Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 91 references

Spectral methods plus comoving drivers yield 20-orbit beyond-GR black-hole waveforms with phase errors under one radian, distinguishable from general relativity and merging earlier.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 21:07 UTC pith:DJM3VL4K

load-bearing objection Longest quantified sGB waveforms via spectral methods plus a new comoving driver; physical earlier-merger claim is credible but still rests on tracking fidelity near merger. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27991 v1 pith:DJM3VL4K submitted 2026-07-30 gr-qc

Towards long and accurate numerical relativity waveforms of binary black holes beyond general relativity

Guillermo Lara , Harald P. Pfeiffer , Nils Deppe , Lawrence E. Kidder , Geoffrey Lovelace , Sizheng Ma , Alexandra Macedo , Jordan Moxon
show 4 more authors
Kyle C. Nelli Mark A. Scheel William Throwe Nils L. Vu
This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords numerical relativitybeyond general relativityscalar Gauss-Bonnet gravityfixing-the-equationsbinary black holesgravitational waveformsspectral methodsCauchy-characteristic evolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that spectral numerical relativity, combined with the fixing-the-equations method and new comoving driver equations, can produce long, accurate gravitational and scalar waveforms for binary black holes in a genuine alternative theory of gravity. Focusing on shift-symmetric scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, the authors evolve equal-mass, nonspinning, eccentricity-reduced binaries through more than twenty orbits, extract both gravitational and scalar waves at future null infinity, and keep accumulated phase errors at or below about one radian after forty-plus gravitational-wave cycles. The phase difference relative to pure general relativity is larger than the numerical error, so the waveforms are distinguishable, and the beyond-GR corrections cause the binary to coalesce earlier than in Einstein gravity. The result matters because next-generation detectors will demand high-fidelity waveforms that include consistent strong-field deviations from general relativity; these simulations supply a concrete path toward injection studies, post-Newtonian comparisons, and calibration of beyond-GR waveform models.

Core claim

The combination of discontinuous-Galerkin spectral methods and the fixing-the-equations approach, equipped with new comoving driver equations that exploit the approximate helical symmetry of quasicircular binaries, produces the longest published waveforms for a genuine beyond-GR theory (shift-symmetric scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity). For equal-mass nonspinning systems the gravitational and scalar (2,2) modes are extracted at future null infinity with phase errors ≲1 rad after 40+ GW cycles; the physical phase shift relative to GR exceeds numerical truncation error and yields an earlier merger.

What carries the argument

Comoving driver equations: auxiliary variables Σ that track the beyond-GR source terms are evolved with a critically damped oscillator written in the binary’s comoving frame, (∂_t + ℒ_v)²Σ + … = −(Σ − S), so that stationary solutions are recovered exactly and orbital motion is Lie-dragged rather than fought by the driver.

Load-bearing premise

The auxiliary variables driven by the comoving equations stay close enough to the true beyond-GR sources, over twenty orbits and through merger, that the simulated dynamics really are those of the intended theory rather than an uncontrolled approximation.

What would settle it

An independent code using a different well-posed formulation of the same shift-symmetric scalar Gauss-Bonnet theory, run on the identical equal-mass nonspinning initial data, either reproduces the earlier coalescence and the reported phase difference versus GR within the claimed error bars, or shows a systematic late-inspiral discrepancy once driver parameters and resolution are varied.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Long beyond-GR waveforms become available for injection studies that stress-test parameterized tests of general relativity.
  • Precise numerical-to-post-Newtonian comparisons of the scalar and gravitational phasing in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity are now feasible.
  • Effective-one-body or other phenomenological waveform models beyond GR can be calibrated against these multi-orbit NR data in the nonlinear regime.
  • The same spectral-plus-comoving-driver infrastructure can be retargeted to other effective-field-theory extensions and scalar-tensor theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the earlier-merger result survives cross-code checks, existing claims of delayed merger in the same theory will need systematic revision of initial-data or gauge choices.
  • Extending the method to spinning or unequal-mass binaries will immediately expose whether charge-flip or eccentricity-injection phenomena remain controllable under the comoving driver.
  • The demonstrated sub-radian phase control over twenty orbits sets a concrete accuracy target that any competing beyond-GR NR scheme must meet before its waveforms can be used for next-generation detector forecasts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This Letter reports long numerical-relativity waveforms of equal-mass, nonspinning black-hole binaries in shift-symmetric scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, obtained in SpECTRE by combining spectral methods with the fixing-the-equations approach and a new class of comoving driver equations for the auxiliary fields Σ. The authors extract gravitational and scalar waveforms at future null infinity via CCE, map them to the BMS inspiral superrest frame, reduce eccentricity to ≲10^{-3}, and quote phase errors ≲1 rad after 40+ GW cycles (~20 orbits). They further report that the sGB–GR phase difference exceeds numerical truncation and driver-parameter errors (Fig. 3) and that increasing the dimensionless coupling advances the coalescence time relative to GR (Fig. 4).

Significance. Long, controlled beyond-GR waveforms are a genuine bottleneck for injection studies, PN comparisons, and calibration of models such as the sGB EOB construction of Julié et al. The work advances the state of the art by (i) introducing comoving drivers that exploit approximate helical symmetry, (ii) implementing the full tensor driver sector with spectral methods, and (iii) applying modern GR infrastructure (CCE for both strain and scalar, BMS frame fixing, automated eccentricity reduction) to a theory whose principal part differs from GR. The explicit error budget separating driver, truncation, and physical sGB–GR phase differences is a clear strength. If the tracking and initial-data caveats are adequately controlled, the result is a useful stepping stone for strong-field tests of gravity.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theory / Results, Eq. (4), Fig. 3] The physical interpretation of the sGB–GR phase offset and earlier coalescence (Figs. 3–4) rests on the auxiliaries Σ remaining faithful trackers of the true beyond-GR sources S over the full inspiral–merger. The only quantitative control shown is the phase difference under variation of σ̂ (≲10^{-3} rad), while the σ̂2=1/16 run already fails through merger and the text invokes the empirical rule σ≳ℓ². Because helical symmetry (and thus the Lie-drag term in Eq. 4) degrades near merger, and because second-time-derivative pieces of S are treated perturbatively under the EFT assumption precisely where curvature peaks, a direct residual diagnostic (e.g., max|Σ−S| or a norm on extraction spheres through the late inspiral) should be reported in the Letter, or at least summarized from the companion, so that the reader can judge whether the accumulated ~0.1–1 rad offset is free of systematic driv
  2. [Methodology] Initial data are GR XCTS solutions plus a small scalar seed; the BHs then scalarize during the early evolution. The eccentricity-reduction target is set after scalarization, which is sensible, but the Letter does not quantify residual orbital or scalar transients (or the sensitivity to the seed amplitude) that could bias the early-inspiral alignment window used for ΔΦ and for the coalescence-time comparison in Fig. 4. A short statement of the residual eccentricity after reduction, the duration of the scalarization transient, and any checks that the aligned early-inspiral segment is free of that transient is needed to support the claim that the phase difference is physical rather than an initial-data artifact.
  3. [Results, Fig. 4 and footnote [77]] The earlier-coalescence conclusion is presented as being at odds with Corman et al. (arXiv:2511.19073v1), with a footnote that private correspondence indicates those authors’ updated results no longer show a delayed merger. For a load-bearing physical claim in a Letter, the comparison should be made to a citable public result (or the claim should be framed more cautiously as applying to the equal-mass nonspinning sector under the present driver and ID setup), and the alignment procedure and mass/coupling normalizations used in Fig. 4 should be stated explicitly enough that an independent group can reproduce the time-to-merger shift.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introduction claim the ‘longest waveforms in the literature’ for a genuine beyond-GR theory. A brief quantitative comparison (cycles or orbits) to the longest published sGB or other beyond-GR binary runs would make that claim falsifiable and more useful to readers.
  2. [Theory / Fig. 4] Notation: ℓ̂² ≡ √κ ℓ²/m² is introduced as the dimensionless coupling, but Fig. 4 uses multiples of ℓ̂²_1=1/40 while the main run uses 1/20; a single consistent definition and a sentence on how component mass m is measured (Christodoulou, apparent-horizon, etc.) would help.
  3. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 caption refers to a vertical deformation ‘proportional to the dynamical scalar Ψ’ but does not state the scale or whether the slice is gauge-fixed; a one-line clarification would improve readability.
  4. [Throughout / Ref. [50]] The companion paper [50] is cited as ‘in prep’ for residual diagnostics and implementation details. For reproducibility, the Letter should state which diagnostics are deferred and, if possible, give a public repository or DOI plan for the waveforms.
  5. [Global] Typographical: ‘L VK’ spacing, ‘thisLetter’ / ‘thisLetter’ missing spaces, and ‘Juli´ e’ accent rendering appear in several places; a copy-edit pass is warranted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: numerical experiment with independent resolution/driver/GR controls; physical sGB–GR offset is not forced by fit or definition.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing claims are empirical outputs of controlled NR runs (longest sGB waveforms, phase error ≲1 rad over 40+ cycles, sGB–GR phase offset larger than truncation and driver-parameter error, earlier coalescence vs GR). The comoving driver (Eq. 4) and free knobs {σ, τ} are numerical tracking devices, varied explicitly in Fig. 3; they are not fitted to the coalescence-time or phase-shift targets. Alignment uses a fixed early-inspiral window; the GR baseline is an independent ˆℓ=0 run. Self-citations (fixing-the-equations literature, SpECTRE methods, companion [50] for residual diagnostics) supply method context and deferred checks but do not define or force the reported sGB–GR difference. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction. Weaknesses (tracking fidelity near merger, GR initial data, EFT truncation) are correctness/assumption risks, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the fixing-the-equations reformulation as a proxy for sGB, on spectral DG evolution in SpECTRE, and on several modeling choices (GR initial data, EFT truncation, helical comoving driver, empirical σ ≳ ℓ²). Free numerical parameters control tracking tightness; the physical coupling ℓ̂ is an input scan, not a fit to GW data. No new fundamental fields beyond the standard sGB scalar are invented; the ‘comoving driver’ is a numerical device.

free parameters (3)
  • driver timescale σ (and τ=2√σ) = σ̂ = 1/4 and 1 used as primary; empirical requirement σ ≳ ℓ²
    Freely chosen positive parameters that set how strictly auxiliary variables track the beyond-GR sources; varied as σ̂ ∈ {4,1,1/4,1/16} to bound method error. Not fitted to observations; chosen for stability and tracking.
  • dimensionless coupling ℓ̂² = √κ ℓ²/m² = primary run ℓ̂² = 1/20; comparison set {0, 1/40, 2/40, 3/40}
    Physical beyond-GR coupling scanned at values such as 1/20 and multiples of 1/40; input theory parameter, not fitted to produce the phase result.
  • initial scalar seed amplitude = described only as ‘small’
    Small initial perturbation to Ψ on GR XCTS data; grows into steady scalar hair. Amplitude is a numerical choice affecting early transients.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Fixing-the-equations: evolving □Ψ=Σ, R_ab=Σ_ab with drivers that track the true sGB sources yields dynamics equivalent to the original theory when tracking is tight.
    Core of the method (Theory and Methodology sections); justified by prior literature (Cayuso, Franchini, Cayuso–Figueras–França–Lehner) but not proved equivalent for 20-orbit binaries here.
  • domain assumption EFT truncation: source terms involving second-order time derivatives may be computed perturbatively under an effective-field-theory assumption.
    Stated explicitly in Methodology when extending the tensor driver; required to close the first-order system.
  • ad hoc to paper Approximate helical symmetry of quasicircular nonspinning binaries justifies replacing partial_t by (partial_t + L_v) in the driver (comoving driver Eq. 4).
    Key new modeling choice of this Letter; exact only in the stationary limit, approximate during inspiral.
  • domain assumption GR extended conformal thin-sandwich initial data plus a small Ψ seed, after early scalarization and eccentricity reduction, adequately represents the desired sGB binary.
    Methodology; authors cite ongoing work on true sGB ID but do not use it here.
  • domain assumption Standard first-order generalized harmonic evolution with damped harmonic gauge remains well-posed and stable when coupled to the scalar and driver sectors as implemented.
    Inherited from SpECTRE/GR infrastructure and prior scalarization paper; assumed to carry over.
  • standard math Spectral discontinuous-Galerkin discretization, excision, and CCE (including Einstein–Klein–Gordon CCE) introduce controllable truncation error that is bounded by the reported p-refinement and σ tests.
    Standard NR convergence logic applied in Results/Fig. 3.
invented entities (1)
  • Comoving driver equations for auxiliary variables Σ no independent evidence
    purpose: Enforce tracking of beyond-GR sources in a frame that co-rotates with the binary, reducing orbital-frame error in the auxiliary fields.
    New numerical device introduced in this Letter (Eq. 4); not a new physical field. Independent evidence is internal (σ-variation tests and stationary-limit exactness), not an external observable prediction.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 18900 in / 3935 out tokens · 84895 ms · 2026-07-31T21:07:10.398029+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Numerical relativity (NR) simulations of compact binaries in theories beyond general relativity (GR) will be pivotal for the continued development of future tests of gravity with gravitational waves (GWs). In this Letter, we show that the combination of spectral methods and the "fixing-the-equations" approach allows us to produce the longest waveforms in the literature for a genuine beyond-GR theory, thus bringing NR methods for alternative theories of gravity closer to the state-of-the-art in GR. For concreteness, we focus on the well-known shift-symmetric version of scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, a theory postulating the existence of an additional dynamical scalar and describing black holes (BHs) different from the Kerr solution. We extract the gravitational and scalar waveforms at future null infinity for equal-mass, nonspinning, eccentricity-reduced BH binaries, and quantify the phase errors to be $\lesssim$ 1 rad after 40+ GW cycles (20+ orbits). We also show that the GW phase corrections in this alternative theory are distinguishable from Einstein's theory and lead to an earlier coalescence time than in GR. Obtaining such waveforms is a stepping stone to perform precise comparisons with Post-Newtonian theory and to calibrate waveform models beyond GR.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27991 by Alexandra Macedo, Geoffrey Lovelace, Guillermo Lara, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Jordan Moxon, Kyle C. Nelli, Lawrence E. Kidder, Mark A. Scheel, Nils Deppe, Nils L. Vu, Sizheng Ma, William Throwe.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 78 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests, (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. II. Parameter- ized Tests, (2026), arXiv:2603.19020 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. III. Tests of the Remnants, (2026), arXiv:2603.19021 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    GWTC-5.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation, (2026), arXiv:2605.27227 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KA- GRA), GWTC-5.0: Tests of General Relativity, (2026), arXiv:2607.19293 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 041403 (2026), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Grimaldi, E

    L. Grimaldi, E. Maggio, L. Pompili, and A. Buonanno, Plunge-Merger-Ringdown Tests of General Relativity with GW250114, (2026), arXiv:2601.13173 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Abacet al.(ET), The Science of the Einstein Tele- scope, (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    A. Abacet al.(ET), The Science of the Einstein Tele- scope, (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Evanset al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community, arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM] (2021)

    M. Evanset al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community, arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM] (2021)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    A. K. Mehta, A. Buonanno, R. Cotesta, A. Ghosh, N. Sennett, and J. Steinhoff, Tests of general relativ- ity with gravitational-wave observations using a flexible theory-independent method, Phys. Rev. D107, 044020 (2023), arXiv:2203.13937 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Agathos, W

    M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D89, 082001 (2014), arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Laraet al., Signatures from metastable oppositely- charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity, (2025), arXiv:2505.14785 [gr-qc]

    G. Laraet al., Signatures from metastable oppositely- charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity, (2025), arXiv:2505.14785 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Juli´ e, L

    F.-L. Juli´ e, L. Pompili, and A. Buonanno, Inspiral- merger-ringdown waveforms in Einstein-scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity within the effective-one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D111, 024016 (2025), arXiv:2406.13654 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Z. Hu, D. D. Doneva, S. S. Yazadjiev, and L. Shao, Quasi- normal mode ringing of binary black hole mergers in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D113, 044041 (2026), arXiv:2511.20301 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    A. M. Abrahamset al.(Binary Black Hole Grand Chal- lenge Alliance), Gravitational wave extraction and outer boundary conditions by perturbative matching, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1812 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9709082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  18. [18]

    G. B. Cooket al.(Binary Black Hole Challenge Alliance), Boosted three-dimensional black hole evolutions with singularity excision, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2512 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  19. [19]

    Gomezet al., Stable characteristic evolution of generic three-dimensional single black hole space-times, Phys

    R. Gomezet al., Stable characteristic evolution of generic three-dimensional single black hole space-times, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3915 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9801069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  20. [20]

    Bruegmann, W

    B. Bruegmann, W. Tichy, and N. Jansen, Numerical simulation of orbiting black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 211101 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0312112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys

    F. Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 121101 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0507014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  22. [22]

    J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz, and J. van Meter, Gravitational wave extraction from an in- spiraling configuration of merging black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 111102 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Campanelli, C

    M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, P. Marronetti, and Y. Zlo- chower, Accurate evolutions of orbiting black-hole bina- ries without excision, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 111101 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Lehner, and R. Luna, Challenges to global solutions in Horndeski’s theory, Phys. Rev. D100, 024011 (2019), arXiv:1904.12866 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    J. L. Ripley, Numerical relativity for Horndeski grav- ity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31, 2230017 (2022), arXiv:2207.13074 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Witek, L

    H. Witek, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, and T. P. Sotiriou, Black holes and binary mergers in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity: scalar field dynamics, Phys. Rev. D99, 064035 (2019), arXiv:1810.05177 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Okounkova, Stability of Rotating Black Holes in Ein- stein Dilaton Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, Phys

    M. Okounkova, Stability of Rotating Black Holes in Ein- stein Dilaton Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, Phys. Rev. D100, 124054 (2019), arXiv:1909.12251 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Okounkova, L

    M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 beyond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D101, 104016 (2020), arXiv:1911.02588 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Okounkova, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys

    M. Okounkova, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 084046 (2020), arXiv:2001.03571 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    ´A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, Well-Posed Formulation of Scalar-Tensor Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 221101 (2020), arXiv:2003.04327 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    ´A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D101, 124003 (2020), arXiv:2003.08398 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Evolution of Einstein- scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity using a modified har- monic formulation, Phys. Rev. D103, 044040 (2021), arXiv:2011.03547 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Corman, J

    M. Corman, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Nonlinear studies of binary black hole mergers in Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D107, 024014 (2023), arXiv:2210.09235 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, K

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Well- Posedness of the Four-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in Singularity Avoiding Coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 261104 (2022), arXiv:2208.14470 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    H. L. H. Shum, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, F. Thaalba, M. Bezares, and T. P. Sotiriou, A well-posed BSSN-type formulation for scalar-tensor theories of gravity with second-order field equations, (2025), arXiv:2512.11034 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Figueras, A

    P. Figueras, A. Held, and ´A. D. Kov´ acs, Well-posed ini- tial value formulation of general effective field theories of gravity, (2024), arXiv:2407.08775 [gr-qc]. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Figueras, ´A

    P. Figueras, ´A. D. Kov´ acs, and S. Yao, Stable non-linear evolution in regularised higher derivative effective field theories, JHEP10, 150, arXiv:2505.00082 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Cayuso, N

    J. Cayuso, N. Ortiz, and L. Lehner, Fixing extensions to general relativity in the nonlinear regime, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084043 (2017), arXiv:1706.07421 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Cayuso and L

    R. Cayuso and L. Lehner, Nonlinear, noniterative treat- ment of EFT-motivated gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 084008 (2020), arXiv:2005.13720 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    G. Lara, M. Bezares, and E. Barausse, UV completions, fixing the equations, and nonlinearities in k-essence, Phys. Rev. D105, 064058 (2022), arXiv:2112.09186 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Franchini, M

    N. Franchini, M. Bezares, E. Barausse, and L. Lehner, Fixing the dynamical evolution in scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D106, 064061 (2022), arXiv:2206.00014 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Cayuso, P

    R. Cayuso, P. Figueras, T. Fran¸ ca, and L. Lehner, Self- Consistent Modeling of Gravitational Theories beyond General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 111403 (2023), arXiv:2303.07246 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    ´A. D. Kov´ acs, Well-posedness of cubic Horndeski theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D100, 024005 (2019), arXiv:1904.00963 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Bezares, R

    M. Bezares, R. Aguilera-Miret, L. ter Haar, M. Crisos- tomi, C. Palenzuela, and E. Barausse, No Evidence of Kinetic Screening in Simulations of Merging Binary Neu- tron Stars beyond General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 091103 (2022), arXiv:2107.05648 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Figueras and T

    P. Figueras and T. Fran¸ ca, Black hole binaries in cubic Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D105, 124004 (2022), arXiv:2112.15529 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Held and H

    A. Held and H. Lim, Nonlinear evolution of quadratic gravity in 3+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D108, 104025 (2023), arXiv:2306.04725 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, D

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, D. D. Doneva, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Challenges in the nonlinear evolution of unequal mass binaries in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D112, 084022 (2025), arXiv:2507.13046 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Thaalba, F

    F. Thaalba, F. Abalos, and M. Bezares, Higher-derivative gravitational effective field theories are generically weakly hyperbolic, (2026), arXiv:2607.11879 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Deppe, W

    N. Deppe, W. Throwe, L. E. Kidder, N. L. Vu, K. C. Nelli, C. Armaza, M. S. Bonilla, F. H´ ebert, Y. Kim, P. Kumar, G. Lovelace, A. Macedo, J. Moxon, E. O’Shea, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, N. A. Wit- tek, I. Anantpurkar, C. Anderson, M. Boyle, A. Car- penter, A. Ceja, H. Chaudhary, N. Corso, C. Dittmer, N. Fayyazuddin Ljungberg, F. Fouca...

    2026

  50. [50]

    G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, G. Lovelace, S. Ma, A. Macedo, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, M. A. Scheel, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, High-accuracy drivers to simulate black hole binaries beyond general rel- ativity with the fixing-the-equations approach, in prep

  51. [51]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Black hole hair in general- ized scalar-tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 251102 (2014), arXiv:1312.3622 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Black hole hair in gener- alized scalar-tensor gravity: An explicit example, Phys. Rev. D90, 124063 (2014), arXiv:1408.1698 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    Capuano, L

    L. Capuano, L. Santoni, and E. Barausse, Black hole hairs in scalar-tensor gravity and the lack thereof, Phys. Rev. D108, 064058 (2023), arXiv:2304.12750 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    E. M. S¨ angeret al., Tests of General Relativity with GW230529: a neutron star merging with a lower mass- gap compact object, (2024), arXiv:2406.03568 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Allwright and L

    G. Allwright and L. Lehner, Towards the nonlinear regime in extensions to GR: assessing possible options, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 084001 (2019), arXiv:1808.07897 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Lindblom, M

    L. Lindblom, M. A. Scheel, L. E. Kidder, R. Owen, and O. Rinne, A New generalized harmonic evolution system, Class. Quant. Grav.23, S447 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0512093

    arXiv 2006

  57. [57]

    M. W. Choptuik and F. Pretorius, Ultra Relativistic Par- ticle Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 111101 (2010), arXiv:0908.1780 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Szilagyi, L

    B. Szilagyi, L. Lindblom, and M. A. Scheel, Simulations of Binary Black Hole Mergers Using Spectral Methods, Phys. Rev. D80, 124010 (2009), arXiv:0909.3557 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [59]

    Deppe, L

    N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukol- sky, Critical behavior in 3D gravitational collapse of massless scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D99, 024018 (2019), arXiv:1802.08682 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, N. A. Wittek, N. L. Vu, K. C. Nelli, A. Carpenter, G. Lovelace, M. A. Scheel, and W. Throwe, Scalarization of isolated black holes in scalar Gauss-Bonnet theory in the fixing-the- equations approach, Phys. Rev. D110, 024033 (2024), arXiv:2403.08705 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    N. L. Vuet al., A scalable elliptic solver with task-based parallelism for the SpECTRE numerical relativity code, Phys. Rev. D105, 084027 (2022), arXiv:2111.06767 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    N. L. Vu, Discontinuous Galerkin scheme for elliptic equations on extremely stretched grids, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084062 (2024), arXiv:2405.06120 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    I. B. Mendes, N. L. Vu, O. Long, H. P. Pfeiffer, and R. Owen, Parameter control for binary black hole initial data, Phys. Rev. D112, 124049 (2025), arXiv:2509.07291 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    A. D. Kovacs, On the construction of asymptotically flat initial data in scalar-tensor effective field theory, (2021), arXiv:2103.06895 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    S. E. Brady, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and A. P. S., Solving the initial conditions problem for mod- ified gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D108, 104022 (2023), arXiv:2308.16791 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    P. J. Nee, G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, and N. L. Vu, Quasis- tationary hair for binary black hole initial data in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, 024061 (2025), arXiv:2406.08410 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Buonanno, L

    A. Buonanno, L. E. Kidder, A. H. Mroue, H. P. Pfeif- fer, and A. Taracchini, Reducing orbital eccentricity of precessing black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D83, 104034 (2011), arXiv:1012.1549 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [68]

    Lovelaceet al., Simulating binary black hole merg- ers using discontinuous Galerkin methods, Class

    G. Lovelaceet al., Simulating binary black hole merg- ers using discontinuous Galerkin methods, Class. Quant. 8 Grav.42, 035001 (2025), arXiv:2410.00265 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Moxon, M

    J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, N. Deppe, N. Fischer, F. H´ ebert, L. E. Kidder, and W. Throwe, SpECTRE Cauchy-characteristic evolution system for rapid, precise waveform extraction, Phys. Rev. D107, 064013 (2023), arXiv:2110.08635 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    S. Ma, K. C. Nelli, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Ein- stein–Klein–Gordon system via Cauchy-characteristic evolution: computation of memory and ringdown tail, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 055006 (2025), arXiv:2409.06141 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Mitmanet al., Fixing the BMS frame of numerical relativity waveforms, Phys

    K. Mitmanet al., Fixing the BMS frame of numerical relativity waveforms, Phys. Rev. D104, 024051 (2021), arXiv:2105.02300 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Mitmanet al., Fixing the BMS frame of numerical relativity waveforms with BMS charges, Phys

    K. Mitmanet al., Fixing the BMS frame of numerical relativity waveforms with BMS charges, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084029 (2022), arXiv:2208.04356 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    D. M. Eardley, Observable effects of a scalar gravi- tational field in a binary pulsar, Astrophys. J.196, 10.1086/181744 (1975)

    doi:10.1086/181744 1975

  74. [74]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Tensor multiscalar theories of gravitation, Class. Quant. Grav.9, 2093 (1992)

    2093

  75. [75]

    Boyle, K

    M. Boyle, K. Mitman, M. Scheel, and L. Stein, The sxs package (2026)

    2026

  76. [76]

    Cardoso, C

    V. Cardoso, C. F. B. Macedo, and R. Vicente, Eccen- tricity evolution of compact binaries and applications to gravitational-wave physics, Phys. Rev. D103, 023015 (2021), arXiv:2010.15151 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    We have been in correspondence with the authors, who have confirmed that their updated results no longer indi- cate a delayed merger for the beyond-GR case, and which they will present in a revised version of the paper

  78. [78]

    Corman, L

    M. Corman, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, and K. Clough, Black hole binaries in shift-symmetric Einstein-scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity experience a slower merger phase, (2025), arXiv:2511.19073v1 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Bezares, L

    M. Bezares, L. ter Haar, M. Crisostomi, E. Barausse, and C. Palenzuela, Kinetic screening in nonlinear stellar oscillations and gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D104, 044022 (2021), arXiv:2105.13992 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Coates and F

    A. Coates and F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Treatments and placebos for the pathologies of effective field theories, Phys. Rev. D108, L101501 (2023), arXiv:2307.07743 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.