REVIEW 2 cited by
Self-Improving Customer Review Response Generation Based on LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Self-Improving Customer Review Response Generation Based on LLMs
read the original abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that proactive interaction with user reviews has a positive impact on the perception of app users and encourages them to submit revised ratings. Nevertheless, developers encounter challenges in managing a high volume of reviews, particularly in the case of popular apps with a substantial influx of daily reviews. Consequently, there is a demand for automated solutions aimed at streamlining the process of responding to user reviews. To address this, we have developed a new system for generating automatic responses by leveraging user-contributed documents with the help of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and advanced Large Language Models (LLMs). Our solution, named SCRABLE, represents an adaptive customer review response automation that enhances itself with self-optimizing prompts and a judging mechanism based on LLMs. Additionally, we introduce an automatic scoring mechanism that mimics the role of a human evaluator to assess the quality of responses generated in customer review domains. Extensive experiments and analyses conducted on real-world datasets reveal that our method is effective in producing high-quality responses, yielding improvement of more than 8.5% compared to the baseline. Further validation through manual examination of the generated responses underscores the efficacy our proposed system.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Benchmarking and Learning Real-World Customer Service Dialogue
OlaMind, a Learn-to-Think plus basic-to-hard RL pipeline for RAG customer service, reports +28.92% issue resolution, -6.08% human transfer online, and an 8.6% offline hallucination rate.
-
Enhancing LLMs through human feedback: a journey towards self-improvement
An auxiliary feedback RAG continuously ingests classified human feedback to iteratively raise a primary RAG system’s answer accuracy and relevance.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.