Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 119 references

Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A systematic review of 106 studies finds NLP for chronic-disease notes is still mostly extracting entities and classifying phenotypes, with deep learning appearing in only three papers.

desk verdict Useful, competent systematic review of NLP for chronic disease notes; the numbers are sloppy and the deep-learning headline is scope-dependent, but the synthesis and recommendations hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05780 v1 pith:DWF2Z6GL submitted 2019-08-15 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR

Seyedmostafa Sheikhalishahi , Riccardo Miotto , Joel T Dudley , Alberto Lavelli , Fabio Rinaldi , Venet Osmani This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.CLcs.IR
keywords electronichealthrecordsclinicalnoteschronicdiseasenaturallanguageprocessingmachinelearningdeeptextminingsystematicreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This systematic review of 106 studies, drawn from 2652 initial records, maps how natural language processing is applied to free-text clinical notes for chronic diseases. Its central finding is that the field is extraction-oriented: most work classifies a disease phenotype or recognizes named entities, using rule-based methods and shallow classifiers such as support vector machines and naive Bayes, while deep learning appears in only three studies. The review also documents a striking disease imbalance, with circulatory-system diseases drawing 38 studies against 14 for metabolic diseases, and attributes this to the more unstructured character of circulatory-system records. The authors read the overall picture as a field held back by interpretability concerns and scarce public clinical data, and they close with five research directions: moving from extraction to understanding, recognizing relations among entities, extracting temporal structure, exploiting alternative knowledge sources, and building large de-identified annotated corpora.

What carries the argument

The engine of the review is a structured article-selection protocol followed by a two-axis classification of the included studies: the NLP method used (rule-based, machine learning, hybrid, or deep) and the NLP task performed (text classification, entity recognition, coreference resolution, negation detection). The load-bearing output is a set of counts—18 support vector machine papers, 11 naive Bayes, 7 conditional random fields, 74 with rule-based components, and only 3 with deep learning—together with a grouping of 43 chronic diseases into 10 categories using ICD-10. These counts and groupings carry every trend claim in the paper: the rise of machine learning over rules, the emergent status of deep learning, and the concentration of effort in circulatory diseases and neoplasms.

What would settle it

Count deep-learning papers that apply natural language processing to chronic-disease clinical notes, published 2013-2018 in journals, conference proceedings, and preprints. If the count is far above the three the review found, the paper's central trend claim is false for the field as a whole and true only for its journal-only sample. A second, even simpler check is to re-run the same journal-only search extended to the present: if deep learning has by now displaced shallow classifiers, the 'emergent' conclusion was a lag artifact; if shallow and rule-based methods still dominate in journals, the claim survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' own terms, the paper establishes a snapshot of chronic-disease clinical NLP between 2007 and 2018: the field is dominated by phenotype classification and entity recognition, carried out by rule-based systems and shallow machine-learning classifiers, with deep learning still emergent at three studies. It documents a shift from purely rule-based to machine-learning approaches, notably support vector machines, naive Bayes, and conditional random fields, while noting that 74 of the surveyed papers still involve rule-based components. It also finds that efforts are unevenly distributed across disease categories in a way that tracks the degree of unstructured content in the records: 38 papers address circulatory-system diseases, 34 neoplasms, and 14 endocrine and metabolic diseases, a pattern the authors explain by the relative richness of structured data in metabolic records. Finally, it shows that publicly available corpora are rare, with only 16 papers using public data at all, and concludes that progress requires methods that go beyond extraction toward temporal and relational understanding.

Load-bearing premise

The review's trend conclusions rest on the assumption that restricting the search to English-language journal articles from 2007 to 2018 captures how the field developed; the authors' own wider search, which found 61 deep-learning papers on clinical notes over roughly the same period, indicates that the 'deep learning is emergent' finding may not survive when conference and preprint literature is included.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the snapshot is right, clinical NLP for chronic diseases has been roughly a decade behind general NLP in adopting deep learning, with journal publication lag likely hiding part of the transition.
  • The disease imbalance implies that NLP effort follows the structure of the data rather than disease burden, leaving metabolic diseases comparatively underserved despite their high incidence.
  • The scarcity of public corpora means that progress in advanced methods, such as learning clinical word embeddings, is gated by data access, so shared-task initiatives and de-identified corpus release would have an outsized effect.
  • The persistence of rule-based and shallow classifiers reflects a real constraint: clinical users need interpretable predictions, so interpretability, not raw accuracy, is a central barrier to adopting more complex models.
  • The five recommendations define a concrete agenda—relation extraction, temporal extraction, alternative knowledge sources, transfer learning, and large annotated corpora—that would move the field from extraction toward understanding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors' own supplementary search of preprint servers, which found 61 deep-learning papers on clinical notes between 2013 and 2018, suggests the 'emergent' verdict is partly a journal-lag artifact; re-running the review with conference and preprint sources included would likely raise the deep-learning count, though not necessarily the chronic-disease-specific count.
  • The data-form hypothesis—circulatory records are unstructured, metabolic records are structured—implies a testable boundary condition: as narrative documentation of metabolic diseases grows (for example, in diabetes self-management notes), the NLP imbalance should narrow.
  • The near-absence of temporal extraction in a longitudinal disease domain suggests the bottleneck is not algorithmic novelty but the lack of annotated longitudinal corpora; building such corpora, even for a single disease, would be a high-leverage intervention.
  • A practical test of the recommendation to exploit alternative knowledge sources would be to add an external decision-support knowledge base to an entity-recognition pipeline and measure whether relation extraction improves on chronic-disease notes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a PRISMA-guided systematic review of natural language processing (NLP) applied to free-text clinical notes for chronic diseases. From 2,652 initially retrieved articles, the authors narrowed to 478 and finally included 106 journal articles published in English between January 2007 and February 2018. They identify 43 chronic diseases grouped into ICD-10 categories, analyze the distribution of studies across disease groups, summarize the NLP methods and tasks used, and discuss trends in machine learning versus rule-based approaches. The central qualitative findings are that most work focuses on phenotype classification and entity recognition, that shallow machine-learning classifiers (especially SVMs and Naive Bayes) dominate, that deep learning is rare (n=3), that public datasets are scarce, and that relation extraction, temporal understanding, and data sharing remain underdeveloped. The authors also compare their review with previous systematic reviews and propose five future research directions.

Significance. The review fills a genuine gap by focusing specifically on chronic diseases, a domain where clinical notes are especially abundant. Its qualitative conclusions--dominance of classification and entity recognition, prevalence of shallow machine learning, scarcity of public data, and the need for relation extraction, temporal extraction, and data sharing--are broadly consistent with the described literature and are useful to researchers entering the field. The PRISMA protocol, multi-database search, dual screening, and detailed comparison with prior systematic reviews are methodological strengths. The disease-group analysis, including the observation that circulatory-system diseases receive more NLP attention than metabolic diseases, offers a useful hypothesis about the role of structured versus unstructured data. However, the quantitative claims about study counts and the deep-learning 'emergent' status are weakened by internal inconsistencies and by an unacknowledged scope limitation, and the absence of the appendices in this version prevents full verification of the reported counts.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, Table 1; Abstract] Table 1 is internally inconsistent: the table title reports n=102, but the Abstract and text consistently report 106 included studies, and the row percentages (35.8%, 32.1%, 13.2%, 15.1%) are computed over 106 while the row counts (38, 34, 14, 16) sum to 102. Additionally, the text claims the 43 diseases were classified into 10 ICD-10 disease categories, but Table 1 shows only four rows, with six disease classes folded into a single 'Other diseases' row. The authors should correct the count discrepancy and present the full 10-category breakdown so that the disease distribution is reproducible.
  2. [Discussion, Principal Findings; Limitations] The central claim that 'deep learning methods remain emergent (n=3)' is conditioned on the journal-only search scope, but this condition is not carried into the Abstract or the Limitations section. The authors' own arXiv keyword search (7 papers from 2013-2015, 13 in 2016, 19 in 2017, and 22 in 2018) indicates substantial deep-learning activity on clinical notes outside journals during the review period. Because this venue exclusion is not scope-neutral, the conclusion should be reframed as 'emergent in the reviewed journal literature' or the review should incorporate conference and preprint venues; the current phrasing overstates the field-level status.
  3. [Methods, Article Selection] The stated inclusion criterion is 'journal articles written in English,' yet the text says that '6 added manually, including 4 conference papers' were part of the 478 initially considered articles. This contradicts the stated scope, and the later exclusion reason 'the article was not a journal paper' suggests conference papers were ultimately excluded. Please clarify whether conference papers were included in the final 106, and if so, how that squares with the journal-only restriction; if they were excluded, remove the apparent contradiction.
  4. [Multimedia Appendices 1 and 2] The manuscript repeatedly refers to Multimedia Appendix 1 (search strategy) and Multimedia Appendix 2 (complete list of reviewed papers, disease classifications, algorithms, venues, and excluded papers), but these materials are not present in the arXiv version. Without the full article list and search queries, the reported n=3 deep learning count, the 106-study total, and the screening decisions cannot be independently verified. The authors should make the appendices available with the manuscript or provide a direct link to them.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Results, Table 2] Table 2 lists method counts that sum to 126 across 106 papers, presumably because a single paper can report multiple methods; please state this explicitly so the reader is not misled.
  2. [Methods, Search Strategy] The exact search queries are said to be in Multimedia Appendix 1, but the appendix is unavailable; at minimum, the main text should state the database-specific search date and any language or publication-type filters applied.
  3. [Results, Categorization of Diseases] The phrase 'identification of 43 chronic diseases, which were then further classified into 10 disease categories using ICD-10' is not fully supported by Table 1; either expand the table or reference the complete mapping in an appendix.
  4. [Discussion, Principal Findings] When citing the arXiv search (7 from 2013-2015, 13 in 2016, 19 in 2017, 22 in 2018), the authors should indicate the search date and exact keywords, since these numbers are not from the systematic review and are not independently reproducible as reported.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the review's claims are descriptive aggregates of an external literature base, not derived from the review's own inputs.

full rationale

The paper is a PRISMA systematic review; its central claims (106 included studies, 43 diseases, classifier frequencies, n=3 deep learning papers, dominance of phenotype classification and entity recognition) are descriptive summaries of independently published primary studies retrieved by database searches. There is no fitted parameter, no predictive model, and no equation whose output is defined by an input; the only classification step (mapping 43 diseases to 10 ICD-10 categories) is an external standard and does not encode the review's conclusions. The one notable self-citation is Miotto et al. 'Deep Patient' [3], counted among the three deep learning studies; this is a legitimate primary-study inclusion with its own external validation, not a load-bearing citation that substitutes for evidence. The Discussion's arXiv search (61 deep learning papers, 2013-2018) is presented by the authors as a hypothesis about venue bias and is explicitly acknowledged in the Limitations section ('The review is limited to journal articles written in the English language'); this is a scope limitation that could affect the 'emergent' characterization, but it is not circular. The n=102 vs n=106 discrepancy between Table 1 and the text, and the absence of the appendices in this version, are reproducibility/consistency issues, not circularity. The review is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims of the review rest entirely on the completeness of the literature search and the coding choices (ICD-10 categories, journal-only scope, subjective topical screening). There are no free parameters or invented entities. The key load-bearing assumptions are about coverage and classification fidelity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The selected databases and keyword combinations provide exhaustive coverage of NLP on clinical notes for chronic diseases.
    The search strategy in Methods (keyword groups and five databases) is assumed to capture the relevant literature; this is standard for PRISMA reviews but is an assumption about coverage.
  • domain assumption ICD-10 is an appropriate classification scheme for grouping the 43 chronic diseases into 10 categories.
    The authors use ICD-10 as the external standard to group diseases in Results and Table 1; no justification is given for this choice.
  • domain assumption Restricting to English-language journal articles from 2007 to 2018 does not bias the observed trends.
    The authors acknowledge this limitation in the Limitations section, and it specifically affects the deep learning count.
  • domain assumption The manual screening by authors is reliable for topical relevance.
    Two authors screened titles and abstracts, five reviewed full texts; inter-rater agreement is not reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DWF2Z6GL

@misc{pith2026190805780,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DWF2Z6GL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05780}
}
read the original abstract

Of the 2652 articles considered, 106 met the inclusion criteria. Review of the included papers resulted in identification of 43 chronic diseases, which were then further classified into 10 disease categories using ICD-10. The majority of studies focused on diseases of the circulatory system (n=38) while endocrine and metabolic diseases were fewest (n=14). This was due to the structure of clinical records related to metabolic diseases, which typically contain much more structured data, compared with medical records for diseases of the circulatory system, which focus more on unstructured data and consequently have seen a stronger focus of NLP. The review has shown that there is a significant increase in the use of machine learning methods compared to rule-based approaches; however, deep learning methods remain emergent (n=3). Consequently, the majority of works focus on classification of disease phenotype with only a handful of papers addressing extraction of comorbidities from the free text or integration of clinical notes with structured data. There is a notable use of relatively simple methods, such as shallow classifiers (or combination with rule-based methods), due to the interpretability of predictions, which still represents a significant issue for more complex methods. Finally, scarcity of publicly available data may also have contributed to insufficient development of more advanced methods, such as extraction of word embeddings from clinical notes. Further efforts are still required to improve (1) progression of clinical NLP methods from extraction toward understanding; (2) recognition of relations among entities rather than entities in isolation; (3) temporal extraction to understand past, current, and future clinical events; (4) exploitation of alternative sources of clinical knowledge; and (5) availability of large-scale, de-identified clinical corpora.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    WHO Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014 URL: https://www.who.int/ nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/ [accessed 2019-03-29] [WebCite Cache ID 77Fa8uXax]

    World Health Organization. WHO Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014 URL: https://www.who.int/ nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/ [accessed 2019-03-29] [WebCite Cache ID 77Fa8uXax]

    2014

  2. [2]

    Adoption factors of the electronic health record: a systematic review

    Kruse CS, Kothman K, Anerobi K, Abanaka L. Adoption factors of the electronic health record: a systematic review. JMIR Med Inform 2016 Jun 01;4(2):e19. [doi: 10.2196/medinform.5525] [Medline: 27251559]

    work page doi:10.2196/medinform.5525 2016

  3. [3]

    Deep patient: an unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records

    Miotto R, Li L, Kidd BA, Dudley JT. Deep patient: an unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records. Sci Rep 2016 Dec 17;6:26094 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1038/srep26094] [Medline: 27185194]

    doi:10.1038/srep26094 2016

  4. [4]

    Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care

    Jensen P, Jensen L, Brunak S. Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat Rev Genet 2012 May 02;13(6):395-405. [doi: 10.1038/nrg3208] [Medline: 22549152]

    doi:10.1038/nrg3208 2012

  5. [5]

    Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review

    Goldstein BA, Navar AM, Pencina MJ, Ioannidis JPA. Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017 Jan;24(1):198-208. [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw042] [Medline: 27189013]

    doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw042 2017

  6. [6]

    Prediction of incident hypertension within the next year: prospective study using statewide electronic health records and machine learning

    Ye C, Fu T, Hao S, Zhang Y, Wang O, Jin B, et al. Prediction of incident hypertension within the next year: prospective study using statewide electronic health records and machine learning. J Med Internet Res 2018 Jan 30;20(1):e22 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9268] [Medline: 29382633]

    work page doi:10.2196/jmir.9268 2018

  7. [7]

    Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges

    Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Dudley JT. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform 2017 May 06. [doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx044] [Medline: 28481991]

    doi:10.1093/bib/bbx044 2017

  8. [9]

    Automated data capture from free-text radiology reports to enhance accuracy of hospital inpatient stroke codes

    Flynn R, Macdonald TM, Schembri N, Murray GD, Doney ASF. Automated data capture from free-text radiology reports to enhance accuracy of hospital inpatient stroke codes. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010 Aug;19(8):843-847. [doi: 10.1002/pds.1981] [Medline: 20602346]

    work page doi:10.1002/pds.1981 2010

Show all 119 references
  1. [10]

    Quantifying care coordination using natural language processing and domain-specific ontology

    Popejoy LL, Khalilia MA, Popescu M, Galambos C, Lyons V, Rantz M, et al. Quantifying care coordination using natural language processing and domain-specific ontology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015 Apr;22(e1):e93-e103 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002702] [Medline: 25324557]

    2015 doi

  2. [11]

    A text mining approach to the prediction of disease status from clinical discharge summaries

    Yang H, Spasic I, Keane JA, Nenadic G. A text mining approach to the prediction of disease status from clinical discharge summaries. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16(4):596-600 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3096] [Medline: 19390098]

    2009 doi

  3. [12]

    Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance

    Wei W, Teixeira PL, Mo H, Cronin RM, Warner JL, Denny JC. Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 Apr;23(e1):e20-e27 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv13...

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    Extracting information from the text of electronic medical records to improve case detection: a systematic review

    Ford E, Carroll JA, Smith HE, Scott D, Cassell JA. Extracting information from the text of electronic medical records to improve case detection: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 Dec;23(5):1007-1015 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv180] [Medline: 26911811]

    2016 doi

  5. [14]

    A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records

    Shivade C, Raghavan P, Fosler-Lussier E, Embi PJ, Elhadad N, Johnson SB, et al. A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21(2):221-230 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001935] [Medlin...

    2014 doi

  6. [18]

    Clinical information extraction applications: a literature review

    Wang Y, Wang ZF, Rastegar-Mojarad M, Moon S, Shen F, Afzal N, et al. Clinical information extraction applications: a literature review. J Biomed Inform 2018 Dec;77:34-49 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.11.011] [Medline: 29162496]

    2018 doi

  7. [19]

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097] [Medline: 19621072]

    2009 doi

  8. [20]

    Coronary artery disease risk assessment from unstructured electronic health records using text mining

    Jonnagaddala J, Liaw S, Ray P, Kumar M, Chang N, Dai H. Coronary artery disease risk assessment from unstructured electronic health records using text mining. J Biomed Inform 2015 Dec;58 Suppl:S203-S210 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.003] [Medline: 26319542] JMIR...

    2015 doi

  9. [21]

    Monitoring prescribing patterns using regression and electronic health records

    Backenroth D, Chase HS, Wei Y, Friedman C. Monitoring prescribing patterns using regression and electronic health records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017 Dec 19;17(1):175 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0575-5] [Medline: 29258594]

    2017 doi

  10. [22]

    Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports

    Castro SM, Tseytlin E, Medvedeva O, Mitchell K, Visweswaran S, Bekhuis T, et al. Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports. J Biomed Inform 2017 Dec;69:177-187 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.011] [Medline: 28428140]

    2017 doi

  11. [23]

    Longitudinal analysis of pain in patients with metastatic prostate cancer using natural language processing of medical record text

    Heintzelman NH, Taylor RJ, Simonsen L, Lustig R, Anderko D, Haythornthwaite JA, et al. Longitudinal analysis of pain in patients with metastatic prostate cancer using natural language processing of medical record text. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013 Sep;20(5):898-905 [FREE Full te...

    2013 doi

  12. [24]

    Assessing occurrence of hypoglycemia and its severity from electronic health records of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Nunes AP, Yang J, Radican L, Engel SS, Kurtyka K, Tunceli K, et al. Assessing occurrence of hypoglycemia and its severity from electronic health records of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016 Nov;121:192-203. [doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.09.012...

    2016 doi

  13. [25]

    Natural language processing framework to assess clinical conditions

    Ware H, Mullett CJ, Jagannathan V. Natural language processing framework to assess clinical conditions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16(4):585-589 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3091] [Medline: 19390100]

    2009 doi

  14. [26]

    Clinical review: prevalence and incidence of endocrine and metabolic disorders in the United States: a comprehensive review

    Golden SH, Robinson KA, Saldanha I, Anton B, Ladenson PW. Clinical review: prevalence and incidence of endocrine and metabolic disorders in the United States: a comprehensive review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009 Jun;94(6):1853-1878 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2291] ...

    2009 doi

  15. [27]

    Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome

    Sanchis-Gomar F, Perez-Quilis C, Leischik R, Lucia A. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med 2016 Jul;4(13):256 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.06.33] [Medline: 27500157]

    2016 doi

  16. [28]

    Methods to develop an electronic medical record phenotype algorithm to compare the risk of coronary artery disease across 3 chronic disease cohorts

    Liao KP, Ananthakrishnan AN, Kumar V, Xia Z, Cagan A, Gainer VS, et al. Methods to develop an electronic medical record phenotype algorithm to compare the risk of coronary artery disease across 3 chronic disease cohorts. PLoS One 2015;10(8):e0136651 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1...

    2015 doi

  17. [29]

    An automatic system to identify heart disease risk factors in clinical texts over time

    Chen Q, Li H, Tang B, Wang X, Liu X, Liu Z, et al. An automatic system to identify heart disease risk factors in clinical texts over time. J Biomed Inform 2015 Dec;58 Suppl:S158-S163 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.09.002] [Medline: 26362344]

    2015 doi

  18. [30]

    Risk factor detection for heart disease by applying text analytics in electronic medical records

    Torii M, Fan J, Yang W, Lee T, Wiley MT, Zisook DS, et al. Risk factor detection for heart disease by applying text analytics in electronic medical records. J Biomed Inform 2015 Dec;58 Suppl:S164-S170 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.011] [Medline: 26279500]

    2015 doi

  19. [31]

    Using local lexicalized rules to identify heart disease risk factors in clinical notes

    Karystianis G, Dehghan A, Kovacevic A, Keane JA, Nenadic G. Using local lexicalized rules to identify heart disease risk factors in clinical notes. J Biomed Inform 2015 Dec;58 Suppl:S183-S188 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.013] [Medline: 26133479]

    2015 doi

  20. [32]

    A hybrid model for automatic identification of risk factors for heart disease

    Yang H, Garibaldi JM. A hybrid model for automatic identification of risk factors for heart disease. J Biomed Inform 2015 Dec;58 Suppl:S171-S182 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.09.006] [Medline: 26375492]

    2015 doi

  21. [33]

    The role of fine-grained annotations in supervised recognition of risk factors for heart disease from EHRs

    Roberts K, Shooshan SE, Rodriguez L, Abhyankar S, Kilicoglu H, Demner-Fushman D. The role of fine-grained annotations in supervised recognition of risk factors for heart disease from EHRs. J Biomed Inform 2015 Dec;58 Suppl:S111-S119 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06...

    2015 doi

  22. [34]

    Automated processing of electronic medical records is a reliable method of determining aspirin use in populations at risk for cardiovascular events

    Pakhomov S, Shah N, Hanson P, Balasubramaniam S, Smith S. Automated processing of electronic medical records is a reliable method of determining aspirin use in populations at risk for cardiovascular events. Inform Prim Care 2010;18(2):125-133 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 21078235]

    2010

  23. [35]

    Medication extraction from electronic clinical notes in an integrated health system: a study on aspirin use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

    Zheng C, Rashid N, Koblick R, An J. Medication extraction from electronic clinical notes in an integrated health system: a study on aspirin use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Clin Ther 2015 Sep;37(9):2048-2052. [doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.002] [Medline...

    2015 doi

  24. [36]

    Unlocking echocardiogram measurements for heart disease research through natural language processing

    Patterson OV, Freiberg MS, Skanderson M, Brandt CA, DuVall SL. Unlocking echocardiogram measurements for heart disease research through natural language processing. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017 Dec 12;17(1):151 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0580-8] [Medline: 28606104]

    2017 doi

  25. [37]

    Automated extraction of VTE events from narrative radiology reports in electronic health records: a validation study

    Tian Z, Sun S, Eguale T, Rochefort CM. Automated extraction of VTE events from narrative radiology reports in electronic health records: a validation study. Med Care 2017 Dec;55(10):e73-e80 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000346] [Medline: 25924079]

    2017 doi

  26. [38]

    Statin intensity or achieved LDL? Practice-based evidence for the evaluation of new cholesterol treatment guidelines

    Ross EG, Shah N, Leeper N. Statin intensity or achieved LDL? Practice-based evidence for the evaluation of new cholesterol treatment guidelines. PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0154952 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154952] [Medline: 27227451]

    2016 doi

  27. [39]

    Use of electronic healthcare records to identify complex patients with atrial fibrillation for targeted intervention

    Wang SV, Rogers JR, Jin Y, Bates DW, Fischer MA. Use of electronic healthcare records to identify complex patients with atrial fibrillation for targeted intervention. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017 Mar 01;24(2):339-344. [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw082] [Medline: 27375290]

    2017 doi

  28. [40]

    Electronic medical records for clinical research: application to the identification of heart failure

    Pakhomov S, Weston S, Jacobsen S, Chute C, Meverden R, Roger V. Electronic medical records for clinical research: application to the identification of heart failure. Am J Manag Care 2007 Jun;13(6 Part 1):281-288 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 17567225] JMIR Med Inform 2019 | vol. ...

    2007

  29. [41]

    Information extraction from Italian medical reports: an ontology-driven approach

    Viani N, Larizza C, Tibollo V, Napolitano C, Priori SG, Bellazzi R, et al. Information extraction from Italian medical reports: an ontology-driven approach. Int J Med Inform 2018 Mar;111:140-148. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.013] [Medline: 29425625]

    2018 doi

  30. [42]

    Natural language processing of clinical notes for identification of critical limb ischemia

    Afzal N, Mallipeddi VP, Sohn S, Liu H, Chaudhry R, Scott CG, et al. Natural language processing of clinical notes for identification of critical limb ischemia. Int J Med Inform 2018 Mar;111:83-89 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.024] [Medline: 29425639]

    2018 doi

  31. [43]

    Mining peripheral arterial disease cases from narrative clinical notes using natural language processing

    Afzal N, Sohn S, Abram S, Scott CG, Chaudhry R, Liu H, et al. Mining peripheral arterial disease cases from narrative clinical notes using natural language processing. J Vasc Surg 2017 Dec;65(6):1753-1761 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.031] [Medline: 28189359]

    2017 doi

  32. [44]

    Leveraging informatics for genetic studies: use of the electronic medical record to enable a genome-wide association study of peripheral arterial disease

    Kullo IJ, Fan J, Pathak J, Savova GK, Ali Z, Chute CG. Leveraging informatics for genetic studies: use of the electronic medical record to enable a genome-wide association study of peripheral arterial disease. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17(5):568-574 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10....

    2010 arXiv

  33. [45]

    Practice-based evidence: profiling the safety of cilostazol by text-mining of clinical notes

    Leeper NJ, Bauer-Mehren A, Iyer SV, Lependu P, Olson C, Shah NH. Practice-based evidence: profiling the safety of cilostazol by text-mining of clinical notes. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e63499 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063499] [Medline: 23717437]

    2013 doi

  34. [46]

    Automatic prediction of coronary artery disease from clinical narratives

    Buchan K, Filannino M, Uzuner O. Automatic prediction of coronary artery disease from clinical narratives. J Biomed Inform 2017 Dec;72:23-32 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.019] [Medline: 28663072]

    2017 doi

  35. [47]

    Text mining and big data analytics for retrospective analysis of clinical texts from outpatient care

    Boytcheva S, Angelova G, Angelov Z, Tcharaktchiev D. Text mining and big data analytics for retrospective analysis of clinical texts from outpatient care. Cybern Inf Technol 2015;1(4):55-77 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1515/cait-2015-0055]

    2015 doi

  36. [48]

    HTNSystem: hypertension information extraction system for unstructured clinical notes

    Jonnagaddala J, Liaw S, Ray P, Kumar M. HTNSystem: hypertension information extraction system for unstructured clinical notes. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2014:219-227 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-13987-6_21]

    2014 doi

  37. [49]

    Evaluating electronic health record data sources and algorithmic approaches to identify hypertensive individuals

    Teixeira PL, Wei W, Cronin RM, Mo H, VanHouten JP, Carroll RJ, et al. Evaluating electronic health record data sources and algorithmic approaches to identify hypertensive individuals. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017 Jan;24(1):162-171 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw071] [Me...

    2017 doi

  38. [50]

    Automatic identification of heart failure diagnostic criteria, using text analysis of clinical notes from electronic health records

    Byrd RJ, Steinhubl SR, Sun J, Ebadollahi S, Stewart WF. Automatic identification of heart failure diagnostic criteria, using text analysis of clinical notes from electronic health records. Int J Med Inform 2014 Dec;83(12):983-992 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012....

    2014 doi

  39. [51]

    Automated extraction of ejection fraction for quality measurement using regular expressions in Unstructured Information Management Architecture (UIMA) for heart failure

    Garvin JH, DuVall SL, South BR, Bray BE, Bolton D, Heavirland J, et al. Automated extraction of ejection fraction for quality measurement using regular expressions in Unstructured Information Management Architecture (UIMA) for heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19(5):85...

    2012 doi

  40. [52]

    Identification and progression of heart disease risk factors in diabetic patients from longitudinal electronic health records

    Jonnagaddala J, Liaw S, Ray P, Kumar M, Dai H, Hsu C. Identification and progression of heart disease risk factors in diabetic patients from longitudinal electronic health records. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:636371 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1155/2015/636371] [Medline: 26380290]

    2015 doi

  41. [53]

    NLP based congestive heart failure case finding: a prospective analysis on statewide electronic medical records

    Wang Y, Luo J, Hao S, Xu H, Shin AY, Jin B, et al. NLP based congestive heart failure case finding: a prospective analysis on statewide electronic medical records. Int J Med Inform 2015 Dec;84(12):1039-1047. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.007] [Medline: 26254876]

    2015 doi

  42. [54]

    Extraction of left ventricular ejection fraction information from various types of clinical reports

    Kim Y, Garvin JH, Goldstein MK, Hwang TS, Redd A, Bolton D, et al. Extraction of left ventricular ejection fraction information from various types of clinical reports. J Biomed Inform 2017 Dec;67:42-48 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.017] [Medline: 28163196]

    2017 doi

  43. [55]

    Types of Heart Failure URL: https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-failure/ what-is-heart-failure/types-of-heart-failure [accessed 2019-03-30] [WebCite Cache ID 77FcIDcn5]

    American Heart Association. Types of Heart Failure URL: https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-failure/ what-is-heart-failure/types-of-heart-failure [accessed 2019-03-30] [WebCite Cache ID 77FcIDcn5]

    2019

  44. [56]

    Studying associations between heart failure self-management and rehospitalizations using natural language processing

    Topaz M, Radhakrishnan K, Blackley S, Lei V, Lai K, Zhou L. Studying associations between heart failure self-management and rehospitalizations using natural language processing. West J Nurs Res 2017 Jan;39(1):147-165. [doi: 10.1177/0193945916668493] [Medline: 27628125]

    2017 doi

  45. [57]

    Automating quality measures for heart failure using natural language processing: a descriptive study in the Department of Veterans Affairs

    Garvin JH, Kim Y, Gobbel GT, Matheny ME, Redd A, Bray BE, et al. Automating quality measures for heart failure using natural language processing: a descriptive study in the Department of Veterans Affairs. JMIR Med Inform 2018 Jan 15;6(1):e5 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/medin...

    2018 doi

  46. [58]

    Prevalence of heart failure signs and symptoms in a large primary care population identified through the use of text and data mining of the electronic health record

    Vijayakrishnan R, Steinhubl SR, Ng K, Sun J, Byrd RJ, Daar Z, et al. Prevalence of heart failure signs and symptoms in a large primary care population identified through the use of text and data mining of the electronic health record. J Card Fail 2014 Jul;20(7):459-464 [FREE F...

    2014 doi

  47. [59]

    Linking electronic health record-extracted psychosocial data in real-time to risk of readmission for heart failure

    Watson AJ, O'Rourke J, Jethwani K, Cami A, Stern TA, Kvedar JC, et al. Linking electronic health record-extracted psychosocial data in real-time to risk of readmission for heart failure. Psychosomatics 2011;52(4):319-327 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.02.007] [Medl...

    2011 doi

  48. [60]

    Toward better public health reporting using existing off the shelf approaches: the value of medical dictionaries in automated cancer detection using plaintext medical data

    Kasthurirathne SN, Dixon BE, Gichoya J, Xu H, Xia Y, Mamlin B, et al. Toward better public health reporting using existing off the shelf approaches: the value of medical dictionaries in automated cancer detection using plaintext medical data. J Biomed Inform 2017 Dec;69:160-17...

    2017 doi

  49. [61]

    Efficient identification of nationally mandated reportable cancer cases using natural language processing and machine learning

    Osborne JD, Wyatt M, Westfall AO, Willig J, Bethard S, Gordon G. Efficient identification of nationally mandated reportable cancer cases using natural language processing and machine learning. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 Nov;23(6):1077-1084. [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw006] [Medline...

    2016 doi

  50. [62]

    Tumor reference resolution and characteristic extraction in radiology reports for liver cancer stage prediction

    Yim W, Kwan SW, Yetisgen M. Tumor reference resolution and characteristic extraction in radiology reports for liver cancer stage prediction. J Biomed Inform 2016 Dec;64:179-191 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.10.005] [Medline: 27729234]

    2016 doi

  51. [63]

    Classifying tumor event attributes in radiology reports

    Yim W, Kwan SW, Yetisgen M. Classifying tumor event attributes in radiology reports. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 2017 Sep 14;68(11):2662-2674. [doi: 10.1002/asi.23937]

    2017 doi

  52. [64]

    Extracting important information from Chinese Operation Notes with natural language processing methods

    Wang H, Zhang W, Zeng Q, Li Z, Feng K, Liu L. Extracting important information from Chinese Operation Notes with natural language processing methods. J Biomed Inform 2014 Apr;48:130-136 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.017] [Medline: 24486562]

    2014 doi

  53. [65]

    Analysis of free text in electronic health records for identification of cancer patient trajectories

    Jensen K, Soguero-Ruiz C, Oyvind MK, Lindsetmo R, Kouskoumvekaki I, Girolami M, et al. Analysis of free text in electronic health records for identification of cancer patient trajectories. Sci Rep 2017 Dec 07;7:46226 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1038/srep46226] [Medline: 28387314]

    2017 doi

  54. [66]

    Using natural language processing to improve efficiency of manual chart abstraction in research: the case of breast cancer recurrence

    Carrell DS, Halgrim S, Tran D, Buist DSM, Chubak J, Chapman WW, et al. Using natural language processing to improve efficiency of manual chart abstraction in research: the case of breast cancer recurrence. Am J Epidemiol 2014 Mar 15;179(6):749-758 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.109...

    2014 doi

  55. [67]

    Machine learning classification of surgical pathology reports and chunk recognition for information extraction noise reduction

    Napolitano G, Marshall A, Hamilton P, Gavin AT. Machine learning classification of surgical pathology reports and chunk recognition for information extraction noise reduction. Artif Intell Med 2016 Dec;70:77-83. [doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.06.001] [Medline: 27431038]

    2016 doi

  56. [68]

    ReCAP: feasibility and accuracy of extracting cancer stage information from narrative electronic health record data

    Warner JL, Levy MA, Neuss MN, Warner JL, Levy MA, Neuss MN. ReCAP: feasibility and accuracy of extracting cancer stage information from narrative electronic health record data. J Oncol Pract 2016 Feb;12(2):157-169. [doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004622] [Medline: 26306621]

    2016

  57. [69]

    Development of automated detection of radiology reports citing adrenal findings

    Zopf JJ, Langer JM, Boonn WW, Kim W, Zafar HM. Development of automated detection of radiology reports citing adrenal findings. J Digit Imaging 2012 Feb;25(1):43-49 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/s10278-011-9425-7] [Medline: 22042494]

    2012 doi

  58. [70]

    Automatic structured reporting from narrative cancer pathology reports

    Ou Y, Patrick J. Automatic structured reporting from narrative cancer pathology reports. 2014 Presented at: HIKM '14 Proceedings of the Seventh Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management; 2014; Auckland

    2014

  59. [71]

    Automatic negation detection in narrative pathology reports

    Ou Y, Patrick J. Automatic negation detection in narrative pathology reports. Artif Intell Med 2015 May;64(1):41-50 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.03.001] [Medline: 25990897]

    2015 doi

  60. [72]

    Automatic lymphoma classification with sentence subgraph mining from pathology reports

    Luo Y, Sohani AR, Hochberg EP, Szolovits P. Automatic lymphoma classification with sentence subgraph mining from pathology reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21(5):824-832 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002443] [Medline: 24431333]

    2014 doi

  61. [73]

    University of California, Irvine-Pathology Extraction Pipeline: the pathology extraction pipeline for information extraction from pathology reports

    Ashish N, Dahm L, Boicey C. University of California, Irvine-Pathology Extraction Pipeline: the pathology extraction pipeline for information extraction from pathology reports. Health Informatics J 2014 Dec;20(4):288-305. [doi: 10.1177/1460458213494032] [Medline: 25155030]

    2014 doi

  62. [74]

    Automated classification of free-text pathology reports for registration of incident cases of cancer

    Jouhet V, Defossez G, Burgun A, Le Beux P, Levillain P, Ingrand P, et al. Automated classification of free-text pathology reports for registration of incident cases of cancer. Methods Inf Med 2012;51(3):242-251. [doi: 10.3414/ME11-01-0005] [Medline: 21792466]

    2012 doi

  63. [75]

    Smart extraction and analysis system for clinical research

    Afzal M, Hussain M, Khan WA, Ali T, Jamshed A, Lee S. Smart extraction and analysis system for clinical research. Telemed J E Health 2017 Dec;23(5):404-420. [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0157] [Medline: 27782787]

    2017

  64. [76]

    Towards generalizable entity-centric clinical coreference resolution

    Miller T, Dligach D, Bethard S, Lin C, Savova G. Towards generalizable entity-centric clinical coreference resolution. J Biomed Inform 2017 Dec;69:251-258 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.015] [Medline: 28438706]

    2017 doi

  65. [77]

    Rule-based information extraction from patients' clinical data

    Mykowiecka A, Marciniak M, Kupść A. Rule-based information extraction from patients' clinical data. J Biomed Inform 2009 Oct;42(5):923-936 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.007] [Medline: 19646551]

    2009 doi

  66. [78]

    Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports

    Bozkurt S, Lipson JA, Senol U, Rubin DL. Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015 Apr;22(e1):e81-e92. [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003009] [Medline: 25352567]

    2015 doi

  67. [79]

    Natural language processing improves identification of colorectal cancer testing in the electronic medical record

    Denny JC, Choma NN, Peterson JF, Miller RA, Bastarache L, Li M, et al. Natural language processing improves identification of colorectal cancer testing in the electronic medical record. Med Decis Making 2012;32(1):188-197. [doi: 10.1177/0272989X11400418] [Medline: 21393557]

    2012 doi

  68. [80]

    Extracting timing and status descriptors for colonoscopy testing from electronic medical records

    Denny JC, Peterson JF, Choma NN, Xu H, Miller RA, Bastarache L, et al. Extracting timing and status descriptors for colonoscopy testing from electronic medical records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17(4):383-388 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004804] [Medline: 20595304]

    2010 arXiv

  69. [81]

    Extracting data from electronic medical records: validation of a natural language processing program to assess prostate biopsy results

    Thomas AA, Zheng C, Jung H, Chang A, Kim B, Gelfond J, et al. Extracting data from electronic medical records: validation of a natural language processing program to assess prostate biopsy results. World J Urol 2014 Feb;32(1):99-103. [doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1040-4] [Medline: ...

    2014 doi

  70. [82]

    Information extraction for tracking liver cancer patients' statuses: from mixture of clinical narrative report types

    Ping X, Tseng Y, Chung Y, Wu Y, Hsu C, Yang P, et al. Information extraction for tracking liver cancer patients' statuses: from mixture of clinical narrative report types. Telemed J E Health 2013 Sep;19(9):704-710. [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0241] [Medline: 23869395]

    2013

  71. [83]

    Natural language processing for the development of a clinical registry: a validation study in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

    Al-Haddad MA, Friedlin J, Kesterson J, Waters JA, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Schmidt CM. Natural language processing for the development of a clinical registry: a validation study in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. HPB (Oxford) 2010 Dec;12(10):688-695 [FREE Full text] [doi...

    2010

  72. [84]

    Improving a full-text search engine: the importance of negation detection and family history context to identify cases in a biomedical data warehouse

    Garcelon N, Neuraz A, Benoit V, Salomon R, Burgun A. Improving a full-text search engine: the importance of negation detection and family history context to identify cases in a biomedical data warehouse. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017 May 01;24(3):607-613. [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw1...

    2017 doi

  73. [85]

    A context-aware approach for progression tracking of medical concepts in electronic medical records

    Chang N, Dai H, Jonnagaddala J, Chen C, Tsai RT, Hsu W. A context-aware approach for progression tracking of medical concepts in electronic medical records. J Biomed Inform 2015 Dec;58 Suppl:S150-S157 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.09.013] [Medline: 26432355]

    2015 doi

  74. [86]

    Extracting information from electronic medical records to identify the obesity status of a patient based on comorbidities and bodyweight measures

    Figueroa RL, Flores CA. Extracting information from electronic medical records to identify the obesity status of a patient based on comorbidities and bodyweight measures. J Med Syst 2016 Aug;40(8):191. [doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0548-8] [Medline: 27402260]

    2016 doi

  75. [87]

    Use of a support vector machine for categorizing free-text notes: assessment of accuracy across two institutions

    Wright A, McCoy AB, Henkin S, Kale A, Sittig DF. Use of a support vector machine for categorizing free-text notes: assessment of accuracy across two institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20(5):887-890 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001576] [Medline: 23543111]

    2013 doi

  76. [88]

    Towards automatic diabetes case detection and ABCS protocol compliance assessment

    Mishra NK, Son RY, Arnzen JJ. Towards automatic diabetes case detection and ABCS protocol compliance assessment. Clin Med Res 2012 Aug;10(3):106-121 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.3121/cmr.2012.1047] [Medline: 22634542]

    2012

  77. [89]

    Zheng L, Wang Y, Hao S, Shin AY, Jin B, Ngo AD, et al. Web-based real-time case finding for the population health management of patients with diabetes mellitus: a prospective validation of the natural language processing-based algorithm with statewide electronic medical record...

    2016 doi

  78. [90]

    Automatic classification of foot examination findings using clinical notes and machine learning

    Pakhomov SVS, Hanson PL, Bjornsen SS, Smith SA. Automatic classification of foot examination findings using clinical notes and machine learning. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008 Mar;15(2):198-202 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2585] [Medline: 18096902]

    2008 doi

  79. [91]

    Lower visual acuity predicts worse utility values among patients with type 2 diabetes

    Smith DH, Johnson ES, Russell A, Hazlehurst B, Muraki C, Nichols GA, et al. Lower visual acuity predicts worse utility values among patients with type 2 diabetes. Qual Life Res 2008 Dec;17(10):1277-1284. [doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9399-1] [Medline: 18972222]

    2008 doi

  80. [92]

    A high throughput semantic concept frequency based approach for patient identification: a case study using type 2 diabetes mellitus clinical notes

    Wei W, Tao C, Jiang G, Chute CG. A high throughput semantic concept frequency based approach for patient identification: a case study using type 2 diabetes mellitus clinical notes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010 Nov 13;2010:857-861 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 21347100]

    2010

  81. [93]

    Automatic quality of life prediction using electronic medical records

    Pakhomov S, Shah N, Hanson P, Balasubramaniam S, Smith SA, Smith SA. Automatic quality of life prediction using electronic medical records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008 Nov 06:545-549 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 18998862]

    2008

  82. [94]

    Identifying axial spondyloarthritis in electronic medical records of US veterans

    Walsh JA, Shao Y, Leng J, He T, Teng C, Redd D, et al. Identifying axial spondyloarthritis in electronic medical records of US veterans. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017 Dec;69(9):1414-1420 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1002/acr.23140] [Medline: 27813310]

    2017 doi

  83. [95]

    Word2Vec inversion and traditional text classifiers for phenotyping lupus

    Turner CA, Jacobs AD, Marques CK, Oates JC, Kamen DL, Anderson PE, et al. Word2Vec inversion and traditional text classifiers for phenotyping lupus. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017 Aug 22;17(1):126 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0518-1] [Medline: 28830409]

    2017 doi

  84. [96]

    Portability of an algorithm to identify rheumatoid arthritis in electronic health records

    Carroll RJ, Thompson WK, Eyler AE, Mandelin AM, Cai T, Zink RM, et al. Portability of an algorithm to identify rheumatoid arthritis in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012 Jun;19(e1):e162-e169 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000583] [Medline: 22374935]

    2012 doi

  85. [97]

    The utility of including pathology reports in improving the computational identification of patients

    Chen W, Huang Y, Boyle B, Lin S. The utility of including pathology reports in improving the computational identification of patients. J Pathol Inform 2016;7:46 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.194838] [Medline: 27994938]

    2016

  86. [98]

    Support vector feature selection for early detection of anastomosis leakage from bag-of-words in electronic health records

    Soguero-Ruiz C, Hindberg K, Rojo-Alvarez JL, Skrovseth SO, Godtliebsen F, Mortensen K, et al. Support vector feature selection for early detection of anastomosis leakage from bag-of-words in electronic health records. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2016 Dec;20(5):1404-1415. [doi:...

    2016

  87. [99]

    Defining a patient population with cirrhosis: an automated algorithm with natural language processing

    Chang EK, Yu CY, Clarke R, Hackbarth A, Sanders T, Esrailian E, et al. Defining a patient population with cirrhosis: an automated algorithm with natural language processing. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016;50(10):889-894. [doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000583] [Medline: 27348317]

    2016 doi

  88. [100]

    Multiple disease risk assessment with uniform model based on medical clinical notes

    Shi X, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Li W, Hao Y, Alelaiwi A, et al. Multiple disease risk assessment with uniform model based on medical clinical notes. IEEE Access 2016;4:7074-7083. [doi: 10.1109/access.2016.2614541]

    2016

  89. [101]

    Applying deep neural networks to unstructured text notes in electronic medical records for phenotyping youth depression

    Geraci J, Wilansky P, de Luca V, Roy A, Kennedy JL, Strauss J. Applying deep neural networks to unstructured text notes in electronic medical records for phenotyping youth depression. Evid Based Ment Health 2017 Jul 24;20(3):83-87 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102688]...

    2017 doi

  90. [102]

    Using electronic patient records to discover disease correlations and stratify patient cohorts

    Roque F, Jensen P, Schmock H, Dalgaard M, Andreatta M, Hansen T, et al. Using electronic patient records to discover disease correlations and stratify patient cohorts. PLoS Comput Biol 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002141 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002141] [Medline: 21901084]

    2011 doi

  91. [103]

    Ananda-Rajah MR, Martinez D, Slavin MA, Cavedon L, Dooley M, Cheng A, et al. Facilitating surveillance of pulmonary invasive mold diseases in patients with haematological malignancies by screening computed tomography reports using natural language processing. PLoS One 2014;9(9...

    2014 doi

  92. [104]

    Big data driven co-occurring evidence discovery in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

    Baechle C, Agarwal A, Zhu X. Big data driven co-occurring evidence discovery in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. J Big Data 2017 Apr 4;4(1). [doi: 10.1186/s40537-017-0067-6]

    2017 doi

  93. [105]

    Predictive modeling of risk factors and complications of cataract surgery

    Gaskin GL, Pershing S, Cole TS, Shah NH. Predictive modeling of risk factors and complications of cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 2016 Jun 10;26(4):328-337 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000706] [Medline: 26692059]

    2016 doi

  94. [106]

    Early recognition of multiple sclerosis using natural language processing of the electronic health record

    Chase HS, Mitrani LR, Lu GG, Fulgieri DJ. Early recognition of multiple sclerosis using natural language processing of the electronic health record. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017 Feb 28;17(1):24 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0418-4] [Medline: 28241760]

    2017 doi

  95. [107]

    Combining structured and unstructured data to identify a cohort of ICU patients who received dialysis

    Abhyankar S, Demner-Fushman D, Callaghan FM, McDonald CJ. Combining structured and unstructured data to identify a cohort of ICU patients who received dialysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21(5):801-807 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001915] [Medline: 24384230]

    2014 doi

  96. [108]

    A hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach to identifying semantically similar concepts

    Pivovarov R, Elhadad N. A hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach to identifying semantically similar concepts. J Biomed Inform 2012 Jun;45(3):471-481 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.01.002] [Medline: 22289420]

    2012 doi

  97. [109]

    A comparison of rule-based and machine learning approaches for classifying patient portal messages

    Cronin R, Fabbri D, Denny J, Rosenbloom S, Jackson G. A comparison of rule-based and machine learning approaches for classifying patient portal messages. Int J Med Inform 2017 Dec;105:110-120 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.004] [Medline: 28750904]

    2017 doi

  98. [110]

    Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients

    Ni Y, Wright J, Perentesis J, Lingren T, Deleger L, Kaiser M, et al. Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015 Apr 14;15:28 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.11...

    2015 doi

  99. [111]

    Text mining applied to electronic cardiovascular procedure reports to identify patients with trileaflet aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease

    Small AM, Kiss DH, Zlatsin Y, Birtwell DL, Williams H, Guerraty MA, et al. Text mining applied to electronic cardiovascular procedure reports to identify patients with trileaflet aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. J Biomed Inform 2017 Dec;72:77-84 [FREE Full text] [d...

    2017 doi

  100. [112]

    Representation of information about family relatives as structured data in electronic health records

    Zhou L, Lu Y, Vitale CJ, Mar PL, Chang F, Dhopeshwarkar N, et al. Representation of information about family relatives as structured data in electronic health records. Appl Clin Inform 2014;5(2):349-367 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-10-RA-0080] [Medline: 25024754]

    2014 doi

  101. [113]

    Document-level classification of CT pulmonary angiography reports based on an extension of the ConText algorithm

    Chapman BE, Lee S, Kang HP, Chapman WW. Document-level classification of CT pulmonary angiography reports based on an extension of the ConText algorithm. J Biomed Inform 2011 Oct;44(5):728-737 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.03.011] [Medline: 21459155]

    2011 doi

  102. [114]

    TEPAPA: a novel in silico feature learning pipeline for mining prognostic and associative factors from text-based electronic medical records

    Lin FP, Pokorny A, Teng C, Epstein RJ. TEPAPA: a novel in silico feature learning pipeline for mining prognostic and associative factors from text-based electronic medical records. Sci Rep 2017 Jul 31;7(1):6918 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07111-0] [Medline: 28761061]

    2017 doi

  103. [115]

    A natural language processing tool for large-scale data extraction from echocardiography reports

    Nath, Albaghdadi MS, Jonnalagadda SR. A natural language processing tool for large-scale data extraction from echocardiography reports. PLoS One 2016;11(4):e0153749 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153749] [Medline: 27124000]

    2016 doi

  104. [116]

    Mapping phenotypic information in heterogeneous textual sources to a domain-specific terminological resource

    Alnazzawi N, Thompson P, Ananiadou S. Mapping phenotypic information in heterogeneous textual sources to a domain-specific terminological resource. PLoS One 2016;11(9):e0162287 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162287] [Medline: 27643689]

    2016 doi

  105. [117]

    Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: a systematic review

    Kreimeyer K, Foster M, Pandey A, Arya N, Halford G, Jones SF, et al. Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: a systematic review. J Biomed Inform 2017 Dec;73:14-29 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.07.012] ...

    2017 doi

  106. [118]

    Text mining applications in psychiatry: a systematic literature review

    Abbe A, Grouin C, Zweigenbaum P, Falissard B. Text mining applications in psychiatry: a systematic literature review. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2016 Dec;25(2):86-100. [doi: 10.1002/mpr.1481] [Medline: 26184780]

    2016 doi

  107. [119]

    Text mining of cancer-related information: review of current status and future directions

    Spasić I, Livsey J, Keane JA, Nenadić G. Text mining of cancer-related information: review of current status and future directions. Int J Med Inform 2014 Sep;83(9):605-623 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.009] [Medline: 25008281]

    2014 doi

  108. [120]

    Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review

    Pons E, Braun LMM, Hunink MGM, Kors JA. Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review. Radiology 2016 May;279(2):329-343. [doi: 10.1148/radiol.16142770] [Medline: 27089187]

    2016 doi

  109. [121]

    Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine

    Ching T, Himmelstein DS, Beaulieu-Jones BK, Kalinin AA, Do BT, Way GP, et al. Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. J R Soc Interface 2018 Apr;15(141) [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0387] [Medline: 29618526]

    2018

  110. [122]

    Rule-based information extraction is dead! Long live rule-based information extraction systems!

    Chiticariu L, Li Y, Reiss F. Rule-based information extraction is dead! Long live rule-based information extraction systems!. 2013 Presented at: Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process EMNLP; 2013; Seattle. JMIR Med Inform 2019 | vol. 7 | iss. 2 | e12239 | p.17http://medinfor...

    2013

  111. [123]

    Barnett GO, Cimino JJ, Hupp JA, Hoffer EP. DXplain. An evolving diagnostic decision-support system. JAMA 1987 Jul 03;258(1):67-74. [Medline: 3295316] Abbreviations BI-RADS: Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System CHF: congestive heart failure CRF: conditional random field Dee...

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.