Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 65 references

This paper establishes that the quasi-Grammian and quasi-Wronskian representations of N-soliton solutions of the anti-self-dual Yang-Mills equation are asymptotically equivalent up to a constant matrix factor, giving the same WZW4 action de

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 17:05 UTC pith:D5325OUX

load-bearing objection A technically substantial extension of the N=1,2 check to general N, with a real but patchable gap in the proof of the solution property at degenerate spectral parameters. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17749 v1 pith:D5325OUX submitted 2026-07-20 nlin.SI hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Asymptotic Equivalence Between Quasi-Grammian and Quasi-Wronskian N-Soliton Solutions of the Anti-Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equation

Shan-Chi Huang This is my paper
classification nlin.SI hep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q5135C0837K1081T13
keywords anti-self-dual Yang-MillsYang equationquasi-Grammianquasi-WronskianN-soliton solutionsphase shiftquasideterminantsWZW4 model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper is trying to prove that two apparently different algebraic formulas for N-soliton solutions of the anti-self-dual Yang-Mills (ASDYM) equation — the quasi-Grammian and the quasi-Wronskian — are asymptotically the same, up to a constant matrix factor that leaves physical quantities unchanged. The setting is the J-matrix formulation of ASDYM, which is the equation of motion of the four-dimensional Wess-Zumino-Witten model. Working in the comoving frame of each individual soliton, the author shows that both formulas reduce to the same 1-soliton-like sech-squared profile for the action density, with an explicit phase-shift factor for N-soliton collisions. If correct, this establishes that the quasi-Grammian representation, which is computationally much lighter, describes exactly the same class of 4D solitons as the quasi-Wronskian, and it supplies a general asymptotic framework for quasi-Grammian solutions. Exact quasi-Grammian solutions are also given for up to four solitons.

Core claim

On the author's own terms, the central discovery is that in each asymptotic region where N-1 solitons have receded far away, the quasi-Grammian N-soliton solution J[N] of the Yang equation takes a matrix form identical to the quasi-Wronskian N-soliton solution up to a constant matrix factor C^(K). Because the action density of the WZW4 model, Tr[(∂_m J)J^{-1}(∂_m J)J^{-1}], is invariant under right multiplication by a constant matrix, the two representations produce the same physical profile: −2 d_KK sech²[X_K + 2 log(|a^{(+)}_K|/|a^{(-)}_K|) + δ_K] in the comoving frame of the K-th soliton, with δ_K given explicitly as a product over the spectral parameters of the other solitons. The Wess-Z

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the quasideterminant, a matrix-valued generalization of the determinant for noncommutative entries. The quasi-Grammian solution is built from a Cauchy-matrix-like block Ξ^TΩ + ρ^Tθ, while the quasi-Wronskian uses a block of powers θ_j Λ_j^k; each entry of the 2×2 J-matrix is an (N+1)×(N+1) quasideterminant. The proof runs on three tools: the derivative formula for quasi-Grammians, a set of Vandermonde-like quasideterminant identities that collapse the N×N Cauchy kernel to a 1-soliton form in the asymptotic frame, and the invariance of the action density under right multiplication by a constant matrix. The phase shift δ_K emerges from these identities as an explicit pro

Load-bearing premise

The proof that the quasi-Grammian ansatz solves the Yang equation assumes that two auxiliary spectral matrices have no common eigenvalue; on the E and U2 real slices this fails when λ_j λ_k = ∓1, a case not excluded by the ansatz.

What would settle it

Take N=2 on the E slice with λ_1 λ_2 = -1, so that µ_1 = λ_2, and substitute the quasi-Grammian ansatz directly into the Yang equation; if the equation fails, the genericity gap is real, and if it still holds, the proof needs a separate argument. Alternatively, expand the exact N=2 solution in that degenerate limit and check whether it reproduces the Theorem 5.7 formula for the action density.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The quasi-Grammian and quasi-Wronskian N-soliton solutions of ASDYM describe the same class of solutions, so the lighter quasi-Grammian formulas can be used for explicit soliton computations.
  • N-soliton collisions in the WZW4 model are governed by the explicit phase shift δ_K, with each soliton emerging with a sech-squared profile and the Wess-Zumino term contributing nothing asymptotically.
  • Exact quasi-Grammian solutions for N≤4 are available as quotients of ordinary determinants, offering a substantial computational advantage over the quasi-Wronskian representation.
  • The solitons behave as four-dimensional analogues of the multi-solitons known from lower-dimensional integrable equations, supporting the idea of higher-dimensional τ-function-like objects underlying the ASDYM equation.
  • Because both representations reduce to the same 1-soliton-like action density, the particle-like identity preservation of 4D solitons holds at the level of the WZW4 action.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the asymptotic equivalence can be promoted to an exact equivalence up to the constant matrix factor, the quasi-Grammian should be obtainable from the quasi-Wronskian by a binary transformation in the quasideterminant setting; comparing the N=3 exact formulas would be a direct test.
  • The unstated eigenvalue-genericity condition suggests that parameter values with λ_j λ_k = ∓1, where the proof of the solution property breaks on the E and U2 slices, may correspond to resonant or degenerate soliton interactions that deserve separate study.
  • The same asymptotic framework could be transferred to the commutative limit, giving a general proof of the classical Grammian–Wronskian equivalence for solitons of lower-dimensional integrable equations, not just for low N.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper establishes an asymptotic equivalence between the quasi-Grammian and quasi-Wronskian representations of N-soliton solutions of the anti-self-dual Yang-Mills (ASDYM) equation in Yang's J-matrix formulation (the WZW4 model). For G=U(2), the author constructs a quasi-Grammian N-soliton ansatz (Section 5.1), computes its asymptotic form in the comoving frame of the K-th soliton (Section 5.2), and shows that the WZW4 action density reduces to a 1-soliton-like sech^2 profile with an explicit phase shift delta_K (Theorem 5.7). The same asymptotic profile is obtained from the previously known quasi-Wronskian ansatz (Section 5.4), so the two representations are claimed to describe the same class of ASDYM N-soliton solutions. Exact quasi-Grammian solutions are also presented for N at most 4.

Significance. If the result holds, it significantly extends the known 1- and 2-soliton equivalence to arbitrary N and provides an explicit, parameter-free phase-shift formula for N-soliton collisions in four dimensions. The paper also supplies a compact quasi-Grammian representation that reduces computational complexity and connects the ASDYM equation to higher-dimensional analogues of Sato theory. The proofs are quasideterminant-based and largely self-contained, with several appendices; the exact N at most 4 formulas are a useful concrete resource. The main caveat is a missing genericity hypothesis in the solution theorem and a uniformity gap in the asymptotic interchange, both of which are local and potentially fixable, so the central claim is defensible but not yet fully rigorous.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 4.1 / Appendix A] The proof of (4.7) uses the assertion that the Sylvester equation Xi^T C - C Lambda = 0 has only the trivial solution, requiring Xi^T and Lambda to have no common eigenvalues. This hypothesis is not stated in Theorem 4.1. For the N-soliton ansatz (5.2)-(5.5), Lambda = diag(lambda_j) and Xi^T = diag(mu_j); the reality conditions (5.7) give mu_j = -1/lambda_j on E and mu_j = 1/lambda_j on U2, so mu_j = lambda_k holds whenever lambda_j lambda_k = -1 (E) or lambda_j lambda_k = 1 (U2). For N at least 2 such parameter pairs are not excluded anywhere. At these values the Sylvester equation admits nonzero solutions, so the derivation of (4.7) and hence the conclusion that J[N] satisfies the Yang equation breaks down as written. The same degeneracies make gamma_jk and the phase shift (5.58) singular. The gap is patchable by adding an explicit generic-spectrum condition or by a limiting argument,
  2. [Lemma 5.6 / Appendix C] The interchange lim_{r to infinity} partial_m J[N] = partial_m J[N]^(K) is justified by the derivative formula (3.15) together with termwise convergence of the columns of partial_m theta^(K). This is not a complete proof: the asymptotic region (5.14) is unbounded, and the factors exp(+-2 Re L_j) converge to zero only directionally, without the uniform control needed to differentiate through the limit. Since the central claim (5.57) is a statement about the limit of derivatives of J[N], this uniformity gap is load-bearing. Please supply a dominated-convergence or uniform-error estimate; the Cauchy-matrix structure of (C.1)-(C.5) should make this feasible.
  3. [Section 5.3, Theorem 5.7 and (5.60)-(5.61)] Theorem 5.7 states real-valuedness of the asymptotic action density on E only for odd N, and the text then says the even-N failure is solved by adjusting the ansatz with xi_[N]. No proof is given that the modified rho in (5.60) preserves the solution property or that the asymptotic form (5.48), whose derivation assumes tilde E = E without xi_[N], remains valid. For even N on E, the product in (5.59) is negative, so delta_K has a negative argument; one needs an explicit check that xi_[N] changes the phase-shift factor or amplitude so that (5.57) is real. Without this, the claimed range of validity of the equivalence is incomplete.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (5.58)] The displayed denominator contains (lambda_j^(-) - lambda_j^(epsilon_j^+)); comparing with delta_K = (1/2) log(p_K p_tilde_K / (q_K q_tilde_K)) and with (5.49), the second factor should be (lambda_K^(-) - lambda_j^(epsilon_j^+)). Please correct this typo.
  2. [Section 5.1] The text '|lambda_1| = |lambda_j| = -1' on U2 should read '= 1'. Also, the sentence 'the latter is not admissible' is unclear: on U2 the condition lambda_j lambda_k = -1 for all j,k is possible only for special choices (e.g. all lambda_j equal to the same square root of -1), so please clarify what is meant.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, including 'Qausi-Gramman', 'Qausi-Grammian', 'Wess-Zummino-Witten', 'Propositon', 'Prposition', 'noncomutative', and inconsistent uses of 'su?ces'/'di?i'. These should be cleaned up.
  4. [Section 5.5, Eq. (5.67)] The notation xi_{[N]}^{+-1} is ambiguous; please spell out the two cases. The powers of xi_[N] in the N=2 and N=3 formulas (5.70)-(5.73) are stated without derivation; a short explanation of how the sign factors arise would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the quasi-Grammian asymptotic form and phase shifts are derived in-paper from the spectral data; the quasi-Wronskian comparison cites published prior work but does not assume the target equivalence.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The quasi-Grammian N-soliton ansatz (5.2)-(5.5) is a Cauchy-matrix/linear-system construction; its asymptotic reduction to a 1-soliton-like matrix (5.48) is obtained within the paper from quasideterminant identities (Lemmas 5.1-5.4) and the solution theorem (Theorem 4.1). The action-density limit (5.57) and phase-shift formula (5.58) are explicit functions of the spectral parameters lambda_j, mu_j, a_j^pm, etc., with no parameter fitted to data. The claimed equivalence with the quasi-Wronskian representation is tested by comparing the in-paper result (5.48) with the quasi-Wronskian asymptotic form (5.64), quoted from the author's earlier published papers [21,25]; that is a parameter-free external benchmark and is not the same as assuming the equivalence. The trace identities used in Appendix D are quoted from [23] but are auxiliary algebraic identities, not the target statement. The genuine caveats in the manuscript are correctness/genericity issues rather than circular ones: Appendix A needs Xi^T and Lambda to have no common eigenvalues for Xi^T C - C Lambda = 0 to force C=0, and this is not stated in Theorem 4.1 nor checked for the N-soliton ansatz on E and U2 where mu_j = -/+ 1/lambda_j can coincide with lambda_k; and Lemma 5.6 asserts limit-derivative interchange without a full uniformity proof. The paper even flags the ill-definedness of delta_K on E for even N and patches it with xi_[N] in (5.60)-(5.61). None of these are fitted-input-called-prediction, self-definitional, or uniqueness-imported-from-authors reductions. Minor self-citation exists but is not load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The N-soliton ansatz carries the standard solution-family parameters (spectral parameters λ_j, amplitudes a(±)_j, orientation α_j, β_j) — these are the degrees of freedom of the solutions being studied, not values fitted to enforce the conclusion. The paper introduces no invented physical entities; ξ[N] is a hand-chosen sign fix for even N on the Euclidean slice. The main hidden inputs are the genericity condition used in the proof of Theorem 4.1 (disjoint spectra of Ξ^T and Λ) and the methodological premise that asymptotic 1-soliton reduction characterizes N-soliton solutions.

free parameters (3)
  • λ_j and µ_j (spectral parameters)
    Free complex parameters from (5.2)-(5.5); µ_j is fixed by the reality condition (5.7) on each real space. These parametrize the soliton family; nothing is fitted to force the equivalence result.
  • a(±)_j, α_j, β_j (soliton amplitudes and orientation)
    Complex amplitude/phase and velocity-orientation parameters in (5.4); standard free data of the solution family, constrained by (5.7).
  • ξ[N] (sign fix) = -1 for even N on E, +1 otherwise
    Introduced in (5.60)-(5.61) ad hoc to make the phase shift δ_K real for even N on the Euclidean slice E; not derived from prior principles.
axioms (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Ξ^T and Λ have no common eigenvalues
    Appendix A requires this to conclude C=0 from Ξ^T C - C Λ = 0 when proving Theorem 4.1; the theorem does not state it and special parameter choices on E/U2 can violate it (µ_j = ±1/λ_j colliding with λ_k).
  • standard math Quasideterminant calculus (Props 3.1-3.5, Lemma 3.6)
    Background from Gelfand-Retakh [14,15] and Gilson-Nimmo [18,19], used throughout the construction and asymptotic reduction.
  • domain assumption Ansatz data solve linear systems (4.1) and Sylvester equation (4.2)
    Verified by direct differentiation for the explicit θ, ρ, Λ, Ξ, and via (4.29) for Ω; supports the claim that J[N] is a genuine solution.
  • domain assumption Equivalences ASDYM ↔ Yang equation ↔ WZW4 action
    Standard results [3,28,29,37,49,61] grounding the identification of soliton behavior with the WZW4 action density.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic 1-soliton reduction in comoving frames characterizes N-soliton solutions
    Methodological premise from Matveev-Salle [45], extended to quasi-Wronskians in [21]; used to infer 'same class of N-soliton solutions' from identical asymptotic profiles.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 49098 in / 27456 out tokens · 284258 ms · 2026-08-01T17:05:20.969631+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Asymptotic equivalence between the quasi-Grammian and quasi-Wronskian representations of $N$-soliton solutions in the $J$-matrix formulation of the anti-self-dual Yang-Mills (ASDYM) equation is established up to a constant matrix factor. This formulation, known as the Yang equation, serves as the equation of motion of the four-dimensional Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW$_4$) model and is equivalent to the ASDYM equation. To visualize the solitonic behavior, the action density of the WZW$_4$ model is evaluated for $\mathrm{G}=\mathrm{U}(2)$, demonstrating that the quasi-Grammian and quasi-Wronskian representations exhibit the same asymptotic soliton profiles, while the phase shift factors associated with $N$-soliton collisions are obtained explicitly. Hence, by virtue of the particle-like nature of solitons, the two representations describe the same class of ASDYM $N$-soliton solutions. These solitons can be regarded as a four-dimensional analogue of KP/KdV-type multi-solitons in fluid dynamics, suggesting a possible connection between the ASDYM equation and higher-dimensional Sato theory. Exact quasi-Grammian $N$-soliton solutions are also presented for $N\leq4$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 30 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell and H. Segur, The inverse scattering transform-fourier analysis for nonlinear problems, Stud. Appl. Math. 53, 249-315 (1974)

    1974

  2. [2]

    Bittleston, Integrability from Chern-Simons theories, Ph.D thesis (2022, Cambridge U, DAMTP)

    R. Bittleston, Integrability from Chern-Simons theories, Ph.D thesis (2022, Cambridge U, DAMTP)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Brihaye, D

    Y. Brihaye, D. B. Fairlie, J. Nuyts and R. G. Yates, Properties of the self dual equations for an SU(n) gauge theory, J. Math. Phys. 19, 2528-2532 (1978)

    1978

  4. [4]

    Bittleston and D

    R. Bittleston and D. Skinner, Twistors, the ASD Yang-Mills equations, and 4d Chern-Simons theory, JHEP 02, 227 (2023) . [arXiv:2011.04638]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Belinski and E

    V. Belinski and E. Verdaguer, Gravitational solitons , (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York, U.S.A., 2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    L. T. Cole, R. A. Cullinan, B. Hoare, J. Liniado and D. C. Thompson, Integrable Deformations from Twistor Space, SciPost Phys. 17, 008 (2024) . [arXiv:2322.17551]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Corrigan, D

    E. Corrigan, D. B. Fairlie, R. G. Yates and P. Goddard, The Construction of Self-dual Solutions to SU(2) Gauge Theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 58, pp.223-240 (1978) . E. Corrigan, D. B. Fairlie, R. G. Yates and P. Goddard, Bäcklund transformations and the construc- tion of the Atiyah-Ward ansätze for self-dual SU(2) gauge fields, Phys. Lett. B 72 (3), pp.354-...

    1978

  8. [8]

    Chakravarty, T

    S. Chakravarty, T. Lewkow and K. I. Maruno, On the construction of KP line-solitons and their interactions, Appl. Anal. 89(4) 529-545 (2010)

    2010

  9. [9]

    Costello, E

    K. Costello, E. Witten, and M. Yamazaki, Gauge Theory and Integrability, I, ICCM Notices 6 (2018), 46-119 . [arXiv:1709.09993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Costello and M

    K. Costello and M. Yamazaki, Gauge Theory And Integrability, III, [arXiv:1908.02289]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  11. [11]

    P. G. Drazin, R. S. Johnson, Solitons: an introduction (2nd ed.), (Cambridge U P, 1989)

    1989

  12. [12]

    Etingof, I

    P. Etingof, I. Gelfand and V. Retakh, Factorization of differential operators, quasideterminants, and nonabelian Toda field equations, Math. Res. Lett. 4(3): 413-425 (June 1997) . [arXiv:q-alg/9701008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  13. [13]

    N. C. Freeman and J. J. C. Nimmo, Soliton solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries and Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equations: The Wronskian technique, Phys. Lett. A 95, 1-3 (1983)

    1983

  14. [14]

    Gelfand, S

    I. Gelfand, S. Gelfand, V. Retakh and R. Wilson, Quasideterminants, Adv. Math. 193 (1), pp.56-141 (2005). [arXiv:math/0208146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Gelfand and V

    I. Gelfand and V. Retakh, Determinants of matrices over noncommutative rings, Funct. Anal. Appl. 25, pp.91-102 (1991)

    1991

  16. [16]

    C. R. Gilson, M. Hamanaka, S. C. Huang and J. J. C. Nimmo, Soliton Solutions of Noncom- mutative Anti-Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53, 404002(17pp) (2020) . [arXiv:2004.01718]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    C. R. Gilson, M. Hamanaka and J. J. C. Nimmo, Bäcklund transformations and the Atiyah- Ward ansatz for noncommutative anti-self-dual Yang-Mills equations, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 465, pp.2613 (2009) . [arXiv:0812.1222]. C. R. Gilson, M. Hamanaka and J. J. C. Nimmo, Bäcklund transformations for noncommutative anti-self-dual Yang-Mills equations, Glasgow Ma...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    C. R. Gilson and J. J. C. Nimmo, On a direct approach to quasideterminant solutions of a noncom- mutative KP equation, Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, pp.3839-3850 (2007) . [arXiv:nlin/0701027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    C. R. Gilson, J. J. C. Nimmo and C. M. Sooman, On a direct approach to quasideterminant solutions of a noncommutative modified KP equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 085202(10pp) (2008) . [arXiv:0711.3733]. 42

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Hamanaka and S.C

    M. Hamanaka and S.C. Huang, New Soliton Solutions of Anti-Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equations, JHEP 10, 101 (2020) . [arXiv:2004.09248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Hamanaka and S.C

    M. Hamanaka and S.C. Huang, Multi-soliton dynamics of anti-self-dual gauge fields, JHEP 01, 039 (2022). [arXiv:2106.01353]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Hamanaka and S.C

    M. Hamanaka and S.C. Huang, solitons in 4d Wess-Zumino-Witten models – Towards unification of integrable systems –, Open Commun. Nonlinear Math. Phys., Vol.4, Special Issue 2, Proceedings of the OCNMP-2024 Conference, 171–189 (2024) [arXiv:2408.16554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Hamanaka, S.C

    M. Hamanaka, S.C. Huang, H. Kanno, Solitons in open N = 2 string theory, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys., 2023 (2023) 043B03 (47pp) . [arxiv:2212.11800]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Hirota, The Direct Method in Soliton Theory , (Cambridge UP, 2004)

    R. Hirota, The Direct Method in Soliton Theory , (Cambridge UP, 2004)

    2004

  25. [25]

    Huang, On Soliton Solutions of the Anti-Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equations from the Perspective of Integrable Systems , Ph.D thesis, Nagoya University, 2021 [arXiv:2112.10702]

    S.C. Huang, On Soliton Solutions of the Anti-Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equations from the Perspective of Integrable Systems , Ph.D thesis, Nagoya University, 2021 [arXiv:2112.10702]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    S.C. Huang, Multi-Soliton scattering of the Anti-Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equations in 4-dimensional split signature, Proceedings of the East Asia Joint Symposium on Fields and Strings 2021 (2022), pp. 33-42 . [arXiv:2201.13318]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Y. J. He, J. Tian and B. Chen, Deformed Integrable Models from Holomorphic Chern-Simons Theory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 100413 (2022) . [arXiv:2105.06826]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Inami, H

    T. Inami, H. Kanno and T. Ueno, Higher-Dimensional WZW Model on Kähler Manifold and Toroidal Lie Algebra, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12, 2757-2764 (1997) . [arXiv:hep-th/9704010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  29. [29]

    Inami, H

    T. Inami, H. Kanno, T. Ueno and C. S. Xiong, Two-toroidal Lie Algebra as Current Algebra of Four-dimensional Kähler WZW Model, Phys. Lett. B 399, 97-104 (1997) . [arXiv:hep-th/9610187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  30. [30]

    Jimbo and T

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, Solitons and infinite dimensional Lie algebras, Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 19 (1983), 943-1001

    1983

  31. [31]

    Kakei, Solutions to the KP hierarchy with an elliptic background, [arxiv:2310.11679]

    S. Kakei, Solutions to the KP hierarchy with an elliptic background, [arxiv:2310.11679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Kodama, KP Solitons and the Grassmannians , (Springer, 2017)

    Y. Kodama, KP Solitons and the Grassmannians , (Springer, 2017). Y. Kodama, Solitons in Two-Dimensional Shallow Water , (SIAM, 2018)

    2017

  33. [33]

    Kodama and L

    Y. Kodama and L. Williams, KP solitons and total positivity for the Grassmannian, Invent. math. 198, 637–699 (2014) . [arXiv:1106.0023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    S.S. Li, S.Z. Liu, D.J. Zhang, From the self-dual Yang-Mills equation to the Fokas-Lenells equation, Stud. Appl. Math., 155 (2025) e70126 (21pp) . [arXiv:2411.10807]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Ling and H

    L. Ling and H. Yang, The determinant representation of Ward soliton solutions and its dynamical behaviors, Nonlinear Dyn. 112, 7417-7432 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    S.S. Li, M. Hamanaka, S.C. Huang and D.J Zhang, Soliton resonances in four dimensional Wess- Zumino-Witten model, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 8, 086023 . [arxiv:2501.08250]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Losev, G

    A. Losev, G. W. Moore, N. Nekrasov and S. Shatashvili, Four-Dimensional A vatars of Two- Dimensional RCFT, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 46, 130-145 (1996) . [arXiv:hep-th/9509151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  38. [38]

    S. S. Li, K. Maruno and D.J. Zhang, A unified approach to the AKNS, DNLS, KP and mKP hierarchies in the anti-self-dual Yang-Mills reduction, [arXiv:2603.23060]

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    S. S. Li, C.Z. Qu, X.X. Yi and D.J. Zhang, Cauchy matrix approach to the SU(2) selfdual Yang–Mills equation, Stud. Appl. Math. 148, 1703 (2022) . [arXiv:2113.06408]

    arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    S.S. Li, C.Z. Qu and D.J. Zhang, Solutions to the SU(N) self-dual Yang-Mills equation, Physica D, 453, 133828 (2023) . [arXiv:2211.08574]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Li and D

    X. Li and D. J. Zhang, Elliptic soliton solutions: τ functions, vertex operators and bilinear identities, J Nonlinear Sci 32, 70 (2022) . [arxiv:2204.01240]. 43

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    L. F. Mollenauer and J. P. Gordon, Solitons in Optical Fibers: Fundamentals and Applications , New York: Academic, 2006

    2006

  43. [43]

    R. M. Miura, C. S. Gardner, and M. D. Kruskal, Korteweg–de Vries equation and generalizations. II. Existence of conservation laws and constants of motion, J. Math. Phys. 9, pp.1204-1209 (1968)

    1968

  44. [44]

    T. Miwa, M. Jimbo and E. Date, Solitons: Differential Equations, Symmetries and Infinite Dimen- sional Algebras , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 135, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

    2000

  45. [45]

    V. B. Matveev and M. A. Salle, Darboux Transformations and Solitons , (SpringerVerlag, 1991)

    1991

  46. [46]

    Manton and P

    N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons, (Cambridge UP, 2004)

    2004

  47. [47]

    Mason, N.M

    L.J. Mason, N.M. Woodhouse, Integrability, Self-Duality, and Twistor Theory , Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1996

    1996

  48. [48]

    V. P. Nair, Kahler-Chern-Simons theory, [arXiv:hep-th/9110042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    V. P. Nair and J. Schiff, A Kähler-Chern-Simons theory and quantization of instanton moduli spaces, Phys. Lett. B 246, 423-429 (1990) ; V. P. Nair and J. Schiff, Kähler-Chern-Simons theory and symmetries of anti-self-dual gauge fields, Nucl. Phys. B 371, 329-352 (1992)

    1990

  50. [50]

    J. J. C. Nimmo, Wronskian determinants, the KP hierarchy and supersymmetric polynomials, J. Phys. A 22, 3213-3221 (1989)

    1989

  51. [51]

    J. J. C. Nimmo, C.R. Gilson, Y. Ohta, Applications of Darboux transformations to the self-dual Yang-Mills equations, Theor. Math. Phys., 122, 239-246 (2000)

    2000

  52. [52]

    J. J. C. Nimmo and H. Yilmaz, Binary Darboux transformation for the Sasa-Satsuma equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 425202 (2015) . [arxiv:1502.07371]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    A recent topic on rogue wave (Recent developments in mathematics of integrable systems)

    Ohta, Yasuhiro. A recent topic on rogue wave (Recent developments in mathematics of integrable systems). RIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu. 2024, B96: 55-63

    2024

  54. [54]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Geometry of N=2 Strings, Nuclear Physics B 361 (1991), 469–518 . H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, N=2 Heterotic Strings, Nuclear Physics B 367 (1991), 83–104

    1991

  55. [55]

    Rogers and W

    C. Rogers and W. K. Schief, Bäcklund and Darboux Transformation: Geometry and Modern Appli- cations in Solitons Theory , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    2002

  56. [56]

    Sato, Soliton equations as dynamical systems on an infinite dimensional Grassmann manifold, RIMS Kokyuroku 439, pp.30-46 (1981)

    M. Sato, Soliton equations as dynamical systems on an infinite dimensional Grassmann manifold, RIMS Kokyuroku 439, pp.30-46 (1981) . M. Sato, Y. Sato, ”Soliton equations as dynamical systems on infinite dimensional Grassmann mani- fold”, in Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations in Applied Science, Proceedings of the U.S.-Japan Seminar, Tokyo, 1982, Nor...

    1981

  57. [57]

    D. A. Takahashi, Tsunami Solitons Emerging from Superconducting Gap, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 123001 (2025) . [arxiv:2508.18311]

    arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Vachaspati, Kinks and Domain Walls: An Introduction to Classical and Quantum Solitons , Cambridge University Press (2023)

    T. Vachaspati, Kinks and Domain Walls: An Introduction to Classical and Quantum Solitons , Cambridge University Press (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    R. S. Ward, Integrable and solvable systems, and relations among them, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 315, pp.451-457 (1985)

    1985

  60. [60]

    Witten, Perturbative Gauge Theory as a String Theory in Twistor Space, Commun

    E. Witten, Perturbative Gauge Theory as a String Theory in Twistor Space, Commun. Math. Phys. 252, 189–258 (2004) . [arXiv:hep-th/0312171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  61. [61]

    C. N. Yang, Condition of Self-Duality for SU(2) Gauge Fields on Euclidean Four Dimensional Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, pp.1377-1379 (1977) . 44

    1977

  62. [62]

    Yilmaz, Binary Darboux transformation for the Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation, Wave Motion 113, 102991 (2022)

    H. Yilmaz, Binary Darboux transformation for the Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation, Wave Motion 113, 102991 (2022) . H. Yilmaz, Quasi-Grammian solutions of the coupled Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation, Wave Motion 124, 103245 (2024)

    2022

  63. [63]

    Zhang, Wronskian solutions of integrable systems

    D.J. Zhang, Wronskian solutions of integrable systems. In: Nonlinear Systems and their Remarkable Mathematical Structures, ed. by N. Euler, M.C. Nucci (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2019), pp. 415-444. [arXiv:1903.09283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Zhang, Integrability and transformations in the bilinear method: An introduction, [arxiv:2606.16205]

    D.J. Zhang, Integrability and transformations in the bilinear method: An introduction, [arxiv:2606.16205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    Zhang, A∞ action of open N = 2 superstring field theory, JHEP 11, 130 (2025)

    X. Zhang, A∞ action of open N = 2 superstring field theory, JHEP 11, 130 (2025) . [arXiv:2506.21247]. 45

    arXiv 2025