Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A particle's circular-orbit radius mirrors a black hole's phase transition only when the first law keeps the mapping monotonic, and near criticality the orbit-radius gap shares the horizon gap's critical exponent.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Monotonicity of the black-hole circular-orbit radius versus horizon radius depends on the thermodynamic ensemble and the first law: reliable at constant pressure, breakable at constant temperature, yet critical exponents are preserved.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →

load-bearing objection Genuinely useful path-dependent monotonicity criterion; isothermal ISCO claim rests on a circular sign proof, so the 'must jump' abstract overreaches. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.17642 v3 pith:DRMVRU52 submitted 2025-12-19 gr-qc

Revisiting particle circular orbits as probes of black hole phase transitions

Lei You , Jinsong Yang This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords black hole thermodynamicscircular orbitsphoton sphereISCOphase transitionscritical exponentsfirst lawAdS black holes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the radius of a particle's circular orbit — the photon sphere or the innermost stable circular orbit — can stand in for the horizon radius as a probe of black hole phase transitions. Earlier work assumed a monotonic relation between orbit radius and horizon radius. The authors show that monotonicity is controlled by the first law and the thermodynamic path: along isobaric processes the orbit radius is monotonic and jumps with the horizon; along isothermal processes it can become non-monotonic for charged and even uncharged AdS black holes. Near the critical endpoint, however, the first law forces local monotonicity, so the coexistence gap in orbit radius shrinks with exactly the same critical exponent as the horizon gap. This makes the orbit radius a reliable order parameter for criticality even when the global encoding fails.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a differential criterion for how orbit radius responds to horizon radius along any path in the parameter space of a static, spherically symmetric black hole: dr_c/dr_h = (2κ/Γ_ε) times the ratio of path derivatives of the circular-orbit condition and the horizon condition. The geometric prefactor cannot change sign for a nonextremal black hole, so path choice decides monotonicity. In the isobaric ensemble the first law gives dM/dr_h > 0, making r_ps(r_h) and r_isco(r_h) monotonic for RN–AdS black holes. In the isothermal ensemble the first law allows dM/dr_h and dP/dr_h to conspire so that r_c(r_h) is non-monotonic, as the paper demonstrates for RN–AdS photon sph

What carries the argument

The monotonicity criterion (2.21), built from implicit differentiation of the circular-orbit condition Φ_ε(r_c;λ)=0 and the horizon condition f(r_h;λ)=0 along an arbitrary path λ(τ) in parameter space. The geometric factor 2κ/Γ_ε never changes sign for nonextremal black holes, so the path-dependent ratio of parameter derivatives alone determines whether r_c(r_h) is monotonic. The first law enters by fixing dM/dr_h in each ensemble: positively in the isobaric case, and with a possible sign-changing dP/dr_h contribution in the isothermal case. Near the critical point the isothermal correction vanishes, forcing local monotonicity and protecting the critical exponent.

Load-bearing premise

For the ISCO, the paper's proof that the pressure derivative ∂_PΦ_1 stays positive assumes the conclusion it is proving, and the companion claim that the phase transition sits on the increasing branch is verified only by a numerical scan in d=4; if either gives way, the isothermal non-monotonicity and reliability conclusions weaken.

What would settle it

Compute ∂_PΦ_1 directly from the ISCO condition for d=5 or d=6 RN–AdS and see whether it ever changes sign for P>0; a single parameter point with ∂_PΦ_1 ≤ 0 would break the ISCO argument. Independently, scan isothermal paths for higher-dimensional RN–AdS and locate the extremum of r_isco(r_h) relative to r_h,s: if r_h,s < r_h,e < r_h,l occurs, the jump Δr_c can be suppressed or vanish, falsifying the paper's reliability claim for that case.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In the isobaric ensemble, any black hole with ∂_MΦ_ε ≠ 0 will show a simultaneous jump in the circular-orbit radius at a first-order transition, because the first law fixes dM/dr_h > 0.
  • In the isothermal ensemble, r_c(r_h) can be globally non-monotonic, so the jump size Δr_c can in principle be suppressed; for the four-dimensional RN–AdS case the paper shows the transition still sits on the increasing branch.
  • Near the critical point, Δr_c and Δr_h share the same critical exponent β, so the circular-orbit radius qualifies as an order parameter for black hole criticality.
  • Non-monotonic evolution of the orbit radius — and hence of images tied to the photon sphere — could distinguish isobaric from isothermal thermodynamic behavior.
  • The critical-exponent result follows from the first law and the criterion alone, without relying on the explicit metric, so it should hold for any black hole with ∂_MΦ_ε ≠ 0.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: The proof that ∂_PΦ_1 > 0 (Appendix E) contains a circular step: it assumes the term ∂_PΦ_1 > 0 to conclude that r_isco decreases with pressure. If that positivity fails for some parameter region, the ISCO non-monotonicity argument would need repair.
  • Editorial: The statement that the phase transition always occurs on the increasing branch is established for d=4 by a numerical scan (Appendix G); extending this to higher dimensions or other charge sectors is an open quantitative check.
  • Editorial: Because shadow size and accretion-disk images are functions of the photon-sphere radius, the predicted non-monotonicity might show up as a non-monotonic image size along an isothermal sequence — a testable signature the paper mentions but does not model.
  • Editorial: The critical-exponent invariance may be a special case of a more general rule: any smooth observable with nonzero derivative with respect to r_h at the critical point inherits the order-parameter exponent β.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives a chain-rule criterion, Eq. (2.21), for the derivative dr_c/dr_h of a circular-orbit radius with respect to the horizon radius along an arbitrary thermodynamic path in a static, spherically symmetric black hole. It then applies the criterion to d-dimensional RN–AdS black holes in the isobaric and isothermal ensembles. In the isobaric ensemble, r_ps(r_h) and r_isco(r_h) are claimed to be globally monotonic; in the isothermal ensemble, they are claimed to become nonmonotonic for RN–AdS. The paper further argues that, near a thermodynamic critical point, the coexistence gap Δr_c shares the same critical exponent as Δr_h, and that this follows from the first law. The central claimed messages are that the first law controls the reliability of circular orbits as probes of phase transitions, and that r_c remains a valid order parameter at criticality even when global monotonicity fails.

Significance. The monotonicity criterion (2.21) is a clean and potentially useful diagnostic: it factors dr_c/dr_h into a geometric part, 2κ/Γ_ϵ, and a path-dependent thermodynamic part, and it makes clear why prior isobaric analyses found monotonic behavior. The explicit d-dimensional RN–AdS formulas in Sec. III and the reduced-variable plots are concrete and reproducible. The observation that isothermal paths can make r_ps(r_h) and r_isco(r_h) nonmonotonic is a substantive new point that was not systematically examined in earlier work. The critical-exponent argument in Sec. IV is essentially a smooth-reparametrization statement and is correct in spirit, provided C := dr_c/dr_h|_c ≠ 0 is established. However, the paper's strongest claims—particularly the isothermal ISCO nonmonotonicity and the assertion that a first-order phase transition forces a simultaneous jump in r_c—rest on two currently unproven lemmas: the positivity of ∂PΦ1 in Appendix E and the branch-ordering r_h,e < r_h,s in Appendix G. These gaps are load-bearing and need to be closed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix E] The proof of ∂PΦ1 > 0 is circular. After Eq. (E13), the text states: “Once P increases, the term ∂PΦ1 > 0 appears,” which is exactly the sign being proved. The continuity argument only shows that if ∂PΦ1 stays positive, then r_isco decreases continuously toward x_+; it does not exclude ∂PΦ1 crossing zero at finite P. A sign change in ∂PΦ1 would alter the sign of δ in Eq. (3.34) and hence could move the zero of dr_isco/dr_h, affecting the conclusions in Sec. III.B.2 and Appendix G. Please replace this step with a direct analytic bound, for example by proving Q(x) > 0 for the actual x = r_isco^{d-3} under the isothermal constraint (E7), or by an implicit-differentiation argument that establishes the monotonicity of r_isco(P).
  2. [Appendix G] The proof that the phase transition occurs on the increasing branch is numerical, not analytic. The appendix states: “we numerically scan the parameter space, extract the extremal radius r_h,e ... and then compare their values,” and Fig. 9 shows the result for d = 4. A finite numerical scan over T̃0 does not prove the inequality r_h,e < r_h,s for the entire interval T̃0 ∈ [√2/2, 1), and the extension to r_isco uses the unproven positivity of ∂PΦ1 plus a verbal “lifts the curve” argument. Since this ordering is essential for the claim that the isothermal phase transition still produces a jump in r_c, an analytic proof (or a rigorous interval-arithmetic certificate) is needed.
  3. [Abstract / Sec. III.B] The abstract states that during a first-order phase transition, if r_h jumps discontinuously, “then r_c must simultaneously undergo a discontinuous jump.” This is stronger than what the body establishes. Section III.B explicitly admits that nonmonotonicity “could reduce the jump in r_c at the phase transition, or even eliminate it,” and that “whether this conclusion holds for other black holes must be examined case by case.” Even for RN–AdS, the jump result depends on the numerical scan in Appendix G. Please qualify the abstract to the isobaric ensemble or to cases where r_c(r_h) is monotone in the coexistence interval, and reserve the “first law alone” claim for the critical-exponent statement in Sec. IV.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3.7)] The sign of ∂MΦ1 for the ISCO is stated as negative via an unspecified function h(r_isco, q, P, d), but h is not displayed. Since this sign is used to establish isobaric monotonicity of r_isco(r_h), please provide the explicit expression or prove its positivity in an appendix.
  2. [Sec. IV] The proof that C := dr_c/dr_h|_c ≠ 0 is implicit. Please state explicitly that C = −(1/Γ_ϵ)(T_c S'(r_h,c) ∂MΦ_ϵ)_c and note that Γ_ϵ ≠ 0 by the stability conditions (2.14), S'(r_h) > 0, and ∂MΦ_ϵ ≠ 0 by assumption. This would make the reparametrization argument fully self-contained.
  3. [Figs. 2 and 3] The labels “Unphysical (κ=0)” and “Unphysical (κ<0)” are unclear. Please state in the captions whether these labels refer to negative Hawking temperature, extremality, or some other condition, and how the truncation affects the monotonicity claims.
  4. [Eq. (3.35)] The second entry in Eq. (3.35) is a limit, not an evaluation: δ(+∞, r_h,min, d, 0, T_0) should be written as lim_{r_isco→∞} δ(...). Please adjust the notation to avoid implying a finite evaluation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Appendix E's proof of ∂PΦ1 > 0 assumes the sign it sets out to prove; the isothermal-ISCO branch and Appendix G depend on this lemma, although the core criterion, isobaric monotonicity, and critical-exponent invariance are independently derived.

specific steps
  1. other [Appendix E, paragraph after Eq. (E15) (proof of ∂PΦ1 > 0)]
    "Next, consider increasing P from zero in Eq. (E13). Initially, one has Φ1 = eΦ1(risco|P=0,M,q,d)=0 with Γ1 = ∂reΦ1 >0. Once P increases, the term ∂PΦ1 >0 appears, so eΦ1 must decrease to maintain Φ1=0. Since Γ1 >0, this requires risco to decrease, meaning that x moves toward x+. As P continues to increase, we assume continuous dependence of risco and ∂PΦ1 on P, so that x must vary continuously from x|P=0 to x+|P→+∞. Consequently, for any finite P, the corresponding x must lie within the interval (x+,x|P=0), which guarantees ∂PΦ1 >0 throughout."

    The sign of ∂PΦ1 is exactly what Appendix E is proving. The argument establishes ∂PΦ1>0 only at P=0, then asserts that as P increases 'the term ∂PΦ1>0 appears'; that signed term is used to infer that risco decreases and x stays in (x+, x|P=0), and the conclusion ∂PΦ1>0 is read back. A zero crossing of ∂PΦ1 at finite P is never excluded, so the continuity argument does not prove the sign. This lemma is load-bearing: Sec. III.B.2 uses ∂PΦ1>0 to fix drisco/drh on the large-rh branch of Sch-AdS, and Appendix G uses it to shift the ISCO extremum to the left of rh,s. The isothermal nonmonotonicity is still independently visible in the numerical Fig. 5, so the circularity is partial.

full rationale

The central monotonicity criterion (2.21) is derived from the implicit function theorem and the chain rule, with no hidden input; it is self-contained. The isobaric monotonicity results in Sec. III.A follow from explicit sign computations of ∂MΦ0, ∂MΦ1, Γ0, Γ1 and dM/drh>0 from the first law, so they are independent of any questionable lemma. The photon-sphere isothermal nonmonotonicity uses only ∂PΦ0=0 and a rigorous zero-counting argument for dM/drh, so it too is independent. The critical-exponent invariance in Sec. IV is a direct Taylor expansion Δrc = C Δrh + o(Δrh) with C≠0; this is an elementary reparametrization statement, not a circularity or a fitted prediction. There is no load-bearing self-citation: references [25] and [19] are external prior work, not the present authors. The only concrete circular step found is Appendix E's proof of ∂PΦ1>0, which assumes the sign it is proving; downstream statements about ISCO branch structure in Sec. III.B.2 and Appendix G inherit this weakness. Appendix G also relies on a d=4 numerical scan rather than an analytic proof, which is a support/rigor concern rather than circularity by itself. Because the main framework and most results are independently established, the overall circularity is moderate, not total.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. Its central claims rest on standard black-hole thermodynamics plus two partially-unsupported technical assumptions: generic ∂_M Φ_ϵ ≠ 0, and ∂_P Φ_1 > 0 whose proof is circular. The critical-exponent result additionally borrows the already-known scaling of Δr_h.

axioms (6)
  • standard math Smoothness of the metric f(r;λ) and non-extremality (κ>0) so that the implicit function theorem applies.
    Used in Sec. IIB to justify the local functions r_c(λ) and r_h(λ) and the differentiation leading to criterion (2.21).
  • domain assumption First law of black hole thermodynamics dM = T dS + V dP in the extended phase space.
    Central to the equations along isobaric/isothermal paths (Eqs. 3.4, 3.19-3.20) and to the critical-point argument in Sec. IV.
  • domain assumption ∂_M Φ_ϵ ≠ 0 on the relevant domain.
    Needed to conclude C ≠ 0 at the critical point and monotonicity in the isobaric ensemble; the paper states this is expected generically but does not prove it for all black holes (Secs. IIIA and V).
  • domain assumption ∂_P Φ_1 > 0 for the RN-AdS ISCO.
    Used for the isothermal ISCO analysis; the proof in Appendix E is circular around Eq. (E14)-(E16).
  • domain assumption Known critical scaling of the horizon gap Δr_h ~ |t|^β for black holes exhibiting criticality.
    Input from prior black-hole thermodynamics (Sec. IV, Eq. 4.1); the paper does not derive this scaling, only transfers it to Δr_c.
  • domain assumption Maxwell equal-area construction determines phase coexistence in the isothermal ensemble.
    Used in Appendix G to extract r_h,s; a standard but nontrivial thermodynamic input.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting particle circular orbits as probes of black hole phase transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DRMVRU52

@misc{pith2026251217642,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting particle circular orbits as probes of black hole phase transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DRMVRU52}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.17642}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Previous studies suggested that the particle circular orbit can serve as a probe of black hole phase transitions. However, these studies only identified this phenomenon by substituting the horizon radius $r_h$ with the circular orbit radius $r_c$ in thermodynamic state relations. Such simplistic substitution fails to uncover the underlying connection between black hole phase transitions and particle circular orbits. In this work, we successfully establish this profound intrinsic link by deriving a differential relation for $r_c$ that relates to thermodynamic parameters and the first law of black hole thermodynamics. Using this relation, we demonstrate that during a first-order phase transition, if $r_h$ experiences a discontinuous jump (such as in the small/large black hole phase transition), then $r_c$ must simultaneously undergo a discontinuous jump. This finding confirms that particle circular orbits can indeed serve as probes of first-order phase transitions. More importantly, we show that this phenomenon is a direct consequence of the nonzero latent heat inherent to first-order phase transitions. Finally, we demonstrate that the jump sizes $\Delta r_c$ and $\Delta r_h$ across the phase transition share the same critical exponent at the thermodynamic critical point, indicating that $\Delta r_c$ can serve as an order parameter for black hole phase transitions. Notably, this conclusion follows directly from the first law.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.17642 by Jinsong Yang, Lei You.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Isothermal profiles of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Isothermal profiles of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Plots of ˜r [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Black hole images as probes of thermodynamic evolution

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    For charged AdS black holes, shadow and disk image sizes grow monotonically along isobars but are nonmonotonic along isotherms, with a critical temperature separating two qualitatively different image evolutions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Photon sphere (ϵ=0) For the metric (3.2) one obtains dM drh = 1 (d−1)c d h 2(d−3)r d−4 h +4(d−2)πT 0 r d−3 h −2(d−2)(d−3)q 2 r 2−d h i , (3.24) 6 and Γ0 = 2(d−3) rps h (d−2)q 2 r 6−2d ps −1 i .(3.25) Moreover,∂ PΦ0 =0, and∂ MΦ0 agrees with Eq. (3.7). We now analyze the sign of dM/dr h. Forq=0 one imme- diately has dM/dr h >0. Forq,0, differentiating dM/dr...

  2. [2]

    It then increases monotonically, remaining glob- ally monotonic in full agreement with Eq

    For the Sch–AdS black hole,r ps(rh) begins atr h,min = (d−3)/(4πT 0), wherer h,min is defined byP(r h,min)=0, and smallerr h would giveP<0 and are therefore discarded as unphysical. It then increases monotonically, remaining glob- ally monotonic in full agreement with Eq. (3.30). In contrast, the RN–AdS black hole exhibits the expected non-monotonic behav...

  3. [3]

    Since van der Waals-type behavior occurs only for charged black holes, we analyze the RN–AdS and Sch–AdS cases separately

    ISCO (ϵ=1) The metric (3.2) yields dP drh =− (d−2) 8π h (d−2)(d−3)q 2 r 3−2d h + 3−d+2πT 0rh r−3 h i , (3.31) and ∂PΦ1 = 16πr isco (d−2)(d−1) h 8+4(d−1)(d−2)q 2r6−2d isco −c d(d−1)(d+1)M r 3−d isco i , (3.32) where∂ PΦ1 >0 (see Appendix E for proof). Since van der Waals-type behavior occurs only for charged black holes, we analyze the RN–AdS and Sch–AdS c...

    2000

  4. [4]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys.31, 161 (1973)

    1973

  5. [5]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333 (1973)

    1973

  6. [6]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics, Phys. Rev. D9, 3292 (1974)

    1974

  7. [7]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975)

    1975

  8. [8]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B379, 99 (1996)

    1996

  9. [9]

    J. M. Maldacena, The largeNlimit of superconformal field the- ories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998)

    1998

  10. [10]

    Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv

    E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253 (1998)

    1998

  11. [11]

    C. Niu, Y . Tian, and X.-N. Wu, Critical phenomena and thermo- dynamic geometry of Reissner-Nordstr ¨om-anti-de Sitter black holes, Phys. Rev. D85, 024017 (2012)

    2012

  12. [12]

    Kubiznak and R

    D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 033

    2012

  13. [13]

    Gunasekaran, R

    S. Gunasekaran, R. B. Mann, and D. Kubiznak, Extended phase space thermodynamics for charged and rotating black holes and Born-Infeld vacuum polarization, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 110

    2012

  14. [14]

    Cai, L.-M

    R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, L. Li, and R.-Q. Yang, P-V criticality in the extended phase space of Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS space, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 005

    2013

  15. [15]

    Wei and Y .-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y .-X. Liu, Critical phenomena and thermody- namic geometry of charged Gauss-Bonnet AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D87, 044014 (2013)

    2013

  16. [16]

    Cheng, S.-W

    P. Cheng, S.-W. Wei, and Y .-X. Liu, Critical phenomena in the extended phase space of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D94, 024025 (2016)

    2016

  17. [17]

    S.-W. Wei, B. Liang, and Y .-X. Liu, Critical phenomena and chemical potential of a charged AdS black hole, Phys. Rev. D 96, 124018 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Wang, S.-J

    R.-B. Wang, S.-J. Ma, L. You, Y .-C. Tang, Y .-H. Feng, X.-R. Hu, and J.-B. Deng, Thermodynamics of AdS- Schwarzschild-like black hole in loop quantum gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1161 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    You, R.-B

    L. You, R.-B. Wang, Y .-C. Tang, J.-B. Deng, and X.-R. Hu, Thermal chaos of quantum-corrected-AdS black hole in the ex- tended phase space, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1133 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. VI. The shadow and mass of the central black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Wei and Y .-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y .-X. Liu, Photon orbits and thermodynamic phase transition ofd-dimensional charged AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D97, 104027 (2018)

    2018

  23. [23]

    Wei, Y .-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y .-X. Liu, and Y .-Q. Wang, Probing the relationship between the null geodesics and thermodynamic phase transition for rotating Kerr-AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D99, 044013 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    Xu, H.-M

    Y .-M. Xu, H.-M. Wang, Y .-X. Liu, and S.-W. Wei, Photon sphere and reentrant phase transition of charged Born-Infeld- AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D100, 104044 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    Naveena Kumara, C

    A. Naveena Kumara, C. L. Ahmed Rizwan, S. Punacha, K. M. Ajith, and M. S. Ali, Photon orbits and thermodynamic 16 phase transition of regular AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D102, 084059 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Du, H.-F

    Y .-Z. Du, H.-F. Li, F. Liu, and L.-C. Zhang, Photon orbits and phase transition for non-linear charged anti-de Sitter black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 137

    2023

  27. [27]

    Yang, S.-P

    S.-J. Yang, S.-P. Wu, S.-W. Wei, and Y .-X. Liu, Deciphering black hole phase transitions through photon spheres, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 120412 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Zhang, S.-Z

    M. Zhang, S.-Z. Han, J. Jiang, and W.-B. Liu, Circular orbit of a test particle and phase transition of a black hole, Phys. Rev. D 99, 065016 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Zhang and M

    M. Zhang and M. Guo, Can shadows reflect phase structures of black holes?, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 790 (2020)

    2020

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.