Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Chemically detaching hBN crystals grown at atmospheric pressure and high temperature for high-performance graphene devices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.03149 v2 pith:EBSG73U4 submitted 2023-04-06 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chemically detaching hBN crystals grown at atmospheric pressure and high temperature for high-performance graphene devices

classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords highcrystalsgraphenedevicestemperaturecarrierpressureraman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we report on the growth of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) crystals from an iron flux at atmospheric pressure and high temperature and demonstrate that (i) the entire sheet of hBN crystals can be detached from the metal in a single step using hydrochloric acid and that (ii) these hBN crystals allow the fabrication of high carrier mobility graphene devices. By combining spatially-resolved confocal Raman spectroscopy and electrical transport measurements, we confirm the excellent quality of these crystals for high-performance hBN-graphene-based van der Waals heterostructures. The full width at half maximum of the graphene Raman 2D peak is as low as 16 cm$^{-1}$, and the room temperature charge carrier mobilitiy is around 80000 cm$^2$/(Vs) at a carrier density 1$\times$10$^{12}$cm$^{-12}$. This is fully comparable with devices of similar dimensions fabricated using crystalline hBN synthesized by the high pressure and high temperature method. Finally, we show that for exfoliated high-quality hBN flakes with a thickness between 20 nm and 40 nm the line width of the hBN Raman peak, in contrast to the graphene 2D line width, is not useful for benchmarking hBN in high mobility graphene devices.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.