Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.04131 v9 pith:D5ZALIIW submitted 2020-09-09 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

classification cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML
keywords approachesrobustrobustnesscertifiablyattacksdnnstrainingverification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Great advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) have led to state-of-the-art performance on a wide range of tasks. However, recent studies have shown that DNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which have brought great concerns when deploying these models to safety-critical applications such as autonomous driving. Different defense approaches have been proposed against adversarial attacks, including: a) empirical defenses, which can usually be adaptively attacked again without providing robustness certification; and b) certifiably robust approaches, which consist of robustness verification providing the lower bound of robust accuracy against any attacks under certain conditions and corresponding robust training approaches. In this paper, we systematize certifiably robust approaches and related practical and theoretical implications and findings. We also provide the first comprehensive benchmark on existing robustness verification and training approaches on different datasets. In particular, we 1) provide a taxonomy for the robustness verification and training approaches, as well as summarize the methodologies for representative algorithms, 2) reveal the characteristics, strengths, limitations, and fundamental connections among these approaches, 3) discuss current research progresses, theoretical barriers, main challenges, and future directions for certifiably robust approaches for DNNs, and 4) provide an open-sourced unified platform to evaluate 20+ representative certifiably robust approaches.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Certified Training for Convolutional Perturbations

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A certified-training method using parameterized blur kernels and symbolic bound propagation gives provable robustness to motion blur and related convolutional perturbations, reaching over 80% verified accuracy on CIFAR10.

  2. Fast SDP certification of neural networks : towards large multi-class datasets

    math.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    An untargeted SDP relaxation certifies full multi-class ReLU robustness in a single solve, with stable-active neuron pruning that shrinks the matrices and accelerates convergence.

  3. Get Global Guarantees: On the Probabilistic Nature of Perturbation Robustness

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    Tower robustness measures a model's expected accuracy over random perturbations within an Lp ball and comes with computable lower and upper bounds based on exact binomial tests.