Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Temporal Sampling for Forgotten Reasoning in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.20196 v1 pith:D73LVBUG submitted 2025-05-26 cs.AI cs.LG

Temporal Sampling for Forgotten Reasoning in LLMs

classification cs.AI cs.LG
keywords reasoningtemporalacrossfine-tuningllmsmodelssamplingtraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is intended to improve their reasoning capabilities, yet we uncover a counterintuitive effect: models often forget how to solve problems they previously answered correctly during training. We term this phenomenon temporal forgetting and show that it is widespread across model sizes, fine-tuning methods (both Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning), and multiple reasoning benchmarks. To address this gap, we introduce Temporal Sampling, a simple decoding strategy that draws outputs from multiple checkpoints along the training trajectory. This approach recovers forgotten solutions without retraining or ensembling, and leads to substantial improvements in reasoning performance, gains from 4 to 19 points in Pass@k and consistent gains in Majority@k across several benchmarks. We further extend our method to LoRA-adapted models, demonstrating that storing only adapter weights across checkpoints achieves similar benefits with minimal storage cost. By leveraging the temporal diversity inherent in training, Temporal Sampling offers a practical, compute-efficient way to surface hidden reasoning ability and rethink how we evaluate LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Failed Reasoning Traces Tell You What Is Fixable (But Not by Reading Them)

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Three problem-level trajectory features derived from the distributional signature of failed LLM rollouts enable failure clustering at 84.3% accuracy and a training-free routing rule that improves rescue by 12.2% on ha...

  2. A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 accept novelty 3.0

    A survey compiling RL methods, challenges, data resources, and applications for enhancing reasoning in large language models and large reasoning models since DeepSeek-R1.