Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Number Cookbook: Number Understanding of Language Models and How to Improve It

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03766 v3 pith:EQTORKNY submitted 2024-11-06 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords tasksnupallmsnumbernumericalunderstandingmodelsbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can solve an increasing number of complex reasoning tasks while making surprising mistakes in basic numerical understanding and processing (such as 9.11 > 9.9). The latter ability is essential for tackling complex arithmetic and mathematical problems and serves as a foundation for most reasoning tasks, but previous work paid little attention to it or only discussed several restricted tasks (like integer addition). In this paper, we comprehensively investigate the numerical understanding and processing ability (NUPA) of LLMs. Firstly, we introduce a benchmark covering four common numerical representations and 17 distinct numerical tasks in four major categories, resulting in 41 meaningful combinations in total. These tasks are derived from primary and secondary education curricula, encompassing nearly all everyday numerical understanding and processing scenarios, and the rules of these tasks are very simple and clear. Through the benchmark, we find that current LLMs fail frequently in many of the tasks. To study the problem, we train small models with existing and potential techniques for enhancing NUPA (such as tokenizers, PEs, and number formats), comprehensively evaluating their effectiveness using our testbed. We also finetune practical-scale LLMs on our proposed NUPA tasks and find that 1) naive finetuning can improve NUPA a lot on many but not all tasks, and 2) surprisingly, techniques designed to enhance NUPA prove ineffective for finetuning pretrained models. We further explore the impact of chain-of-thought techniques on NUPA. Our work provides a more detailed and comprehensive understanding of NUPA in LLMs. Our benchmark and code are released at https://github.com/GraphPKU/number_cookbook.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PiERN: Token-Level Routing for Integrating High-Precision Computation and Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    PiERN proposes token-level routing of physically-isolated experts to embed high-precision computation directly into LLMs, reporting higher accuracy and lower latency, token count, and energy use than fine-tuning or mu...

  2. A Triadic Suffix Tokenization Scheme for Numerical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Triadic Suffix Tokenization groups digits into triads with fixed magnitude suffixes to make order-of-magnitude relationships explicit at the token level for LLMs.

  3. BALM-TSF: Balanced Multimodal Alignment for LLM-Based Time Series Forecasting

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BALM-TSF combines a statistical-prompt text branch with a patch-based time series branch, using scaling plus contrastive alignment to balance the two modalities, improving long-term and few-shot forecasting on five of...

Pith tools