Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Zero-Cost Proxies for Lightweight NAS

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.08134 v2 pith:DUZBDLGR submitted 2021-01-20 cs.LG cs.AIcs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.NE
keywords proxiessearchzero-costaccuracybestmodelsproxycompared
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is quickly becoming the standard methodology to design neural network models. However, NAS is typically compute-intensive because multiple models need to be evaluated before choosing the best one. To reduce the computational power and time needed, a proxy task is often used for evaluating each model instead of full training. In this paper, we evaluate conventional reduced-training proxies and quantify how well they preserve ranking between multiple models during search when compared with the rankings produced by final trained accuracy. We propose a series of zero-cost proxies, based on recent pruning literature, that use just a single minibatch of training data to compute a model's score. Our zero-cost proxies use 3 orders of magnitude less computation but can match and even outperform conventional proxies. For example, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between final validation accuracy and our best zero-cost proxy on NAS-Bench-201 is 0.82, compared to 0.61 for EcoNAS (a recently proposed reduced-training proxy). Finally, we use these zero-cost proxies to enhance existing NAS search algorithms such as random search, reinforcement learning, evolutionary search and predictor-based search. For all search methodologies and across three different NAS datasets, we are able to significantly improve sample efficiency, and thereby decrease computation, by using our zero-cost proxies. For example on NAS-Bench-101, we achieved the same accuracy 4$\times$ quicker than the best previous result. Our code is made public at: https://github.com/mohsaied/zero-cost-nas.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NN-Former: Rethinking Graph Structure in Neural Architecture Representation

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    NN-Former improves neural accuracy and latency prediction by using attention masks over sibling nodes in the architecture graph.

  2. Searching Efficient Deep Architectures for Radar Target Detection using Monte-Carlo Tree Search

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Monte-Carlo tree search found a radar detection network with 60% fewer parameters than a baseline U-Net at comparable detection performance.

  3. Loss Functions for Predictor-based Neural Architecture Search

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Weighted losses identify top architectures best with enough training data, ranking losses win with very few data, and switching between them (PWLNAS) gives small consistent gains in predictor-based NAS.

  4. CARL: Causality-guided Architecture Representation Learning for an Interpretable Performance Predictor

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CARL improves NAS performance predictors by separating critical from redundant architecture features and training with latent-space interventions.

  5. Scaling Closed-Loop Feature Channel Configuration with LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Scaling LLM-generated channel-configuration search from sparse to 250 candidates per cycle yields a modest mean-accuracy trend, a frontier improvement from 0.3144 to 0.3676, and measurable channel-allocation regularities.

Pith tools