pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.03582 · v3 · pith:EN3G6ON2new · submitted 2026-02-03 · 💻 cs.LG

Optimization and Generation in Aerodynamics Inverse Design

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords designvehiclevisualgenerationoptimizationaerodynamicaircraftdrag
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Aerodynamic inverse design can improve vehicle and aircraft efficiency, but practical design rarely seeks performance alone: vehicle refinement must reduce drag while preserving visual features linked to design language, brand recognition and user perception. Traditional CFD-driven optimization is accurate but slow for broad exploration, and current learning-based methods are still largely performance-driven and lack a coherent target linking optimization, generation and visual consistency. Here we formulate visual preservation and aerodynamic improvement as one probability target. Designs consistent with a reference shape or view define a learned visual design distribution, which is reweighted by aerodynamic cost. Optimization then refines an initial geometry toward a low-cost, high-probability design, whereas guided generation samples lower-cost 3D candidates from the same input view. OpenFOAM evaluation shows that visual-feature-preserving optimization reduces vehicle drag by 5.8\% relative to the initial vehicle and reduces the best valid aircraft drag-to-lift objective by 28.8\% relative to the initial aircraft while preserving input visual features. For view-based generation, guidance reduces vehicle drag by 3.0\% and the aircraft drag-to-lift objective by 68.6\% relative to direct generation from the same view, while maintaining visual consistency. Wind-tunnel tests with 3D-printed vehicle prototypes provide an independent wake-level check, and controlled analyses explain the distributional mechanisms behind these results. This work provides a probabilistic foundation and practical route for visual-feature-preserving aerodynamic refinement and early-stage 3D design exploration.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometry-Aware Neural Optimizer for Shape Optimization and Inversion

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GANO unifies shape encoding with auto-decoders, denoising-stabilized latent optimization, and geometry-injected surrogates into an end-to-end differentiable pipeline for PDE-governed shape optimization and inversion.

  2. Geometry-Aware Neural Optimizer for Shape Optimization and Inversion

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    GANO is an end-to-end differentiable latent-space optimizer that unifies shape encoding, surrogate prediction, and controllable geometry updates for PDE-governed shape optimization and inversion.

  3. Geometry-Aware Neural Optimizer for Shape Optimization and Inversion

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GANO unifies shape encoding, field prediction, and latent optimization with denoising for stable, controllable updates in PDE shape problems, reporting SOTA accuracy and up to 55.9% lift-to-drag gains on benchmarks.