REVIEW 2 cited by
The Evens and Odds of CMB Anomalies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The lack of power of large--angle CMB anisotropies is known to increase its statistical significance at higher Galactic latitudes, where a string--inspired pre--inflationary scale $\Delta$ can also be detected. Considering the Planck 2015 data, and relying largely on a Bayesian approach, we show that the effect is mostly driven by the \emph{even}--$\ell$ harmonic multipoles with $\ell \lesssim 20$, which appear sizably suppressed in a way that is robust with respect to Galactic masking, along with the corresponding detections of $\Delta$. On the other hand, the first \emph{odd}--$\ell$ multipoles are only suppressed at high Galactic latitudes. We investigate this behavior in different sky masks, constraining $\Delta$ through even and odd multipoles, and we elaborate on possible implications. We include low--$\ell$ polarization data which, despite being noise--limited, help in attaining confidence levels of about 3 $\sigma$ in the detection of $\Delta$. We also show by direct forecasts that a future all--sky $E$--mode cosmic--variance--limited polarization survey may push the constraining power for $\Delta$ beyond 5 $\sigma$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings
Non-supersymmetric AdS×S flux vacua in three string models decay by flux-reducing tunneling whose semi-classical rates match brane-instanton estimates from D1- or NS5-branes.
-
Is the lack of power anomaly in the CMB correlated with the orientation of the Galactic plane?
The low large-scale CMB variance, concentrated away from the Galactic plane, remains anomalous at about 2.8 to 3 sigma even after random rotations of the sky are taken into account.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.