Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FingER: Content Aware Fine-grained Evaluation with Reasoning for AI-Generated Videos

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.10358 v1 pith:DFKSD4HE submitted 2025-04-14 cs.CV cs.AI

FingER: Content Aware Fine-grained Evaluation with Reasoning for AI-Generated Videos

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords reasoningtextbfvideoscontentevaluationfine-grainedmodelquestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Recent advances in video generation have posed great challenges in the assessment of AI-generated content, particularly with the emergence of increasingly sophisticated models. The various inconsistencies and defects observed in such videos are inherently complex, making overall scoring notoriously difficult. In this paper, we emphasize the critical importance of integrating fine-grained reasoning into video evaluation, and we propose $\textbf{F}$ing$\textbf{ER}$, a novel entity-level reasoning evaluation framework that first automatically generates $\textbf{F}$ine-grained $\textbf{E}$ntity-level questions, and then answers those questions by a $\textbf{R}$easoning model with scores, which can be subsequently weighted summed to an overall score for different applications. Specifically, we leverage LLMs to derive entity-level questions across five distinct perspectives, which (i) often focus on some specific entities of the content, thereby making answering or scoring much easier by MLLMs, and (ii) are more interpretable. Then we construct a FingER dataset, consisting of approximately 3.3k videos and corresponding 60k fine-grained QA annotations, each with detailed reasons. Based on that, we further investigate various training protocols to best incentivize the reasoning capability of MLLMs for correct answer prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that a reasoning model trained using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a cold-start strategy achieves the best performance. Notably, our model surpasses existing methods by a relative margin of $11.8\%$ on GenAI-Bench and $5.5\%$ on MonetBench with only 3.3k training videos, which is at most one-tenth of the training samples utilized by other methods. Our code and dataset will be released soon.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SAGA: Source Attribution of Generative AI Videos

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SAGA is a multi-granular source attribution system for generative AI videos that identifies the exact generator with state-of-the-art accuracy using only 0.5% labeled data per class.

  2. AutoDrive-R$^2$: Incentivizing Reasoning and Self-Reflection Capacity for VLA Model in Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AutoDrive-R² adds four-step CoT reasoning with self-reflection to VLA models via SFT on nuScenesR²-6K and GRPO RL under spatial, dynamic, and smoothness rewards, reporting SOTA results on nuScenes and Waymo.