pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12779 · v1 · pith:ESREB6WPnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.chem-ph· physics.comp-ph

Molecular reference corrections for quantum Monte Carlo adsorption energies

Roman Fanta , Michal Bajdich This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords quantum Monte Carlodiffusion Monte Carloadsorption energiessurface thermochemistrymolecular referencecoupled clusterPt(111)ORR intermediates
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid cycle corrects molecular reference imbalance in SD-FNDMC adsorption energies

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that molecular reference imbalance is a separable source of error in single-determinant fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo calculations of surface thermochemistry. Gas-phase thermochemistry diagnoses the imbalance between extended slabs and molecular states for oxygenated ORR intermediates on Pt(111). A hybrid cycle retains the SD-FNDMC slab-adsorbate binding term while replacing molecular formation energies with coupled cluster benchmarks. This reduces the bias for OOH more than for O or OH. The same cycle applied to HCO and COH on Cu(111) produces opposite-sign corrections, showing control by molecular electronic structure rather than geometry.

Core claim

Molecular reference imbalance is identified as a separable source of error in SD-FNDMC surface thermochemistry. The hybrid cycle reduces the corresponding bias without modifying the SD-FNDMC slab-binding contribution by keeping surface binding at the SD-FNDMC level and substituting benchmark coupled cluster references for molecular formation. Corrections are small for O and OH but larger for OOH on Pt(111), while HCO and COH on Cu(111) give corrections of opposite sign.

What carries the argument

The hybrid thermodynamic cycle that isolates molecular reference imbalance by retaining the SD-FNDMC slab-adsorbate binding term and replacing molecular formation with coupled cluster references.

If this is right

  • The correction is small for O and OH but larger for OOH on Pt(111).
  • Geometry-matched refinement gives only a secondary correction.
  • Applying the cycle to HCO and COH on Cu(111) produces corrections of opposite sign.
  • The bias is controlled primarily by the electronic structure of the molecular reference.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The separation allows higher-accuracy methods to target only the molecular references while preserving the surface calculation.
  • Similar hybrid cycles could address reference mismatch in other quantum Monte Carlo surface studies.
  • The finding implies that improving the description of isolated molecules would directly raise accuracy of computed adsorption energies.

Load-bearing premise

Error cancellation is expected to be most favorable for the surface binding term at the SD-FNDMC level.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of hybrid-corrected adsorption energies against experimental values or higher-accuracy calculations for the same Pt(111) and Cu(111) systems would show whether the reference bias is reduced as claimed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12779 by Michal Bajdich, Roman Fanta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Signed errors for 298.15 K gas-phase thermochemistry of H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Adsorption energies of (a) HCO and (b) COH on Cu(111) at bridge, fcc, hcp, and top sites for the CHE scheme, Scheme 1, and Scheme 2. Error bars denote one stan￾dard deviation QMC statistical uncertainties. gies by only 0.006–0.032 eV depending on site, whereas for HCO it ranges from −0.029 eV at the bridge site to +0.045 eV at the top site. This stronger site sensitivity indicates that, unlike the nearly u… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate surface thermochemistry requires balanced error cancellation between extended slabs and molecular reference states. This balance can fail whenever the electronic-structure error is not transferable across the chemically distinct species entering a thermodynamic cycle. Here we examine this problem in single-determinant fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo (SD-FNDMC) for oxygenated ORR intermediates on Pt(111). Gas-phase thermochemistry is used to diagnose the reference-state imbalance, and a hybrid cycle is introduced to separate slab-adsorbate binding from molecular formation. The hybrid cycle keeps the surface binding term at the SD-FNDMC level, where cancellation is expected to be most favorable, and replaces the molecular formation contribution with a benchmark coupled cluster reference. For Pt(111), the resulting correction is small for O and OH but larger for OOH, while the geometry-matched refinement gives only a secondary correction. Applying the same cycle to HCO and COH on Cu(111) gives corrections of opposite sign, showing that the bias is controlled primarily by the electronic structure of the molecular reference rather than by adsorbate geometry alone. This decomposition identifies molecular reference imbalance as a separable source of error in SD-FNDMC surface thermochemistry and reduces the corresponding bias without modifying the SD-FNDMC slab-binding contribution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a hybrid thermodynamic cycle for SD-FNDMC adsorption energies of ORR intermediates on Pt(111) and HCO/COH on Cu(111). The cycle retains the slab-adsorbate binding contribution at the SD-FNDMC level while replacing the gas-phase molecular formation term with coupled-cluster benchmarks, yielding small corrections for O/OH, larger for OOH on Pt, and opposite-sign corrections on Cu that are attributed primarily to molecular electronic structure rather than geometry.

Significance. If the central premise holds, the decomposition isolates molecular-reference imbalance as a separable error source and supplies a practical correction route that leaves the expensive SD-FNDMC slab term unchanged. The approach is directly relevant to improving accuracy in QMC surface thermochemistry when reference-state error cancellation is incomplete.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'cancellation is expected to be most favorable' for the SD-FNDMC surface-binding term (and therefore that the hybrid cycle isolates molecular-reference imbalance) is asserted without any direct numerical comparison of fixed-node or single-determinant errors between the binding leg and the molecular-formation leg on equivalent footing. No auxiliary all-electron CCSD(T) calculation on a cluster model of the adsorbate+slab versus the isolated molecule is reported to test this premise.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting this important point regarding the justification of our central premise. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'cancellation is expected to be most favorable' for the SD-FNDMC surface-binding term (and therefore that the hybrid cycle isolates molecular-reference imbalance) is asserted without any direct numerical comparison of fixed-node or single-determinant errors between the binding leg and the molecular-formation leg on equivalent footing. No auxiliary all-electron CCSD(T) calculation on a cluster model of the adsorbate+slab versus the isolated molecule is reported to test this premise.

    Authors: We agree that a direct numerical test on equivalent footing, for example via all-electron CCSD(T) on finite cluster models of the adsorbate+slab system, would constitute stronger evidence. Such calculations are not reported because they lie outside the scope of the present work and would require substantial additional computational resources. The statement in the abstract is phrased as an expectation rather than a demonstrated result; it rests on the established observation that fixed-node errors in SD-FNDMC are more transferable between chemically similar extended systems (clean slab versus adsorbate-covered slab) than between those systems and isolated gas-phase molecules. We will revise the abstract and the opening of the introduction to make this reasoning explicit and to qualify the claim accordingly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: hybrid cycle imports external CC benchmark for molecular term

full rationale

The paper defines a hybrid thermodynamic cycle that retains the SD-FNDMC slab-binding contribution while substituting an external coupled-cluster reference for the molecular-formation term. This separation is presented as a methodological choice justified by the expectation of favorable error cancellation in the binding leg, but the construction does not reduce any derived quantity to a parameter fitted inside the paper, nor does it rely on self-citation chains or self-definitional steps. The central claim therefore remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the domain assumption that coupled cluster supplies sufficiently accurate molecular formation energies and that SD-FNDMC error cancellation is favorable specifically for the slab-adsorbate term; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Coupled cluster theory supplies accurate molecular formation energies suitable as reference
    Used to replace the molecular contribution in the hybrid cycle (abstract).
  • domain assumption Error cancellation is expected to be most favorable for the surface binding term at SD-FNDMC level
    Stated as the reason for keeping the slab-adsorbate term at SD-FNDMC (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5753 in / 1427 out tokens · 30638 ms · 2026-06-27T06:42:36.721517+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references

  1. [1]

    All electronic-structure and QMC inputs were assembled through the Nexus workflow infrastructure [85]

    between the 1×1 and 2×2 surface cells ∆E∞ = N −5/4 2 ∆E1 −N −5/4 1 ∆E2 N −5/4 2 −N −5/4 1 ,(2) whereN 1 andN 2 denote the numbers of elec- trons in the two simulation cells and ∆E 1 and ∆E2 are the corresponding adsorption ener- gies. All electronic-structure and QMC inputs were assembled through the Nexus workflow infrastructure [85]. For the Cu(111) tra...

  2. [2]

    Wellendorff, K

    J. Wellendorff, K. T. Lundgaard, A. Møgelhøj, V. Petzold, D. D. Landis, J. K. Nørskov, T. Bligaard, and K. W. Jacobsen, Density functionals for surface science: Exchange-correlation model devel- opment with bayesian error estimation, Phys. Rev. B85, 235149 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Wellendorff, T

    J. Wellendorff, T. L. Silbaugh, D. Garcia- Pintos, J. K. Nørskov, T. Bligaard, F. Studt, and C. T. Campbell, A benchmark database for adsorption bond energies to transition metal surfaces and comparison to selected dft functionals, Surf. Sci.640, 36 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    R. B. Araujo, G. L. S. Rodrigues, E. C. Dos Santos, and L. G. M. Pettersson, Adsorp- tion energies on transition metal surfaces: to- wards an accurate and balanced description, Nat. Commun.13, 6853 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Kothakonda, A

    M. Kothakonda, A. Patra, R. Zhang, J. Ning, J. Furness, Q. Zhao, and J. Sun, Toward Chemical Accuracy for Chemi- and Ph- ysisorption with an Efficient Density Func- tional, J. Phys. Chem. C130, 2997 (2026)

    2026

  6. [6]

    Paier, M

    J. Paier, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, Why does the B3LYP hybrid functional fail for metals?, J. Chem. Phys.127, 024103 (2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    Stroppa and G

    A. Stroppa and G. Kresse, The shortcomings of semi-local and hybrid functionals: what we can learn from surface science studies, New J. Phys.10, 063020 (2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    A. J. Garza, A. T. Bell, and M. Head-Gordon, Nonempirical meta-generalized gradient ap- proximations for modeling chemisorption at metal surfaces, J. Chem. Theory Comput.14, 3083 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Urrego-Ortiz, S

    R. Urrego-Ortiz, S. Builes, F. Illas, and F. Calle-Vallejo, Gas-phase errors in com- putational electrocatalysis: a review, EES Catal.2, 157 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Sargeant, F

    E. Sargeant, F. Illas, P. Rodr´ ıguez, and F. Calle-Vallejo, Importance of the gas-phase error correction for O 2 when using DFT to model the oxygen reduction and evolution re- actions, J. Electroanal. Chem.896, 115178 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    L. P. Granda-Marulanda, A. Rend´ on-Calle, S. Builes, F. Illas, M. T. M. Koper, and F. Calle-Vallejo, A Semiempirical Method to Detect and Correct DFT-Based Gas-Phase Errors and Its Application in Electrocataly- sis, ACS Catal.10, 6900 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    Urrego-Ortiz, S

    R. Urrego-Ortiz, S. Builes, and F. Calle- Vallejo, Fast Correction of Errors in the DFT- Calculated Energies of Gaseous Nitrogen- Containing Species, ChemCatChem13, 2508 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Basera, S

    P. Basera, S. C. Mandal, F. Abild-Pedersen, and M. Bajdich, Crossing the Oxo-Peroxo 14 Wall for Selective Electrochemical Epoxida- tion, Adv. Sci.13, e17229 (2026)

    2026

  14. [14]

    Stevanovi´ c, S

    V. Stevanovi´ c, S. Lany, X. Zhang, and A. Zunger, Correcting density functional the- ory for accurate predictions of compound en- thalpies of formation: Fitted elemental-phase reference energies, Phys. Rev. B85, 115104 (2012)

    2012

  15. [15]

    Ceperley, G

    D. Ceperley, G. V. Chester, and M. H. Ka- los, Monte carlo simulation of a many-fermion study, Phys. Rev. B16, 3081 (1977)

    1977

  16. [16]

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Quantum Monte Carlo simula- tions of solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 33 (2001)

    2001

  17. [17]

    C. J. Umrigar, J. Toulouse, C. Filippi, S. Sorella, and R. G. Hennig, Alleviation of the Fermion-Sign Problem by Optimization of Many-Body Wave Functions, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 110201 (2007)

    2007

  18. [18]

    M. A. Morales, J. McMinis, B. K. Clark, J. Kim, and G. E. Scuseria, Multideterminant wave functions in quantum monte carlo, J. Chem. Theory Comput.8, 2181 (2012)

    2012

  19. [19]

    A. D. Powell and R. Dawes, Calculating po- tential energy curves with fixed-node diffu- sion monte carlo: CO and N2, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 224308 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Doblhoff-Dier, J

    K. Doblhoff-Dier, J. Meyer, P. E. Hoggan, and G.-J. Kroes, Quantum monte carlo calcu- lations on a benchmark molecule–metal sur- face reaction: H 2 + Cu(111), J. Chem. The- ory Comput.13, 3208 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    H. Shin, Y. Luo, A. Benali, and Y. Kwon, Diffusion Monte Carlo study of O2 adsorption on single layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B100, 075430 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    G. R. Iyer and B. M. Rubenstein, Finite-Size Error Cancellation in Diffusion Monte Carlo Calculations of Surface Chemistry, J. Phys. Chem. A126, 4636 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Stachov´ a, M

    M. Stachov´ a, M. Dubeck´ y, and F. Karlick´ y, Adsorption of atomic and molecular monolay- ers on Pt-supported graphene, Chem. Phys. 564, 111713 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    B. X. Shi, A. Zen, V. Kapil, P. R. Nagy, A. Gr¨ uneis, and A. Michaelides, Many-body methods for surface chemistry come of age: Achieving consensus with experiments, J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 25372 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Fanta and M

    R. Fanta and M. Bajdich, Resolution of Se- lectivity Steps of CO Reduction Reaction on Copper by Quantum Monte Carlo, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , 1494 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Dubeck´ y, Bias cancellation in one- determinant fixed-node diffusion monte carlo: Insights from fermionic occupation numbers, Phys

    M. Dubeck´ y, Bias cancellation in one- determinant fixed-node diffusion monte carlo: Insights from fermionic occupation numbers, Phys. Rev. E95, 033308 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Nˇ emec, M

    N. Nˇ emec, M. D. Towler, and R. J. Needs, Benchmark all-electron ab initio quantum monte carlo calculations for small molecules, J. Chem. Phys.132, 034111 (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    F. R. Petruzielo, J. Toulouse, and C. J. Um- rigar, Approaching chemical accuracy with quantum monte carlo, J. Chem. Phys.136, 124116 (2012)

    2012

  29. [29]

    T. Wang, X. Zhou, and F. Wang, Perfor- mance of the Diffusion Quantum Monte Carlo Method with a Single-Slater-Jastrow Trial Wavefunction Using Natural Orbitals and Density Functional Theory Orbitals on At- omization Energies of the Gaussian-2 Set, J. Phys. Chem. A.123, 3809 (2019)

    2019

  30. [30]

    ˇSulka, K

    M. ˇSulka, K. ˇSulkov´ a, P. Jureˇ cka, and M. Dubeck´ y’, Dynamic and nondynamic elec- tron correlation energy decomposition based on the node of the hartree–fock slater deter- minant, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 8147 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Fanta, P

    R. Fanta, P. Jureˇ cka, and M. Dubeck´ y, Why nondynamic correlation matters forππstack- ing? lessons from the benzene dimer, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 10982 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Giner, A

    E. Giner, A. Scemama, and M. Caffarel, Fixed-node diffusion monte carlo potential energy curve of the fluorine molecule f2 us- ing selected configuration interaction trial wavefunctions, J. Chem. Phys.142, 044115 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    Spanedda, A

    N. Spanedda, A. Benali, F. A. Reboredo, and J. T. Krogel, Multireference diffusion Monte Carlo reaches 2D materials, Sci. Rep.15, 32984 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    J. K. Nørskov, J. Rossmeisl, A. Logadottir, L. Lindqvist, J. R. Kitchin, T. Bligaard, and H. J´ onsson, Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode, J. Phys. Chem. B.108, 17886 (2004)

    2004

  35. [35]

    Rossmeisl, A

    J. Rossmeisl, A. Logadottir, and J. Nørskov, Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal sur- faces, Chem. Phys.319, 178 (2005)

    2005

  36. [36]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  37. [37]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular- dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal– amorphous-semiconductor transition in ger- manium, Phys. Rev. B49, 14251 (1994)

    1994

  38. [38]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iter- ative schemes for ab initio total-energy cal- culations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996). 15

    1996

  39. [39]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  40. [40]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  41. [41]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  42. [42]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurateab initio parametrization of density functional disper- sion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  43. [43]

    Grimme, S

    S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerigk, Ef- fect of the damping function in dispersion cor- rected density functional theory, J. Comput. Chem.32, 1456 (2011)

    2011

  44. [44]

    Neese, The orca program system, WIRES Comput

    F. Neese, The orca program system, WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci.2, 73 (2012)

    2012

  45. [45]

    Neese, Software update: the orca program system, version 4.0, WIRES Comput

    F. Neese, Software update: the orca program system, version 4.0, WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci.8, 1 (2018)

    2018

  46. [46]

    Neese, Software update: the orca program system, version 5.0, WIRES Comput

    F. Neese, Software update: the orca program system, version 5.0, WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci.12, e1606 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Weigend and R

    F. Weigend and R. Ahlrichs, Balanced ba- sis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for h to rn: Design and assessment of accuracy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.7, 3297 (2005)

    2005

  48. [48]

    Rappoport and F

    D. Rappoport and F. Furche, Property- optimized gaussian basis sets for molecular response calculations, J. Chem. Phys.133, 134105 (2010)

    2010

  49. [49]

    Caldeweyher, S

    E. Caldeweyher, S. Ehlert, A. Hansen, H. Neugebauer, S. Spicher, C. Bannwarth, and S. Grimme, A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent london dispersion correction, J. Chem. Phys.150, 154122 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    Caldeweyher, J

    E. Caldeweyher, J. Mewes, S. Ehlert, and S. Grimme, Extension and evaluation of the d4 london-dispersion model for periodic sys- tems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 8499 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  52. [52]

    Hammer, L

    B. Hammer, L. B. Hansen, and J. K. Nørskov, Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised perdew-burke-ernzerhof functionals, Phys. Rev. B59, 7413 (1999)

    1999

  53. [53]

    J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 036402 (2015)

    2015

  54. [54]

    Adamo and V

    C. Adamo and V. Barone, Toward reli- able density functional methods without ad- justable parameters: The PBE0 model, J. Chem. Phys.110, 6158 (1999)

    1999

  55. [55]

    P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Cha- balowski, and M. J. Frisch, Ab Initio Calcu- lation of Vibrational Absorption and Circu- lar Dichroism Spectra Using Density Func- tional Force Fields, J. Phys. Chem.98, 11623 (1994)

    1994

  56. [56]

    Russell D

    NIST Computational Chemistry Compari- son and Benchmark Database, NIST Compu- tational Chemistry Comparison and Bench- mark Database, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 101 (2022), release 22, May 2022, Ed. Russell D. Johnson III

    2022

  57. [57]

    L. V. Gurvich, I. V. Veyts, and C. B. Alcock, Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Sub- stances, 4th ed. (Hemisphere Publishing Co., New York, 1989)

    1989

  58. [58]

    J. D. Cox, D. D. Wagman, and V. A. Medvedev,CODATA Key Values for Ther- modynamics, CODATA Series on Thermo- dynamic Properties (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, 1989)

    1989

  59. [59]

    T. M. Ramond, S. J. Blanksby, S. Kato, V. M. Bierbaum, G. E. Davico, R. L. Schwartz, W. C. Lineberger, and G. B. Ellison, Thermo- chemistry of the formyl radical, hco, J. Phys. Chem. A.106, 9641 (2002)

    2002

  60. [60]

    Ruscic, R

    B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, N. K. Srinivasan, M.-C. Su, J. W. Sutherland, and J. V. Michael, Active thermochemical tables: Accurate enthalpy of formation of hydroper- oxyl radical, ho 2, J. Phys. Chem. A.110, 6592 (2006)

    2006

  61. [61]

    Mester, P

    D. Mester, P. R. Nagy, J. Cs´ oka, L. Gyevi- Nagy, P. B. Szab´ o, R. A. Horv´ ath, K. Petrov, B. H´ egely, B. Lad´ oczki, G. Samu, B. D. L˝ orincz, and M. K´ allay, Overview of Devel- opments in the MRCC Program System, J. Phys. Chem. A.129, 2086 (2025)

    2086

  62. [62]

    K´ allay, P

    M. K´ allay, P. R. Nagy, D. Mester, L. Gyevi- Nagy, J. Cs´ oka, P. B. Szab´ o, Z. Rolik, G. Samu, B. H´ egely, B. Lad´ oczki, K. Petrov, J. Csontos, ´A. Ganyecz, I. Ladj´ anszki, L. Szegedy, M. Farkas, P. D. Mezei, R. A. Horv´ ath, and B. D. L˝ orincz, MRCC: A quan- tum chemical program suite,http://www. mrcc.hu(2026), program package written by M. K´ all...

    2026

  63. [63]

    Raghavachari, G

    K. Raghavachari, G. W. Trucks, J. A. Pople, and M. Head-Gordon, A fifth-order perturba- tion comparison of electron correlation theo- ries, Chem. Phys. Letter157, 479 (1989)

    1989

  64. [64]

    Rolik, L

    Z. Rolik, L. Szegedy, I. Ladj´ anszki, B. Lad´ oczki, and M. K´ allay, An efficient linear-scaling CCSD(T) method based on local natural orbitals, J. Chem. Phys.139, 094105 (2013)

    2013

  65. [65]

    Gyevi-Nagy, M

    L. Gyevi-Nagy, M. K´ allay, and P. R. Nagy, Integral-Direct and Parallel Implementation of the CCSD(T) Method: Algorithmic De- velopments and Large-Scale Applications, J. Chem. Theory Comput.16, 366 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    Y. J. Bomble, J. F. Stanton, M. K´ allay, and J. Gauss, Coupled-cluster methods including noniterative corrections for quadruple excita- tions, J. Chem. Phys.123, 054101 (2005)

    2005

  67. [67]

    K´ allay and J

    M. K´ allay and J. Gauss, Approximate treat- ment of higher excitations in coupled-cluster theory, J. Chem. Phys.123, 214105 (2005)

    2005

  68. [68]

    K´ allay and J

    M. K´ allay and J. Gauss, Approximate treatment of higher excitations in coupled- cluster theory. II. Extension to general single-determinant reference functions and improved approaches for the canonical Hartree–Fock case, J. Chem. Phys.129, 144101 (2008)

    2008

  69. [69]

    Helgaker, W

    T. Helgaker, W. Klopper, H. Koch, and J. Noga, Basis-set convergence of correlated calculations on water, J. Chem. Phys.106, 9639 (1997)

    1997

  70. [70]

    Halkier, T

    A. Halkier, T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, W. Klopper, H. Koch, J. Olsen, and A. K. Wilson, Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N2, and H2O, Chem. Phys. Letters286, 243 (1998)

    1998

  71. [71]

    T. H. Dunning Jr., Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. i. the atoms boron through neon and hydrogen, J. Chem. Phys.90, 1007 (1989)

    1989

  72. [72]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Ca- landra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougous- sis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin- Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S....

    2009

  73. [73]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Co- coccioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. ...

    2017

  74. [74]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonf` a, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavaz- zoni, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. Fer- rari Ruffino, A. Ferretti, N. Marzari, I. Tim- rov, A. Urru, and S. Baroni, Quantum espresso toward the exascale, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 154105 (2020)

    2020

  75. [75]

    M. C. Bennett, C. A. Melton, A. Annab- erdiyev, G. Wang, L. Shulenburger, and L. Mitas, A new generation of effective core potentials for correlated calculations, J. Chem. Phys.147, 224106 (2017)

    2017

  76. [76]

    Annaberdiyev, G

    A. Annaberdiyev, G. Wang, C. A. Melton, M. C. Bennett, L. Shulenburger, and L. Mi- tas, A new generation of effective core poten- tials from correlated calculations: 3d transi- tion metal series, J. Chem. Phys.149, 134108 (2018)

    2018

  77. [77]

    H. Zhou, B. Kincaid, G. Wang, A. Annab- erdiyev, P. Ganesh, and L. Mitas, A new gen- eration of effective core potentials: Selected lanthanides and heavy elements, J. Chem. Phys.160, 084302 (2024)

    2024

  78. [78]

    J. Kim, A. D. Baczewski, T. D. Beaudet, A. Benali, M. C. Bennett, M. A. Berrill, N. S. Blunt, E. J. L. Borda, M. Casula, D. M. Ceperley, S. Chiesa, B. K. Clark, R. C. Clay, K. T. Delaney, M. Dewing, K. P. Esler, H. Hao, O. Heinonen, P. R. C. Kent, J. T. Krogel, I. Kyl¨ anp¨ a¨ a, Y. W. Li, M. G. Lopez, Y. Luo, F. D. Malone, R. M. Martin, A. Mathuriya, J. ...

    2018

  79. [79]

    P. R. C. Kent, A. Annaberdiyev, A. Be- nali, M. C. Bennett, E. J. Landinez Borda, P. Doak, H. Hao, K. D. Jordan, J. T. Kro- gel, I. Kyl¨ anp¨ a¨ a, J. Lee, Y. Luo, F. D. Mal- one, C. A. Melton, L. Mitas, M. A. Morales, E. Neuscamman, F. A. Reboredo, B. Ruben- stein, K. Saritas, S. Upadhyay, G. Wang, S. Zhang, and L. Zhao, QMCPACK: Ad- vances in the develo...

    2020

  80. [80]

    Toulouse and C

    J. Toulouse and C. J. Umrigar, Optimization of quantum Monte Carlo wave functions by energy minimization, J. Chem. Phys.126, 084102 (2007)

    2007

Showing first 80 references.