Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Methods of improving LLM training stability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.16682 v1 pith:E5BC33AO submitted 2024-10-22 cs.CL cs.LG

Methods of improving LLM training stability

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords layerlayersnormalizationtrainingmodelapplylearningmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training stability of large language models(LLMs) is an important research topic. Reproducing training instabilities can be costly, so we use a small language model with 830M parameters and experiment with higher learning rates to force models to diverge. One of the sources of training instability is the growth of logits in attention layers. We extend the focus of the previous work and look not only at the magnitude of the logits but at all outputs of linear layers in the Transformer block. We observe that with a high learning rate the L2 norm of all linear layer outputs can grow with each training step and the model diverges. Specifically we observe that QKV, Proj and FC2 layers have the largest growth of the output magnitude. This prompts us to explore several options: 1) apply layer normalization not only after QK layers but also after Proj and FC2 layers too; 2) apply layer normalization after the QKV layer (and remove pre normalization). 3) apply QK layer normalization together with softmax capping. We show that with the last two methods we can increase learning rate by 1.5x (without model divergence) in comparison to an approach based on QK layer normalization only. Also we observe significant perplexity improvements for all three methods in comparison to the baseline model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Unifying View of Attention Sinks: Two Algorithms, Two Solutions

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Attention sinks reflect either adaptive nop or broadcast mechanisms, with distinct traces, synthetic diagnostics, and complementary interventions via gating plus registers.

  2. Why Low-Precision Transformer Training Fails: An Analysis on Flash Attention

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Low-precision Flash Attention fails due to similar low-rank attention representations combined with biased rounding errors that accumulate and corrupt weight updates; a minimal fix to reduce rounding bias stabilizes training.

  3. Pion: A Spectrum-Preserving Optimizer via Orthogonal Equivalence Transformation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Pion is an optimizer that preserves the singular values of weight matrices in LLM training by applying orthogonal equivalence transformations.