pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.15856 · v2 · pith:DBBE6W2Pnew · submitted 2026-01-22 · ✦ hep-ph

WIMP Dark Matter from a Natural Discrete Gauge Symmetry in the Standard Model

Jie Sheng , Tsutomu T. Yanagida , Kairui Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 07:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords WIMP dark matterdiscrete gauge symmetryStandard Modelanomaly cancellationright-handed neutrinosMajorana fermionssecluded dark matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Standard Model's internal structure implies a Z4 × Z3 discrete gauge symmetry that stabilizes a new Majorana fermion as WIMP dark matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the Standard Model's internal structure naturally suggests a discrete gauge symmetry of Z4 times Z3. To cancel the associated Dai-Freed anomalies, three right-handed neutrinos and three new Majorana fermions must be added. This symmetry automatically prevents the lightest new fermion from decaying into ordinary particles, making it a stable dark matter candidate without an extra stabilizing symmetry or domain-wall issues. The mass of this particle arises from the vacuum expectation value of a singlet scalar near the electroweak scale, allowing standard WIMP freeze-out via scalar-mediated annihilation to match the observed relic density while satisfying direct detection bounds.

Core claim

The internal structure of the Standard Model implies a natural Z_4 × Z_3 discrete gauge symmetry. Cancellation of the corresponding Dai--Freed anomalies requires the introduction of three right-handed neutrinos and three additional Majorana fermions χ_i. This gauge symmetry forbids the decay of the lightest fermion χ_1 into Standard Model particles, rendering it automatically stable and providing a dark matter candidate without introducing an ad hoc stabilizing symmetry and domain-wall problem. The mass of χ_1 is generated by the vacuum expectation value of a singlet scalar near the electroweak scale, naturally realizing a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) freeze-out scenario. Dark

What carries the argument

The natural Z_4 × Z_3 discrete gauge symmetry implied by the Standard Model's internal structure, whose Dai-Freed anomaly cancellation by three right-handed neutrinos and three χ_i Majorana fermions stabilizes the lightest χ_1 as dark matter.

If this is right

  • The relic abundance of χ1 matches observations through scalar-mediated annihilation while remaining consistent with current direct-detection constraints.
  • The setup realizes the secluded dark matter scenario without domain-wall problems from high-scale symmetry breaking.
  • The model can be tested by next-generation direct detection and collider experiments searching for the singlet scalar or new fermions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The required right-handed neutrinos may link to neutrino mass generation mechanisms in the same framework.
  • Collider production of the singlet scalar could provide an independent test channel beyond dark matter searches.
  • The discrete symmetry approach might extend to other Standard Model extensions seeking automatic stability without ad hoc symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

The internal structure of the Standard Model implies a natural Z4 × Z3 discrete gauge symmetry whose Dai-Freed anomalies are cancelled precisely by the addition of three right-handed neutrinos and three χi Majorana fermions.

What would settle it

Observation of the lightest χ1 decaying into Standard Model particles at a detectable rate, or direct detection signals inconsistent with scalar-mediated annihilation, would falsify the stability and relic abundance claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.15856 by Jie Sheng, Kairui Zhang, Tsutomu T. Yanagida.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Number changing diagrams involving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Number changing diagrams involving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Relic density of dark matter particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Comparison between the DM–nucleon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The internal structure of the Standard Model implies a natural $\mathbb{Z}_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_3$ discrete gauge symmetry. Cancellation of the corresponding Dai--Freed anomalies requires the introduction of three right-handed neutrinos and three additional Majorana fermions $\chi_i$. This gauge symmetry forbids the decay of the lightest fermion $\chi_1$ into Standard Model particles, rendering it automatically stable and providing a dark matter candidate without introducing an ad hoc stabilizing symmetry and domain-wall problem. The mass of $\chi_1$ is generated by the vacuum expectation value of a singlet scalar near the electroweak scale, naturally realizing a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) freeze-out scenario. Dark matter annihilation proceeds through scalar mediation, allowing the observed relic abundance to be reproduced while remaining consistent with current direct-detection constraints. It naturally realizes the secluded dark matter scenario and can be further tested in the next generation of experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the internal structure of the Standard Model implies a natural Z_4 × Z_3 discrete gauge symmetry whose Dai-Freed anomalies are cancelled by adding three right-handed neutrinos and three Majorana fermions χ_i. The symmetry automatically stabilizes the lightest χ_1 as a WIMP dark matter candidate without an ad hoc Z_2 or domain-wall issues. The χ_1 mass arises from the VEV of a singlet scalar near the electroweak scale; annihilation proceeds via scalar mediation, reproducing the observed relic density while satisfying direct-detection bounds and realizing the secluded DM scenario.

Significance. If the symmetry assignment is shown to follow uniquely or inevitably from SM quantum numbers and anomaly cancellation without additional model-building choices, the construction would supply a motivated, non-ad hoc DM candidate whose stability is tied to a discrete gauge symmetry. The WIMP freeze-out via scalar mediation is a standard mechanism, but the link to an SM-derived discrete symmetry would be noteworthy if the 'implication' step is made rigorous.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, first two sentences; Introduction] Abstract and introduction: the central claim that 'the internal structure of the Standard Model implies' the specific Z_4 × Z_3 assignment is not derived from any dynamical principle or uniqueness theorem internal to the SM; the manuscript instead presents one consistent charge assignment whose anomalies cancel with the added fermions. This construction step is load-bearing for the 'natural' and 'without ad hoc stabilizing symmetry' assertions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statements that 'the observed relic abundance [is] reproduced' and 'remaining consistent with current direct-detection constraints' are asserted without explicit cross-section formulas, Boltzmann-equation solutions, or benchmark parameter values (e.g., singlet VEV, scalar-fermion couplings, or m_χ1). The central WIMP claim therefore rests on unshown computations.
  3. [Abstract; model Lagrangian section] The mass generation and annihilation mechanism rely on a singlet scalar VEV and scalar-fermion couplings chosen near the electroweak scale; these are free parameters listed in the axiom ledger and reduce the relic-density match to a parameter adjustment rather than a parameter-free prediction from the discrete symmetry alone.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the three χ_i fermions and the singlet scalar should be introduced with explicit charge assignments under Z_4 × Z_3 in a dedicated table or subsection for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, first two sentences; Introduction] Abstract and introduction: the central claim that 'the internal structure of the Standard Model implies' the specific Z_4 × Z_3 assignment is not derived from any dynamical principle or uniqueness theorem internal to the SM; the manuscript instead presents one consistent charge assignment whose anomalies cancel with the added fermions. This construction step is load-bearing for the 'natural' and 'without ad hoc stabilizing symmetry' assertions.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation. The charge assignments under Z_4 × Z_3 for the SM fields are uniquely determined by their hypercharges together with the requirement that all Dai-Freed anomalies cancel upon addition of the three right-handed neutrinos and three χ_i fermions. This leads to the discrete symmetry without further ad hoc choices. However, we do not claim a dynamical principle or uniqueness theorem proving this is the only possible discrete symmetry. To address the concern, we have revised the abstract and introduction to describe the symmetry as a natural and consistent outcome of anomaly cancellation with the SM quantum numbers, rather than strictly implied by an internal uniqueness theorem. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statements that 'the observed relic abundance [is] reproduced' and 'remaining consistent with current direct-detection constraints' are asserted without explicit cross-section formulas, Boltzmann-equation solutions, or benchmark parameter values (e.g., singlet VEV, scalar-fermion couplings, or m_χ1). The central WIMP claim therefore rests on unshown computations.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the main results of the paper. The explicit annihilation cross sections (including s- and t-channel scalar mediation), the numerical solution of the Boltzmann equation, and benchmark points (with specific values for the singlet VEV, couplings, and m_χ1) are all provided in the dedicated relic-density and direct-detection sections of the manuscript. To make the abstract more self-contained, we have added a short parenthetical reference to representative benchmark values. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract; model Lagrangian section] The mass generation and annihilation mechanism rely on a singlet scalar VEV and scalar-fermion couplings chosen near the electroweak scale; these are free parameters listed in the axiom ledger and reduce the relic-density match to a parameter adjustment rather than a parameter-free prediction from the discrete symmetry alone.

    Authors: We agree that the singlet VEV and the scalar-fermion couplings remain free parameters whose specific values are chosen to reproduce the observed relic density, as is standard in WIMP constructions. The discrete symmetry fixes the allowed interaction structure and guarantees stability, while the electroweak-scale choice for the VEV is motivated by naturalness considerations. We have added a clarifying paragraph in the model section and conclusion noting that the relic density is achieved for a viable range of parameters consistent with the symmetry, rather than as a unique, parameter-free prediction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is explicit model construction

full rationale

The provided text presents an explicit model-building construction: a discrete Z4 × Z3 symmetry is assigned to SM fields plus added fermions such that Dai-Freed anomalies cancel, the lightest χ1 is stable by the resulting charge assignments, and a scalar VEV near the electroweak scale allows scalar-mediated annihilation to match the observed relic density. No equations, self-citations, or uniqueness theorems are quoted that would reduce any claimed prediction or first-principles result to an input by construction. The 'implies' language in the abstract is a framing of the construction rather than a derived equivalence, and parameter choices for the VEV and couplings are presented as enabling consistency rather than as a fitted prediction of an independent observable. This is a standard model-building paper whose central claims rest on the explicit assignments, not on circular reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of the discrete symmetry, the necessity of the listed new fermions for anomaly cancellation, and the placement of the singlet scalar VEV near the electroweak scale; these are not derived from more fundamental principles within the paper.

free parameters (2)
  • Singlet scalar VEV
    Set near the electroweak scale to generate the χ1 mass that realizes the WIMP freeze-out scenario.
  • Scalar-fermion couplings
    Adjusted to reproduce the observed relic density through annihilation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The internal structure of the Standard Model implies a natural Z4 × Z3 discrete gauge symmetry.
    Stated as the starting point in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Dai-Freed anomalies of the discrete symmetry are cancelled by exactly three right-handed neutrinos and three χi Majorana fermions.
    Invoked to justify the introduction of the new fields.
invented entities (2)
  • Three Majorana fermions χi no independent evidence
    purpose: Cancel anomalies and supply the stable DM candidate χ1.
    New particles postulated by the model.
  • Singlet scalar field no independent evidence
    purpose: Generate the χ1 mass via its VEV.
    New scalar introduced to set the DM mass scale.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5691 in / 1654 out tokens · 28289 ms · 2026-05-25T07:38:09.284726+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Natural SUSY with mixed axion/axino dark matter

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Natural SUSY with axino LSP allows viable mixed axion-axino dark matter matching the observed abundance for axino masses near 100 keV and PQ scales of 10^11 to 3x10^12 GeV in DFSZ and KSVZ models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, “Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2406.01705[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,”Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279–390, [arXiv:hep-ph/0404175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Dark Matter Candidates

    L. Bergstrom, “Dark Matter Candidates,”New J. Phys. 11(2009) 105006, [arXiv:0903.4849[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    The Waning of the WIMP? A Review of Models, Searches, and Constraints

    G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, “The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,”Eur. Phys. J. C78no. 3, (2018) 203, [arXiv:1703.07364[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Aspects of the WIMP quality problem and R-parity violation in natural supersymmetry with all axion dark matter,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, J. Bolich, D. Sengupta, and K. Zhang, “Aspects of the WIMP quality problem and R-parity violation in natural supersymmetry with all axion dark matter,”JCAP10(2025) 072, [arXiv:2505.09785[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Prospects for supersymmetry at High-Luminosity LHC,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, J. Bolich, J. Dutta, D. Martinez, S. Salam, D. Sengupta, and K. Zhang, “Prospects for supersymmetry at High-Luminosity LHC,”Rev. Mod. Phys.97no. 4, (2025) 045001, [arXiv:2502.10879 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Supersymmetry at High Luminosity LHC,

    K. Zhang, “Supersymmetry at High Luminosity LHC,” [arXiv:2601.01066[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791–1797

    work page 1977

  9. [9]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    work page 1977

  10. [10]

    Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

    work page 1978

  11. [11]

    A New Light Boson?,

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 40(1978) 223–226

    work page 1978

  12. [12]

    Quintessence Axion Potential Induced by Electroweak Instanton Effects

    Y. Nomura, T. Watari, and T. Yanagida, “Quintessence axion potential induced by electroweak instanton effects,”Phys. Lett. B484(2000) 103–111, [arXiv:hep-ph/0004182]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  13. [13]

    Eta-Invariants and Determinant Lines

    X.-z. Dai and D. S. Freed, “eta invariants and determinant lines,”J. Math. Phys.35(1994) 5155–5194, [arXiv:hep-th/9405012]. [Erratum: J.Math.Phys. 42, 2343–2344 (2001)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  14. [14]

    Dai-Freed theorem and topological phases of matter

    K. Yonekura, “Dai-Freed theorem and topological phases of matter,”JHEP09(2016) 022, [arXiv:1607.01873 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    High Quality QCD Axion in the Standard Model,

    J. Sheng and T. T. Yanagida, “High Quality QCD Axion in the Standard Model,” [arXiv:2510.17370[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics,

    I. Garc´ ıa-Etxebarria and M. Montero, “Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics,”JHEP08(2019) 003, [arXiv:1808.00009[hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Dai-Freed anomaly in the standard model and topological inflation,

    M. Kawasaki and T. T. Yanagida, “Dai-Freed anomaly in the standard model and topological inflation,”JHEP 11(2023) 106, [arXiv:2304.10100[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Tokyo, Japan, June, 1981

    Institute for Nuclear Study (INS),INS Symposium on Quark and Lepton Physics. Tokyo, Japan, June, 1981. June 25–27, 1981

    work page 1981

  19. [19]

    µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,

    P. Minkowski, “µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,”Phys. Lett. B67(1977) 421–428

    work page 1977

  20. [20]

    Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,

    T. Yanagida, “Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,”Conf. Proc. C7902131(1979) 95–99

    work page 1979

  21. [21]

    Horizontal Symmetry and Mass of the Top Quark,

    T. Yanagida, “Horizontal Symmetry and Mass of the Top Quark,”Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 2986

    work page 1979

  22. [22]

    Complex Spinors and Unified Theories

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, “Complex Spinors and Unified Theories,”Conf. Proc. C790927 (1979) 315–321, [arXiv:1306.4669[hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  23. [23]

    Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, “Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,”Phys. Lett. B174(1986) 45–47

    work page 1986

  24. [24]

    Discrete gauge anomalies revisited

    C.-T. Hsieh, “Discrete gauge anomalies revisited,” [arXiv:1808.02881[hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Testable Inverse Seesaw Motivated from a High Quality QCD Axion,

    Y. Georis, J. Sheng, S. Urrea, and T. T. Yanagida, “Testable Inverse Seesaw Motivated from a High Quality QCD Axion,” [arXiv:2512.13158[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    A lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis

    S. Davidson and A. Ibarra, “A Lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis,”Phys. Lett. B535(2002) 25–32, [arXiv:hep-ph/0202239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  27. [27]

    Leptogenesis

    S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, “Leptogenesis,” Phys. Rept.466(2008) 105–177, [arXiv:0802.2962 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  28. [28]

    Testable flavored TeV-scale resonant leptogenesis with MeV-GeV dark matter in a neutrinophilic two-Higgs-doublet model,

    P. Huang and K. Zhang, “Testable flavored TeV-scale resonant leptogenesis with MeV-GeV dark matter in a neutrinophilic two-Higgs-doublet model,”Phys. Rev. D 111no. 11, (2025) 115011, [arXiv:2411.18973 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant,

    S. Weinberg, “Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant,”Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 2607

    work page 1987

  30. [30]

    Affleck-Dine Baryogenesis after Thermal Inflation

    E. D. Stewart, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida, “Affleck-Dine baryogenesis after thermal inflation,” Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6032–6039, [arXiv:hep-ph/9603324]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  31. [31]

    Secluded WIMP Dark Matter

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, “Secluded WIMP Dark Matter,”Phys. Lett. B662(2008) 53–61, [arXiv:0711.4866[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [32]

    The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model

    U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, “The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model,” Phys. Rept.496(2010) 1–77, [arXiv:0910.1785 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  33. [33]

    Evading Direct Dark Matter Detection in Higgs Portal Models

    G. Arcadi, C. Gross, O. Lebedev, S. Pokorski, and T. Toma, “Evading Direct Dark Matter Detection in Higgs Portal Models,”Phys. Lett. B769(2017) 129–133, [arXiv:1611.09675[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Dark Matter physics in general NMSSM,

    L. Meng, J. Cao, F. Li, and S. Yang, “Dark Matter physics in general NMSSM,”JHEP08(2024) 212, [arXiv:2405.07036[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    WIMP Shadows: Phenomenology of Secluded Dark Matter in Three Minimal BSM Scenarios,

    M. Di Mauro and Y. Wang, “WIMP Shadows: Phenomenology of Secluded Dark Matter in Three Minimal BSM Scenarios,” [arXiv:2510.23771[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Singlet fermionic dark matter

    Y. G. Kim, K. Y. Lee, and S. Shin, “Singlet fermionic dark matter,”JHEP05(2008) 100, [arXiv:0803.2932 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter, and a Standard Model like Higgs at 125 GeV

    L. Lopez-Honorez, T. Schwetz, and J. Zupan, “Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter, and a Standard Model like Higgs at 125 GeV,”Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 179–185, [arXiv:1203.2064[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  38. [38]

    Detection prospects of singlet fermionic dark matter

    S. Esch, M. Klasen, and C. E. Yaguna, “Detection prospects of singlet fermionic dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 075017, [arXiv:1308.0951[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    Self-consistent Dark Matter Simplified Models with an s-channel scalar mediator

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni, and I. W. Sanderson, “Self-consistent Dark Matter Simplified Models with an s-channel scalar mediator,”JCAP03(2017) 015, [arXiv:1612.03475[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Two Higgs Doublet Dark Matter Portal

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni, and I. W. Sanderson, “Two Higgs Doublet Dark Matter Portal,”JCAP01(2018) 015, [arXiv:1710.10764[hep-ph]]. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    A second Higgs from the Higgs portal

    A. Falkowski, C. Gross, and O. Lebedev, “A second Higgs from the Higgs portal,”JHEP05(2015) 057, [arXiv:1502.01361[hep-ph]]. [43]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Constraints on new phenomena via Higgs boson couplings and invisible decays with the ATLAS detector,”JHEP11(2015) 206, [arXiv:1509.00672[hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe, vol. 69. Taylor and Francis, 5, 2019

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Revisiting CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation,

    M. Kawasaki, H. Nakatsuka, K. Nakayama, and T. Sekiguchi, “Revisiting CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation,”JCAP12no. 12, (2021) 015, [arXiv:2105.08334[astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Unitarity limits on the mass and radius of dark-matter particles,

    K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, “Unitarity limits on the mass and radius of dark-matter particles,”Phys. Rev. Lett.64(Feb, 1990) 615–618.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.615

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.615 1990

  45. [45]

    Bound-state formation for thermal relic dark matter and unitarity

    B. von Harling and K. Petraki, “Bound-state formation for thermal relic dark matter and unitarity,”JCAP12 (2014) 033, [arXiv:1407.7874[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    TeV-Scale Thermal WIMPs: Unitarity and its Consequences,

    J. Smirnov and J. F. Beacom, “TeV-Scale Thermal WIMPs: Unitarity and its Consequences,”Phys. Rev. D 100no. 4, (2019) 043029, [arXiv:1904.11503[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Thermal Relic Dark Matter Beyond the Unitarity Limit

    K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, K. Kaneta, W. Nakano, and M. Suzuki, “Thermal Relic Dark Matter Beyond the Unitarity Limit,”JHEP08(2016) 151, [arXiv:1606.00159[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Heavy Thermal Dark Matter from a New Collision Mechanism,

    E. D. Kramer, E. Kuflik, N. Levi, N. J. Outmezguine, and J. T. Ruderman, “Heavy Thermal Dark Matter from a New Collision Mechanism,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 126no. 8, (2021) 081802, [arXiv:2003.04900[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Roadmap to Thermal Dark Matter beyond the Weakly Interacting Dark Matter Unitarity Bound,

    R. Frumkin, E. Kuflik, I. Lavie, and T. Silverwater, “Roadmap to Thermal Dark Matter beyond the Weakly Interacting Dark Matter Unitarity Bound,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 17, (2023) 171001, [arXiv:2207.01635 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Ultraheavy atomic dark matter freeze-out through rearrangement,

    Y.-C. Qiu, J. Sheng, L. Tan, and C.-Y. Xing, “Ultraheavy atomic dark matter freeze-out through rearrangement,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 9, (2024) 095007, [arXiv:2312.13758[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, “Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,”Nucl. Phys. B360 (1991) 145–179

    work page 1991

  52. [52]

    Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,

    K. Griest and D. Seckel, “Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,”Phys. Rev. D43(May,

    work page

  53. [53]

    3191–3203.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3191

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3191

  54. [54]

    Forbidden Dark Matter

    R. T. D’Agnolo and J. T. Ruderman, “Light Dark Matter from Forbidden Channels,”Phys. Rev. Lett.115 no. 6, (2015) 061301, [arXiv:1505.07107[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Impeded Dark Matter

    J. Kopp, J. Liu, T. R. Slatyer, X.-P. Wang, and W. Xue, “Impeded Dark Matter,”JHEP12(2016) 033, [arXiv:1609.02147[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    Forbidden dark matter combusted around supermassive black hole,

    Y. Cheng, S.-F. Ge, X.-G. He, and J. Sheng, “Forbidden dark matter combusted around supermassive black hole,” Phys. Lett. B847(2023) 138294, [arXiv:2211.05643 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Right-handed neutrino dark matter with forbidden annihilation,

    Y. Cheng, S.-F. Ge, J. Sheng, and T. T. Yanagida, “Right-handed neutrino dark matter with forbidden annihilation,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 12, (2023) 123013, [arXiv:2304.02997[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Dark matter annihilation via Breit-Wigner enhancement with heavier mediator,

    Y. Cheng, S.-F. Ge, J. Sheng, and T. T. Yanagida, “Dark matter annihilation via Breit-Wigner enhancement with heavier mediator,”Phys. Lett. B861 (2025) 139290, [arXiv:2309.12043[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    A Tale of Two Portals: Testing Light, Hidden New Physics at Future $e^+ e^-$ Colliders

    J. Liu, X.-P. Wang, and F. Yu, “A Tale of Two Portals: Testing Light, Hidden New Physics at Futuree +e− Colliders,”JHEP06(2017) 077, [arXiv:1704.00730 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Thermal relic right-handed neutrino dark matter,

    J. Sheng, Y. Cheng, and T. T. Yanagida, “Thermal relic right-handed neutrino dark matter,”Phys. Lett. B 854(2024) 138735, [arXiv:2312.15637[hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    PAMELA Positron Excess as a Signal from the Hidden Sector

    D. Feldman, Z. Liu, and P. Nath, “PAMELA Positron Excess as a Signal from the Hidden Sector,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 063509, [arXiv:0810.5762[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Breit-Wigner Enhancement of Dark Matter Annihilation

    M. Ibe, H. Murayama, and T. T. Yanagida, “Breit-Wigner Enhancement of Dark Matter Annihilation,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 095009, [arXiv:0812.0072[hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    Enhancement of Dark Matter Annihilation via Breit-Wigner Resonance

    W.-L. Guo and Y.-L. Wu, “Enhancement of Dark Matter Annihilation via Breit-Wigner Resonance,” Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 055012, [arXiv:0901.1450 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  64. [64]

    Resonant Annihilation of WIMP Dark Matter for Halo Gamma Ray Signal,

    H. Murayama, “Resonant Annihilation of WIMP Dark Matter for Halo Gamma Ray Signal,” [arXiv:2512.01404[hep-ph]]. [66]PandaXCollaboration, Z. Boet al., “Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 1, (2025) 011805, [arXiv:2408.00664[hep-ex]]. [67]XENONCollaboration, E. Aprileet al., “First Dark Matter Search...

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Design, construction and commissioning of the PandaX-30T liquid xenon management system,

    X. Wang, Z. Lei, Y. Ju, J. Liu, N. Zhou, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Cui, Y. Meng, and L. Zhao, “Design, construction and commissioning of the PandaX-30T liquid xenon management system,”JINST18no. 05, (2023) P05028, [arXiv:2301.06044[physics.ins-det]]. [70]PandaXCollaboration, Z. Boet al., “First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino...

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Detectability of certain dark-matter candidates,

    M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, “Detectability of certain dark-matter candidates,”Phys. Rev. D31(Jun,

    work page

  67. [67]

    3059–3063.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.3059

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.31.3059

  68. [68]

    A Supersymmetry Primer

    S. P. Martin, “A Supersymmetry primer,”Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.18(1998) 1–98, [arXiv:hep-ph/9709356]. [73]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Search for diphoton resonances in the 66 to 110 GeV mass range using pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,”JHEP01(2025) 053, [arXiv:2407.07546 [hep-ex]]. [74]CMSCollaboration, A. Hayrapetya...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998