REVIEW 4 cited by
Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision
read the original abstract
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination a lot, generating responses that apparently contradict to the image content occasionally. The key problem lies in its weak ability to comprehend detailed content in a multi-modal context, which can be mainly attributed to two factors in training data and loss function. The vision instruction dataset primarily focuses on global description, and the auto-regressive loss function favors text modeling rather than image understanding. In this paper, we bring more detailed vision annotations and more discriminative vision models to facilitate the training of LVLMs, so that they can generate more precise responses without encounter hallucination. On one hand, we generate image-text pairs with detailed relationship annotations in panoptic scene graph dataset (PSG). These conversations pay more attention on detailed facts in the image, encouraging the model to answer questions based on multi-modal contexts. On the other hand, we integrate SAM and mask prediction loss as auxiliary supervision, forcing the LVLMs to have the capacity to identify context-related objects, so that they can generate more accurate responses, mitigating hallucination. Moreover, to provide a deeper evaluation on the hallucination in LVLMs, we propose a new benchmark, RAH-Bench. It divides vision hallucination into three different types that contradicts the image with wrong categories, attributes or relations, and introduces False Positive Rate as detailed sub-metric for each type. In this benchmark, our approach demonstrates an +8.4% enhancement compared to original LLaVA and achieves widespread performance improvements across other models.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
MM-Snowball: Evaluating and Mitigating Hallucination Snowballing in Multimodal Multi-Turn Dialogue
MM-Snowball benchmark diagnoses hallucination snowballing in multi-turn MLLM dialogues; CAVR mitigates it via dual visual rectification at representation and logit levels.
-
DV-SFT: Direct Vision Supervision for Fine-Grained Visual Understanding
DV-SFT introduces direct vision supervision for visual tokens in MLLMs by auto-labeling from OCR correspondences, outperforming standard SFT on three in-domain and four out-of-domain benchmarks.
-
See Only When Needed: Context-Aware Attention Intervention for Mitigating Hallucinations in LVLMs
CAI is a training-free inference-time attention intervention that uses two-axis selectivity (where to look and when to intervene) via entropy- and depth-gating to mitigate hallucinations in LVLMs while preserving fluency.
-
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
The survey organizes causes of hallucinations in MLLMs, reviews evaluation benchmarks and metrics, and outlines mitigation approaches plus open questions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.