pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09016 · v1 · pith:EJ6CQH3Inew · submitted 2019-06-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.supr-con· quant-ph

Knot Topology in Quantum Spin System

X. M. Yang , L. Jin , Z. Song This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.supr-conquant-ph
keywords knot topologyquantum spin systemMajorana modestopological phasescrossing numberslinking numbersgapped phasesgapless phases
0
0 comments X

The pith

Majorana modes in quantum spin systems map to knots and links whose crossing and linking numbers mark gapped versus gapless phases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces knot theory to exactly solvable quantum spin models with long-range interactions by mapping their Majorana modes onto knots and links. Eigenstate curves are shown to braid into links in gapped phases and into knots in gapless phases, with crossing and linking numbers serving as direct geometric readouts of the ground-state topology. This mapping supplies a visual and quantitative language for one-dimensional topological phases that a reader can follow by tracking how the curves tangle. The approach matters because it turns abstract invariants into countable features of curves that can be drawn and deformed.

Core claim

Majorana modes of the quantum spin system are mapped into different knots and links. The topological properties of ground states are visualized and characterized using crossing and linking numbers, which capture the geometric topologies of knots and links. In gapped phases, eigenstate curves are tangled and braided around each other forming links. In gapless phases, the tangled eigenstate curves may form knots. The interactivity of energy bands is highlighted.

What carries the argument

Mapping of Majorana modes to knots and links, with crossing and linking numbers used to encode the topologies of the eigenstate curves.

If this is right

  • In gapped phases the eigenstate curves form links.
  • In gapless phases the eigenstate curves form knots.
  • Crossing and linking numbers characterize the topological properties of the ground states.
  • The approach supplies an alternative geometric understanding of one-dimensional topological phases of matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same knot-mapping procedure could be tested on other long-range spin chains to see whether the link-versus-knot distinction remains sharp.
  • Linking numbers might allow direct numerical extraction of phase boundaries without separate calculation of winding numbers or Berry phases.
  • If the deformation remains valid under weak perturbations, the method could serve as a visualization aid for experimental signatures of Majorana modes in engineered spin chains.

Load-bearing premise

Eigenstate curves in the models can be continuously deformed into knots and links whose crossing and linking numbers faithfully encode the topological invariants of the spin system.

What would settle it

In one of the exactly solvable models, compute the crossing or linking number of the mapped curve and find that it fails to match the independently known topological invariant of the ground state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09016 by L. Jin, X. M. Yang, Z. Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The upper (lower) two rows are eigenstate knots and links on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Curve of Bloch vector in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) A two-component Hopf link lies on the torus surface, each component is a closed loop of the eigenstate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Knot theory provides a powerful tool for the understanding of topological matters in biology, chemistry, and physics. Here knot theory is introduced to describe topological phases in the quantum spin system. Exactly solvable models with long-range interactions are investigated, and Majorana modes of the quantum spin system are mapped into different knots and links. The topological properties of ground states of the spin system are visualized and characterized using crossing and linking numbers, which capture the geometric topologies of knots and links. The interactivity of energy bands is highlighted. In gapped phases, eigenstate curves are tangled and braided around each other forming links. In gapless phases, the tangled eigenstate curves may form knots. Our findings provide an alternative understanding of the phases in the quantum spin system, and provide insights into one-dimension topological phases of matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces knot theory to characterize topological phases in exactly solvable long-range quantum spin models. Majorana modes are mapped to knots and links, with crossing and linking numbers used to visualize and classify ground-state topologies: gapped phases yield links while gapless phases yield knots. The work claims this provides an alternative geometric understanding of 1D topological phases of matter.

Significance. If the claimed mapping were shown to be invariant and equivalent to standard invariants, the geometric visualization could offer an intuitive tool for distinguishing phases in spin systems. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are present to strengthen the result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that crossing and linking numbers 'capture the geometric topologies' of the ground states requires a derivation establishing that these numbers remain invariant under continuous deformations of eigenstate curves within a fixed phase and reproduce known invariants (e.g., Pfaffian sign or winding number) of the Majorana Hamiltonian; no such derivation is supplied.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the distinction that gapped phases produce links and gapless phases produce knots rests on the unproven assumption that eigenstate curves admit continuous deformations into knots/links whose crossing/linking numbers are in one-to-one correspondence with the physical topological classification; the manuscript supplies no explicit check of this correspondence.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'exactly solvable models with long-range interactions' but does not name the Hamiltonians or display their explicit form; including the model definitions would clarify the mapping.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments on the abstract below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that crossing and linking numbers 'capture the geometric topologies' of the ground states requires a derivation establishing that these numbers remain invariant under continuous deformations of eigenstate curves within a fixed phase and reproduce known invariants (e.g., Pfaffian sign or winding number) of the Majorana Hamiltonian; no such derivation is supplied.

    Authors: Crossing and linking numbers are topological invariants by definition in knot theory and are therefore unchanged under continuous deformations (ambient isotopy) of the curves. The manuscript maps the Majorana zero modes of the long-range spin models onto these curves and uses the invariants to visualize the resulting geometries. We do not supply a derivation proving that the numerical values reproduce the Pfaffian sign or winding number, because the work presents knot theory as an alternative geometric language rather than as a mathematically equivalent re-derivation of existing invariants. revision: no

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the distinction that gapped phases produce links and gapless phases produce knots rests on the unproven assumption that eigenstate curves admit continuous deformations into knots/links whose crossing/linking numbers are in one-to-one correspondence with the physical topological classification; the manuscript supplies no explicit check of this correspondence.

    Authors: In the exactly solvable models examined, gapped phases yield multiple disconnected Majorana components whose curves form links, while gapless phases produce single-component tangled curves that form knots. This distinction is shown explicitly for the parameter regimes studied. A general, model-independent proof that the knot/link type stands in one-to-one correspondence with the standard topological classification is not provided, as the manuscript focuses on introducing the geometric visualization rather than establishing full equivalence. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: mapping is presented as a visualization tool without self-referential reduction to inputs

full rationale

The abstract and provided text introduce knot theory as an alternative description for phases in long-range spin models, mapping Majorana modes to knots/links and using crossing/linking numbers to visualize gapped vs gapless behavior. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that would make any claimed invariant equivalent to its own definition or input data by construction. The derivation chain is not exhibited in a form that reduces to renaming or self-definition; the work is a geometric analogy offered for insight, self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on an unstated assumption that knot invariants are faithful for the spin-system topology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5676 in / 1102 out tokens · 23803 ms · 2026-05-25T18:58:42.317720+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    In gapped phases, eigenstate curves are tangled and braided around each other forming links. In gapless phases, the tangled eigenstate curves may form knots. ... linking number L = w ... all knots represent gapless phases.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDualityProof.lean linking_dimension echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    The curves on the torus forms a torus knot... linking number of two closed curves r+(k) and r−(k′) ... L = −1/2π ∫ ∇k ϕ+(k) dk

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    (7) The ground state phase diagram is obtained using ϵ± kc = 0, where the energy band gap closes

    The phases in eigenstate ⏐⏐ψ± k ⟩ are real periodic functions of k, ϕ+(k) = arctan (−By/Bx), and ϕ−(k) = ϕ+(k) + π. (7) The ground state phase diagram is obtained using ϵ± kc = 0, where the energy band gap closes. Knot topology.—The topological features of the ground state are completely encoded in phase factor ϕ±(k). In the absence of band degeneracy, th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The graph with L = 2 presents a Solomon’s knot, it belongs to a link in contrast to its name and its notation is 4 2

    work page

  3. [3]

    The graph with L = 3 is the star of David denoted as 6 2 1. The gapless phase separates two gapped phases with linking numbers LA and LB, and its eigenstate graph corresponds to a link with a linking number of L = (LA + LB) /2 for two degenerate points in the energy band. The graphs are similar to those in the first and third rows of Fig. 1. The gapless ph...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The number of knot windings on the torus is c (K) and has c (K) number of crossing points in a planar plane

    The knot with crossing number c (K) = 7 [c (K) = 9] represents the gapless phase, which separates the gapped phases with LA = 3 and LB = 4 ( LA = 4 and LB = 5). The number of knot windings on the torus is c (K) and has c (K) number of crossing points in a planar plane. Conclusion.—We introduce a graphic approach to in- vestigate the topological phase tran...

    work page

  5. [5]

    C. C. Adams, The Knot Book (Freeman, New York, 1994)

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    J. W. Alexander and G. B. Briggs, On Types of Knotted Curves, Ann. Math. 28, 562 (1926)

    work page 1926

  7. [7]

    S. A. Wasserman, J. M. Dungan, and N. R. Cozzarelli, Discovery of a Predicted DNA Knot Substantiates a Model for Site-Specific Recombination, Science 229, 171 (1985)

    work page 1985

  8. [8]

    R. S. Forgan, J.-P. Sauvage, and J. F. Stoddart, Chemical Topology: Complex Molecular Knots, Links, and Entan- glements, Chem. Rev. 111, 5434 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Wilczek and A

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Linking Numbers, Spin, and Statistics of Solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2250 (1983)

    work page 1983

  10. [10]

    Rovelli and L

    C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Knot Theory and Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1155 (1988)

    work page 1988

  11. [11]

    C. N. Yang and M. L. Ge, Braid Group, Knot Theory, and Statistical Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989)

    work page 1989

  12. [12]

    F. Y. Wu, Knot theory and statistical mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1099 (1992)

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    Atiyah, Quantum physics and the topology of knots, Rev

    M. Atiyah, Quantum physics and the topology of knots, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 977, (1995)

    work page 1995

  14. [14]

    Katritch, J

    V. Katritch, J. Bednar, D. Michoud, R. G. Scharein, J. Dubochet, and A. Stasiak, Geometry and physics of knots, Nature 384, 142 (1996)

    work page 1996

  15. [15]

    Faddeev and A

    L. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, Stable knot-like structures in classical field theory, Nature 387, 58 (1997)

    work page 1997

  16. [16]

    H Kauffman, The mathematics and physics of knots, Rep

    L. H Kauffman, The mathematics and physics of knots, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 2829 (2005)

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Kleckner and W

    D. Kleckner and W. T. M. Irvine, Creation and dynamics of knotted vortices, Nat. Phys. 9, 253 (2013)

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Kleckner, L

    D. Kleckner, L. H. Kauffman, and W. T. M. Irvine, How superfluid vortex knots untie. Nat. Phys. 12, 650 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Leach, M

    J. Leach, M. R. Dennis, J. Courtial, and M. J. Padgett, Knotted threads of darkness, Nature 432, 165 (2004)

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    M. R. Dennis, R. P. King, B. Jack, K. O’Holleran, and M. J. Padgett, Isolated optical vortex knots, Nat. Phys. 6, 118 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    A. J. Taylor and M. R. Dennis, Vortex knots in tangled quantum eigenfunctions, Nat. Commun. 7, 12346 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    D. S. Hall, M. W. Ray, K. Tiurev, E. Ruokokoski, A. H. Gheorghe and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Tying quantum knots, Nat. Phys. 12, 478 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    X.-Q. Sun, B. Lian, and S.-C. Zhang, Double Helix Nodal Line Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 147001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Chen, H.-Z

    W. Chen, H.-Z. Lu, and J.-M. Hou, Topological semimet- als with a double-helix nodal link, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041102(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Ezawa, Topological semimetals carrying arbitrary Hopf numbers: Fermi surface topologies of a Hopf link, Solomon’s knot, trefoil knot, and other linked nodal va- rieties, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Topological semimetals carrying arbitrary Hopf numbers: Fermi surface topologies of a Hopf link, Solomon’s knot, trefoil knot, and other linked nodal va- rieties, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041202(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    R. Bi, Z. Yan, L. Lu, and Z. Wang, Nodal-knot semimet- als, Phys. Rev. B 96, 201305(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Z. Yan, R. Bi, H. Shen, L. Lu, S.-C. Zhang, and Z. Wang, Nodal-link semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041103(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Chang and C.-H

    P.-Y. Chang and C.-H. Yee, Weyl-link semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 96, 081114(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    P. J. Ackerman and I. I. Smalyukh, Diversity of Knot Solitons in Liquid CrystalsManifested by Linking of Preimages in Torons and Hopfions, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Deng, S.-T

    D.-L. Deng, S.-T. Wang, C. Shen, and L.-M. Duan, Phys. Rev. B 88, 201105(R) (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Probe knots and Hopf insulators with ultracold atoms

    D.-L. Deng, S.-T.Wang, K. Sun, and L.-M. Duan, Probe knots and Hopf insulators with ultracold atoms, arXiv:1612.01518

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Q. Yan, R. Liu, Z. Yan, B. Liu, H. Chen, Z. Wang, and L. Lu, Experimental discovery of nodal chains, Nat. Phys. 14, 461 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Yang, C.-K

    Z. Yang, C.-K. Chiu, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Evolution of nodal lines and knot transitions in topological semimet- als, arXiv:1905.00210

    work page arXiv 1905

  34. [34]

    Yang and J

    Z. Yang and J. Hu, Non-Hermitian Hopf-link exceptional line semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 99, 081102(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Carlstr¨ om and E

    J. Carlstr¨ om and E. J. Bergholtz, Exceptional links and twisted Fermi ribbons in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042114 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Carlstr¨ om, M Str¨ alhammar, J

    J. Carlstr¨ om, M Str¨ alhammar, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Knotted non-Hermitian metals, Phys. Rev. B 99, 161115(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    C. H. Lee, G. Li, Y. Liu, T. Tai, R. Thomale, and X. Zhang, Tidal surface states as fingerprints of non- Hermitian nodal knot metals, arXiv:1812.02011

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    R. P. Feynman, Space-Time Appxoach to Quantum Elec- trodynamics, Phys. Rev. 76, 769 (1949)

    work page 1949

  39. [39]

    Zhang, C

    G. Zhang, C. Li, and Z. Song, Majorana charges, winding numbers and Chern numbers in quantum Ising models, Sci. Rep. 7, 8176 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Suzuki, Relationship among Exactly Soluble Models of Critical Phenomena

    M. Suzuki, Relationship among Exactly Soluble Models of Critical Phenomena. I: 2D Ising Model, Dimer Prob- lem and the Generalized XY-Model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 46, 1337 (1971)

    work page 1971

  41. [41]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    work page 1999

  42. [42]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys. Usp. 44, 131 (2001)

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    Y. Niu, S. B. Chung, C.-H. Hsu, I. Mandal, S. Raghu, and S. Chakravarty, Majorana zero modes in a quantum Ising chain with longer-ranged interactions, Phys. Rev. B 85, 035110 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Supplementary Material provides more details on the Bloch vector, winding number, and linking number

    work page

  45. [45]

    X. M. Yang, P. Wang, L. Jin, and Z. Song, Visualizing topology of real-energy gapless phase arising from excep- tional point, arXiv: 1905.07109

    work page arXiv 1905

  46. [46]

    J. W. Alexander, Topological invariants of knots and links, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 20, 275 (1923)

    work page 1923

  47. [47]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators: Band-structure topology and edge states in one and two dimensions (Springer, 2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Y. X. Zhao and A. P. Schnyder, Nonsymmor- phic symmetry-required band crossings in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 94, 195109 (2016). 6 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL FOR ”KNOT TOPOLOGY IN QUANTUM SPIN SYSTEM” X. M. Yang, L. Jin, and Z. Song School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China A: Bloch vector and winding number The planar Bloch vecto...

    work page 2016