Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Beyond Numeric Rewards: In-Context Dueling Bandits with LLM Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.01887 v4 pith:D3HMHTAI submitted 2024-07-02 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsduelingicrlin-contextregretagenticagentsalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In-Context Reinforcement Learning (ICRL) is a frontier paradigm to solve Reinforcement Learning (RL) problems in the foundation model era. While ICRL capabilities have been demonstrated in transformers through task-specific training, the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) out-of-the-box remains largely unexplored. This paper investigates whether LLMs can generalize cross-domain to perform ICRL under the problem of Dueling Bandits (DB), a stateless preference-based RL setting. We find that the top-performing LLMs exhibit a notable zero-shot capacity for relative decision-making, which translates to low short-term weak regret across all DB environment instances by quickly including the best arm in duels. However, an optimality gap still exists between LLMs and classic DB algorithms in terms of strong regret. LLMs struggle to converge and consistently exploit even when explicitly prompted to do so, and are sensitive to prompt variations. To bridge this gap, we propose an agentic flow framework: LLM with Enhanced Algorithmic Dueling (LEAD), which integrates off-the-shelf DB algorithm support with LLM agents through fine-grained adaptive interplay. We show that LEAD has theoretical guarantees inherited from classic DB algorithms on both weak and strong regret. We validate its efficacy and robustness even with noisy and adversarial prompts. The design of such an agentic framework sheds light on how to enhance the trustworthiness of general-purpose LLMs generalized to in-context decision-making tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Model-Enhanced Multi-Armed Bandits

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using an LLM as a reward predictor inside Thompson sampling and regression-oracle bandits outperforms LLM direct arm selection in the tested tasks.

  2. Meta-Prompt Optimization for LLM-Based Sequential Decision Making

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EXPO uses adversarial bandit weighting over LLM-generated prompt variations to optimize the meta-prompt of LLM-based sequential decision-making agents, improving performance on optimization and bandit tasks.

Pith tools