Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Autonomous Penetration Testing using Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.05965 v1 pith:EKJLEGVV submitted 2019-05-15 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords pentestingnetworktestingsecurityalgorithmsenvironmentlearningmodel-free
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Penetration testing (pentesting) involves performing a controlled attack on a computer system in order to assess it's security. Although an effective method for testing security, pentesting requires highly skilled practitioners and currently there is a growing shortage of skilled cyber security professionals. One avenue for alleviating this problem is automate the pentesting process using artificial intelligence techniques. Current approaches to automated pentesting have relied on model-based planning, however the cyber security landscape is rapidly changing making maintaining up-to-date models of exploits a challenge. This project investigated the application of model-free Reinforcement Learning (RL) to automated pentesting. Model-free RL has the key advantage over model-based planning of not requiring a model of the environment, instead learning the best policy through interaction with the environment. We first designed and built a fast, low compute simulator for training and testing autonomous pentesting agents. We did this by framing pentesting as a Markov Decision Process with the known configuration of the network as states, the available scans and exploits as actions, the reward determined by the value of machines on the network. We then used this simulator to investigate the application of model-free RL to pentesting. We tested the standard Q-learning algorithm using both tabular and neural network based implementations. We found that within the simulated environment both tabular and neural network implementations were able to find optimal attack paths for a range of different network topologies and sizes without having a model of action behaviour. However, the implemented algorithms were only practical for smaller networks and numbers of actions. Further work is needed in developing scalable RL algorithms and testing these algorithms in larger and higher fidelity environments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VulnGym: Evaluating Vulnerability Management Strategies against Advanced Persistent Threats

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A shared-network RL simulator shows importance-based patching cuts APT goal success far more than CVSS or centrality policies under limited defender budget.

  2. Reinforcement Learning for Automated Cybersecurity Penetration Testing

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An RL agent using permutation-symmetric neural networks automates web pentesting on simulated sites and is claimed to find all reachable vulnerabilities on DVWA and DockerLabs.

Pith tools