Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Predicting physical properties of alkanes with neural networks

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A five-integer molecular code plus a fragmented-data neural network predicts six alkane physical properties at or above the accuracy of semi-empirical models.

desk verdict A competent application of fragmented-data NNs to alkane property prediction with a useful flash-point error correction, but the molecular descriptor needs a canonicalization proof and some headline numbers rest on very small comparison sets. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02067 v1 pith:DUWV77ST submitted 2019-08-06 physics.comp-ph physics.chem-phphysics.data-an

Pavao Santak , Gareth Conduit This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.comp-phphysics.chem-phphysics.data-an
keywords fragmenteddataneuralnetworkalkanepropertiesmolecularbasisflashpointmeltingkinematicviscositylubricant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a single neural-network architecture can predict the physical properties of alkanes — boiling point, heat capacity, vapor pressure, flash point, melting point, and kinematic viscosity — more accurately and consistently than standard semi-empirical models. Its central move is to encode each linear, single-branched, or double-branched alkane by five nonnegative integers and to train the network on fragmented experimental data, so that measured properties of one molecule help impute the unmeasured properties of another. If the claim holds, computational screening of lubricant base oils becomes practical for alkane families whose individual members have never been isolated or measured. A sympathetic reader would say the paper demonstrates that structure-property and property-property correlations, learned together, outperform group-additivity, topological-index, and free-volume baselines on the same data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the five-integer molecular basis: carbon count, distance from one end of the longest chain to its nearest branch, length of that branch, distance from the other end to its nearest branch, and length of the second branch, with zeros for shorter molecules. This converts each alkane into a fixed-length vector while allowing straight chains to pass smoothly into singly and then doubly branched isomers. The second mechanism is the fragmented-data neural network: physical properties appear as both inputs and outputs, the diagonal output weights are pinned to zero during training, and missing values are filled by iterating $x^{[n+1]} = \gamma x^{[n]} + (1-\gamma) f(x^{[n]})$ with $\gamma=\frac{1}{2}$ until convergence. Six networks trained with different random data weights supply a mean and an uncertainty; leave-one-out cross-validation selects the hidden-node count and reports generalization accuracy. For melting point, two extra inputs — an odd/even carbon parity flag and the total number of molecular symmetries — carry the argument that symmetry, not just topology, controls melting.

What would settle it

Enumerate every alkane with up to twelve carbons that has two or more ways to pick the longest carbon chain or branches at equal distances from the chain ends, write each in the five-integer basis, and check whether any two distinct isomers produce the same tuple; a single collision disproves the uniqueness claim on which all the property predictions rest.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that a neural network with a five-integer molecular basis and a self-consistent imputation scheme reproduces experimental alkane properties at or above the accuracy of established semi-empirical methods. Cross-validated results include $R^2=0.992$ with an average absolute deviation of $1.74^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for the boiling point of 188 branched alkanes, $R^2=0.997$ for liquid heat capacity, $R^2=0.999$ for flash point after removing flagged erroneous entries, $R^2=0.998$ for melting point once molecular-symmetry and odd/even descriptors are added, $R^2=0.917$ for vapor pressure integrated over the Antoine-equation range, and $R^2=0.998$ for kinematic viscosity at $20^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ on nine linear alkanes. The paper also claims two physical insights: adding a branch at constant molecular weight lowers the boiling point by about $7^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and raises vapor pressure, and molecular symmetry strongly raises the melting point. The flash-point result doubles as a data-quality finding: entries for eicosane through hexacosane are identified as incorrect in the source literature and removed.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the five-integer molecular basis is a unique fingerprint for every linear, single-branched, and double-branched alkane it encodes, but it never tests molecules where the longest chain is not unique or where branches sit at equal distances from both ends; if two isomers share a tuple, the network cannot distinguish them and every structure-property prediction for that pair collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, boiling point is predictable for unmeasured branched alkanes with fewer than 13 carbons to within about $1.7^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$, and the errors shrink as molecular weight grows.
  • The model's flash-point screening procedure — flagging entries more than two standard errors from the mean prediction and confirming against the flash-boiling correlation — can be used to audit other property databases.
  • Because heat capacity is roughly linear in carbon number while branching effects are negligible, the model gives a simple engineering rule for choosing heat-transfer capacity in a base oil.
  • Molecular symmetry, quantified as a simple integer count, is a first-order driver of melting point; including it lifts the network's cross-validated $R^2$ from $0.650$ to $0.998$.
  • Kinematic viscosity at $40^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and $100^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ can be obtained from predicted dynamic viscosity and density, and the resulting viscosity index identifies eicosane as the only linear alkane studied for which a viscosity index can be defined, implying linear alkanes play a small role in real base oils.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test this paper leaves open is whether the five-integer descriptor is injective on all alkanes in its scope; molecules in which two equivalent longest chains or branch positions at equal distances from both ends exist could collide, and an enumeration over isomers up to $\mathrm{C}_{12}$ would settle it.
  • The same imputation architecture could be pointed at the temperature-pressure surface of longer alkanes by seeding it with molecular-dynamics data, which the paper names as a possible next step.
  • The symmetry descriptor for melting point could be refined to include crystal-structure details, which the paper itself notes would be the next improvement.
  • The flash-point error screening suggests a general template for database validation: train on all but one property, flag outliers in cross-validation residuals, and confirm with a physical correlation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper trains artificial neural networks that can exploit fragmented data and property-property correlations to predict six physical properties of linear, single-branched, and double-branched alkanes up to roughly tridecane, with comparisons to semi-empirical methods. A five-integer molecular basis encodes molecular structure, a leave-one-out cross-validation scheme selects network architectures and reports accuracy, and the method is applied to boiling point, heat capacity, vapor pressure (via Antoine coefficients), flash point, melting point, and kinematic viscosity. The central claims are that the five-integer basis uniquely characterizes each alkane and that the neural network predictions are more accurate and more consistent than existing group-contribution, topological-index, and free-volume models.

Significance. If the descriptor uniqueness and validation issues are resolved, the paper would make a useful contribution to data-driven thermophysical property prediction: it demonstrates a practical way to train on fragmented experimental data, exploits property-property correlations for imputation, and uses leave-one-out cross-validation for each property model. The flash-point analysis also attempts an external check against original sources, and the kinematic viscosity model combines separate density and viscosity models in a physically sensible way. These strengths are tempered by the unresolved question of whether the molecular basis is truly injective and by the self-referential outlier removal in the flash-point analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1] The five-integer descriptor is claimed to uniquely encode every linear, single-branched, and double-branched alkane, but the definition is incomplete because 'the longest carbon chain' is not unique in general and no tie-breaking or canonicalization rule is given. The paper gives no proof that the tuple is invariant under the choice of a longest chain, and it does not prove that distinct molecules always yield distinct tuples. Since this descriptor is the only structural input to every network, the uniqueness claim is load-bearing; the authors should either provide a canonical definition with a proof of injectivity for the intended class or demonstrate injectivity computationally for all alkanes in the considered range and state the result.
  2. [Section 3.3] The reported flash-point R2=0.999 is obtained after removing data entries that the same neural network flagged as lying more than two standard errors from the prediction. This is a self-referential cleaning rule: leave-one-out cross-validation on the cleaned subset does not estimate predictive accuracy on the original dataset, and the improvement from R2=0.910 to 0.999 may substantially reflect removing hard cases rather than correcting errors. The authors should report how many entries were removed and their identities, evaluate performance on an independent holdout set selected without using model residuals, and show the sensitivity of R2 to the removal threshold before claiming that the model predictions can replace experimental measurements.
  3. [Sections 3.4 and 3.5 (Tables 4 and 5)] The comparative claims against topological-index melting-point models and free-volume viscosity models rest on only 4 and 9 molecules, respectively. These sample sizes are too small to establish that the neural network is 'more accurate and consistent' than the competing methods; for instance, the standard deviations quoted for the free-volume comparison are computed on nine points and any single point heavily influences them. The authors should either expand the comparison sets or soften the comparative conclusions to a demonstration of feasibility on the limited common data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1 and Table 6] The number of alkanes used for heat capacity is given as 176 in Section 3.1 but 181 in Table 6; the heat-capacity AAD is given as 2.10 J(mol K)-1 in Section 3.1 and 2.33 J(mol K)-1 in Table 6. Please reconcile these numbers.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Table 6] The flash-point AAD is reported as 1.65 C in Section 3.3 and 1.61 C in Table 6, and the table lists 21 molecules while the text describes additional removed entries; please clarify which set these numbers refer to and how the leave-one-out procedure is run after the removal.
  3. [Equation (8)] Equation (8) is ambiguous: the intended expression should be written as T = B/(A - log10 p) + C with the two log10 p values substituted, and the current notation '(Tmin,Tmax) = Bexp/(Aexp - (-1.875, 0.294)) + Cexp' is not a standard tuple equation.
  4. [Throughout] There are several grammatical errors that should be corrected, including 'an dataset' in Section 2.4 and 'Our dataset consists comprises 51 molecules' in Section 3.4. Also, please add a data availability statement listing the exact experimental data sources and the trained network definitions, as the paper does not currently provide the data or code needed to reproduce the models.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all six property predictions are leave-one-out cross-validated against independent experimental data and external benchmark models, with self-citations limited to the network formalism.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. The molecular basis (Section 2.1) is a structural input representation defined from the alkane graph, not from any target property, so the five-integer descriptors are inputs to the network rather than outputs derived from the predicted quantities. The fragmented-data neural-network formalism is restated in the paper's own equations (Eqs. 1-5) rather than imported as an unexamined black box; the only self-citations (Refs. 6, 26, 27, 40, 41) point to earlier uses of the same formalism, and the present predictions are validated by leave-one-out cross-validation and by comparisons to independent group-contribution, topological-index, free-volume, and Antoine-equation models. The property-property correlation mechanism explicitly sets w2_ii=0 so that a property's prediction is not a function of its own input value, and the iterative imputation (Eq. 4) is a standard fixed-point procedure rather than a self-definitional shortcut. The flash-point outlier removal is the closest self-referential step, but the paper independently confirms the flagged eicosane-through-hexacosane entries against original sources and against the boiling-point correlation, so the final R2=0.999 is not a fitted parameter disguised as a prediction. Potential non-injectivity of the five-integer descriptor when the longest carbon chain is not unique is a correctness risk for the representation, but it is not a circularity of the derivation. Overall, the central results are self-contained empirical fits evaluated on held-out data.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the molecular basis descriptors are derived from structure, not postulates. The neural network weights themselves are not listed as free parameters because the paper does not report them, which is instead captured under reproducibility.

free parameters (3)
  • gamma (imputation mixing parameter) = 1/2
    Chosen by hand in Section 2.3 (Eq. 4) to control the recursive imputation update.
  • number of hidden nodes per property model = 6 (boiling point, heat capacity, vapor pressure); 2 (flash point); 5 (melting point)
    Selected via leave-one-out cross-validation in Section 2.4; the choice is data-dependent.
  • flash point outlier threshold = 2 standard errors
    Chosen in Section 3.3 to flag suspect flash point entries before removal and retraining.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The five-integer molecular basis uniquely encodes every linear, single branched, and double branched alkane.
    Stated in Section 2.1; without uniqueness the network cannot distinguish structurally different molecules.
  • domain assumption The Antoine equation describes vapor pressure over the studied temperature range.
    Used in Section 3.2 to convert predicted coefficients into vapor pressure curves.
  • domain assumption Experimental data from cited sources (TRC, DIPPR 801, online databases) are accurate except where the paper flags errors.
    The training and validation sets are built from these sources; erroneous flash point entries are later removed.
  • standard math Universal approximation theorem for tanh neural networks.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 (Ref [11]) to justify the representational power of the models.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Predicting physical properties of alkanes with neural networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DUWV77ST

@misc{pith2026190802067,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Predicting physical properties of alkanes with neural networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DUWV77ST}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02067}
}
read the original abstract

We train artificial neural networks to predict the physical properties of linear, single branched, and double branched alkanes. These neural networks can be trained from fragmented data, which enables us to use physical property information as inputs and exploit property-property correlations to improve the quality of our predictions. We characterize every alkane uniquely using a set of five chemical descriptors. We establish correlations between branching and the boiling point, heat capacity, and vapor pressure as a function of temperature. We establish how the symmetry affects the melting point and identify erroneous data entries in the flash point of linear alkanes. Finally, we exploit the temperature and pressure dependence of shear viscosity and density in order to model the kinematic viscosity of linear alkanes. The accuracy of the neural network models compares favorably to the accuracy of several physico-chemical/thermodynamic methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02067 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The molecular basis of 3-ethyl-2-methylhexane comprises [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of a plain neural network. There are three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Determining the optimal number of hidden nodes for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Parity plot for boiling point of alkanes. Our neural network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Boiling point vs number of carbon atoms for linear alkanes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Average absolute deviation of the neural network model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Parity plot for heat capacity of alkanes. Neural network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Antoine B coefficient for linear alkanes and 2-methyl ho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Flash point vs number of carbon atoms when erroneous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Parity plot for the flash point. Our neural network model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Cross-validation of density at 100◦C for 4-methylheptane, 2,6-dimethylheptane and 4,5-dimethyloctane. In the top figure, we show results obtained from the neural network architecture that uses only the molecular basis as input features. In the bottom figure, we show r…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Parity plot for kinematic viscosity of linear alkanes. Our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Research Project 44 and Texas Engineering Experiment Station

    American Petroleum Institute. Research Project 44 and Texas Engineering Experiment Station. Thermodynamics Research Center. TRC Thermodynamic Tables: Hydrocarbons . Ther- modynamics Research Center, Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A & M University System, 1986

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Alqaheem and M

    Sara S. Alqaheem and M. R. Riazi. Flash points of hydrocarbons and petroleum products: Prediction and evaluation of methods. Energy & Fuels , 31(4):3578–3584, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    M. J. Assael and M. Papadaki. Measurements of the viscosity of n-heptane, n-nonane, and n-undecane at pressures up to 70 MPa. International Journal of Thermophysics , 12(5):801–810, Sep 1991

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    Baled, Dazun Xing, Harrison Katz, Deepak Tapriyal, Isaac K

    Hseen O. Baled, Dazun Xing, Harrison Katz, Deepak Tapriyal, Isaac K. Gamwo, Yee Soong, Babatunde A. Bamgbade, Yue Wu, Kun Liu, Mark A. McHugh, and Robert M. Enick. Viscos- ity of n-hexadecane, n-octadecane and n-eicosane at pressures up to 243MPa and temperatures up to 534K. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 72:108 – 116, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Christopher M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006

    2006

  6. [6]

    Verpoort, P MacDonald, and G Conduit

    P C. Verpoort, P MacDonald, and G Conduit. Materials data validation and imputation with an artificial neural network. 147, 02 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    D. R. Caudwell, J. P. M. Trusler, V. Vesovic, and W. A. Wake- ham. The viscosity and density of n-dodecane and n-octadecane at pressures up to 200MPa and temperatures up to 473 K.Inter- national Journal of Thermophysics , 25(5):1339–1352, Sep 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Caudwell, J

    Derek R. Caudwell, J. P. Martin Trusler, Velisa Vesovic, and William A. Wakeham. Viscosity and density of five hydrocarbon liquids at pressures up to 200 MPa and temperatures up to 473 K. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data , 54(2):359–366, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    https: //www.chemeo.com/

    Chemeo - chemical & physical properties by chemeo. https: //www.chemeo.com/

  2. [10]

    http://www.chemicaldictionary

    Chemical dictionary online. http://www.chemicaldictionary. org/

  3. [11]

    Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function

    Cybenko G. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math. Control Signals Systems , (2):303–314, 1989

    1989

  4. [12]

    Hernndez-Galvn, Fernando Garca-Snchez, and Ricardo Macas-Salinas

    Miguel A. Hernndez-Galvn, Fernando Garca-Snchez, and Ricardo Macas-Salinas. Liquid viscosities of benzene, n- tetradecane, and benzene+n-tetradecane from 313 to 393K and pressures up to 60MPa: Experiment and modeling. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 262(1):51 – 60, 2007

    2007

  5. [13]

    Marano and Gerald D

    John J. Marano and Gerald D. Holder. General equation for cor- relating the thermophysical properties of n-paraffins, n-olefins, and other homologous series. 1. formalism for developing asymp- 11 Physical Property Nmolecules R2 AAD Tboil 188 0.992 1.74 ◦C Cmolar 181 0.997 2.33 J(...

    1997

  6. [14]

    Marano and Gerald D

    John J. Marano and Gerald D. Holder. General equation for cor- relating the thermophysical properties of n-paraffins, n-olefins, and other homologous series. 2. asymptotic behavior correla- tions for pvt properties. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 36(5):1895–1907, 1997

    1907

  7. [15]

    Marano and Gerald D

    John J. Marano and Gerald D. Holder. A general equation for correlating the thermophysical properties of n-paraffins, n- olefins, and other homologous series. 3. asymptotic behavior correlations for thermal and transport properties. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 3...

    1997

  8. [16]

    Matthews, John B

    Michael A. Matthews, John B. Rodden, and Aydin Akger- man. High-temperature diffusion, viscosity, and density mea- surements in n-hexadecane. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 32(3):317–319, 1987

    1987

  9. [17]

    Messerly, Thomas A

    Richard A. Messerly, Thomas A. Knotts, Neil F. Giles, and W. Vincent Wilding. Developing an internally consistent set of theoretically based prediction models for the critical constants and normal boiling point of large n-alkanes. Fluid Phase Equi- libria, 449:104 – 116, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

    The pubchem project. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

  11. [19]

    Needham, I Chien

    Diane E. Needham, I Chien. Wei, and Paul G. Seybold. Molec- ular modeling of the physical properties of alkanes. Journal of the American Chemical Society , 110(13):4186–4194, 1988

    1988

  12. [20]

    Santos, Marta F.V

    Tania V.M. Santos, Marta F.V. Pereira, Helena M.N.T. Avelino, Fernando J.P. Caetano, and Joo M.N.A. Fareleira. Viscosity and density measurements on liquid n-tetradecane at moderately high pressures. Fluid Phase Equilibria , 453:46 – 57, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    The Ele- ments of Statistical Learning

    Jerome Friedman Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani. The Ele- ments of Statistical Learning . 2009

    2009

  14. [22]

    Molecular symmetry, rotational entropy, and ele- vated melting points

    James Wei. Molecular symmetry, rotational entropy, and ele- vated melting points. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Re- search, 38(12):5019–5027, 1999

    1999

  15. [23]

    Wohlfarth

    C. Wohlfarth. Viscosity of the mixture (1) tridecane; (2) 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane. 25, 01 2009

    2009

  16. [24]

    Ian T.Jolliffe, Jorge Cadima Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374: 20150202

  17. [25]

    and Williams, C.K.I

    Rasmussen, C.E. and Williams, C.K.I. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning University Press Group Limited

  18. [26]

    Conduit and N.G

    B.D. Conduit and N.G. Jones and H.J. Stone and G.J. Conduit Probabilistic design of a molybdenum-base alloy using a neural network Scripta Materialia, 146, 82-86, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Conduit and N.G

    B.D. Conduit and N.G. Jones and H.J. Stone and G.J. Con- duit Design of a nickel-base superalloy using a neural network Materials & Design, 131, 358-365, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    cgi?D2270+10(2016)

    Viscosity index https://compass.astm.org/EDIT/html_annot. cgi?D2270+10(2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    and Wakefield, D.K

    Burch, K.J. and Wakefield, D.K. and Whitehead Jr, E.G. Boil- ing point models of alkanes MATCH Communications in Math- ematical and in Computer Chemistry, 01, 25-52, 2003

    2003

  22. [30]

    Constantinou, Leonidas and Gani, Rafiqul New group con- tribution method for estimating properties of pure compounds AIChE Journal,40,10, 1697-1710,1994

    1994

  23. [31]

    D.Mathieu Inductive modeling of physico-chemical properties: Flash point of alkanes Journal of Hazardous Materials, 179 , 1, 1161-1164, 2010

    2010

  24. [32]

    Estimation of the Heat Capacities of Organic Liquids as a Function of Temper- ature using Group Additivity

    Ruzicka,Vlastimil and Domalski,Eugene S. Estimation of the Heat Capacities of Organic Liquids as a Function of Temper- ature using Group Additivity. II. Compounds of Carbon, Hy- drogen, Halogens, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Sulfur Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 22,...

    1993

  25. [33]

    Burch, Kimberly Jordan and Whitehead, Earl Glen Melting- Point Models of Alkanes Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 49, 4, 858-863, 2004

    2004

  26. [34]

    De la Porte and C.A

    J.J. De la Porte and C.A. Kossack A liquid phase viscositytem- perature model for long-chain n-alkanes up to C64H130 based on the Free Volume Theory Fuel, 135, 156-164, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Nicolas Riesco and Velisa Vesovic Extended hard-sphere model for predicting the viscosity of long-chain n-alkanes Fluid Phase Equilibria, 425, 385-392, 2016

    2016

  28. [36]

    Predictive Corresponding-States Viscosity Model for the Entire Fluid Region: n-Alkanes Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52, 20, 6841-6847, 2013

    Novak, Lawrence T. Predictive Corresponding-States Viscosity Model for the Entire Fluid Region: n-Alkanes Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52, 20, 6841-6847, 2013

    2013

  29. [37]

    Suzuki, Takahiro and Ebert, Ralf-Uwe and Schrmann, Ger- rit Application of Neural Networks to Modeling and Estimat- ing Temperature-Dependent Liquid Viscosity of Organic Com- pounds Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sci- ences, 41, 3, 776-790, 2001

    2001

  30. [38]

    Tarjomannejad, Ali Prediction of the Liquid Vapor Pres- sure Using the Artificial Neural Network-Group Contribution Method Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineer- ing (IJCCE),34, 4, 97-111, 2015

    2015

  31. [39]

    Hosseini, Sayed Mostafa, Pierantozzi Mariano and Moghadasi Jalil Viscosities of some fatty acid esters and biodiesel fuels from a rough hard-sphere-chain model and artificial neural network Fuel, 235, 1083 - 1091, 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    Whitehead, T. M. and Irwin, B. W. J. and Hunt, P. and Segall, M. D. and Conduit, G. J. Imputation of Assay Bioactivity Data Using Deep Learning Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 59, 3, 1197-1204, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    and Conduit G.J

    Conduit B.D, Illston T., Baker S., Vadegadde Duggappa D., Harding S., Stone H.J. and Conduit G.J. Probabilistic neu- ral network identification of an alloy for direct laser deposition Materials & Design, 168, 107644, 2019 12

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.