE-, 47:3--3

    1994

  31. [39]

    Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, and Zhifang Sui. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64 A survey on in-context learning . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on E...

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, Anirudh Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Aobo Yang, Archi Mitra, Archie Sravankumar, Artem Korenev, Arthur Hinsvark, Arun Rao, Aston Zha...

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Shiran Dudy, Ibrahim Said Ahmad, Ryoko Kitajima, and Agata Lapedriza. 2024. Analyzing cultural representations of emotions in llms through mixed emotion survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02143

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Penelope Eckert. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual review of Anthropology, 41(1):87--100

    2012

  35. [43]

    Penelope Eckert and John R Rickford. 2001. Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Press

    2001

  36. [44]

    Wenqi Fan, Yujuan Ding, Liangbo Ning, Shijie Wang, Hengyun Li, Dawei Yin, Tat-Seng Chua, and Qing Li. 2024. A survey on rag meeting llms: Towards retrieval-augmented large language models. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,...

    2024

  37. [45]

    Andres Ferraro. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3347052 Music cold-start and long-tail recommendation: bias in deep representations . In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys '19, page 586–590, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing ...

    2019

  38. [46]

    Tecumseh Fitch, Marc D

    W. Tecumseh Fitch, Marc D. Hauser, and Noam Chomsky. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005 The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications . Cognition, 97(2):179--210

    2005 doi

  39. [47]

    Marlen Fr \"o hlich, Christine Sievers, Simon W Townsend, Thibaud Gruber, and Carel P van Schaik. 2019. Multimodal communication and language origins: integrating gestures and vocalizations. Biological Reviews, 94(5):1809--1829

    2019

  40. [48]

    Yichao Fu, Peter Bailis, Ion Stoica, and Hao Zhang. 2024. Break the sequential dependency of llm inference using lookahead decoding. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML'24. JMLR.org

    2024

  41. [49]

    Yunfan Gao, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, and Haofen Wang. 2023. Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Hofstede Geert and Gert Jan Hofstede. 2004. Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind, volume 2

    2004

  43. [51]

    Clifford Geertz. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. Basic books

    1973

  44. [52]

    Jack Grieve, Sara Bartl, Matteo Fuoli, Jason Grafmiller, Weihang Huang, Alejandro Jawerbaum, Akira Murakami, Marcus Perlman, Dana Roemling, and Bodo Winter. 2025. The sociolinguistic foundations of language modeling. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7:1472411

    2025

  45. [53]

    Shane Griffith, Kaushik Subramanian, Jonathan Scholz, Charles L Isbell, and Andrea L Thomaz. 2013. Policy shaping: Integrating human feedback with reinforcement learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 26

    2013

  46. [54]

    Gholamreza Haffari, Tuan Dung Tran, and Mark Carman. 2017. https://aclanthology.org/E17-1039 Efficient benchmarking of NLP API s using multi-armed bandits . In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the E uropean Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume ...

    2017

  47. [55]

    Zellig Harris. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics

    1951

  48. [56]

    Zellig Sabbettai Harris. 1963. Structural linguistics

    1963

  49. [57]

    Hauser, Charles Yang, Robert C

    Marc D. Hauser, Charles Yang, Robert C. Berwick, Ian Tattersall, Michael J. Ryan, Jeffrey Watumull, Noam Chomsky, and Richard C. Lewontin. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401 The mystery of language evolution . Frontiers in Psychology, 5

    2014

  50. [58]

    Marcel H \'e naff. 1998. Claude Levi-Strauss and the making of structural anthropology. U of Minnesota Press

    1998

  51. [59]

    Joseph Henrich, Steven J Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(2-3):61--83

    2010

  52. [60]

    Geert Hofstede. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5 Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , volume 41

    2001 doi

  53. [61]

    Timothy Hospedales, Antreas Antoniou, Paul Micaelli, and Amos Storkey. 2021. Meta-learning in neural networks: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(9):5149--5169

    2021

  54. [62]

    Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE international conference on data mining, pages 263--272. Ieee

    2008

  55. [63]

    Lei Huang, Weijiang Yu, Weitao Ma, Weihong Zhong, Zhangyin Feng, Haotian Wang, Qianglong Chen, Weihua Peng, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3703155 A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and o...

    2025 doi

  56. [64]

    Gustav Jahoda and Ioan Lewis. 2015. Acquiring Culture (Psychology Revivals): Cross Cultural Studies in Child Development. Psychology Press

    2015

  57. [65]

    Akshita Jha, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Chandan K Reddy, Shachi Dave, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, and Sunipa Dev. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.548 S ee GULL : A stereotype benchmark with broad geo-cultural coverage leveraging generative models . In Proceedings of...

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    Ziwei Ji, Nayeon Lee, Rita Frieske, Tiezheng Yu, Dan Su, Yan Xu, Etsuko Ishii, Ye Jin Bang, Andrea Madotto, and Pascale Fung. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730 Survey of hallucination in natural language generation . ACM Comput. Surv., 55(12)

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    Jiho Jin, Jiseon Kim, Nayeon Lee, Haneul Yoo, Alice Oh, and Hwaran Lee. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00661 K o BBQ : K orean bias benchmark for question answering . Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 12:507--524

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    David H Jonassen and Philip Henning. 1999. Mental models: Knowledge in the head and knowledge in the world. Educational technology, pages 37--42

    1999

  61. [69]

    Rudi Keller. 1994. On language change: The invisible hand in language. Psychology Press

    1994

  62. [71]

    Julia Kharchenko, Tanya Roosta, Aman Chadha, and Chirag Shah. 2024 b . https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14805 How well do llms represent values across cultures? empirical analysis of llm responses based on hofstede cultural dimensions . Preprint, arXiv:2406.14805

    2024 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Joo-Kyung Kim, Young-Bum Kim, Ruhi Sarikaya, and Eric Fosler-Lussier. 2017. Cross-lingual transfer learning for pos tagging without cross-lingual resources. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 2832--2838

    2017

  64. [73]

    Fajri Koto, Nurul Aisyah, Haonan Li, and Timothy Baldwin. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.760 Large language models only pass primary school exams in I ndonesia: A comprehensive test on I ndo MMLU . In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods i...

    2023 doi

  65. [74]

    Fajri Koto, Rahmad Mahendra, Nurul Aisyah, and Timothy Baldwin. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00726 I ndo C ulture: Exploring geographically influenced cultural commonsense reasoning across eleven I ndonesian provinces . Transactions of the Association for Computational...

    2024 doi

  66. [75]

    Grgur Kovač, Masataka Sawayama, Rémy Portelas, Cédric Colas, Peter Ford Dominey, and Pierre-Yves Oudeyer. 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07870 Large language models as superpositions of cultural perspectives . Preprint, arXiv:2307.07870

    2023 arXiv

  67. [76]

    A. Kuper. 1988. https://books.google.ae/books?id=yg4okTJNE24C The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an Illusion . Routledge

    1988

  68. [77]

    Margaret Diane LeCompte and Jean J Schensul. 2010. Designing & conducting ethnographic research: An introduction, volume 1. Rowman Altamira

    2010

  69. [78]

    Heather Lent, Kushal Tatariya, Raj Dabre, Yiyi Chen, Marcell Fekete, Esther Ploeger, Li Zhou, Ruth-Ann Armstrong, Abee Eijansantos, Catriona Malau, Hans Erik Heje, Ernests Lavrinovics, Diptesh Kanojia, Paul Belony, Marcel Bollmann, Loïc Grobol, Miryam de Lhoneux, Daniel Hershc...

    2024 doi

  70. [79]

    Angela K-y Leung, Sau-lai Lee, and Chi-yue Chiu. 2013. Meta-knowledge of culture promotes cultural competence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(6):992--1006

    2013

  71. [80]

    u ttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt \

    Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich K \"u ttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt \"a schel, et al. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in Neural Information Proc...

    2020

  72. [81]

    CHENG LI, Mengzhuo Chen, Jindong Wang, Sunayana Sitaram, and Xing Xie. 2024 a . https://openreview.net/forum?id=sIsbOkQmBL Culture LLM : Incorporating cultural differences into large language models . In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

    2024

  73. [82]

    CHENG LI, Damien Teney, Linyi Yang, Qingsong Wen, Xing Xie, and Jindong Wang. 2024 b . https://openreview.net/forum?id=bIFHHf2RoD Culturepark: Boosting cross-cultural understanding in large language models . In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processi...

    2024

  74. [83]

    Huayang Li, Yixuan Su, Deng Cai, Yan Wang, and Lemao Liu. 2022. A survey on retrieval-augmented text generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.01110

    2022 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Huihan Li, Liwei Jiang, Nouha Dziri, Xiang Ren, and Yejin Choi. 2024. https://openreview.net/forum?id=DbsLm2KAqP CULTURE - GEN : Revealing global cultural perception in language models through natural language prompting . In First Conference on Language Modeling

    2024

  76. [85]

    Jan Malte Lichtenberg, Alexander Buchholz, and Pola Schwöbel. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01285 Large language models as recommender systems: A study of popularity bias . Preprint, arXiv:2406.01285

    2024 arXiv

  77. [86]

    David W Lightfoot. 2002. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach

    2002

  78. [87]

    Bing Liu and Sahisnu Mazumder. 2020. Lifelong learning dialogue systems: Chatbots that self-learn on the job. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.10750

    2020 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Chen Liu, Fajri Koto, Timothy Baldwin, and Iryna Gurevych. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.112 Are multilingual LLM s culturally-diverse reasoners? an investigation into multicultural proverbs and sayings . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North A...

    2024 doi

  80. [89]

    Tyler Lu, David Pal, and Martin Pal. 2010. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v9/lu10a.html Contextual multi-armed bandits . In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, volume 9 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pa...

    2010

  81. [90]

    McCorkle and D

    W.W. McCorkle and D. Xygalatas. 2013. https://books.google.ae/books?id=LLfnMgEACAAJ Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion . Religion, cognition and culture. Acumen

    2013

  82. [91]

    Anna P McHugh, Jennifer L Smith, and Winston R Sieck. 2008. Cultural variations in mental models of collaborative decision making. Macrocognition and naturalistic decision making, pages 141--158

    2008

  83. [92]

    McIntosh, Tong Liu, Teo Susnjak, Paul Watters, Alex Ng, and Malka N

    Timothy R. McIntosh, Tong Liu, Teo Susnjak, Paul Watters, Alex Ng, and Malka N. Halgamuge. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2023.3332837 A culturally sensitive test to evaluate nuanced gpt hallucination . IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 5(6):2739--2751

    2024

  84. [93]

    Shervin Minaee, Tomas Mikolov, Narjes Nikzad, Meysam Chenaghlu, Richard Socher, Xavier Amatriain, and Jianfeng Gao. 2024. Large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06196

    2024 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Ramesh C Mishra. 2001. Cognition across cultures. The handbook of culture and psychology, pages 119--135

    2001

  86. [95]

    Fabian Moerchen, Patrick Ernst, and Giovanni Zappella. 2020. https://www.amazon.science/publications/personalizing-natural-language-understanding-using-multi-armed-bandits-and-implicit-feedback Personalizing natural-language understanding using multi-armed bandits and implicit...

    2020

  87. [96]

    Leila Monaghan, Jane E Goodman, and Jennifer Robinson. 2012. A cultural approach to interpersonal communication: Essential readings. John Wiley & Sons

    2012

  88. [97]

    Richard Montague et al. 1970. Universal grammar. 1974, pages 222--46

    1970

  89. [98]

    Jann Railey Montalan, Jian Gang Ngui, Wei Qi Leong, Yosephine Susanto, Hamsawardhini Rengarajan, William Chandra Tjhi, and Alham Fikri Aji. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15380 Kalahi: A handcrafted, grassroots cultural llm evaluation suite for filipino . Preprint, arXiv:2409.15380

    2024 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Mark Diaz, Dylan K Baker, and Vinodkumar Prabhakaran. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1029 D 3 CODE : Disentangling disagreements in data across cultures on offensiveness detection and evaluation . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conferen...

    2024 doi

  91. [100]

    Sagnik Mukherjee, Muhammad Farid Adilazuarda, Sunayana Sitaram, Kalika Bali, Alham Fikri Aji, and Monojit Choudhury. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.884 Cultural conditioning or placebo? on the effectiveness of socio-demographic prompting . In Proceedings of ...

    2024 doi

  92. [101]

    Richard M \"u nch and Neil J Smelser. 1992. Theory of culture. University of California Press Berkeley

    1992

  93. [102]

    Junho Myung, Nayeon Lee, Yi Zhou, Jiho Jin, Rifki Afina Putri, Dimosthenis Antypas, Hsuvas Borkakoty, Eunsu Kim, Carla Perez-Almendros, Abinew Ali Ayele, Victor Gutierrez Basulto, Yazmin Ibanez-Garcia, Hwaran Lee, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Kiwoong Park, Anar Sabuhi Rzayev, ...

    2024

  94. [103]

    Moin Nadeem, Anna Bethke, and Siva Reddy. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.416 S tereo S et: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models . In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th Inte...

    2021 doi

  95. [104]

    Nikita Nangia, Clara Vania, Rasika Bhalerao, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.154 C row S -pairs: A challenge dataset for measuring social biases in masked language models . In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Na...

    2020 doi

  96. [105]

    Richard E Nisbett and Ara Norenzayan. 2002. Culture and cognition. John Wiley & Sons

    2002

  97. [106]

    Mahdi Noshadi and Ali Dabbagh. 2015. Metacultural competence: A benchmark for advances in applied elt. In Selected Papers of 2nd conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language Teaching, Literature and Translation Studies, pages 52--62. Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, K...

    2015

  98. [107]

    Anna M Ortiz, Long Beach, et al. 2013. The ethnographic interview. In Research in the college context, pages 51--64. Routledge

    2013

  99. [108]

    Louis Owen, Vishesh Tripathi, Abhay Kumar, and Biddwan Ahmed. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09362 Komodo: A linguistic expedition into indonesia's regional languages . Preprint, arXiv:2403.09362

    2024 arXiv

  100. [109]

    Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Harshit Budhiraja, Sougata Saha, and Monojit Choudhury. 2025. https://aclanthology.org/2025.coling-demos.21/ CULTURALLY YOURS : A reading assistant for cross-cultural content . In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguisti...

    2025

  101. [110]

    Talcott Parsons. 1972. Culture and social system revisited. Social Science Quarterly, pages 253--266

    1972

  102. [111]

    Pamela Perniss. 2018. Why we should study multimodal language. Frontiers in psychology, 9:1109

    2018

  103. [112]

    Fabio Petroni, Tim Rockt \"a schel, Sebastian Riedel, Patrick Lewis, Anton Bakhtin, Yuxiang Wu, and Alexander Miller. 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1250 Language models as knowledge bases? In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language P...

    2019 doi

  104. [113]

    Henry Prakken. 2006. Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The knowledge engineering review, 21(2):163--188

    2006

  105. [114]

    Reid Pryzant, Dan Iter, Jerry Li, Yin Lee, Chenguang Zhu, and Michael Zeng. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.494 Automatic prompt optimization with gradient descent and beam search . In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Languag...

    2023 doi

  106. [115]

    Rifki Afina Putri, Faiz Ghifari Haznitrama, Dea Adhista, and Alice Oh. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1145 Can LLM generate culturally relevant commonsense QA data? case study in I ndonesian and S undanese . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical...

    2024 doi

  107. [116]

    Abhinav Rao, Akhila Yerukola, Vishwa Shah, Katharina Reinecke, and Maarten Sap. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12464 Normad: A benchmark for measuring the cultural adaptability of large language models . Preprint, arXiv:2404.12464

    2024 arXiv

  108. [117]

    Abhinav Sukumar Rao, Aditi Khandelwal, Kumar Tanmay, Utkarsh Agarwal, and Monojit Choudhury. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.892 Ethical reasoning over moral alignment: A case and framework for in-context ethical policies in LLM s . In Findings of the Ass...

    2023 doi

  109. [118]

    Amon Rapp, Lorenzo Curti, and Arianna Boldi. 2021. The human side of human-chatbot interaction: A systematic literature review of ten years of research on text-based chatbots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 151:102630

    2021

  110. [119]

    Vipula Rawte, Amit Sheth, and Amitava Das. 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05922 A survey of hallucination in large foundation models . Preprint, arXiv:2309.05922

    2023 arXiv

  111. [120]

    Adam Roberts, Colin Raffel, and Noam Shazeer. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.437 How much knowledge can you pack into the parameters of a language model? In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages...

    2020 doi

  112. [121]

    Sougata Saha. 2024. Persuasive Dialogue Systems for Social Good. Ph.D. thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo

    2024

  113. [122]

    Edgar H Schein. 1990. Organizational culture., volume 45. American Psychological Association

    1990

  114. [123]

    Melanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Alane Suhr. 2024. https://openreview.net/forum?id=RIu5lyNXjT Quantifying language models' sensitivity to spurious features in prompt design or: How i learned to start worrying about prompt formatting . In The Twelfth International...

    2024

  115. [124]

    Agrima Seth, Sanchit Ahuja, Kalika Bali, and Sunayana Sitaram. 2024. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.474/ DOSA : A dataset of social artifacts from different I ndian geographical subcultures . In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational L...

    2024

  116. [125]

    William H Sewell. 2004. The concept (s) of culture. In Practicing history, pages 76--95. Routledge

    2004

  117. [126]

    Farzad Sharifian. 2013. Globalisation and developing metacultural competence in learning english as an international language. Multilingual education, 3:1--11

    2013

  118. [127]

    Jonathan Skinner et al. 2013. The interview: An ethnographic approach, volume 49. A&C Black

    2013

  119. [128]

    Aleksandrs Slivkins. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000068 Introduction to multi-armed bandits . Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 12(1-2):1--286

    2019 doi

  120. [129]

    Elizabeth Soper, Erin Pacquetet, Sougata Saha, Souvik Das, and Rohini Srihari. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.hcinlp-1.5 Let ' s chat: Understanding user expectations in socialbot interactions . In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Bridging Human--Computer Interact...

    2022 doi

  121. [130]

    Helen Spencer-Oatey and Peter Franklin. 2012. What is culture. A compilation of quotations. GlobalPAD Core Concepts, 1(22):1--21

    2012

  122. [131]

    James P Spradley. 2016. The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press

    2016

  123. [132]

    C Levi Strauss. 1974. Structural anthropology. Persona & Derecho, 1:571

    1974

  124. [133]

    Fan-Keng Sun, Cheng-Hao Ho, and Hung-Yi Lee. 2020. https://openreview.net/forum?id=Skgxcn4YDS \ LAMAL \ : \ LA \ nguage modeling is all you need for lifelong language learning . In International Conference on Learning Representations

    2020

  125. [134]

    Mortensen

    Jimin Sun, Hwijeen Ahn, Chan Young Park, Yulia Tsvetkov, and David R. Mortensen. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.204 Cross-cultural similarity features for cross-lingual transfer learning of pragmatically motivated tasks . In Proceedings of the 16th Conference...

    2021 doi

  126. [135]

    Sali A Tagliamonte. 2006. Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Press

    2006

  127. [136]

    Kumar Tanmay, Aditi Khandelwal, Utkarsh Agarwal, and Monojit Choudhury. 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13356 Probing the moral development of large language models through defining issues test . Preprint, arXiv:2309.13356

    2023 arXiv

  128. [137]

    Stephanie Taylor. 2001. Ethnographic research: A reader. Sage

    2001

  129. [138]

    B Thompson, SG Roberts, and G Lupyan. 2020. Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment. nature human behaviour, 4 (10), 1029--1038

    2020

  130. [139]

    William Forde Thompson et al. 2011. Cross-cultural similarities and differences

    2011

  131. [140]

    Greg Urban. 2010. A method for measuring the motion of culture. American Anthropologist, 112(1):122--139

    2010

  132. [141]

    Juozas Vaicenavicius, David Widmann, Carl Andersson, Fredrik Lindsten, Jacob Roll, and Thomas Sch \"o n. 2019. Evaluating model calibration in classification. In The 22nd international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 3459--3467. PMLR

    2019

  133. [142]

    Joaquin Vanschoren. 2019. Meta-learning. Automated machine learning: methods, systems, challenges, pages 35--61

    2019

  134. [143]

    Gabriella Vigliocco, Pamela Perniss, and David Vinson. 2014. Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution

    2014

  135. [144]

    Yixin Wan, Jieyu Zhao, Aman Chadha, Nanyun Peng, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.648 Are personalized stochastic parrots more dangerous? evaluating persona biases in dialogue systems . In Findings of the Association for Computational Li...

    2023 doi

  136. [145]

    Jane X Wang. 2021. Meta-learning in natural and artificial intelligence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 38:90--95

    2021

  137. [146]

    Yuhang Wang, Yanxu Zhu, Chao Kong, Shuyu Wei, Xiaoyuan Yi, Xing Xie, and Jitao Sang. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.c3nlp-1.1 CDE val: A benchmark for measuring the cultural dimensions of large language models . In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Cross-Cultural Cons...

    2024 doi

  138. [147]

    Sean Welleck, Amanda Bertsch, Matthew Finlayson, Hailey Schoelkopf, Alex Xie, Graham Neubig, Ilia Kulikov, and Zaid Harchaoui. 2024. https://openreview.net/forum?id=eskQMcIbMS From decoding to meta-generation: Inference-time algorithms for large language models . Transactions ...

    2024

  139. [148]

    Tony L Whitehead. 2005. Basic classical ethnographic research methods. Cultural ecology of health and change, 1:1--29

    2005

  140. [149]

    Haryo Wibowo, Erland Fuadi, Made Nityasya, Radityo Eko Prasojo, and Alham Aji. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.77 COPAL - ID : I ndonesian language reasoning with local culture and nuances . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter ...

    2024 doi

  141. [150]

    Charles Yang, Stephen Crain, Robert C Berwick, Noam Chomsky, and Johan J Bolhuis. 2017. The growth of language: Universal grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81:103--119

    2017

  142. [151]

    Seongjun Yang, Gibbeum Lee, Jaewoong Cho, Dimitris Papailiopoulos, and Kangwook Lee. 2024. https://openreview.net/forum?id=yUmJ483OB0 Predictive pipelined decoding: A compute-latency trade-off for exact LLM decoding . Transactions on Machine Learning Research

    2024

  143. [152]

    Da Yin, Hritik Bansal, Masoud Monajatipoor, Liunian Harold Li, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2022. Geomlama: Geo-diverse commonsense probing on multilingual pre-trained language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2039--2055

    2022

  144. [153]

    Hongzhi Yin, Bin Cui, Jing Li, Junjie Yao, and Chen Chen. 2012. https://doi.org/10.14778/2311906.2311916 Challenging the long tail recommendation . Proc. VLDB Endow., 5(9):896–907

    2012

  145. [154]

    Jiajing Zhao, Cheng Huang, and Xian Li. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4566507/v1 A comparative study of cultural hallucination in large language models on culturally specific ethical questions

    2024 doi

  146. [155]

    Junhao Zheng, Shengjie Qiu, Chengming Shi, and Qianli Ma. 2024. Towards lifelong learning of large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06391

    2024 arXiv

  147. [156]

    Li Zhou, Taelin Karidi, Nicolas Garneau, Yong Cao, Wanlong Liu, Wenyu Chen, and Daniel Hershcovich. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06833 Does mapo tofu contain coffee? probing llms for food-related cultural knowledge . Preprint, arXiv:2404.06833

    2024 arXiv

  148. [157]

    online" 'onlinestring :=

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list...

  149. [158]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.