REVIEW 4 cited by
A Survey on Large Language Models with Multilingualism: Recent Advances and New Frontiers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey on Large Language Models with Multilingualism: Recent Advances and New Frontiers
read the original abstract
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrates remarkable multilingual capabilities in natural language processing, attracting global attention in both academia and industry. To mitigate potential discrimination and enhance the overall usability and accessibility for diverse language user groups, it is important for the development of language-fair technology. Despite the breakthroughs of LLMs, the investigation into the multilingual scenario remains insufficient, where a comprehensive survey to summarize recent approaches, developments, limitations, and potential solutions is desirable. To this end, we provide a survey with multiple perspectives on the utilization of LLMs in the multilingual scenario. We first rethink the transitions between previous and current research on pre-trained language models. Then we introduce several perspectives on the multilingualism of LLMs, including training and inference methods, information retrieval, model security, multi-domain with language culture, and usage of datasets. We also discuss the major challenges that arise in these aspects, along with possible solutions. Besides, we highlight future research directions that aim at further enhancing LLMs with multilingualism. The survey aims to help the research community address multilingual problems and provide a comprehensive understanding of the core concepts, key techniques, and latest developments in multilingual natural language processing based on LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Managing Map Cardinality in Automatic Disease Classification Mapping: Balancing Precision, Recall and Coverage
A blocking-plus-LLM-matching method delivers higher precision and broader coverage than threshold or top-K baselines while maintaining comparable recall on ICD version mapping tasks.
-
When Models Meet Users: An Empirical Study of Perceptions of General LLMs and Multimodal LLMs on Hugging Face
Across 662 annotated Hugging Face threads, gated access (dominated by Llama), multimodal generation quality, and deployment/invocation complexity are the most prominent user concerns.
-
When Models Meet Users: An Empirical Study of Perceptions of General LLMs and Multimodal LLMs on Hugging Face
Hugging Face discussions show that access barriers, output quality, and setup complexity are the main user concerns for both general and multimodal LLMs.
-
Sentra-Guard: A Real-Time Multilingual Defense Against Adversarial LLM Prompts
Sentra-Guard reports 99.96% detection of adversarial LLM prompts with AUC 1.00 and ASR of 0.004% using a hybrid SBERT-FAISS and transformer classifier architecture with multilingual translation and human feedback.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.