Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Jet tagging algorithm of graph network with HaarPooling message passing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.13869 v5 pith:DLHBGECL submitted 2022-10-25 hep-ex cs.CVcs.LGhep-ph

classification hep-excs.CVcs.LGhep-ph
keywords haarpoolingdeltahmpnetfeaturesgraphinformationtaggingadding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recently methods of graph neural networks (GNNs) have been applied to solving the problems in high energy physics (HEP) and have shown its great potential for quark-gluon tagging with graph representation of jet events. In this paper, we introduce an approach of GNNs combined with a HaarPooling operation to analyze the events, called HaarPooling Message Passing neural network (HMPNet). In HMPNet, HaarPooling not only extracts the features of graph, but embeds additional information obtained by clustering of k-means of different particle features. We construct Haarpooling from five different features: absolute energy $\log E$, transverse momentum $\log p_T$, relative coordinates $(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)$, the mixed ones $(\log E, \log p_T)$ and $(\log E, \log p_T, \Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)$. The results show that an appropriate selection of information for HaarPooling enhances the accuracy of quark-gluon tagging, as adding extra information of $\log P_T$ to the HMPNet outperforms all the others, whereas adding relative coordinates information $(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)$ is not very effective. This implies that by adding effective particle features from HaarPooling can achieve much better results than solely pure message passing neutral network (MPNN) can do, which demonstrates significant improvement of feature extraction via the pooling process. Finally we compare the HMPNet study, ordering by $p_T$, with other studies and prove that the HMPNet is also a good choice of GNN algorithms for jet tagging.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KIGNet: Physics-Motivated Multi-Graph Representation Learning for Explainable Jet Tagging

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    E-PCN reaches 94.67% macro-accuracy on 10-class jet tagging by weighting graphs with angular separation, transverse momentum, momentum fraction, and invariant mass, with Grad-CAM showing the first two account for 76% ...

  2. Transformer networks for Heavy flavor jet tagging

    hep-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of transformer-based jet tagging that highlights the authors' CA-Mixer network as a state-of-the-art, faster alternative to Particle Transformer.

Pith tools