pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31583 · v1 · pith:E32TF6PFnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Predisposition of galaxy clusters to producing exotic hyperbolic umbilic lensing configurations

Quentin Basto (CRAL) , Johan Richard (CRAL) , David J. Lagattuta (University of Hertfordshire , Durham University) , Ashish K. Meena (IIS Bengaluru) , Harald Ebeling (IfA Univ. of Hawaii) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords galaxy clustersstrong gravitational lensinghyperbolic umbilic configurationsexotic lensingparametric mass modelssource plane mappingcomoving volume
0
0 comments X

The pith

Parametric mass models of 74 galaxy clusters map an average exotic comoving volume of 0.125 galaxies per cluster for hyperbolic umbilic lensing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses parametric mass models to locate source-plane regions that produce hyperbolic umbilic image configurations and integrates those areas over redshift to obtain an exotic comoving volume per cluster. Validation on two known systems precedes application to the full sample of 74 models, where correlations with cluster parameters such as ellipticity paired with Einstein radius are quantified. The resulting average contribution per cluster is reported as roughly 0.125 galaxies, which directly implies that a random sample of 19 clusters carries a 90 percent probability of containing at least one hyperbolic umbilic system. Uncertainties from both systematic and stochastic sources are shown to remain small enough to preserve the conclusion.

Core claim

Using parametric cluster mass models, the authors define an exotic comoving volume V_z<10 by mapping and integrating source-plane areas where hyperbolic umbilic configurations can form. After validation on confirmed systems RXJ0437.1+0043 and Abell 1703, the method applied to 74 clusters yields an average per-cluster contribution of 0.125 galaxies to this volume as a conservative lower bound, with pairs of parameters best distinguishing high-volume systems.

What carries the argument

The exotic comoving volume V_z<10, obtained by integrating the source-plane area producing hyperbolic umbilic images over redshift up to z=10.

If this is right

  • Pairs of cluster parameters, especially ellipticity with Einstein radius or cuspiness, distinguish systems with larger exotic volumes.
  • A random sample of 19 clusters carries a 90 percent chance of containing at least one hyperbolic umbilic system.
  • Systematic and stochastic uncertainties on the exotic area and volume estimates remain small enough to support the conclusions.
  • The average contribution of 0.125 galaxies per cluster is presented as a conservative lower bound.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Targeted selection of high-ellipticity clusters could raise the detection rate above the random-sample baseline.
  • Extending the source-plane mapping to non-parametric mass models would test whether the volume estimates depend on the modeling choice.
  • Accumulating more confirmed hyperbolic umbilic systems could tighten constraints on the underlying cluster mass distributions.
  • The volume calculation supplies a quantitative prior for planning surveys aimed at rare high-magnification lensing events.

Load-bearing premise

The parametric cluster mass models correctly identify the source-plane regions that produce hyperbolic umbilic image configurations.

What would settle it

A survey of approximately 19 clusters that finds zero hyperbolic umbilic systems, or far more than one on average, would contradict the reported average exotic volume per cluster.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31583 by Ashish K. Meena (IIS Bengaluru), David J. Lagattuta (University of Hertfordshire, Durham University), Harald Ebeling (IfA Univ. of Hawaii), Johan Richard (CRAL), Quentin Basto (CRAL).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Diagram illustrating the evolution of tangential (red) and radial (green) caustic lines with source redshift and the loca￾tion of a hyperbolic umbilic (HU) point at the cusp exchange (blue). The dashed circles highlight the cusp-exchange point in the source plane. HU configurations are characterised by the formation of a compact quadruplet of highly magnified images at the cusp exchange, accompanied by an … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A3 line construction for A1703. Tan￾gential and radial A3 lines are shown in red and green, respectively, with HU points in light blue. The close-up highlights shear vectors and κ + γ isocontours (dashed black), where radial A3 lines occur where the eigenvalue isocontour and the shear vector are aligned. The yellow contour outlines the multiple-image region of the cluster, computed at an effective source r… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Exotic regions of RXJ0437+00 computed at source redshifts 1.97, 2.97, and 6.02 (blue), highlighting known HU exotic 4-image systems (red circles) and their predicted counter-images (dashed red circles). The dashed blue regions indicate the counter￾image areas of the exotic regions, i.e. the corresponding counter-image space in the source plane. The yellow contour outlines the multiple-image region of the c… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Exotic regions of A1703 computed at source redshift 0.89 (blue) overlaid on known HU exotic configurations (red). The dashed regions indicate the counter-image space associated with the exotic configurations, while the dashed lines mark the measured counter-image position. Small offsets between the pre￾dicted regions and the observed HU locations are likely to arise from the RMS positional uncertainty in t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Exotic region in the source plane (black￾coloured regions) for A1703 and RXJ0437+00 at z = 0.89 and 1.97 respectively. Tangential and radial caustic lines are shown in red and green respectively. removed and the procedure was repeated as long as at least five images remained. This amplification hierarchy is consistent with the asymp￾totic HU regime, in which the characteristic HU quadruplet lies arbitraril… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of tangential and radial caustic lines (red and green) with source redshift for RXJ0437+00. The scale is the same for the three panels computed for z=1.5, z=1.97 (the measured redshift of a confirmed HU exotic system) and z=2.5. Artificial point sources (blue, pink and orange) are placed in and out the exotic region at z=1.97. affect our results, provided that the clusters span a wide range of mo… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Image-plane projections of three point sources at z = 1.97 (left), colour-coded as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Exotic area Ω versus source redshift for RXJ0437+00 (left) and A1703 (right). In each panel, the blue curve traces the measured area from z = 0 to z = 10. Dashed red vertical lines mark the redshifts at which our algorithm pre￾dicts HU-exotic regions within which the con￾firmed systems were found. fication, markedly separated from the significantly higher values of the other images in the system. In contra… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Maximum exotic area Ωmax,z<10 as a function of the source redshift. Point colour encodes the exotic comoving vol￾ume Vz<10 for each cluster. Histograms display the distribution of points along the redshift and area axes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Vz<4 distribution for our sample. One of the first results from this analysis is that we di￾rectly notice that a significant number of clusters (18%) have Vz<4 < 0.1 Mpc3 at this map resolution. Conversely, clusters such as RXJ0437+00 and A1703 stand out, with Vz<4 equal to 15 Mpc3 and 13 Mpc3 , respectively. Interestingly, we can see that several clusters show a large exotic volume per our criteria but h… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Evolution of the exotic area as a function of source redshift. For each cluster, the envelope is normalised by its own maximum value over the explored redshift range. The colour of each envelope encodes the exotic comoving volume up to z = 10. Green and red ticks indicate, for each cluster, the source redshifts at which the exotic area reaches its maximum when restricting the calculation to z < 4 (Ωmax,z<… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Exotic regions in the image plane (blue) for the four clusters with the highest Vz<10 in our sample. In each panel, the source is placed at the redshift that maximises the exotic area Ω, and the yellow contour shows the corre￾sponding multiple-image region, and the green and red contours show the tangential and radial critical lines respectively, all computed at this source redshift. Dashed lines indicate… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Systematic uncertainty in the ex￾otic surface area (left) and the cumulative ex￾otic comoving exotic volume (right) as func￾tions of source redshift for AS1063. Results are shown for four independent lens models (CATS, GLAFIC, Keeton, and Sharon), and the shaded band at each redshift represents the maximum deviation from the median value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Intrinsic MCMC uncertainty in the ex￾otic surface area (left) and the cumulative ex￾otic comoving volume (right) as functions of source redshift for cluster A1703. Curves show the mean over 100 MCMC realisations, with the error bars indicating the ±1σ scatter at each redshift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Exotic comoving volume Vz<10 versus six individual cluster parameters. Coloured markers denote each cluster (error bars on parameters where available), while black squares connected by lines show the mean Vz<10 in quantile bins of the horizontal axis parameter, with ±1 SE error bars. – Lens redshift (zl) affects the lens-source distance ratio Dls/Ds and thus the redshift range over which HU config￾uration… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Triangle plot of Vz<10 against all parameter pairs. Off-diagonal panels show Vz<10-coloured scatter, weighted KDE, 1-σ ellipses (dashed: unweighted, solid: Vz<10-weighted), and the associated correlation ratio Rcorr; diagonal panels show histograms for each parameter. The top-right panel illustrates the distribution of clusters in the (e, RE) plane, with blue and red points highlighting two extreme popula… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Distribution (orange) and empirical cumulative distribu￾tion function (CDF, blue) of the expected number of observable HU systems per cluster, Ngal(< mlim), computed across the 74- cluster sample and considering a source redshift 1 < zs < 4. From this relation, one finds that approximately N = 9 clus￾ters are required to achieve a 50% chance of detecting at least one HU system, and N = 29 for 90% confiden… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strong gravitational lensing is a powerful tool for investigating the universe's large-scale structure and understanding the properties of dark matter and dark energy. The magnification and distortion of distant background sources by cluster lenses have enabled detailed studies of both lens and source populations, making these systems promising probes for precision cosmology. While classical strong-lenses are well understood, much remains to be explored for hyperbolic-umbilic (HU) exotic lenses, which produce unique telescopic effects and uncommon images with potentially very high magnifications. Identifying and quantifying these objects, along with characterising their geometric configurations, could have broad implications for studies of galaxy clusters and lensed galaxy populations. Using parametric cluster mass models, we mapped regions in the source plane where HU exotic images can form and integrate these areas over redshift to define an exotic comoving volume (V_z<10). We validated this approach on confirmed exotic systems (RXJ0437.1+0043 and Abell 1703), then applied it to a sample of 74 cluster models. We show HU-region contours for the most promising clusters, assess both systematic and stochastic uncertainties on exotic area and volume estimates, and confirm that our error remains sufficiently small to support robust conclusions. Next, we explore correlations between six cluster parameters and (V_z<10), finding that pairs of parameters, especially ellipticity with Einstein radius or cuspiness, best distinguish high-(V_z<10) systems. Finally, we estimate that each cluster contributes ~0.125 galaxies to its exotic volume on average (as a conservative lower bound), meaning that observing 19 clusters yields a 90% chance of detecting at least one HU system in a random sample.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that parametric mass models of 74 galaxy clusters can be used to map source-plane regions producing hyperbolic umbilic (HU) exotic lensing configurations; these areas are integrated over z<10 to define an exotic comoving volume V_z<10. The method is validated by reproducing the two known HU systems (RXJ0437.1+0043 and Abell 1703), then applied to the full sample. Correlations are found between cluster parameters (especially ellipticity paired with Einstein radius or cuspiness) and V_z<10. The central quantitative result is that each cluster contributes ~0.125 galaxies to its exotic volume on average (conservative lower bound), implying that a random sample of 19 clusters yields a 90% chance of detecting at least one HU system.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a quantitative, observationally testable prediction for the rarity of exotic HU configurations across cluster samples. This could directly inform survey strategies for high-magnification events and provides a statistical link between observable cluster parameters and the higher-order lensing properties that produce umbilic caustics. The reported parameter correlations offer a practical way to pre-select promising targets.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the source-plane HU mapping is validated solely by reproducing the two known systems before being applied to the remaining 72 models. Because the reported mean exotic volume of ~0.125 (and the derived 90% probability for 19 clusters) is obtained by integrating these mapped areas, any systematic mismatch between the parametric forms (e.g., elliptical NFW) and the true higher-order derivatives or critical-curve topology in other clusters would directly bias the average; no independent check or sensitivity test on a subset of the 74 models is described.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the integration procedure that produces V_z<10 (parametric forms, source-redshift distribution, numerical quadrature, and propagation of the quoted systematic/stochastic uncertainties) is not specified. Without these details it is impossible to verify that the ~0.125 average is free of post-hoc tuning or that the error budget remains small enough to support the 90% detection probability statement.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that error remains 'sufficiently small to support robust conclusions' but provides no quantitative thresholds or comparison to the 0.125 value itself.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. We address each major comment below and agree that the manuscript would benefit from additional explicit details and tests. Revisions will be made accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the source-plane HU mapping is validated solely by reproducing the two known systems before being applied to the remaining 72 models. Because the reported mean exotic volume of ~0.125 (and the derived 90% probability for 19 clusters) is obtained by integrating these mapped areas, any systematic mismatch between the parametric forms (e.g., elliptical NFW) and the true higher-order derivatives or critical-curve topology in other clusters would directly bias the average; no independent check or sensitivity test on a subset of the 74 models is described.

    Authors: We agree that validation rests on the two known HU systems (the only confirmed examples) and that an explicit sensitivity test on a subset of the 74 models would strengthen the result. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated sensitivity analysis: for a representative subset of 10 clusters we will perturb key parameters (ellipticity, Einstein radius, cuspiness) within their reported uncertainties, recompute the source-plane HU regions and V_z<10, and quantify the resulting variation in the mean exotic volume. This will directly address concerns about possible systematic mismatch with higher-order lensing properties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the integration procedure that produces V_z<10 (parametric forms, source-redshift distribution, numerical quadrature, and propagation of the quoted systematic/stochastic uncertainties) is not specified. Without these details it is impossible to verify that the ~0.125 average is free of post-hoc tuning or that the error budget remains small enough to support the 90% detection probability statement.

    Authors: We agree that the integration procedure requires explicit specification. The full manuscript already contains the source-redshift distribution (uniform in comoving volume to z=10) and states that both systematic and stochastic uncertainties were assessed, but the numerical quadrature method and uncertainty propagation steps are only summarized. In revision we will add a new subsection (Methods) that details: (i) the exact parametric forms used for each cluster, (ii) the redshift integration limits and weighting, (iii) the quadrature algorithm (adaptive Simpson with convergence tolerance), and (iv) the Monte-Carlo propagation of the quoted uncertainties to obtain the final mean of ~0.125 and the 90 % detection probability. This will allow full verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: exotic volume and probability follow directly from model integration without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The derivation computes HU source-plane areas from parametric mass models (validated on two known systems then applied to 74), integrates to V_z<10, reports the sample mean ~0.125 galaxies per cluster, and converts that mean to a binomial probability for 19 clusters. None of these steps matches the enumerated circularity patterns: no self-definition of quantities, no fitted parameter relabeled as prediction, no load-bearing self-citation, and no ansatz or uniqueness imported from prior author work. The final statistics are ordinary sample summaries of independently computed volumes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of parametric mass models for predicting HU regions and on the representativeness of the 74-model sample; the exotic volume itself is an internal definition whose numerical values depend on the chosen model parameters.

free parameters (3)
  • ellipticity
    Cluster shape parameter whose correlation with exotic volume is reported as one of the strongest predictors
  • Einstein radius
    Lensing scale parameter paired with ellipticity to distinguish high-volume systems
  • cuspiness
    Concentration parameter included in the six-parameter correlation analysis
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Parametric mass models reliably locate hyperbolic umbilic regions in the source plane
    Invoked when mapping regions and integrating to obtain V_z<10
  • domain assumption The sample of 74 cluster models is statistically representative for estimating average exotic volume per cluster
    Required to extrapolate the 0.125 average and 90% probability from the observed sample
invented entities (1)
  • exotic comoving volume V_z<10 no independent evidence
    purpose: Integrated measure of source-plane area prone to HU configurations across redshift
    Newly defined quantity used to quantify predisposition and derive the per-cluster average

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5876 in / 1740 out tokens · 90233 ms · 2026-07-01T04:03:54.833326+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Aazami, A. B. & Petters, A. O. 2009, Journal of mathematical physics, 50

    2009

  2. [2]

    2021, A&A, 647, A107

    Bacon, R., Mary, D., Garel, T., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A107

    2021

  3. [3]

    & Schneider, P

    Bartelmann, M. & Schneider, P. 2001, Physics Reports, 340, 291

    2001

  4. [4]

    2025, A&A

    Bergamini, P., Meneghetti, M., Acebron, A., et al. 2025, A&A

    2025

  5. [5]

    2021, ApJ, 162, 47

    Bouwens, R., Oesch, P., Stefanon, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 162, 47

    2021

  6. [6]

    2012, MNRAS, 427, 1953

    Christensen, L., Richard, J., Hjorth, J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1953

    2012

  7. [7]

    2022, A&A, 666, A78

    Claeyssens, A., Richard, J., Blaizot, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A78

    2022

  8. [8]

    2019, ApJ, 884, 85

    Coe, D., Salmon, B., Bradaˇc, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 85

    2019

  9. [9]

    2017, A&A, 605, A81

    Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Zamojski, M., Rujopakarn, W., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A81

    2017

  10. [10]

    2007, ApJ, 661, L33

    Ebeling, H., Barrett, E., Donovan, D., et al. 2007, ApJ, 661, L33

    2007

  11. [11]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society, 471, 3305

    Ebeling, H., Qi, J., & Richard, J. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society, 471, 3305

    2017

  12. [12]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 2662

    Ebeling, H., Richard, J., Beauchesne, B., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2662

    2025

  13. [13]

    Egami, E. et al. 2012, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts# 220, V ol. 220, 308–02 Elíasdóttir, Á., Limousin, M., Richard, J., et al. 2007, arXiv preprint arXiv:0710.5636

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    L., Ryan, R

    Finkelstein, S. L., Ryan, R. E., Papovich, C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 71

    2015

  15. [15]

    Fischler, M. A. & Bolles, R. C. 1981, Communications of the ACM, 24, 381

    1981

  16. [16]

    Fox, C., Mahler, G., Sharon, K., & González, J. D. R. 2022, ApJ, 928, 87

    2022

  17. [17]

    J., Zitrin, A., Richard, J., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Richard, J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 2242

    2024

  18. [18]

    T., Ebeling, H., & Richard, J

    Ho, I. T., Ebeling, H., & Richard, J. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1992

    2012

  19. [19]

    Hogg, D. W. 1999, arXiv preprint astro-ph/9905116

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  20. [20]

    2013, MNRAS, 429, 833

    Hsu, L.-Y ., Ebeling, H., & Richard, J. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 833

    2013

  21. [21]

    2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 452, 1437

    Jauzac, M., Richard, J., Jullo, E., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 452, 1437

    2015

  22. [22]

    L., Sharon, K., Bayliss, M

    Johnson, T. L., Sharon, K., Bayliss, M. B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 48

    2014

  23. [23]

    2007, New Journal of Physics, 9, 447

    Jullo, E., Kneib, J.-P., Limousin, M., et al. 2007, New Journal of Physics, 9, 447

    2007

  24. [24]

    & Kovner, I

    Kassiola, A. & Kovner, I. 1993, ApJ, 417, 450

    1993

  25. [25]

    2018, ApJ, 855, 4

    Kawamata, R., Ishigaki, M., Shimasaku, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 4

    2018

  26. [26]

    2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13640

    Kokorev, V ., Atek, H., Chisholm, J., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13640

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    1994, A&A, 284, 285

    Kormann, R., Schneider, P., & Bartelmann, M. 1994, A&A, 284, 285

    1994

  28. [28]

    J., Richard, J., Bauer, F

    Lagattuta, D. J., Richard, J., Bauer, F. E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3738

    2019

  29. [29]

    J., Richard, J., Ebeling, H., et al

    Lagattuta, D. J., Richard, J., Ebeling, H., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 1091

    2023

  30. [30]

    2008, A&A, 489, 23

    Limousin, M., Richard, J., Kneib, J.-P., et al. 2008, A&A, 489, 23

    2008

  31. [31]

    M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al

    Lotz, J. M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 97

    2017

  32. [32]

    & Dickinson, M

    Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. 2014, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics, 52, 415

    2014

  33. [33]

    & Schneider, P

    Mao, S. & Schneider, P. 1998, MNRAS, 295, 587

    1998

  34. [34]

    V ., Kent, J

    Mardia, K. V ., Kent, J. T., & Taylor, C. C. 2024, Multivariate analysis (John Wiley & Sons)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Meena, A. K. & Bagla, J. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3294

    2020

  36. [36]

    Meena, A. K. & Bagla, J. S. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 2097

    2021

  37. [37]

    Meena, A. K. & Bagla, J. S. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 4151

    2022

  38. [38]

    Meena, A. K. & Bagla, J. S. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3902

    2023

  39. [39]

    Meena, A. K. & Bagla, J. S. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16826

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    K., Ghosh, A., Bagla, J

    Meena, A. K., Ghosh, A., Bagla, J. S., & Williams, L. L. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1526

    2021

  41. [41]

    2007, A&A, 461, 25

    Meneghetti, M., Argazzi, R., Pace, F., et al. 2007, A&A, 461, 25

    2007

  42. [42]

    2023, A&A, 678, L2

    Meneghetti, M., Cui, W., Rasia, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, L2

    2023

  43. [43]

    & Kneib, J.-P

    Natarajan, P. & Kneib, J.-P. 1997, MNRAS, 287, 833

    1997

  44. [44]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. 1997, ApJ, 490, 493

    1997

  45. [45]

    B., Treu, T., Ellis, R

    Newman, A. B., Treu, T., Ellis, R. S., & Sand, D. J. 2013, ApJ, 765, 25

    2013

  46. [46]

    & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. & Gunn, J. 1983, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 266, Mar. 15, 1983, p. 713-717., 266, 713 Orban de Xivry, G. & Marshall, P. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 2

    1983

  47. [47]

    O., Levine, H., & Wambsganss, J

    Petters, A. O., Levine, H., & Wambsganss, J. 2012, Singularity theory and grav- itational lensing, V ol. 21 (Springer Science & Business Media)

    2012

  48. [48]

    2012, A&AS, 199, 25

    Postman, M., Coe, D., Benitez, N., et al. 2012, A&AS, 199, 25

    2012

  49. [49]

    A., Keeton, C

    Raney, C. A., Keeton, C. R., & Brennan, S. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 503

    2020

  50. [50]

    & Ebeling, H

    Repp, A. & Ebeling, H. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 844

    2018

  51. [51]

    2021, A&A, 646, A83

    Richard, J., Claeyssens, A., Lagattuta, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A83

    2021

  52. [52]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 268

    Richard, J., Jauzac, M., Limousin, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 268

    2014

  53. [53]

    Richard, J., Pei, L., Limousin, M., Jullo, E., & Kneib, J. P. 2009, A&A, 498, 37

    2009

  54. [54]

    P., Kneib, J.-P., et al

    Richard, J., Smith, G. P., Kneib, J.-P., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 325

    2010

  55. [55]

    1976, ApJ, 203, 297

    Schechter, P. 1976, ApJ, 203, 297

    1976

  56. [56]

    E., et al

    Schneider, P., Ehlers, J., Falco, E. E., et al. 1992, Gravitational lenses as astro- physical tools (Springer)

    1992

  57. [57]

    Silverman, B. W. 2018, Density estimation for statistics and data analysis (Rout- ledge)

    2018

  58. [58]

    2024, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol

    Tagliavia, M., Horwath, G., Gladders, M., & Cool-Lamps. 2024, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 243, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #243, 460.02

    2024

  59. [59]

    T., Tuan-Anh, P., Pello, R., et al

    Thai, T. T., Tuan-Anh, P., Pello, R., et al. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 678, A139

    2023

  60. [60]

    2016, ApJ, 821, 116

    Umetsu, K., Zitrin, A., Gruen, D., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 116

    2016

  61. [61]

    2009, MNRAS, 398, 1235

    Xu, D., Mao, S., Wang, J., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1235

    2009

  62. [62]

    Strong Gravitational Lensing with the James Webb Space Telescope

    Zitrin, A. 2026, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.15189 Article number, page 17 of 20 A&A proofs:manuscript no. article Appendix A: Cluster properties and exotic lensing diagnostics. Cluster properties and exotic lensing diagnostics. Summary of the lensing and structural parameters for all galaxy clusters an- alyzed in this study. The table lists the cluster red...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026