Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLMs for Science: Usage for Code Generation and Data Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16733 v4 pith:ERSHSMI4 submitted 2023-11-28 cs.SE cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.CL
keywords toolsllmsresearchcasesllm-basedworkacrosscode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been touted to enable increased productivity in many areas of today's work life. Scientific research as an area of work is no exception: the potential of LLM-based tools to assist in the daily work of scientists has become a highly discussed topic across disciplines. However, we are only at the very onset of this subject of study. It is still unclear how the potential of LLMs will materialise in research practice. With this study, we give first empirical evidence on the use of LLMs in the research process. We have investigated a set of use cases for LLM-based tools in scientific research, and conducted a first study to assess to which degree current tools are helpful. In this paper we report specifically on use cases related to software engineering, such as generating application code and developing scripts for data analytics. While we studied seemingly simple use cases, results across tools differ significantly. Our results highlight the promise of LLM-based tools in general, yet we also observe various issues, particularly regarding the integrity of the output these tools provide.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Knowledge-Enhanced Program Repair for Data Science Code

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DSrepair combines a knowledge graph of data science APIs with AST-level bug localization to repair LLM-generated code, fixing more DS-1000 tasks than five baseline repair methods.

  2. From Scientific Texts to Verifiable Code: Automating the Process with Transformers

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A prototype that uses an LLM iteratively with Dafny verification can turn natural-language graph proofs into verifiable code for three simple lemmas, suggesting a two-stage path toward automated verification.

Pith tools