Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Efficient Prompt Optimization Through the Lens of Best Arm Identification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.09723 v3 pith:EJ5SP3RV submitted 2024-02-15 stat.ML cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords promptoptimizationtriplepromptsselectionbai-fbbestbudget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The remarkable instruction-following capability of large language models (LLMs) has sparked a growing interest in automatically finding good prompts, i.e., prompt optimization. Most existing works follow the scheme of selecting from a pre-generated pool of candidate prompts. However, these designs mainly focus on the generation strategy, while limited attention has been paid to the selection method. Especially, the cost incurred during the selection (e.g., accessing LLM and evaluating the responses) is rarely explicitly considered. To overcome this limitation, this work provides a principled framework, TRIPLE, to efficiently perform prompt selection under an explicit budget constraint. TRIPLE is built on a novel connection established between prompt optimization and fixed-budget best arm identification (BAI-FB) in multi-armed bandits (MAB); thus, it is capable of leveraging the rich toolbox from BAI-FB systematically and also incorporating unique characteristics of prompt optimization. Extensive experiments on multiple well-adopted tasks using various LLMs demonstrate the remarkable performance improvement of TRIPLE over baselines while satisfying the limited budget constraints. As an extension, variants of TRIPLE are proposed to efficiently select examples for few-shot prompts, also achieving superior empirical performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Col-Bandit: Query-Time Top-$K$ Estimation for Late-Interaction Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An adaptive confidence-bound cell-pruning method recovers the exhaustive MaxSim top-K with roughly one-quarter to one-third of the compute on BEIR and REAL-MM-RAG, at the price of a calibrated rather than certified de...

  2. Audit, Alignment, and Optimization of LM-Powered Subroutines with Application to Public Comment Processing

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A framework for auditable, type-checked LM subroutines with bandit prompt optimization and self-critique is applied to NEPA public comment processing; the baseline evaluation shows high quote precision but low recall.

Pith tools