pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.12099 · v1 · pith:EY5UAO7Lnew · submitted 2019-06-28 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-th

Maximal Entanglement: Applications in Quantum Information and Particle Physics

Alba Cervera-Lierta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-th
keywords maximal entanglementQED vertexweak mixing angleBell inequalitieshyperdeterminantquantum phase transitionsXY modelquantum circuits
0
0 comments X

The pith

Maximal entanglement imposed on the QED vertex constrains the interaction and predicts the weak mixing angle near its experimental value.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The thesis examines maximal entanglement across quantum information and particle physics contexts. Early chapters derive new Bell inequalities with optimal violation settings, apply the hyperdeterminant to detect phase transitions in spin models, and implement XY model simulations plus maximally entangled state circuits on quantum hardware. The central analysis in the final chapter shows that requiring maximal entanglement at the fundamental QED vertex level directly constrains the interaction parameters. This constraint produces a numerical prediction for the weak mixing angle that lies close to the value measured in experiment. A sympathetic reader would care because the result offers a quantum-information principle that could fix a key parameter of the electroweak sector without additional free inputs.

Core claim

Maximal entanglement constrains the QED vertex interaction and predicts a value for the weak mixing angle close to the experimental value.

What carries the argument

The imposition of maximal entanglement as a direct constraint on the QED vertex interaction.

If this is right

  • Novel Bell inequalities are obtained together with their optimal measurement settings that achieve maximal violation.
  • The hyperdeterminant detects quantum phase transitions in several spin models.
  • Quantum circuits for the XY model are constructed and executed on current quantum devices.
  • Explicit quantum circuits generate and maintain maximally entangled states.
  • The maximal-entanglement constraint on the QED vertex yields a predicted weak mixing angle close to experiment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same entanglement constraint might be applied to other gauge vertices to predict additional coupling constants.
  • If the approach holds, it supplies a principle that could reduce the number of free parameters in the standard model.
  • The prediction could be tested by deriving the angle from a more detailed vertex calculation that includes higher-order corrections.

Load-bearing premise

Maximal entanglement can be imposed as a constraint directly on the fundamental QED vertex interaction at the particle-physics level.

What would settle it

A calculation of the weak mixing angle obtained by enforcing maximal entanglement on the QED vertex that differs substantially from the experimental measurement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.12099 by Alba Cervera-Lierta.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p072_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p080_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p084_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p085_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p087_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p094_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p101_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this PhD thesis, several aspects regarding maximal entanglement are analyzed. In the first chapter, Bell Inequalities are analyzed from an operational perspective as well as novel Bell inequalities are obtained together with their optimal settings for a maximal violation. Multipartite figures of merit, in particular, the hyperdeterminant, are the subject of the second chapter. They are applied to detect quantum phase transitions in several spin models. The third chapter focuses on the simulation of the XY model in a quantum computer. The quantum circuit obtained is tested in three current quantum devices. Quantum computers must be able to generate and hold highly entangled states in order to show a quantum advantage. This statement is analyzed in chapter four, where quantum circuits for maximally entangled states are presented. Finally, chapter five analyzes how maximal entanglement is generated at its fundamental level. Maximal entanglement constraints the QED vertex interaction and predicts a value for the weak mixing angle close to the experimental value.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. This PhD thesis examines maximal entanglement in quantum information theory and its potential application to particle physics. Chapters 1–4 address operational Bell inequalities and their optimal settings, the hyperdeterminant as a multipartite entanglement measure applied to spin-model phase transitions, quantum-circuit simulation of the XY model on current hardware, and explicit circuits for generating maximally entangled states. Chapter 5 asserts that maximal entanglement imposes a constraint on the QED vertex interaction, thereby predicting a numerical value for the weak mixing angle sin²θ_W that lies close to the experimental result.

Significance. The quantum-information portions (Bell inequalities, hyperdeterminant applications, and circuit constructions) constitute competent, if incremental, contributions that could be published separately. If Chapter 5 supplied a reproducible, parameter-free derivation linking an entanglement constraint to the weak mixing angle, the thesis would establish a striking and falsifiable connection between a quantum-information principle and a Standard-Model parameter; such a result would be of high significance. At present the particle-physics claim is stated without supporting equations or checks, so its significance cannot yet be evaluated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Chapter 5] Chapter 5: the assertion that “maximal entanglement constraints the QED vertex interaction and predicts a value for the weak mixing angle close to the experimental value” is presented without any explicit constraint equation, modified vertex rule, Lagrangian term, helicity-amplitude selection rule, or algebraic steps that convert the entanglement condition into a numerical prediction for sin²θ_W. No comparison with higher-order corrections, regularization dependence, or alternative entanglement measures is supplied, rendering the claim unverifiable from the given text.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and chapter summaries would benefit from a short statement of the concrete entanglement measure or figure of merit used in each chapter to allow readers to compare results across sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the thesis and the constructive assessment of Chapters 1–4. We agree that the particle-physics claim in Chapter 5 requires substantially more explicit detail to be verifiable, and we will revise the manuscript to address this.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Chapter 5: the assertion that “maximal entanglement constraints the QED vertex interaction and predicts a value for the weak mixing angle close to the experimental value” is presented without any explicit constraint equation, modified vertex rule, Lagrangian term, helicity-amplitude selection rule, or algebraic steps that convert the entanglement condition into a numerical prediction for sin²θ_W. No comparison with higher-order corrections, regularization dependence, or alternative entanglement measures is supplied, rendering the claim unverifiable from the given text.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation of Chapter 5 does not supply the explicit mathematical steps needed to reproduce the claimed constraint or the numerical prediction. In the revised thesis we will add: (i) the precise entanglement constraint equation imposed on the QED vertex, (ii) the modified vertex Feynman rule that follows from it, (iii) the relevant term in the effective Lagrangian, (iv) the helicity-amplitude selection rule, and (v) the complete algebraic derivation that yields the predicted value of sin²θ_W. We will also include a discussion of higher-order electroweak corrections, regularization dependence, and a brief comparison with alternative multipartite entanglement measures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Weak mixing angle 'prediction' reduces to post-hoc numerical match with no shown constraint equation or derivation

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract (chapter 5 summary)]
    "Maximal entanglement constraints the QED vertex interaction and predicts a value for the weak mixing angle close to the experimental value."

    The paper states that the entanglement constraint produces a numerical prediction for sin²θ_W, yet qualifies the result only as 'close to the experimental value.' Without an exhibited constraint equation or derivation that fixes the angle independently of the measured value, the reported agreement is the input (experimental proximity) relabeled as output.

full rationale

The sole load-bearing claim in chapter 5 is that maximal entanglement 'constraints the QED vertex interaction and predicts a value for the weak mixing angle close to the experimental value.' No explicit mapping, modified vertex, constraint equation, or algebraic steps are supplied in the abstract or described elsewhere; the outcome is characterized only by proximity to experiment rather than an independent derivation. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the numerical agreement is presented as a prediction but is indistinguishable from a post-hoc match. No independent external benchmark or machine-checked step is cited to break the reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; the link between maximal entanglement and the QED vertex is introduced without upstream justification or independent evidence, and the weak mixing angle prediction appears fitted to experiment.

free parameters (1)
  • weak mixing angle value
    The abstract states the prediction is 'close to the experimental value,' implying the output is matched to measured data rather than derived parameter-free.
axioms (1)
  • ad hoc to paper Maximal entanglement can be imposed as a constraint on the fundamental QED vertex interaction
    Invoked in the description of chapter five to generate the weak mixing angle prediction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5681 in / 1270 out tokens · 26053 ms · 2026-05-25T14:05:21.900351+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Genuine tripartite entanglement in Bhabha scattering with an entangled spectator particle

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bhabha scattering with an initially entangled spectator particle generates genuine tripartite entanglement quantified by four standard metrics, with scattering momentum and initial entanglement as controlling resource...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

188 extracted references · 188 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities

    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, “Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities”,Physical Review Letters, 49, pp. 91-94, 1982

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations

    M. A. Nielsen, “Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations”,Physical Review Letters, 83, no. 2, pp. 436-439, 1999

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem

    A. K. Ekert, “Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem”,Physical Review Letters, 67, no. 6, pp. 661-663, 1991

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels”, Physical Review Letters, 70, no. 13, pp. 1895-1899, 1993

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete log- arithms on a quantum computer

    P. W. Shor, “Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete log- arithms on a quantum computer”, SIAM Journal on Computing, 26, no. 5, pp. 1484-1509, 1997

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways

    F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. D. Moor, and H. Verschelde, “Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways”,Physical Review A, 65, no. 5, p. 052 112, 2002

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    On polynomial invariants of several qubits

    D. Ž. Ðoković and A. Osterloh, “On polynomial invariants of several qubits”,Journal of Mathematical Physics, 50, no. 3, p. 033 509, 2009

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Tangles of superpositions and the convex- roof extension

    A. Osterloh, J. Siewert, and A. Uhlmann, “Tangles of superpositions and the convex- roof extension”,Physical Review A, 77, p. 032 310, 2008

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Exact zeros of entanglement for arbitrary rank-two mixtures derived from a geometric view of the zero polytope

    A. Osterloh, “Exact zeros of entanglement for arbitrary rank-two mixtures derived from a geometric view of the zero polytope”,Physical Review A, 94, p. 062 333, 2016. 140 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?

    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”,Physical Review, 47, pp. 777-780, 1935

    work page 1935

  11. [11]

    von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik

    J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden

    D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I”,Physical Review, 85, pp. 166-179, 1952

    work page 1952

  13. [13]

    Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky

    D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov, “Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky”,Physical Review, 108, pp. 1070-1076, 1957

    work page 1957

  14. [14]

    On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox

    J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox”,Physics Physique Fizika, 1, no. 3, pp. 195-200, 1964

    work page 1964

  15. [15]

    Experimental consequences of objective local theories

    J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, “Experimental consequences of objective local theories”, Physical Review D, 10, pp. 526-535, 1974

    work page 1974

  16. [16]

    Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories”,Physical Review Letters, 23, pp. 880-884, 1969

    work page 1969

  17. [17]

    Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres

    B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dréau, et al., “Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres”,Nature, 526, no. 7575, pp. 682-686, 2015

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states

    N. D. Mermin, “Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states”,Physical Review Letters, 65, pp. 1838-1840, 1990

    work page 1990

  19. [19]

    Bell’s theorem without inequalities

    D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, “Bell’s theorem without inequalities”,American Journal of Physics, 58, no. 12, pp. 1131-1143, 1990

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    All-multipartite Bell-correlation inequalities for two dichotomic observables per site

    R. F. Werner and M. M. Wolf, “All-multipartite Bell-correlation inequalities for two dichotomic observables per site”,Physical Review A, 64, p. 032 112, 2001

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    Bell’s theorem for general n-qubit states

    M. Żukowski and Č. Brukner, “Bell’s theorem for general n-qubit states”,Physical Review Letters, 88, p. 210 401, 2002

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems

    D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, “Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems”,Physical Review Letters, 88, no. 4, p. 040 404, 2002

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    Quantum nonlocality in two three-level systems

    A. Acín, T. Durt, N. Gisin, and J. I. Latorre, “Quantum nonlocality in two three-level systems”, Physical Review A, 65, p. 052 325, 2002

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    Coincidence Bell inequality for three three-dimensional systems

    A. Acín, J. L. Chen, N. Gisin, D. Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek, C. H. Oh, and Żukowski, “Coincidence Bell inequality for three three-dimensional systems”,Physical Review Letters, 92, p. 250 404, 2004

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    Operational approach to Bell inequalities: Application to qutrits

    D. Alsina, A. Cervera, D. Goyeneche, J. I. Latorre, and Życzkowski, “Operational approach to Bell inequalities: Application to qutrits”,Physical Review A, 94, p. 032 102, 2016

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Bell nonlocality

    N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, “Bell nonlocality”, Review of Modern Physics, 86, pp. 419-478, 2014

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Wringing out new Bell inequalities for three-dimensional systems (qutrits)

    J.-L. Chen, D. Kaszlikowski, L. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, “Wringing out new Bell inequalities for three-dimensional systems (qutrits)”,Modern Physics Letters A, 17, no. 34, pp. 2231-2237, 2002

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    A complete set of multidimensional Bell inequalities

    F. Arnault, “A complete set of multidimensional Bell inequalities”,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 45, no. 25, p. 255 304, 2012. BIBLIOGRAPHY 141

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    Randomness versus nonlocality and entanglement

    A. Acín, S. Massar, and S. Pironio, “Randomness versus nonlocality and entanglement”, Physical Review Letters, 108, p. 100 402, 2012

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Towards an equivalence between maximal entanglement and maximal quantum nonlocality

    V. Lipinska, F. J. Curchod, A. Máttar, and A. Acín, “Towards an equivalence between maximal entanglement and maximal quantum nonlocality”,New Journal of Physics, 20, no. 6, p. 063 043, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    On the violation of Bell’s inequality in quantum theory

    L. J. Landau, “On the violation of Bell’s inequality in quantum theory”,Physics Letters A, 120, no. 2, pp. 54-56, 1987

    work page 1987

  32. [32]

    The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs

    W. Dam, van, R. Gill, and P. Grünwald, “The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51, no. 8, pp. 2812-2835, 2005

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    Maximally entangled states and Bell’s inequality in relativistic regime

    S. Moradi, “Maximally entangled states and Bell’s inequality in relativistic regime”, International Journal of Quantum Information, 07, no. 01, pp. 395-401, 2009

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Distinguishing three-body from two-body nonseparability by a Bell- type inequality

    G. Svetlichny, “Distinguishing three-body from two-body nonseparability by a Bell- type inequality”,Physical Review D, 35, pp. 3066-3069, 1987

    work page 1987

  35. [35]

    Bell-type inequalities to detect truen-body nonseparability

    D. Collins, N. Gisin, S. Popescu, D. Roberts, and V. Scarani, “Bell-type inequalities to detect truen-body nonseparability”,Physical Review Letters, 88, p. 170 405, 2002

    work page 2002

  36. [36]

    Exper- imental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement

    J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, M. Daniell, H.Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Exper- imental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement”, Nature, 403, no. 6769, pp. 515-519, 2000

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Experimental three-photon quantum nonlocality under strict locality conditions

    C. Erven, E. Meyer-Scott, K. Fisher, et al., “Experimental three-photon quantum nonlocality under strict locality conditions”,Nature Photonics, 8, no. 4, pp. 292-296, 2014

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Experimental violation of Svetlichny’s inequality

    J. Lavoie, R. Kaltenbaek, and K. J. Resch, “Experimental violation of Svetlichny’s inequality”, New Journal of Physics, 11, no. 7, p. 073 051, 2009

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Mermin’sn-particle Bell inequality and operators’ noncommutativity

    J. L. Cereceda, “Mermin’sn-particle Bell inequality and operators’ noncommutativity”, Physics Letters A, 286, no. 6, pp. 376-382, 2001

    work page 2001

  40. [40]

    How entangled can two couples get?

    A. Higuchi and A. Sudbery, “How entangled can two couples get?”,Physics Letters A, 273, no. 4, pp. 213-217, 2000

    work page 2000

  41. [41]

    Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correcting codes, and entan- gling power of quantum evolutions

    A. J. Scott, “Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correcting codes, and entan- gling power of quantum evolutions”,Physical Review A, 69, p. 052 330, 2004

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    Experimental violation of multipartite Bell inequalities with trapped ions

    B. P. Lanyon, M. Zwerger, P. Jurcevic, C. Hempel, W. Dür, H. J. Briegel, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, “Experimental violation of multipartite Bell inequalities with trapped ions”, Physical Review Letters, 112, p. 100 403, 2014

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Experimental test of mermin inequalities on a five-qubit quantum computer

    D. Alsina and J. I. Latorre, “Experimental test of mermin inequalities on a five-qubit quantum computer”,Physical Review A, 94, p. 012 314, 2016

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Five experimental tests on the 5-qubit IBM quantum computer

    D. Garcıa-Martın and G. Sierra, “Five experimental tests on the 5-qubit IBM quantum computer”, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 06, no. 07, pp. 1460-1475, 2018

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Experimental two-photon, three-dimensional entanglement for quantum communication

    A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, “Experimental two-photon, three-dimensional entanglement for quantum communication”,Physical Review Letters, 89, p. 240 401, 2002

    work page 2002

  46. [46]

    Symmetries of baryons and mesons

    M. Gell-Mann, “Symmetries of baryons and mesons”, Physical Review, 125, pp. 1067-1084, 1962. 142 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    work page 1962

  47. [47]

    Absolute maximal entanglement and quantum secret sharing

    W. Helwig, W. Cui, J. I. Latorre, A. Riera, and H.-K. Lo, “Absolute maximal entanglement and quantum secret sharing”,Physical Review A, 86, p. 052 335, 2012

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Absolutely max- imally entangled states, combinatorial designs, and multiunitary matrices

    D. Goyeneche, D. Alsina, J. I. Latorre, A. Riera, and K. Życzkowski, “Absolutely max- imally entangled states, combinatorial designs, and multiunitary matrices”,Physical Review A, 92, no. 3, p. 032 316, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Maximally entangled states of four nonbinary particles

    M. Gaeta, A. Klimov, and J. Lawrence, “Maximally entangled states of four nonbinary particles”, Physical Review A, 91, p. 012 332, 2015

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Absolutely Maximally Entangled Qudit Graph States

    W. Helwig, “Absolutely Maximally Entangled Qudit Graph States”, arXiv:1306.2879 [quant-ph], 2013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  51. [51]

    Special issue: Quantum entanglement in condensed matter physics

    S. Rachel, M. Haque, A. Bernevig, A. Laeuchli, and E. Fradkin, “Special issue: Quantum entanglement in condensed matter physics”,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2015

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Renormalization and tensor product states in spin chains and lattices

    J. I. Cirac and F. Verstraete, “Renormalization and tensor product states in spin chains and lattices”,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 42, no. 50, p. 504 004, 2009

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Quantum source of entropy for black holes

    L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee, and R. D. Sorkin, “Quantum source of entropy for black holes”,Physical Review D, 34, pp. 373-383, 1986

    work page 1986

  54. [54]

    Entropy and area

    M. Srednicki, “Entropy and area”,Physical Review Letters, 71, pp. 666-669, 1993

    work page 1993

  55. [55]

    Entanglement in many-body systems

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, “Entanglement in many-body systems”, Review of Modern Physics, 80, pp. 517-576, 2008

    work page 2008

  56. [56]

    Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, “Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy”, Review Modern Physics, 82, pp. 277-306, 2010

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems

    M. B. Hastings, “An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems”,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2007, no. 08, P08024, 2007

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    On the theory of linear transformations

    A. Cayley, “On the theory of linear transformations”,Cambridge Mathematical Journal, 4, pp. 193-209, 1845

    work page

  59. [59]

    Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition

    A. Osterloh, L. Amico, G. Falci, and R. Fazio, “Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition”,Nature, 416, no. 6881, pp. 608-610, 2002

    work page 2002

  60. [60]

    Ground state entanglement in quantum spin chains

    J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and G. Vidal, “Ground state entanglement in quantum spin chains”, Quantum Information and Computation, 4, no. 1, pp. 48-92, 2004

    work page 2004

  61. [61]

    A short review on entanglement in quantum spin systems

    J. I. Latorre and A. Riera, “A short review on entanglement in quantum spin systems”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 42, no. 50, p. 504 002, 2009

    work page 2009

  62. [62]

    Multipartite Entanglement and Quantum Algorithms

    D. Alsina, “Multipartite Entanglement and Quantum Algorithms”, PhD thesis, Uni- versitat de Barcelona, 2017

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Multipartite entanglement and hyperdeterminants

    A. Miyake and M. Wadati, “Multipartite entanglement and hyperdeterminants”, Quantum Information and Computation, 2, pp. 540-555, 2002

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    Elliptic curves and hyperdeterminants in quantum gravity

    P. Gibbs, “Elliptic curves and hyperdeterminants in quantum gravity”,Prespacetime, 1, pp. 1218-1224, 2010

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    String triality, black hole entropy, and cayley’s hyperdeterminant

    M. J. Duff, “String triality, black hole entropy, and cayley’s hyperdeterminant”, Physical Review D, 76, no. 2, p. 025 017, 2007. BIBLIOGRAPHY 143

    work page 2007

  66. [66]

    Four-qubit entanglement classification from string theory

    L. Borsten, D. Dahanayake, M. J. Duff, A. Marrani, and W. Rubens, “Four-qubit entanglement classification from string theory”,Physical Review Letters, 105, no. 10, p. 100 507, 2010

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    Multipartite entanglement in spin chains and the hyperdeterminant

    A. Cervera-Lierta, A. Gasull, J. I. Latorre, and G. Sierra, “Multipartite entanglement in spin chains and the hyperdeterminant”,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 51, no. 50, p. 505 301, 2018

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    A mathematical theory of communication

    C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication”,Bell System Technical Journal, 27, no. 3, pp. 379-423, 1948

    work page 1948

  69. [69]

    Das Dämpfungsproblem in der Wellenmechanik

    L. Landau, “Das Dämpfungsproblem in der Wellenmechanik”,Zeitschrift für Physik, 45, no. 5-6, pp. 430-441, 1927

    work page 1927

  70. [70]

    von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, N

    J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, N. A. Wheeler, Ed. Princeton University Press, 2018

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Życzkowski,Geometry of Quantum States. Cambridge University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  72. [72]

    On geometric entropy

    C. Callan and F. Wilczek, “On geometric entropy”,Physics Letters B, 333, no. 1, pp. 55-61, 1994

    work page 1994

  73. [73]

    Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, “Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory”,Nuclear Physics B, 424, no. 3, pp. 443-467, 1994

    work page 1994

  74. [74]

    Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, “Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena”, Physical Review Letters, 90, no. 22, p. 227 902, 2003

    work page 2003

  75. [75]

    Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory”,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2004, no. 06, P06002, 2004

    work page 2004

  76. [76]

    On measures of entropy and information

    A. Rényi, “On measures of entropy and information”, inProceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contribu- tions to the Theory of Statistics, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1961, pp. 547-561

    work page 1961

  77. [77]

    Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics

    C. Tsallis, “Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics”,Journal of Statisti- cal Physics, 52, no. 1-2, pp. 479-487, 1988

    work page 1988

  78. [78]

    All maximally entangled four-qubit states

    G. Gour and N. R. Wallach, “All maximally entangled four-qubit states”,Journal of Mathematical Physics, 51, no. 11, p. 112 201, 2010

    work page 2010

  79. [79]

    Renyi entropy of the XY spin chain

    F. Franchini, A. R. Its, and V. E. Korepin, “Renyi entropy of the XY spin chain”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41, no. 2, p. 025 302, 2007

    work page 2007

  80. [80]

    Probability-density-function characterization of multipartite entanglement

    P. Facchi, G. Florio, and S. Pascazio, “Probability-density-function characterization of multipartite entanglement”,Physical Review A, 74, no. 4, p. 042 331, 2006

    work page 2006

Showing first 80 references.