REVIEW 1 cited by
Reinforcement Learning for Feedback-Enabled Cyber Resilience
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Digitization and remote connectivity have enlarged the attack surface and made cyber systems more vulnerable. As attackers become increasingly sophisticated and resourceful, mere reliance on traditional cyber protection, such as intrusion detection, firewalls, and encryption, is insufficient to secure the cyber systems. Cyber resilience provides a new security paradigm that complements inadequate protection with resilience mechanisms. A Cyber-Resilient Mechanism (CRM) adapts to the known or zero-day threats and uncertainties in real-time and strategically responds to them to maintain critical functions of the cyber systems in the event of successful attacks. Feedback architectures play a pivotal role in enabling the online sensing, reasoning, and actuation process of the CRM. Reinforcement Learning (RL) is an essential tool that epitomizes the feedback architectures for cyber resilience. It allows the CRM to provide sequential responses to attacks with limited or without prior knowledge of the environment and the attacker. In this work, we review the literature on RL for cyber resilience and discuss cyber resilience against three major types of vulnerabilities, i.e., posture-related, information-related, and human-related vulnerabilities. We introduce three application domains of CRMs: moving target defense, defensive cyber deception, and assistive human security technologies. The RL algorithms also have vulnerabilities themselves. We explain the three vulnerabilities of RL and present attack models where the attacker targets the information exchanged between the environment and the agent: the rewards, the state observations, and the action commands. We show that the attacker can trick the RL agent into learning a nefarious policy with minimum attacking effort. Lastly, we discuss the future challenges of RL for cyber security and resilience and emerging applications of RL-based CRMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ARM-IRL: Adaptive Resilience Metric Quantification Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning
The paper learns adaptive resilience metrics as reward functions using adversarial inverse reinforcement learning and shows these reduce episode lengths versus PPO in cyber-physical power system restoration tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.