Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Chinese SafetyQA: A Safety Short-form Factuality Benchmark for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.15265 v2 pith:CYEOKRTX submitted 2024-12-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords chinesefactualitymodelssafetysafetyqaabilitylanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), significant safety concerns have emerged. Fundamentally, the safety of large language models is closely linked to the accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity of their understanding of safety knowledge, particularly in domains such as law, policy and ethics. This factuality ability is crucial in determining whether these models can be deployed and applied safely and compliantly within specific regions. To address these challenges and better evaluate the factuality ability of LLMs to answer short questions, we introduce the Chinese SafetyQA benchmark. Chinese SafetyQA has several properties (i.e., Chinese, Diverse, High-quality, Static, Easy-to-evaluate, Safety-related, Harmless). Based on Chinese SafetyQA, we perform a comprehensive evaluation on the factuality abilities of existing LLMs and analyze how these capabilities relate to LLM abilities, e.g., RAG ability and robustness against attacks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Chinese Large Language Models: The Influence of Persona Assignment on Stereotypes and Safeguards

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Assigning personas to Chinese LLMs amplifies toxic output relative to default behavior, while refusal rates shift systematically with persona gender and target social group.

  2. USB: A Comprehensive and Unified Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    USB-SafeBench is a unified MLLM safety benchmark with 61 risk categories, 4 modality combinations, and dual-language vulnerability and oversensitivity tests.

Pith tools