Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Answering Climate Questionnaires from Unstructured Climate Reports

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.04253 v2 pith:ETGLL2HC submitted 2023-01-11 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.LG
keywords climatemodelsexistingunstructureddatasetsintroducequestionnairesreports
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The topic of Climate Change (CC) has received limited attention in NLP despite its urgency. Activists and policymakers need NLP tools to effectively process the vast and rapidly growing unstructured textual climate reports into structured form. To tackle this challenge we introduce two new large-scale climate questionnaire datasets and use their existing structure to train self-supervised models. We conduct experiments to show that these models can learn to generalize to climate disclosures of different organizations types than seen during training. We then use these models to help align texts from unstructured climate documents to the semi-structured questionnaires in a human pilot study. Finally, to support further NLP research in the climate domain we introduce a benchmark of existing climate text classification datasets to better evaluate and compare existing models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Climate-Eval: A Comprehensive Benchmark for NLP Tasks Related to Climate Change

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ClimateEval unifies 25 climate-related NLP tasks into one benchmark and shows that open-source LLMs gain from few-shot examples but lag on misinformation and fine-grained entity recognition.

Pith tools