Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Distinctive Electronic Characteristics and Ultra-high Thermoelectric Power Factor in Be-Fe Intermetallics

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A first-principles structure search predicts that Be11Fe, a clathrate electride, has the highest thermoelectric power factor of any known semiconductor at room temperature, 178 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻².

desk verdict Useful structure prediction, but the headline power factor is a PBE-level estimate that should not be called a record. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15780 v1 pith:DBIUXTJY submitted 2024-11-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.otherphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph

Q. D. Hao , H. Wang , X. R. Chen , Hua Y. Geng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.otherphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords beryllium-ironintermetallicsthermoelectricpowerfactorclathrateelectridefirst-principlesstructurepredictionanionicironsemiconductingGWbandgap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Density-functional theory and evolutionary crystal-structure search predict that beryllium-iron forms several previously unknown intermetallics, including two that are semiconductors: Be11Fe and Be4Fe, with corrected band gaps of 0.22 eV and 0.85 eV. The calculations show iron acting as an anion in every Be-Fe compound, with a charge that reaches about -5 in Be4Fe and completely fills its 3d shell. Be11Fe adopts a clathrate electride structure, and its computed thermoelectric power factor reaches 178 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻² at 300 K, claimed to be the highest among known semiconductors under ambient conditions. If these predictions hold, beryllium-based alloys, previously thought to be exclusively metallic, become candidates for thermoelectric energy harvesting, active cooling, and photovoltaic applications.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the clathrate electride structure of Be11Fe, in which a cage of sixteen Be atoms encloses the central Fe and interstitial quasi-atoms (charge-density maxima in tetrahedral voids) hold significant electron density. The mechanism that produces the semiconducting state is charge transfer: each Be loses about one electron, Fe accepts up to roughly five, and its 3d and 4p bands hybridize with Be 2p states to open a gap or pseudogap at the Fermi level. On the transport side, the key machinery is the Boltzmann transport equation with relaxation times obtained from the imaginary part of the electron-phonon self-energy, which yields the long relaxation times (two to three orders of magnitude longer than in Be4Fe) that drive the high electrical conductivity and record power factor.

What would settle it

Synthesize Be11Fe and measure its Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity at 300 K: if the product falls far below 178 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻², or if the sample is metallic without a measurable gap, the central claim collapses. A cheaper calculation-level check is to redo the Boltzmann transport using the G0W0 quasiparticle bands and see whether the power factor is preserved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Be-Fe phase diagram contains semiconducting ground states, contrary to the long-held picture that all beryllium intermetallics are metals. An unbiased structure search yields the clathrate electride Be11Fe (tetragonal, space group P4̄m2) and the lower-symmetry Be4Fe; both show small indirect gaps at the PBE level (0.06 eV and 0.04 eV) that single-shot GW calculations open to 0.22 eV and 0.85 eV. The same analysis finds that Fe always gains charge from Be and acts as an anion, with a nominal valence up to -5 in Be4Fe, so its 3d orbitals are filled. Be11Fe is distinctive: a Be16 cage encloses Fe, and interstitial quasi-atoms localize charge in tetrahedral voids, making it a clathrate electride. Combining Boltzmann transport with electron-phonon relaxation times, the authors compute an electrical conductivity that peaks near 4.4×10⁵ Ω⁻¹ m⁻¹ at 400 K and, under a small chemical-potential shift, a power factor of 178 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻² at 300 K, which they identify as the highest reported for any semiconductor at ambient conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative transport claims, including the 178 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻² record, are computed from PBE Kohn-Sham eigenvalues and relaxation times derived from them, while the paper reports that the true gap is roughly four times larger at the G0W0 level; the accuracy of PBE band energies for this material is never tested.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Be-based intermetallics are not necessarily metallic; semiconducting Be11Fe and Be4Fe open an electronic-device and photovoltaic niche for beryllium alloys.
  • At 178 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻², Be11Fe would outperform the best known bulk thermoelectric semiconductors at room temperature (e.g., roughly 106 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻² for Nb0.95Ti0.05FeSb), enabling waste-heat harvesting and active cooling.
  • Mild hole doping (chemical-potential shift of about -0.06 eV) is predicted to raise the electrical conductivity to 3.5×10⁶ Ω⁻¹ m⁻¹, so the already high power factor could be pushed higher.
  • The computed ZT of 0.36 at 300 K combined with high thermal conductivity makes Be11Fe a fit for active-cooling devices that need high power factor rather than maximum ZT.
  • Observing Fe in a -5 formal charge state would be a new extreme for iron chemistry and may inform design rules for other Be-rich intermetallics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If synthesized, Be11Fe would likely require extreme care due to beryllium's toxicity, but its low density could make it attractive for spacecraft power systems, an application the paper mentions in passing.
  • The paper's transport numbers depend on PBE band energies; a rigorous follow-up using GW-based transport could either confirm or lower the record, so the 178 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻² value should be read as a prediction with an unquantified error bar.
  • The coexistence of clathrate electride character and a semiconducting gap suggests Be11Fe may exhibit the 'universal metallic surface states' predicted for electrides; a surface-sensitive measurement (e.g., photoemission) could test this distinct signature.
  • The type-II interstitial quasi-atoms identified in Be17Fe2, Be5Fe, and Be2Fe offer a way to search for electride-like behavior in other Be-rich compounds, potentially guiding a broader materials discovery campaign.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a first-principles evolutionary search of the Be-Fe binary phase diagram, predicting five previously unreported intermetallics (Be11Fe, Be4Fe, Be3Fe, BeFe, and BeFe2) alongside known phases. The authors characterize the electronic structure, identify Be11Fe as a clathrate electride, and argue that Fe acts as an anion in all Be-Fe intermetallics, with a Bader-derived nominal valence reaching -5 in Be4Fe. They compute PBE and G0W0 band gaps for Be11Fe (0.06 eV and 0.22 eV) and Be4Fe (0.04 eV and 0.85 eV), and calculate thermoelectric transport for Be11Fe within the Boltzmann RTA using EPW relaxation times, reporting a power factor of 178 uW cm^-1 K^-2 at 300 K and a ZT of about 0.36 at the optimal chemical potential. The paper claims this is the highest power factor among known semiconductors under ambient conditions and the first report of insulating phases in Be-based intermetallics.

Significance. If substantiated, the prediction of insulating Be-Fe intermetallics and a record thermoelectric power factor would be significant. The structure search is unbiased, the new phases are dynamically stable at the harmonic level, and the reproduction of the known Be2Fe and Be5Fe structures and magnetic moments lends credibility to the methodology. The G0W0 gap calculations and the EPW-based relaxation times are also nontrivial and valuable. However, the headline thermoelectric claim is not established as presented: the transport pipeline uses PBE Kohn-Sham eigenvalues with a 0.06 eV gap for Be11Fe while the paper's own G0W0 gap is 0.22 eV, and no transport calculation or sensitivity analysis at the corrected gap is provided. The comparison of a predicted power factor against measured power factors of known materials also overstates the 'highest among known semiconductors' claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods (p. 3) and Results (Fig. 6); SI Supplementary Methods] The record power factor for Be11Fe is computed with PBE Kohn-Sham eigenvalues and EPW relaxation times, as stated in Methods ('along with the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues obtained from the DFT') and confirmed by the SI, while the paper's own G0W0 calculation gives a band gap of 0.22 eV for Be11Fe, roughly four times the PBE gap of 0.06 eV. At 300 K, kT is about 0.026 eV, so the PBE gap is only about 2.3 kT and thermally excited carriers across the gap contribute substantially to the conductivity and suppress the Seebeck coefficient through bipolar conduction; with a 0.22 eV gap this channel is essentially closed. The optimal PF at 300 K is quoted at a chemical potential shift of -0.004 eV (Fig. 6), very close to the PBE conduction-band minimum, so the result is particularly sensitive to the band-edge position. The authors neither perform transport at the G0W0 level nor provide a scissor-shift or sensitivity analysis. I therefore do not consider the headline value of 178 uW cm^-1 K^-2, or its status as the highest among known semiconductors, to be established.
  2. [Results (convex hull) vs. SI Supplementary Methods] The main text states that Be11Fe is one of five stable structures that sit on the convex hull, but the SI states that Be11Fe has an enthalpy less than 4 meV/atom above the convex hull and that it is 'take[n] as a ground state in this work as well.' These statements are mutually inconsistent. Because the thermoelectric and insulating-phase claims rest on Be11Fe being a real, synthesizable equilibrium phase, the paper should state clearly whether Be11Fe is predicted to be stable or metastable within the computational accuracy and report the hull distance in the main text.
  3. [Abstract and Results (Fig. 6d)] The abstract and conclusion describe the Be11Fe power factor as 'the highest among known semiconductors under ambient conditions.' However, Fig. 6(d) compares a first-principles computed power factor with experimentally measured power factors of established thermoelectric materials. This comparison is not apples-to-apples: the computed value is an idealized prediction that neglects, for example, doping limitations, carrier scattering beyond the RTA/EPW treatment, and the PBE-vs-G0W0 gap issue raised above. The record claim should be rephrased as, for example, 'the highest predicted power factor among...' or benchmarked against computed power factors at the same level of theory.
  4. [Results (Bader charges and valence states); Table S1] The claim that Fe reaches a valence state of -5 is based on Bader charge partitioning (Table S1 gives a Bader charge of 4.84 e- on Fe in Be4Fe). Bader charges are a charge-partitioning scheme, not formal oxidation states, and calling this a 'valence state' of -5 overstates the chemical interpretation. The text should say 'a Bader charge of about -5 e-' or justify the valence assignment with additional criteria such as projected orbital occupations or a well-defined oxidation-state analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract vs. Results (p. 13 and Fig. 6)] The abstract reports 178 uW cm^-1 K^-2 at room temperature, while the Results text reports 184 uW cm^-1 K^-2 at 200 K and 178 uW cm^-1 K^-2 at 300 K; these numbers should be harmonized, and 'ambient conditions' cannot describe 200 K.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) defines a constant relaxation-time tensor tau_c^{alpha beta} as a ratio of conductivity to a velocity-weighted occupation factor; the notation should clarify that this is an effective constant used for the comparison in Fig. 5(b), not the full energy-resolved tau_{nk} from EPW used in the final transport coefficients.
  3. [Results, Type-II ISQ] The term 'type-II ISQ (fluxible interstitial quasi-atom)' is introduced without a crisp definition; the criterion distinguishing type-I and type-II ISQs should be stated at first use, beyond the qualitative ELF threshold used in the text.
  4. [Fig. 6 caption] Figure 6 should indicate which curves correspond to 300 K and where the 200 K maximum of 184 uW cm^-1 K^-2 appears, since the text refers to both temperatures.
  5. [Abstract and Conclusion] The phrase 'all known Be-Fe intermetallics' should be qualified as 'all known and newly predicted Be-Fe intermetallics studied here,' since the study does not exhaustively cover every possible Be-Fe composition or structure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted phases and thermoelectric power factor are independent first-principles outputs; minor self-citations are interpretive, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claims in this paper are outputs of a first-principles pipeline: USPEX evolutionary structure search, VASP/PBE energetics, G0W0 band gaps, EPW electron-phonon relaxation times, and BoltzTraP2 solution of the Boltzmann transport equation. The record power factor of 178 µW cm-1 K-2 at 300 K is computed, not fitted; the only free knob is the rigid-band chemical-potential shift, which is a standard doping variable and is optimized over, not tuned to reproduce a target PF. The insulating character of Be11Fe and Be4Fe is established from calculated band structures and gaps, and the Fe-anion/valence-state claims come from Bader and DOS analyses. The paper does cite prior work by the same group (Refs. 15, 16, 51, 60) for electride concepts and surface-state suggestions, but those citations are interpretive or speculative and are not the derivation of the PF or the gap. One genuine methodological caveat, which is a correctness risk rather than circularity, is that transport is computed from PBE Kohn-Sham eigenvalues (PBE gap 0.06 eV for Be11Fe) while the paper reports the G0W0 gap as 0.22 eV; the optimal PF lies near the band edge, so a GW-corrected band structure could change the quoted PF. No circular reduction is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central results rest on standard DFT, G0W0, and EPW machinery with no fitted external parameters, but the record PF and the stability assignment of Be11Fe depend on two hand-chosen quantities (chemical potential shift and a 4 meV/atom tolerance), and the interpretation of Fe as a -5 anion relies on a model-dependent charge partitioning.

free parameters (2)
  • chemical potential shift for optimal PF = -0.004 eV (300 K)
    The headline PF of 178 µW/cm K² is obtained by shifting the chemical potential by -0.004 eV from the intrinsic Fermi level, an optimization variable rather than a prediction for a specific dopant concentration.
  • convex hull tolerance for Be11Fe = 4 meV/atom
    Be11Fe is 4 meV/atom above the PBE convex hull; the authors assert this is within numerical accuracy and promote it to a ground state, which is a hand-chosen tolerance.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBE eigenvalues are adequate for transport calculations
    Transport and PF are computed with PBE Kohn-Sham energies, but the paper's reported gaps are G0W0 (0.22 eV vs PBE 0.06 eV for Be11Fe); no justification is given that PBE transport approximates G0W0 transport.
  • domain assumption Bader charge analysis can define formal oxidation states
    The claim that Fe reaches valence -5 is based on Bader partitioning, which is not an experimentally measurable oxidation state.
  • domain assumption The evolutionary algorithm with up to 28 atoms per cell and 60 generations samples the relevant configurational space
    No convergence study regarding the number of generations or cell sizes is provided, so the completeness of the structure search is assumed.
  • domain assumption ELF maxima above 0.74 identify electrides
    The electride classification relies on the conventional ELF plus charge density criterion from the electride literature.
invented entities (1)
  • type-II ISQ (fluxible interstitial quasi-atom)
    purpose: To explain interstitial charge accumulation in Be17Fe2, Be5Fe, and Be2Fe, where ELF is too low for conventional ISQs but Bader analysis shows charge concentration.
    This is a new classification introduced by the authors; no direct experimental observable distinguishes type-II ISQs from background interstitial charge, and it is defined purely by the ELF threshold (below 0.6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Distinctive Electronic Characteristics and Ultra-high Thermoelectric Power Factor in Be-Fe Intermetallics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DBIUXTJY

@misc{pith2026241115780,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Distinctive Electronic Characteristics and Ultra-high Thermoelectric Power Factor in Be-Fe Intermetallics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DBIUXTJY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15780}
}
abstract

Beryllium (Be) alloys are indispensable in cutting-edge applications due to their unique advantages. However, the scientific understanding about their structure and property is deficient, which greatly restricts their applications within a narrow field. In this work, a systematic investigation on the structure and properties of Be-Fe binary was carried out with first-principles unbiased evolutionary algorithms. Five new intermetallics unreported before, including insulating Be11Fe and Be4Fe, metallic Be3Fe, and metastable BeFe and BeFe2 were discovered, among which Be11Fe has a unique clathrate structure and is an electride. Surprisingly, we found that Fe unexpectedly acts as an anion in all known Be-Fe intermetallics, and its valence state can even reach -5, leading to the complete filling of its 3d orbitals. Most of these compounds exhibiting a gap or pseudogap at the Fermi level. Specifically, the band gap is determined as 0.22 eV and 0.85 eV for Be11Fe and Be4Fe at the level of single-shot GW, respectively. This is the first report of insulating phases in Be-based intermetallics. We also discovered that Be11Fe exhibits an impressive thermoelectric power factor of 178 ${\mu}W cm^{-1}K^2$ at room temperature, to our best knowledge, the highest among known semiconductors under ambient conditions, indicating its potential for waste heat harvesting and active cooling. These findings will deepen our understanding of Be-based and Fe-based compounds, and expand the application fields of Be-based alloys to a brand-new realm.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15780 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Convex hull of BexFey. Calculated formation enthalpy of BexFey with respect to the elemental solids, where the thermodynamically stable phases are represented by solid squares on the convex hull (solid line), and the metastable phases are represented by open squares connected by dashed line. On the whole, the structure of metastable NM phases BeFe2 and BeFe have a space group 𝐼4/𝑚𝑚𝑚 and 𝑃4/𝑛𝑚𝑚 , respectively. As Be … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Transport properties of Be4Fe and Be11Fe. (color online) (a) Calculated intrinsic electrical conductivity of Be11Fe and Be4Fe. (b) The calculated 𝜏𝑐 for along the x and y directions of Be11Fe and along the z direction of Be4Fe, respectively. (c) The lattice thermal conductivity (𝜅𝐿 ), electronic thermal conductivity (𝜅𝐸), and their sum (𝜅𝑇) of Be11Fe, along different directions, respectively. (d) The electronic ther… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Thermal electric properties of Be11Fe. (color online) (a) The electrical conductivity, (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. P. Gardner, J. C. Mather, M. Clampin, R. Doyon, M. A. Greenhouse, H. B. Hammel, J. B. Hutchings, P. Jakobsen, S. J. Lilly, K. S. Long, J. I. Lunine, M. J. McCaughrean, M. Mountain, J. Nella, G. H. Rieke, M. J. Rieke, H.-W. Rix, E. P. Smith, G. Sonneborn, M. Stiavelli, H. S. Stockman, R. A. Windhorst, G. S. Wright, The James Webb Space Telescope. Space ...

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Polmear, From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystals 4th edn (Elsevier, 2006)

    I. Polmear, From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystals 4th edn (Elsevier, 2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Cverna, ASM Ready Reference: Ther mal properties of metals (ASM International, 2002)

    F. Cverna, ASM Ready Reference: Ther mal properties of metals (ASM International, 2002)

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Gold, Evaluation of the stiffness coefficients for beryllium from ultrasonic measurements in polycrystalline and single crystal specimens

    L. Gold, Evaluation of the stiffness coefficients for beryllium from ultrasonic measurements in polycrystalline and single crystal specimens. Phys. Rev. 77, 390 (1950)

    work page 1950

  5. [5]

    Atomic, crystal, elastic, thermal, nuclear, and other properties of beryllium

    A. Goldberg, "Atomic, crystal, elastic, thermal, nuclear, and other properties of beryllium" (Tech. Rep. UCRL -TR-224850, Lawrence Livermore National Lab. Livermore, CA., 2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    K. A. Walsh, Beryllium chemistry and processing (ASM international, 2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Guoliang, W

    X. Guoliang, W. Qiangsong, M. Xujun, X. Baiqing, P. Lijun, The precipitation behavior and strengthening of a Cu –2.0 wt% Be alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 558, 326 - 330 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    R. W. Fenn Jr, R. A. Glass, R. A. Needham, M. A. Steinberg, Beryllium-Aluminum alloys. J. Spacecr. Rockets 2, 87-93 (1965)

    work page 1965

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    D. H. Carter, M. A. Bourke, Neutron diffraction study of the deformation behavior of Beryllium–Aluminum composites. Acta Mater. 48, 2885-2900 (2000)

    2000

  2. [10]

    K. M. Friederich, S. Jonsson, F. Aldinger, G. Petzow, The Beryllium-Nickel phase diagram. Z. MetaIlkd. 71, 584-587 (1980)

    1980

  3. [11]

    Gillam, H

    E. Gillam, H. Rooksby, L. Brownlee, Structural relationships in Beryllium – Titanium alloys. Acta Crystallogr. 17, 762-763 (1964)

    1964

  4. [12]

    J. Feng, R. G. Hennig, N. W. Ashcroft, R. Hoffmann, Emergent reduction of electronic state dimensionality in dense ordered Li -Be alloys. Nature 451, 445 -448 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    Y . Xu, C. Chen, B. Wu, Superconductivity in ordered LiBe alloy under high pressure: A first-principles study. Solid State Commun. 152, 151-154 (2012). [14 N. E. Alekseevskii, V . I. Nizhankovskii, V . N. Narozhnyi, E. P. Khlybov, A. V . Mitin, J. Mater. Chem. A, 12, 24370-243...

    2012

  6. [15]

    Zhang, Q

    L. Zhang, Q. Wu, S. Li, Y . Sun, X. Yan, Y . Chen, H. Y . Geng, Interplay of Anionic Quasi-Atoms and Interstitial Point Defects in Electrides: Abnormal Interstice Occupation and Colossal Charge State of Point Defects in Dense fcc -Lithium. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 6130-...

    2021

  7. [16]

    Zhang, H

    L. Zhang, H. Y . Geng, Q. Wu, Prediction of anomalous LA -TA splitting in electrides. Matter Radiat. Extremes 6, 038403 (2021)

    2021

  8. [17]

    Misch, Über zwei intermetallische Verbindungen des Berylliums mit Eisen

    L. Misch, Über zwei intermetallische Verbindungen des Berylliums mit Eisen. Die Naturwissenschaften 23, 287-288 (1935)

    1935

  9. [18]

    J. S. Gaev, R. S. Sokolov, The system Iron -Beryllium. Metallurg 4 (12), 42 -48 (1937)

    1937

  10. [19]

    R. J. Teitel, M. Cohen, The Beryllium -Iron system. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng. 185, 285-296 (1949)

    1949

  11. [20]

    A. J. Martin, A. Moore, The structure of Beryllium, with particular reference to temperatures above 1200°C. J. Less-Common Met. 1, 85-93 (1959)

    1959

  12. [21]

    M. K. Miller, M. G. Burke, Identification of an ordered hexagonal BeFe phase. J. Phys. Colloq. 49, C6_373-C6_378 (1988)

    1988

  13. [22]

    Tanner, H

    L. Tanner, H. Okamoto, The Be− Fe (Beryllium -Iron) system. Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 9, 494-508 (1988)

    1988

  14. [23]

    Johnson, G

    Q. Johnson, G. S. Smith, O. H. Krikorian, D. E. Sands, The crystal structure of RhBe6.6. Acta Cryst. B 26, 109-113 (1970)

    1970

  15. [24]

    Jönsson, K

    S. Jönsson, K. Kaltenbach, G. Petzow, Phase relations in the Beryllium-rich section of the system Beryllium-Copper-Iron. Int. J. Mater. Res. 73, 534-539 (1982)

    1982

  16. [25]

    Aldinger, Constitution of Beryllium and its alloys

    F. Aldinger, Constitution of Beryllium and its alloys. Beryllium Sci. Technol. 1, 235-305 (1979)

    1979

  17. [26]

    Levine, G

    E. Levine, G. Lütjering, Precipitation in the Beryllium -Iron system. J. Less - Common Met. 23, 343-357 (1971)

    1971

  18. [27]

    F. W. V on Batchelder, R. F. Raeuchle, The structure of a new series of MBe 12 compounds. Acta Crystallogr. 10, 648-649 (1957)

    1957

  19. [28]

    P. A. Burr, S. C. Middleburgh, R. W. Grimes, Crystal structure, thermodynamics, magnetics and disorder properties of Be –Fe–Al intermetallics. J. Alloys Compd. 639, 111-122 (2015)

    2015

  20. [29]

    A. Herr, R. Kuentzler, A. J. P. Meyer, Magnetization and specific heat of Fe –Be alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1375-1376 (1969)

    1969

  21. [30]

    A. R. Oganov, C. W. Glass, Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: principles and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244704 (2006)

    2006

  22. [33]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total -energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169-11186 (1996). J. Mater. Chem. A, 12, 24370-24379 (2024) 18

    1996

  23. [34]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865-3868 (1996)

    1996

  24. [35]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented -wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953-17979 (1994)

    1994

  25. [36]

    Kresse, D

    G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758-1775 (1999)

    1999

  26. [37]

    A. Togo, I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scripta Mater. 108, 1-5 (2015)

    2015

  27. [40]

    Baroni, P

    S. Baroni, P. Giannozzi, A. Testa, Green's-function approach to linear response in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1861-1864 (1987)

    1987

  28. [41]

    Gonze, C

    X. Gonze, C. Lee, Dynamical matrices, Born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density -functional perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. B 55, 10355-10368 (1997)

    1997

  29. [42]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Marti n- Samos, N. Marzari, F. ...

    2009

  30. [44]

    Distinctive Electronic Characteristics and Ultra - high Thermoelectric Power Factor in Be-Fe Intermetallics

    Supplementary Information for " Distinctive Electronic Characteristics and Ultra - high Thermoelectric Power Factor in Be-Fe Intermetallics "

  31. [45]

    Jessert, I

    B. Jessert, I. Vinczet, Magnetic Properties of Be xFe1-x Compounds near to Be 2Fe. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 6, 1567 (1976)

    1976

  32. [46]

    Zalkin, D

    A. Zalkin, D. E. Sands, R. G. Bedford, O. H. Krikorian, The beryllides of Ti, V , Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf and Ta. Acta Crystallogr. 14, 63-65 (1961)

    1961

  33. [47]

    Villars, Pearson's handbook: crystallographic data for intermetallic phases (ASM International: Materials Park, OH, 1997), vol

    P. Villars, Pearson's handbook: crystallographic data for intermetallic phases (ASM International: Materials Park, OH, 1997), vol. 1

    1997

  34. [48]

    Sanville, S

    E. Sanville, S. D. Kenny, R. Smith, G. Henkelman, Improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. J. Comput. Chem. 28, 899-908 (2007)

    2007

  35. [49]

    X. Dong, A. R. Oganov, H. Cui, X. -F. Zhou, H. -T. Wang, Electronegativity and chemical hardness of elements under pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2117416119 (2022). [50]L. Zhu, H. Liu, C. J. Pickard, G. Zou, Y . Ma, Reactions of xenon with iron and nickel are ...

    2022

  36. [52]

    Schäfer, B

    H. Schäfer, B. Eisenmann, W. Müller, Zintl phases: transitions between metallic and ionic bonding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 12, 694-712 (1973)

    1973

  37. [53]

    R. F. Berger, P. L. Walters, S. Lee, R. Hoffmann, Connecting the chemical and physical viewpoints of what determines structure: From 1-d chains to γ-brasses. Chem. Rev. 111, 4522-4545 (2011)

    2011

  38. [54]

    V . J. Yannello, D. C. Fredrickson, Generality of the 18 -n rule: intermetallic structural chemistry explained through isolobal analogies to transition metal complexes. Inorg. Chem. 54, 11385-11398 (2015)

    2015

  39. [55]

    Nagai, Effects of mechanical alloying and grinding on the preparation and thermoelectric properties of β-FeSi2 (overview)

    H. Nagai, Effects of mechanical alloying and grinding on the preparation and thermoelectric properties of β-FeSi2 (overview). Mater. Trans., JIM 36, 365-372 (1995)

    1995

  40. [56]

    Hadano, S

    Y . Hadano, S. Narazu, M. A. Avila, T. Onimaru, T. Takabatake, Thermoelectric and magnetic properties of a narrow -gap semiconductor FeGa 3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 013702 (2008)

    2008

  41. [57]

    Nishino, M

    Y . Nishino, M. Kato, S. Asano, K. Soda, M. Hayasaki, U. Mizutani, Semiconductorlike behavior of electrical resistivity in Heusler-type Fe2V Al Compound. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1909-1912 (1997)

    1997

  42. [58]

    S. A. Khandy, I. Islam, D. C. Gupta, R. Khenata, A. Laref, Lattice dynamics, mechanical stability and electronic structure of Fe-based Heusler semiconductors. Sci. Rep. 9, 1475 (2019)

    2019

  43. [59]

    Takabatake, K

    T. Takabatake, K. Suekuni, T. Nakayama, E. Kaneshita, Phonon -glass electron - crystal thermoelectric clathrates: Experiments and theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 669-716 (2014). [60]D. Wang, H. Song, L. Zhang, H. Wang, Y . Sun, F. Wu, Y . Chen, X. Chen, H. Geng, Universal Metallic...

    2014

  44. [61]

    R. He, D. Kraemer, J. Mao, L. Zeng, Q. Jie, Y . Lan, C. Li, J. Shuai, H. S. Kim, Y . Liu, D. Broido, C. W. Chu, G. Chen, Z. Ren, Achieving high power factor and output power density in p-type half-Heuslers Nb1-xTixFeSb. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 13576-13581 (2016)

    2016

  45. [62]

    W. Liu, H. S. Kim, Q. Jie, Z. Ren, Importance of high power factor in thermoelectric materials for power generation application: A perspective. Scripta Mater. 111, 3-9 (2016)

    2016

  46. [63]

    Zebarjadi, Electronic cooling using thermoelectric devices

    M. Zebarjadi, Electronic cooling using thermoelectric devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 203506 (2015)

    2015

  47. [64]

    Adams, M

    M. Adams, M. Verosky, M. Zebarjadi, J. Heremans, Active peltier coolers based on correlated and magnon-drag metals. Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 054008 (2019)

    2019

  48. [65]

    Komatsu, Y

    N. Komatsu, Y . Ichinose, O. S. Dewey, L. W. Taylor, M. A. Trafford, Y . Yomogida, G. Wehmeyer, M. Pasquali, K. Yanagi, J. Kono, Macroscopic weavable fibers of carbon nanotubes with giant thermoelectric power factor. Nat Commun. 12, 4931 (2021)

    2021

  49. [66]

    K. Wada, K. Munakata, J. H Kim, K. Yonehara, D. Wakai, M. Nakamichi, Oxidation resistance of Be 12Ti fabricated by plasma-sintering method. J. Nucl. Mater. J. Mater. Chem. A, 12, 24370-24379 (2024) 20 442, S494-S496 (2013)

    2024

  50. [67]

    V . E. Ivanov, V . F. Zelenskii, V . K. Khorenko, B. V . Matvienko, L. A. Kornienko, Sintered beryllium -base compositions: II. Corrosion properties and possibilities of raising corrosion resistance in humid atmospheres. Sov. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 7, 647-650 (1968)

    1968

  51. [68]

    Shockley, H

    W. Shockley, H. J. Queisser, Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p‐n junction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510-519 (1961)

    1961

  52. [69]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. L. Pope, I. R. T. Littleton, T. M. Tritt, V . Ponnambalam, Y . Xia, S. J. Poon, Effect of Sb doping on the thermoelectric properties of Ti-based half-Heusler compounds, TiNiSn1− xSbx. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2476-2478 (2000)

    2000

  53. [70]

    Joshi, H

    G. Joshi, H. Lee, Y . Lan, X. Wang, G. Zhu, D. Wang, R. W. Gould, D. C. Cuff, M. Y . Tang, M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Chen, Z. Ren, Enhanced thermoelectric figure-of-merit in nanostructured p -type silicon germanium bulk alloys. Nano Lett. 8, 4670 -4674 (2008). [71]L.-D. Zhao, S.-H...

    2008

  54. [71]

    C. W. Glass, A. R. Oganov, N. Hansen, USPEX —evolutionary crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 175, 713-720 (2006)

    2006

  55. [72]

    J. P. Heremans, V . Jovovic, E. S. Toberer, A. Saramat, K. Kurosaki, A. Charoenphakdee, S. Yamanaka, G. J. Snyder, Enhancement of thermoelectric efficiency in PbTe by distortion of the electronic density of states. Science 321, 554-557 (2008)

    2008

  56. [73]

    H. Muta, K. Kurosaki, S. Yamanaka, Thermoelectric properties of rare earth doped SrTiO3. J. Alloys Compd. 350, 292-295 (2003)

    2003

  57. [74]

    Y . S. Hor, A. Richardella, P. Roushan, Y . Xia, J. G. Checkelsky, A. Yazdani, M. Z. Hasan, N. P. Ong, R. J. Cava, p -type Bi 2Se3 for topological insulator and low - temperature thermoelectric applications. Phys. Rev. B 79, 195208 (2009). J. Mater. Chem. A, 12, 24370-24379 (2...

    2009

  58. [75]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab -initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15-50 (1996)

    1996

  59. [76]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total -energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169-11186 (1996)

    1996

  60. [77]

    H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin -zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  61. [78]

    W. Li, J. Carrete, N. A. Katcho, N. Mingo, ShengBTE: A solver of the Boltzmann transport equation for phonons. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1747-1758 (2014)

    2014

  62. [79]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin - Samos, N. Marzari, F. ...

    2009

  63. [80]

    Poncé, E

    S. Poncé, E. R. Margine, C. Verdi, F. Giustino, EPW: electron –phonon coupling, transport and superconducting properties using maximally localized Wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 209, 116-133 (2016)

    2016

  64. [81]

    G. K. H. Madsen, J. Carrete, M. J. Verstraete, BoltzTraP2, a program for interpolating band structures and calculating semi -classical transport coefficients. Comput. Phys. Commun. 231, 140-145 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.