Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A phi meson moving through nuclear matter should have one mass for its transverse polarizations and a different, momentum-dependent mass for its longitudinal polarization, with the splitting growing quadratically with momentum.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 05:46 UTC pith:DFUYBEOC

load-bearing objection Careful two-scheme calculation showing a robust qualitative polarization splitting in the in-medium phi mass; the advertised quantitative double-peak is softer than the abstract implies. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.15971 v2 pith:DFUYBEOC submitted 2026-03-16 hep-ph nucl-th

Polarization-dependent mass modifications of φ meson with finite momentum in nuclear matter

Ahmad Jafar Arifi , Philipp Gubler , Kazuo Tsushima This is my paper
classification hep-ph nucl-th
keywords phi mesonnuclear matterpolarization splittingin-medium mass shiftkaon loopvector mean fieldLorentz symmetry breakingspectral function
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that inside nuclear matter, the usual single in-medium phi meson mass splits once the meson carries finite momentum. The transverse polarization keeps the same mass as at rest, while the longitudinal polarization gets lighter as the momentum increases, dropping like the square of the momentum. This follows from the coupling of the longitudinal mode to the vector mean field through derivative interactions in the kaon-loop self-energy. If true, fast phi mesons in nuclear reactions should display a two-peak spectral shape, a direct fingerprint of Lorentz-symmetry breaking by the medium. The pattern is stable across two different regularization schemes, making it a concrete prediction for experiments that separate polarization states.

Core claim

The paper claims that in nuclear matter the transverse and longitudinal phi polarization modes evolve differently with momentum: the transverse mass is independent of phi momentum, while the longitudinal mass decreases quadratically as momentum grows. The origin is traced to the self-energy operators: the transverse projector yields a momentum-independent piece, whereas the longitudinal projector produces a term proportional to V_omega^2 |p|^2 (times a logarithm), with V_omega the kaon vector mean field. Both covariant form-factor and dimensional regularization give the same imaginary part and same qualitative momentum dependence. At normal density, the longitudinal mass drops by a few perce

What carries the argument

The central object is the in-medium phi self-energy decomposed into transverse and longitudinal projectors. The kaon-loop and contact contributions come from an effective Lagrangian with phi-K-Kbar and phi-phi-K-Kbar couplings, with in-medium kaon masses and energies taken from the quark-meson coupling model. The decisive mechanism is the vector mean field V_omega: after shifting the loop energy, the longitudinal operator contains (q0 - V_omega)|p| - q_z E*_phi squared, which generates the quadratic V_omega^2 |p|^2 term in the longitudinal self-energy. The transverse operator has no such momentum dependence. This single mechanism creates the polarization splitting.

Load-bearing premise

The size of the predicted splitting depends on the strength of the vector mean field felt by kaons, which is fixed through a phenomenological enhancement factor fitted to the roughly 20 MeV kaon-nucleon repulsion; if that repulsion is smaller or arises from other dynamics, the quadratic decrease shrinks.

What would settle it

Measure the invariant mass distribution of phi -> K+ K- pairs produced in nuclear targets, selecting events with phi momentum near 2-3 GeV and separating longitudinal and transverse yields via the decay angular distribution (e.g., the phi -> K Kbar correlation). If the longitudinal and transverse peaks do not separate, or if the transverse peak shifts noticeably with momentum, the central claim is wrong.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At rest in nuclear matter, the phi mass drops by about 2-4% and its width grows to roughly 30-35 MeV at normal density, consistent with dilepton data.
  • At finite momentum, only the longitudinal mode becomes lighter; the transverse mode is frozen, so the longitudinal-transverse splitting grows with the square of the momentum.
  • The unpolarized phi spectral function develops a double-peak structure at momenta around 2-3 GeV, because the two modes separate in mass and width.
  • In the kinematic range of current dilepton measurements (beta-gamma below about 1.25), the peaks overlap into a single broad bump; only higher-momentum or polarization-resolved measurements reveal the splitting.
  • The longitudinal mass decrease matches QCD-sum-rule results, while the transverse behavior differs, offering an experimental way to distinguish theoretical models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same vector-mean-field-plus-derivative-coupling mechanism should produce analogous polarization splittings for other vector mesons (rho, omega, K*) in dense matter.
  • Because the quadratic term carries a renormalization-scale-dependent logarithm, the quantitative size of the splitting is not tightly fixed by the model; a future measurement would pin down that scale.
  • The transverse mode being exactly momentum-independent is a sharp falsifiable signature: any observed momentum drift of the transverse mass would imply additional medium effects beyond the kaon-loop mechanism.
  • If confirmed, the double-peak structure would be a clean example of Lorentz-symmetry breaking in strong-interaction matter, analogous to birefringence in optics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the in-medium φ-meson self-energy at finite three-momentum in symmetric nuclear matter, using an effective Lagrangian with K K̅ loops and the associated gauge-contact term. The in-medium kaon mass and vector potential are taken from the QMC model. The loop integrals are evaluated in two schemes, covariant form-factor regularization and dimensional regularization, with analytic expressions in Apps. A and B. Solving the on-shell condition m*_φ^2 = (m0_φ)^2 + Re Π(E*^2, p^2) gives polarization-dependent masses: the transverse mode is momentum independent, while the longitudinal mode decreases quadratically with |p| through a V_ω^2 |p|^2 term. The paper predicts a growing longitudinal–transverse splitting with momentum and density, and a double-peak spectral structure for |p| ≈ 2–3 GeV, with discussion of observability at J-PARC.

Significance. If the predicted polarization splitting is correct, it is a new, falsifiable result for vector mesons in a medium: it goes beyond the usual rest-frame treatment and gives a concrete target for angular-correlation measurements in φ → K K̅. The main strengths are the explicit analytic expressions in the appendices, the exact agreement of the imaginary parts between the two regularization schemes, and the fact that g_φ, m0_φ, Λ, μ, and a(μ) are fixed from vacuum properties and QMC inputs rather than fitted to the momentum-dependence. The qualitative behavior (transverse flat, longitudinal quadratic) is structural and scheme-independent. The main caveats are quantitative: the magnitude of the splitting and the advertised double-peak onset depend on the enhanced kaon–omega coupling and on a residual renormalization-scale dependence in the longitudinal |p|^2 term.

major comments (3)
  1. [App. B, Eqs. (B10) and (B19)] At p=0 the longitudinal expression in Eq. (B18) reduces exactly to the transverse expression in Eq. (B9). Therefore the analytic formulas for Re Π^T_total and Re Π^L_total must coincide when the V_ω^2 |p|^2 term vanishes. They do not: the finite constants differ, with −5/18 in Eq. (B10) and −8/15 in Eq. (B19). This is an internal inconsistency in the printed analytic expressions and would break the stated p=0 degeneracy if Eq. (B19) were used. Please correct the typo and verify the result by direct numerical integration of Eq. (B18).
  2. [Eqs. (51), (B18)–(B19), Sec. V.D] The advertised double-peak signature at |p| ≈ 2–3 GeV is governed by the |p|^2 coefficient of the longitudinal self-energy. In dimensional regularization this coefficient contains ln(m*_K^2/μ^2) (Eq. B19), and the subtraction constant a(μ) is fixed only by the vacuum p=0 condition, so this μ dependence is not removed. Varying μ from 0.5 to 0.7 GeV changes the coefficient by roughly a factor of two; the paper shows a band, but it does not state the resulting uncertainty in the peak separation or the onset momentum. Because this is the main quantitative observable claim, please provide an explicit estimate of the μ-dependence of the spectral splitting, or remove the scale ambiguity by a medium-dependent counterterm.
  3. [Sec. IV.A, Secs. V.B and V.D] The magnitude of the L–T splitting scales as V_ω^2. The kaon vector potential is obtained by the phenomenological enhancement g^q_{Kω} = 1.4^2 g^q_ω, chosen to reproduce the ~20 MeV K+N repulsion; the paper itself notes (Ref. [68]) that alternative mechanisms could generate the same repulsion without this coupling change. A modest uncertainty in V_ω translates into a quadratic uncertainty in the |p|^2 term and therefore in the momentum window where a double peak appears. The qualitative conclusion is robust, but the quantitative prediction would be strengthened by a sensitivity study in which the enhancement factor is varied or its uncertainty is stated explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure captions, Figs. 4–6] Typo: “Dimesnsional” should be “Dimensional”.
  2. [Sec. II.B, Eq. (23)] After the variable shift q0 → q0 − V_ω, the symbol q0 silently changes meaning: the propagators no longer contain V_ω, but the operators in Eq. (48) do. This is understandable but should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.
  3. [Sec. V.C, text after Eq. (58)] The claim that the explicit p^2-dependent corrections in Eq. (58) contribute only minor effects is not quantified. For the highest momenta considered, the factor 12 V_ω^2 |p|^2/(β^2 m*_φ^4) can be O(1) for reasonable V_ω values; a short numerical statement would make the claim more transparent.
  4. [Sec. V.D, Fig. 8] The normalization condition in Eq. (30) and the Breit–Wigner form in Eq. (29) are stated, but it would help to note explicitly that the plotted curves are normalized in s and that the 1/3–2/3 polarization weights are included. The comment in the text that the longitudinal peak height is comparable to the transverse one despite the 2/3 transverse weight is useful and could be expanded.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the polarization splitting follows structurally from the Lagrangian and QMC inputs, which are fixed independently of the predicted phi mass shift.

full rationale

The central claim is that the transverse in-medium phi mass is momentum-independent while the longitudinal mass decreases quadratically with momentum. This is derived, not fitted: the transverse operator O_T^* = 2 q_perp^2 has no |p| dependence (Eq. 47), while the longitudinal operator O_L^* = (4/m_phi*^2)([q0 - V_omega]|p| - qz E_phi*)^2 (Eq. 48) generates the explicit -2|p|^2 V_omega^2/m_phi*^2 (1/C^2) terms in Eqs. (51) and (B18). The parameters are fixed independently of the predicted phi polarization splitting: g_phi = 4.517 is fixed from the vacuum phi decay width, the bare mass and subtraction constant are fixed from the vacuum mass, and the in-medium kaon mass and vector potential V_omega come from the QMC model calibrated to nuclear saturation and the ~20 MeV K+N repulsion (Sec. IV.A). The self-citations [53,59] are inputs, but they are not circular: the QMC fitted quantities do not include the target phi splitting and are externally constrained by other hadronic observables. The paper itself flags the quantitative sensitivity of V_omega, noting that 'alternative mechanisms [68] could also produce a similar repulsive effect without modifying the coupling strength,' but this is a model-robustness caveat, not a reduction of the prediction to its inputs. Both regularization schemes give the same imaginary parts and the same structural p^2 dependence, and the longitudinal behavior is checked against the independent QCDSR analysis of Ref. [58]. I therefore find no step where an output is equivalent by construction to an input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles or mediators are introduced. The derivation relies on the effective phi-K-Kbar Lagrangian from a gauged kaon kinetic term (Sec. II.A), QMC mean-field inputs for m_K* and V_omega (Sec. II.D, Ref. [59]), and standard regularization. The phi coupling, bare mass, and subtraction constant are fixed from vacuum physics; the kaon-vector coupling enhancement is fitted to the K+N interaction. The central momentum-dependence prediction is not fitted, but its magnitude is tied to V_omega^2 and is renormalization-scale dependent in the dimensional-regularization scheme.

free parameters (5)
  • g_phi = 4.517
    phi-K-Kbar coupling fixed by reproducing the vacuum phi decay width 4.249 MeV (Sec. IV.A).
  • bare phi mass m0_phi (form-factor scheme) = 1.113, 1.164, 1.220 GeV for Lambda = 0.8, 0.9, 1.0 GeV
    Chosen to reproduce the physical vacuum phi mass; regulator-dependent.
  • form-factor cutoff Lambda = 0.8, 0.9, 1.0 GeV
    Scanned range; central results are shown as bands, not fixed by data.
  • renormalization scale mu and subtraction constant a(mu) = mu = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 GeV with a(mu) = -1.581, -1.216, -0.908
    Determined by requiring Re Pi = 0 in vacuum (Sec. IV.B).
  • kaon-vector mean-field coupling enhancement = g^q_{K omega} = 1.4^2 g^q_omega
    Phenomenological factor fixed to reproduce the ~20 MeV K+N repulsion (Sec. IV.A); controls V_omega^2 that multiplies the longitudinal p^2 term in the self-energy.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The phi meson couples to nuclear matter dominantly through K Kbar loops generated by the gauged kaon kinetic term; phi-N coupled-channel resonant contributions are negligible.
    Sec. II.A; the paper itself notes in Sec. VI that 'additional effects, such as coupled channels, should be included' for a more rigorous description.
  • domain assumption Nuclear matter is static, uniform, at rest, with scalar and vector mean fields (Hartree approximation).
    Sec. II.D; standard QMC model treatment of symmetric nuclear matter, with the expectation value of the vector mean field purely time-like.
  • domain assumption In-medium kaon dispersion is E_K(q) = sqrt(m_K*^2 + q^2) ± V_omega with m_K* = m_K - V_sigma.
    Sec. II.D, Eqs. (37)–(39), taken from the QMC model of Ref. [59].
  • domain assumption The kaon is a stable particle with zero width inside the loop.
    Sec. II.A: 'we assume that the kaon is a stable particle and has no width'.
  • standard math Standard QFT loop machinery (Feynman parameterization, Wick rotation, dimensional regularization, principal-value evaluation) applies to this non-renormalizable effective theory.
    Secs. III and Apps. A–B; the paper provides analytic expressions to back the numerical integrations.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21666 in / 15112 out tokens · 137637 ms · 2026-08-04T05:46:01.296688+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the in-medium properties of the $\phi$ meson with finite momentum, going beyond the commonly studied case at rest. In a nuclear medium, Lorentz invariance is broken, leading to distinct longitudinal and transverse polarization modes that evolve differently with density and momentum. Within an effective Lagrangian approach, we calculate the polarization-dependent mass shifts and width modifications of the $\phi$ meson arising from $K\bar{K}$ loops and mean-field interactions. The divergent loop integrals are regulated using two different schemes: a covariant form factor and dimensional regularization. Our results show that the mass shift of the transverse polarization is independent of the $\phi$-meson momentum, whereas that of the longitudinal polarization decreases quadratically with momentum. This difference originates from the coupling of the longitudinal mode to the vector mean field and derivative-type interactions in the self-energy. These effects have direct implications for experimental observables, especially for upcoming measurements at J-PARC, and provide a new prediction for experiments studying hadron dynamics in dense matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.15971 by Ahmad Jafar Arifi, Kazuo Tsushima, Philipp Gubler.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Self-energy of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. In-medium mass and energy of a kaon at rest in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: also shows that, in the form-factor scheme, the mass shift depends strongly on the cutoff values, with larger Λ leading to stronger mass reductions. However, the results in dimensional regularization are relatively insensitive to the renormalization scale. This is because a shift in µ can be partially absorbed into the subtrac￾tion constant a(µ). Despite quantitative differences, both schemes exhibit quali… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Momentum dependence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. In-medium width of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Unpolarized spectral functions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Polarization dependence of the $\phi$ meson from finite-temperature QCD sum rules

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Finite-temperature QCD sum rules predict momentum-dependent mass increases and growing transverse-longitudinal splitting for the phi meson, driven primarily by dimension-four spin-dependent thermal condensates.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 49 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Analytical expressions Here, we provide the analytic expressions for the form factor regularization. a. Contact termFirst of all, the self-energy of the contact term in Eqs. (51) and (50) is computed as Πλ con(p) =−N Z xdx xΛ2 −(1−x)m ∗2 K ,(A13) where the analytic result is given by Πλ con(p) =− N (Λ2 +m ∗2 K ) 1 + m∗2 K Λ2 +m ∗2 K ln Λ2 m∗2 K . (A14) b....

  2. [2]

    Longitudinal mode For the longitudinal mode, the loop contribution is given by ΠL loop(p) = 8ig2 ϕ m∗2 ϕ Z 1 0 dx Z d4q (2π)4 [q0 −V ω]|p| −qzE∗ ϕ 2 (q2 −∆ ∗)2 . (B11) Since the cross term vanishes by symmetry, the expres- sion reduces to OL loop = 4 m∗2 ϕ (qz)2E∗2 ϕ + (q0)2|p|2 +|p| 2V 2 ω .(B12) After performing the Wick rotation and extending the integ...

  3. [3]

    The momentum integrals are evaluated using dimensional regularization ind= 4−ϵdimensions

    T ransverse mode Including both the loop and contact contributions, the transverse self-energy can be written as ΠT total(p) = 4ig 2 ϕ Z ddq (2π)d Z 1 0 dx P T µνqµqν D∗2 ∆ + 1 D∗ K , (B4) where, working inddimensions, we have used the identity q2 ⊥ =P T µνqµqν. The momentum integrals are evaluated using dimensional regularization ind= 4−ϵdimensions. Usin...

  4. [4]

    G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Scaling effective Lagrangians in a dense medium, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 2720 (1991)

    1991

  5. [5]

    G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Chiral restoration in hot and/or dense matter, Phys. Rept.269, 333 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9504250

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  6. [6]

    Leupold, V

    S. Leupold, V. Metag, and U. Mosel, Hadrons in strongly interacting matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E19, 147 (2010), arXiv:0907.2388 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    R. S. Hayano and T. Hatsuda, Hadron properties in the nuclear medium, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2949 (2010), arXiv:0812.1702 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    J. Kim, P. Gubler, and S. H. Lee,ϕmeson properties in nuclear matter from QCD sum rules with chirally sepa- rated four-quark condensates, Phys. Rev. D105, 114053 (2022), arXiv:2204.11440 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Hatsuda and S

    T. Hatsuda and S. H. Lee, QCD sum rules for vector mesons in the nuclear medium, Phys. Rev. C46, R34 (1992)

    1992

  10. [10]

    Gubler and K

    P. Gubler and K. Ohtani, Constraining the strangeness content of the nucleon by measuring theϕmeson mass shift in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. D90, 094002 (2014), arXiv:1404.7701 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Gubler and W

    P. Gubler and W. Weise, Phi meson spectral moments and QCD condensates in nuclear matter, Nucl. Phys. A 954, 125 (2016), arXiv:1602.09126 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, L. Lellouch, K. K. Szabo, C. Torrero, and L. Varnhorst, Ab-initio calcula- tion of the proton and the neutron’s scalar couplings for new physics searches, (2020), arXiv:2007.03319 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Durret al., Lattice computation of the nucleon scalar quark contents at the physical point, Phys

    S. Durret al., Lattice computation of the nucleon scalar quark contents at the physical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 172001 (2016), arXiv:1510.08013 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Y.-B. Yang, A. Alexandru, T. Draper, J. Liang, and K.- F. Liu (xQCD),πN and strangeness sigma terms at the physical point with chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D94, 054503 (2016), arXiv:1511.09089 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Abdel-Rehim, C

    A. Abdel-Rehim, C. Alexandrou, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, C. Kallidonis, G. Kout- sou, and A. Vaquero Aviles-Casco (ETM), Direct Eval- uation of the Quark Content of Nucleons from Lattice QCD at the Physical Point, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 252001 (2016), arXiv:1601.01624 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    S.-H. Kim, T. S. H. Lee, S.-i. Nam, and Y. Oh, Dynamical model ofϕmeson photoproduction on the nucleon and He4, Phys. Rev. C104, 045202 (2021), arXiv:2108.12039 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    G. S. Bali, S. Collins, P. Georg, D. Jenkins, P. Korcyl, A. Sch¨ afer, E. E. Scholz, J. Simeth, W. S¨ oldner, and S. Weish¨ aupl (RQCD), Scale setting and the light baryon spectrum in N f = 2 + 1 QCD with Wilson fermions, JHEP05, 035, arXiv:2211.03744 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Aokiet al.(Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), FLAG review 2024, Phys

    Y. Aokiet al.(Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), FLAG review 2024, Phys. Rev. D113, 014508 (2026), arXiv:2411.04268 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Oh and H

    Y.-S. Oh and H. C. Bhang, Asymmetries in phi photopro- duction and the OZI violation, Phys. Rev. C64, 055207 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0104068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Tolos and L

    L. Tolos and L. Fabbietti, Strangeness in Nuclei and Neu- tron Stars, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.112, 103770 (2020), arXiv:2002.09223 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Y. Lyu, T. Doi, T. Hatsuda, Y. Ikeda, J. Meng, K. Sasaki, and T. Sugiura, Attractive N-ϕinteraction and two-pion tail from lattice QCD near physical point, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074507 (2022), arXiv:2205.10544 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    L. M. Abreu, P. Gubler, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Mar- tinez Torres, and A. Hosaka, A study of theϕN cor- relation function, Phys. Lett. B860, 139175 (2025), arXiv:2409.05170 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Metag, M

    V. Metag, M. Nanova, and E. Y. Paryev, Me- son–nucleus potentials and the search for meson–nucleus bound states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.97, 199 (2017), arXiv:1706.09654 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Balassa, K

    G. Balassa, K. Aoki, P. Gubler, S. H. Lee, H. Sako, and G. Wolf, Studying the In-MediumφMeson Spectrum Through Kaons in Proton–Nucleus Reactions, PTEP 2025, 113C01 (2025), arXiv:2508.11344 [hep-ph]. 16

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Cassing and E

    W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Parton-Hadron- String Dynamics: an off-shell transport approach for relativistic energies, Nucl. Phys. A831, 215 (2009), arXiv:0907.5331 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    Muhlich, T

    P. Muhlich, T. Falter, C. Greiner, J. Lehr, M. Post, and U. Mosel, Photoproduction of phi mesons from nuclei, Phys. Rev. C67, 024605 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0210079

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  27. [27]

    Gubler, M

    P. Gubler, M. Ichikawa, T. Song, and E. Bratkovskaya, Production and in-medium modification ofφmesons in proton-nucleus reactions from a transport approach, Phys. Rev. C111, 034908 (2025), arXiv:2408.15364 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    W. S. Chung, C. M. Ko, and G.-Q. Li, Seeing phi meson through the dilepton spectra in heavy ion collisions, Nucl. Phys. A641, 357 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9803059

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  29. [29]

    M. Ichikawaet al.(KEK-PS E325), Analysis of Spec- tral Modification ofφMesons at Finite Density Using a Transport Approach in 12 GeV pA Reactions, PTEP 2025, 093D01 (2025), arXiv:2507.00420 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    C. M. Ko and B. H. Sa, Phi meson production in hadronic matter, Phys. Lett. B258, 6 (1991)

    1991

  31. [31]

    W. S. Chung, G.-Q. Li, and C. M. Ko, Phi meson produc- tion in heavy ion collisions at SIS energies, Nucl. Phys. A625, 347 (1997), arXiv:nucl-th/9704002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  32. [32]

    T. Song, J. Aichelin, and E. Bratkovskaya, In-medium effects inϕmeson production in heavy-ion collisions from subthreshold to relativistic energies, Phys. Rev. C106, 024903 (2022), arXiv:2205.10251 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    S. Pal, C. M. Ko, and Z.-w. Lin, Phi meson production in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Nucl. Phys. A707, 525 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0202086

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  34. [34]

    B. B. Backet al.(E917), Production of phi mesons in Au+Au collisions at 11.7-A-GeV/c, Phys. Rev. C69, 054901 (2004), arXiv:nucl-ex/0304017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [35]

    B. I. Abelevet al.(STAR), Measurements of phi meson production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C79, 064903 (2009), arXiv:0809.4737 [nucl- ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Sakumaet al.(E325), Study of nuclear matter mod- ification of decay widths inϕ→e +e− andϕ→K +K − channels, Phys

    F. Sakumaet al.(E325), Study of nuclear matter mod- ification of decay widths inϕ→e +e− andϕ→K +K − channels, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 152302 (2007), arXiv:nucl- ex/0606029

    arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Steinheimer, T

    J. Steinheimer, T. Reichert, and M. Bleicher, Determina- tion of theϕ-meson production process and its absorption cross section via directed flow, Phys. Lett. B869, 139870 (2025), arXiv:2507.19289 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Ishikawaet al., phi photo-production from Li, C, Al, and Cu nuclei atE(γ) = 1.5 GeV to 2.4 GeV, Phys

    T. Ishikawaet al., phi photo-production from Li, C, Al, and Cu nuclei atE(γ) = 1.5 GeV to 2.4 GeV, Phys. Lett. B608, 215 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0411016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  39. [39]

    Mutoet al.(KEK-PS-E325), Evidence for in-medium modification of the phi meson at normal nuclear den- sity, Phys

    R. Mutoet al.(KEK-PS-E325), Evidence for in-medium modification of the phi meson at normal nuclear den- sity, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 042501 (2007), arXiv:nucl- ex/0511019

    arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    Adamczewski-Muschet al.(HADES), Strong absorp- tion of hadrons with hidden and open strangeness in nuclear matter, Phys

    J. Adamczewski-Muschet al.(HADES), Strong absorp- tion of hadrons with hidden and open strangeness in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 022002 (2019), arXiv:1812.03728 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    M. H. Woodet al.(CLAS), Absorption of theωandϕ Mesons in Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 112301 (2010), arXiv:1006.3361 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    Polyanskiyet al., Measurement of the in-medium phi- meson width in proton-nucleus collisions, Phys

    A. Polyanskiyet al., Measurement of the in-medium phi- meson width in proton-nucleus collisions, Phys. Lett. B 695, 74 (2011), arXiv:1008.0232 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    Hartmannet al., Momentum dependence of the phi- meson nuclear transparency, Phys

    M. Hartmannet al., Momentum dependence of the phi- meson nuclear transparency, Phys. Rev. C85, 035206 (2012), arXiv:1201.3517 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  44. [44]

    Aokiet al., Experimental investigation of vector mesons in medium through dielectron decay at J-PARC, J

    K. Aokiet al., Experimental investigation of vector mesons in medium through dielectron decay at J-PARC, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol.3, 100019 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Yokkaichiet al., Electron pair spectrometer at the J- PARC 50-GeV PS to explore the chiral symmetry in QCD (2007)

    S. Yokkaichiet al., Electron pair spectrometer at the J- PARC 50-GeV PS to explore the chiral symmetry in QCD (2007)

    2007

  46. [46]

    Naruki, Hadron physics at J-PARC, PTEP2012, 02B013 (2012)

    M. Naruki, Hadron physics at J-PARC, PTEP2012, 02B013 (2012)

    2012

  47. [47]

    Aokiet al., Experimental Study of In-medium Spec- tral Change of Vector Mesons at J-PARC, Few Body Syst.64, 63 (2023)

    K. Aokiet al., Experimental Study of In-medium Spec- tral Change of Vector Mesons at J-PARC, Few Body Syst.64, 63 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Asakawa and C

    M. Asakawa and C. M. Ko, Phi meson mass in hot and dense matter, Nucl. Phys. A572, 732 (1994)

    1994

  49. [49]

    Sakoet al., Experimental studies of in-medium mod- ification ofϕmeson mass throughϕ→K +K − decays, J

    H. Sakoet al., Experimental studies of in-medium mod- ification ofϕmeson mass throughϕ→K +K − decays, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol.1-2, 100012 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    J. G. Messchendorpet al., Hadron Physics Opportunities at F AIR, (2025), arXiv:2512.15986 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    C. M. Ko, P. Levai, X. J. Qiu, and C. T. Li, Phi meson in dense matter, Phys. Rev. C45, 1400 (1992)

    1992

  52. [52]

    Cabrera, A

    D. Cabrera, A. N. Hiller Blin, and M. J. Vicente Va- cas,ϕmeson self-energy in nuclear matter fromϕN resonant interactions, Phys. Rev. C95, 015201 (2017), arXiv:1609.03880 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Klingl, T

    F. Klingl, T. Waas, and W. Weise, Modification of the phi meson spectrum in nuclear matter, Phys. Lett. B431, 254 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9709210

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  54. [54]

    Zschocke, O

    S. Zschocke, O. P. Pavlenko, and B. Kampfer, Evalua- tion of QCD sum rules for light vector mesons at finite density and temperature, Eur. Phys. J. A15, 529 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0205057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  55. [55]

    Cabrera and M

    D. Cabrera and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phi meson mass and decay width in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C67, 045203 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0205075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    Kaur and A

    M. Kaur and A. Kumar,ϕmeson properties in dense res- onance matter at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D112, 014030 (2025), arXiv:2505.07065 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    benefited from discussions at the Reimei Workshop on In-Medium Modification of Vector Mesons held at Yonsei University and acknowledges the support and hospitality

    A.J.A. benefited from discussions at the Reimei Workshop on In-Medium Modification of Vector Mesons held at Yonsei University and acknowledges the support and hospitality. A.J.A. was supported by the JAEA Post- doctoral Fellowship Program and partly by the PUTI Q1 Grant from the University of Indonesia under Con- tract No. PKS-206/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2025. ...

    2025

  58. [58]

    J. J. Cobos-Mart ´ ınez, K. Tsushima, G. Krein, and A. W. Thomas,ϕmeson mass and decay width in nu- clear matter and nuclei, Phys. Lett. B771, 113 (2017), arXiv:1703.05367 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Ahmad, N

    Z. Ahmad, N. Chahal, A. Kumar, and S. Dutt, Impact of Finite Volume on Kaon, Antikaon, andϕMeson Masses and Decay Widths in Asymmetric Strange Hadronic Mat- ter, PTEP2025, 013B03 (2025), arXiv:2407.05263 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Mondal and A

    A. Mondal and A. Mishra,ϕmeson in nuclear matter and atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. D111, 094037 (2025), arXiv:2502.08320 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    S. H. Lee, Vector mesons in-medium with finite three momentum, Phys. Rev. C57, 927 (1998), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 58, 3771 (1998)], arXiv:nucl-th/9705048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  62. [62]

    Kim and P

    H. Kim and P. Gubler, Theϕmeson with finite mo- mentum in a dense medium, Phys. Lett. B805, 135412 (2020), arXiv:1911.08737 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Tsushima, K

    K. Tsushima, K. Saito, A. W. Thomas, and S. V. Wright, In-medium kaon and antikaon properties in the quark meson coupling model, Phys. Lett. B429, 239 (1998), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 436, 453–453 (1998)], arXiv:nucl- th/9712044

    arXiv 1998

  64. [64]

    I. W. Park, H. Sako, K. Aoki, P. Gubler, and S. H. Lee, Disentangling longitudinal and transverse modes of the ϕmeson through dilepton and kaon decays, Phys. Rev. D107, 074033 (2023), arXiv:2211.16949 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Gale and J

    C. Gale and J. I. Kapusta, Vector dominance model at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. B357, 65 (1991)

    1991

  66. [66]

    P. A. M. Guichon, A Possible Quark Mechanism for the Saturation of Nuclear Matter, Phys. Lett. B200, 235 (1988)

    1988

  67. [67]

    Saito, K

    K. Saito, K. Tsushima, and A. W. Thomas, Nucleon and hadron structure changes in the nuclear medium and im- pact on observables, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.58, 1 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0506314

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  68. [68]

    P. A. M. Guichon, J. R. Stone, and A. W. Thomas, 17 Quark–Meson-Coupling (QMC) model for finite nuclei, nuclear matter and beyond, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.100, 262 (2018), arXiv:1802.08368 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    G. E. Brown, C. M. Ko, and K. Kubodera, Strangeness production in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Z. Phys. A 341, 301 (1992)

    1992

  70. [70]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    Fuchs, Kaon production in heavy ion reactions at in- termediate energies, Prog

    C. Fuchs, Kaon production in heavy ion reactions at in- termediate energies, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.56, 1 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0507017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    A. J. Arifi, P. T. P. Hutauruk, and K. Tsushima, In- medium properties of the light and heavy-light mesons in a light-front quark model, Phys. Rev. D107, 114010 (2023), arXiv:2302.12382 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    I. W. Park, H. Sako, K. Aoki, P. Gubler, and S. H. Lee, Identifying the transverse and longitudinal modes of theK ∗ andK 1 mesons through their angular- dependent decay modes, Phys. Rev. D109, 114042 (2024), arXiv:2403.18288 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    S. Yeo, H. Kim, and S. H. Lee,K ± 1 mesons moving in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. D110, 014013 (2024), arXiv:2404.04532 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024