Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 39 references

The hadron spectrum now includes states that a quark-antiquark pair cannot produce, and experiments have established several of them.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 01:02 UTC pith:DXIG7DTG

load-bearing objection A solid, honest encyclopedia review of hadron spectroscopy — no new physics, but a reliable status map with one internal date slip and one overstatement about pentaquarks.

arxiv 2608.00191 v1 pith:DXIG7DTG submitted 2026-07-31 nucl-ex hep-exhep-ph

Hadron Spectroscopy: Experimental Overview

Volker Crede This is my paper
classification nucl-ex hep-exhep-ph PACS 12.38.-t14.20.-c14.40.-n
keywords hadron spectroscopyquantum chromodynamicsexotic hadronsquark modeltetraquarkspentaquarkshybrid mesonsglueballs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review of meson and baryon spectroscopy argues that the traditional quark model — mesons as quark–antiquark pairs, baryons as three quarks — is no longer enough to describe the observed hadron spectrum. It walks through the measured states sector by sector and claims that QCD also produces spin-exotic mesons with quantum numbers no quark-antiquark pair can carry, as well as tetraquarks and pentaquarks whose quark content is unambiguously non-minimal. The review does not assert that every exotic candidate is settled; it argues that the combination of charged hidden-charm states, doubly charmed tetraquarks, and hidden-charm pentaquarks makes the existence of such states 'established beyond doubt.' A sympathetic reader would care because the spectrum is the main experimental window onto QCD in the non-perturbative regime, where perturbation theory does not work.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that recent experiments have demonstrated that the hadron spectrum includes states beyond the simple quark-model classification. In the light-flavor sector, two historical spin-exotic candidates are converging on a single 1^-+ resonance pole, a quantum number that a quark-antiquark pair cannot generate; in the heavy-flavor sector, electrically charged states with a minimal four-quark content and hidden-charm pentaquark states with five valence quarks are listed in the standard particle tables. The review presents the map of conventional mesons and baryons in multiplet tables, flags which assignments are established and which are 'merely educated guesses,' and con

What carries the argument

The central instrument is the quantum-number sieve: the set of J^PC values — total angular momentum, parity, and charge-conjugation parity — that a simple quark-antiquark pair can produce. Any observed state with a J^PC outside that set, such as 1^-+, is exotic by construction, independent of its internal dynamics; states with four or five valence quarks are likewise identified by their flavor content. Around this sieve, the review organizes the spectrum using SU(3)-flavor multiplets, SU(6)⊗O(3) supermultiplets for baryons, harmonic-oscillator excitation bands, and a quark-diquark coordinate system for singly heavy baryons. The multiplet tables carry the argument: they assign every observed

Load-bearing premise

The whole ordering of the spectrum rests on accepting the star ratings and the model-dependent partial-wave analyses behind the particle listings; the review itself notes that many hyperon and heavy-baryon spin-parity assignments are inferred from quark-model expectations rather than measured, and that several multiplet assignments are merely educated guesses.

What would settle it

A high-statistics, model-independent amplitude analysis of the ηπ and η′π P-waves that found no resonance pole, or a demonstration that the reported pentaquark peaks arise from kinematic rescattering rather than genuine resonances, would overturn the claim that exotic hadrons are established beyond doubt.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The light-flavor 1^-+ channel is consistent with a single hybrid-meson pole; the two historical candidates can be described by one resonance in a single coupled-channel fit.
  • Electrically charged hidden-charm states and the doubly charmed tetraquark establish four-quark resonances; hidden-charm pentaquarks establish five-quark resonances.
  • The scalar meson sector has more states than the quark-model nonet can hold, leaving room for glueball mixing, and the pseudoscalar glueball candidate awaits confirmation in an independent experiment.
  • The Lambda(1405) region is now listed as two nearby states, supporting the two-pole picture of a quasi-bound meson-baryon system.
  • Bottom-baryon excitation energies scale below charmed-baryon ones as the heavy-quark mass increases, and the same phenomenological patterns predict at least sixteen excited bottom-baryon masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-pole 1^-+ picture holds, a full nonet of spin-exotic hybrids should exist at predictable masses; the unconfirmed isoscalar partner near 1855 MeV is the natural next test.
  • The same J^PC sieve could be turned on doubly heavy baryons and bottomonium-like states to see whether the exotic degrees of freedom scale with quark mass the way the conventional multiplets do.
  • Because many baryon spin-parity assignments are inherited from quark-model expectations, a few decisive spin measurements could reorder the multiplets without changing a single mass — the 'spectrum' as ordered is more fragile than the 'spectrum' as measured.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This is an invited encyclopedia-style review of experimental hadron spectroscopy, covering meson and baryon spectra, quark-model classifications, partial-wave-analysis methods, and the status of exotic hadrons (tetraquarks, hybrids, glueball candidates, pentaquarks). The paper synthesizes the 2024/2025/2026 PDG listings and recent results from COMPASS, LHCb, BESIII, Belle, CLAS12, GlueX, and JPAC. Its central assertions are that the light- and heavy-flavor sectors have produced compelling evidence for exotic mesons (§2.5) and that the LHCb pentaquark discoveries established pentaquarks beyond doubt (§3.3.4). The review explicitly labels many multiplet assignments and spin-parity entries as 'merely educated guesses' (Tables 3 and 4) and distinguishes established states from one- and two-star candidates.

Significance. If judged as a research article, the paper introduces no new data, derivation, or falsifiable prediction; its value lies in accuracy, completeness, and balance as a reference chapter. The manuscript is carefully anchored to the PDG and to primary experimental papers, and it is commendably honest about the model dependence of partial-wave extractions and the tentative status of many resonances. The central qualitative claim—that QCD supports hadrons beyond the simple quark model—does not rest on the disputed P_c candidates alone, since the review points to Z_c(4430)^+ and T_cc(3875)^+ as established manifestly exotic states (§2.5.2). The review's explicit caveats on star ratings and on the 'merely educated guesses' in Tables 3 and 4 are a strength, not a weakness. For an encyclopedia chapter, the manuscript is fit for purpose once the local inconsistencies identified below are corrected.

minor comments (6)
  1. [§1 (Introduction)] The text says 'since the discovery of the 2017 pentaquark candidates, P_c(4380)^+ and P_c(4450)^+'. This is inconsistent with §3.3.4, which correctly dates the observation to 2015, and with the cited reference [Aaij et al. (2015)]. Please correct the date in the Introduction.
  2. [§3.3.4] The sentence 'the discovery of the P_c states established beyond doubt that QCD supports exotic hadrons beyond the traditional quark-model picture' is hard to reconcile with the same section's statement that the P_c states are 'listed as one-star P_c\bar c states in the RPP' and with the paper's own explanation in §3.3 that one-star means 'evidence of existence is poor'. Since the broader exotic-hadron claim is already supported by the established Z_c(4430) and T_cc(3875) states, I recommend softening this to something like 'provided strong evidence for beyond-the-quark-model baryons' or explicitly noting that the pentaquark candidates have not yet reached the PDG's highest confidence level.
  3. [§3.3.2] The subsection heading 'Multi-strange Ξ and Σ resonances' is inaccurate: Σ resonances are singly strange (S = -1). The multi-strange hyperons are Ξ (S = -2) and Ω (S = -3). Please change the heading to 'Multi-strange Ξ and Ω resonances' or similar.
  4. [§2.4, §3.3.2, §3.3.3] The manuscript refers to 'the 2025 edition of the Review of Particle Physics' (§2.4), 'the 2026 edition of the RPP' (§3.3.2), and 'the 2025 update' (§3.3.3), but the only RPP reference is [Navas et al. (2024)], the 2024 edition. Please harmonize the edition labels with the actual cited reference, or add the appropriate PDG online-update citations.
  5. [Reference list and Table 3 caption] The author name in the reference 'Crede V and Y elton J (2024)' has an erroneous space: 'Y elton' should be 'Yelton'. The same typo appears in the Table 3 caption ('Crede and Y elton (2024)').
  6. [§2.5.2] Minor grammar: 'as well as the open-charm D*_{s0}(2317) state by the BaBar Collaboration' should read 'as well as the discovery of the open-charm D*_{s0}(2317) state' to match the parallel with 'the discovery of the hidden-charm X(3872) state'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review is anchored to PDG and independent primary data, with only benign self-citations and an internal overstatement.

full rationale

This paper is an encyclopedia review with no derivation chain: it does not fit parameters, make predictions, or invoke a uniqueness theorem. Its spectrum content is taken from the PDG RPP [Navas et al. (2024)] and from primary experiments (LHCb, Belle, BESIII, COMPASS, JPAC), and its multiplet assignments are explicitly hedged — Table 3 caption: 'the classifications are merely educated guesses'; Table 4 caption: 'all multiplet assignments are merely educated guesses.' The author self-citations (Crede & Roberts 2013 for Fig. 5; Crede & Yelton 2024 for Fig. 7 and the adapted Table 3) are used as review/figure sources, not as load-bearing theorems or fitted inputs, so they do not create a closed loop. The only flagged issue is internal: §3.3.4 describes the Pc states as 'listed as one-star Pc̄c states in the RPP' but then says their 'discovery ... established beyond doubt that QCD supports exotic hadrons beyond the traditional quark-model picture.' That is an overstatement against the paper's own star-rating definitions ('evidence of existence is poor'), but it is not circular, because the paper's exotic-hadron conclusion is independently supported by the established manifestly exotic states Zc(4430)+ (Tc̄c1(4430)+) and Tcc(3875)+ (§2.5.2), not by the Pc claim. No prediction or derived quantity is equivalent to an input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

A review paper: no new data, no free parameters, no invented entities. The load-bearing input is the PDG catalog plus the model-dependent partial-wave analyses the field uses to extract resonance parameters; the paper inherits those assumptions and, to its credit, flags the most fragile ones.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The PDG/RPP listings and star ratings are a faithful inventory of the experimental evidence.
    The entire review is a summary of [Navas et al. 2024]; Section 3.3 describes the star-rating system but does not independently audit its entries.
  • standard math SU(3) flavor and SU(6) x O(3) spin-flavor representation theory is the valid organizing scheme for the light-baryon spectrum.
    Used throughout Section 3.1 and Tables 2-4; the paper itself says most assignments are 'educated guesses', so the framework is assumed and its predictive content is not derived here.
  • domain assumption Color confinement is established, though analytically unproven, from lattice QCD and experiment.
    Stated explicitly in Section 1; the review's framing presupposes confined composite states.
  • domain assumption The categories of tetraquark, hybrid, molecule, and glueball can be meaningfully assigned to observed states from production and decay patterns.
    The exotic-hadron discussion in Section 2.5 relies on these categories while noting that they mix and that some assignments are ambiguous.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 35603 in / 12219 out tokens · 150086 ms · 2026-08-04T01:02:35.374005+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the most fascinating phenomena in nuclear and particle physics is the formation of light hadrons -- strongly interacting particles -- out of massless gluons and almost massless quarks. These particles exhibit rich excitation spectra due to their complex quark-gluon structures. Short-lived pairs of virtual quarks and antiquarks are continually formed and annihilated inside hadrons. Every physics student probably knows that the proton consists of three quarks. This statement is misleading, though. For example, the proton only shows a constant excess of three quarks versus antiquarks from the outside, and these three quarks are not even well defined. Understanding hadrons goes well beyond explaining their properties in terms of three quarks for baryons and a quark-antiquark pair for mesons. Much like atomic spectroscopy revealed the structure of atoms through discrete energy levels, hadron spectroscopy seeks the mapping of the spectrum of hadronic states and to use that information to better understand the underlying theory of the strong force -- Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Over the past few decades, hadron spectroscopy has entered an exciting new era with the discovery of many exotic hadrons that do not fit neatly into the traditional quark model classification of ordinary baryons and mesons. Many of the discoveries come from the heavy-flavor sector. As experimental techniques and computational methods continue to advance, hadron spectroscopy will remain a vital tool for probing the deepest layers of matter and understanding the fundamental structure of the universe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and others

    Abachi, S. and others. Observation of the top quark. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2632

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.2632 1995

  2. [2]

    Observation of J/ p Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in _b^0 J/ K^- p Decays

    Aaij, Roel and others. Observation of J/ p Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in _b^0 J/ K^- p Decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.072001 2015

  3. [3]

    and others

    Adolph, C. and others. Odd and even partial waves of ^- and ' ^- in ^-p ^ ( ) ^-p at 191\, GeV /c. Phys. Lett. B. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.11.058

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.11.058 2015

  4. [4]

    and others

    Rodas, A. and others. Determination of the pole position of the lightest hybrid meson candidate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.042002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.042002 2019

  5. [5]

    and others

    Navas, S. and others. Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  6. [6]

    Wohl, C. G. and others. Review of Particle Properties. Particle Data Group. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1984. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.56.S1

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.56.s1 1984

  7. [7]

    and others

    Ablikim, M. and others. Observation of an Isoscalar Resonance with Exotic J^ PC =1^ -+ Quantum Numbers in J/ ^ \,. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.192002

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.192002 2022

  8. [8]

    Determination of Spin-Parity Quantum Numbers of X(2370) as 0^ -+ from J/ K_S^0 K_S^0 ^ \,

    Ablikim, Medina and others. Determination of Spin-Parity Quantum Numbers of X(2370) as 0^ -+ from J/ K_S^0 K_S^0 ^ \,. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.181901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.181901 2024

  9. [9]

    Novel approaches in hadron spectroscopy

    Albaladejo, Miguel and others. Novel approaches in hadron spectroscopy. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103981. arXiv:2112.13436

    arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics

    Gross, Franz and others. 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2023. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2. arXiv:2212.11107

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    A review of the open charm and open bottom systems

    Chen, Hua-Xing and Chen, Wei and Liu, Xiang and Liu, Yan-Rui and Zhu, Shi-Lin. A review of the open charm and open bottom systems. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2017. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa6420. arXiv:1609.08928

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Jaffe, R. L. Exotica. Phys. Rept. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.11.005. arXiv:hep-ph/0409065

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    and De T \'e ramond, Guy F

    Deur, Alexandre and Brodsky, Stanley J. and De T \'e ramond, Guy F. The Spin Structure of the Nucleon. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2019. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab0b8f. arXiv:1807.05250

    arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    The Bonn electron stretcher accelerator ELSA: Past and future

    Hillert, W. The Bonn electron stretcher accelerator ELSA: Past and future. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2006. doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-09-015-4

    doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-09-015-4 2006

  15. [15]

    Mecking, B. A. Twenty years of physics at MAMI: What did it mean?. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2006. doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-09-020-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-09-020-7 2006

  16. [16]

    and others

    Bartalini, O. and others. Measurement of ^0 photoproduction on the proton from 550 MeV to 1500 MeV at GRAAL. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2005. doi:10.1140/epja/i2005-10191-2

    doi:10.1140/epja/i2005-10191-2 2005

  17. [17]

    and others

    Muramatsu, N. and others. Development of high intensity laser-electron photon beams up to 2.9 GeV at the SPring-8 LEPS beamline. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2013.11.039. arXiv:1308.6453

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    McKeown, R. D. Overview of Nuclear Physics at Jefferson Lab. PoS. 2013. doi:10.22323/1.172.0001. arXiv:1303.6622

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    Chew, G. F. and Goldberger, M. L. and Low, F. E. and Nambu, Yoichiro. Relativistic dispersion relation approach to photomeson production. Phys. Rev. 1957. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.106.1345

    doi:10.1103/physrev.106.1345 1957

  20. [20]

    and Burkert, V

    Klempt, E. and Burkert, V. and Thoma, U. and Tiator, L. and Workman, R. and Excitations and the Quark Model. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2020. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00261-2. arXiv:2007.04232

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    and others

    Moriya, K. and others. Spin and parity measurement of the (1405) baryon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.082004. arXiv:1402.2296

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Measurement of the spin of the ^- hyperon at BABAR

    Aubert, Bernard and others. Measurement of the spin of the ^- hyperon at BABAR. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.112001. arXiv:hep-ex/0606039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Observation of Cabibbo suppressed and W exchange ^+_c baryon decays

    Abe, Kazuo and others. Observation of Cabibbo suppressed and W exchange ^+_c baryon decays. Phys. Lett. B. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01373-9. arXiv:hep-ex/0111032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  24. [24]

    Measurement of the Spin of the (1530) Resonance

    Aubert, Bernard and others. Measurement of the Spin of the (1530) Resonance. Phys. Rev. D. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.034008. arXiv:0803.1863

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    and others

    Sumihama, M. and others. Observation of (1620)^0 and evidence for (1690)^0 in _c^+ ^- ^+ ^+ decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.072501. arXiv:1810.06181

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    70 years of hyperon spectroscopy: a review of strange , baryons, and the spectrum of charmed and bottom baryons

    Crede, Volker and Yelton, John. 70 years of hyperon spectroscopy: a review of strange , baryons, and the spectrum of charmed and bottom baryons. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2024. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad7610. arXiv:2502.08815

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Determination of the _c^+ spin via the reaction e^+e^- _c^+ _c^-

    Ablikim, Medina and others. Determination of the _c^+ spin via the reaction e^+e^- _c^+ _c^-. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L091101. arXiv:2011.00396

    arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Observation of the doubly charmed baryon _ cc ^ ++

    Aaij, Roel and others. Observation of the doubly charmed baryon _ cc ^ ++. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.112001. arXiv:1707.01621

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    The lightest hybrid meson supermultiplet in QCD

    Dudek, Jozef J. The lightest hybrid meson supermultiplet in QCD. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.074023. arXiv:1106.5515

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    and Dudek, Jozef J

    Edwards, Robert G. and Dudek, Jozef J. and Richards, David G. and Wallace, Stephen J. Excited state baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.074508. arXiv:1104.5152

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    and Mathur, Nilmani and Richards, David G

    Edwards, Robert G. and Mathur, Nilmani and Richards, David G. and Wallace, Stephen J. Flavor structure of the excited baryon spectra from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.054506. arXiv:1212.5236

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    Glozman, L. Ya. Chiral multiplets of excited mesons. Phys. Lett. B. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.066. arXiv:hep-ph/0312354

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    Kaiser, Norbert and Siegel, P. B. and Weise, W. Chiral dynamics and the S_ 11 (1535) nucleon resonance. Phys. Lett. B. 1995. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01203-3. arXiv:nucl-th/9507036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  34. [34]

    and Mai, Maxim and Meissner, Ulf G

    Bruns, Peter C. and Mai, Maxim and Meissner, Ulf G. Chiral dynamics of the S_ 11 (1535) and S_ 11 (1650) resonances revisited. Phys. Lett. B. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.008. arXiv:1012.2233

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Completeness rules for spin observables in pseudoscalar meson photoproduction

    Chiang, Wen-Tai and Tabakin, Frank. Completeness rules for spin observables in pseudoscalar meson photoproduction. Phys. Rev. C. 1997. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.55.2054. arXiv:nucl-th/9611053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  36. [36]

    and others

    Yelton, J. and others. Observation of an Excited ^- Baryon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.052003. arXiv:1805.09384

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    and Wilczek, Frank

    Gross, David J. and Wilczek, Frank. Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1973. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1343

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.30.1343 1973

  38. [38]

    and de Teramond, Guy F

    Brodsky, Stanley J. and de Teramond, Guy F. AdS/CFT and Light-Front QCD. Subnucl. Ser. 2009. doi:10.1142/9789814293242_0008. arXiv:0802.0514

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  39. [39]

    and Roberts, W

    Crede, V. and Roberts, W. Progress towards understanding baryon resonances. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2013. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076301. arXiv:1302.7299

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013