Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Cluster-level Group Representativity Fairness in k-means Clustering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.14467 v1 pith:F3BWYS6I submitted 2022-12-29 cs.LG cs.CY

Cluster-level Group Representativity Fairness in k-means Clustering

classification cs.LG cs.CY
keywords clusteringclustergroupalgorithmsclustersmethodcluster-leveldifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

There has been much interest recently in developing fair clustering algorithms that seek to do justice to the representation of groups defined along sensitive attributes such as race and gender. We observe that clustering algorithms could generate clusters such that different groups are disadvantaged within different clusters. We develop a clustering algorithm, building upon the centroid clustering paradigm pioneered by classical algorithms such as $k$-means, where we focus on mitigating the unfairness experienced by the most-disadvantaged group within each cluster. Our method uses an iterative optimisation paradigm whereby an initial cluster assignment is modified by reassigning objects to clusters such that the worst-off sensitive group within each cluster is benefitted. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through extensive empirical evaluations over a novel evaluation metric on real-world datasets. Specifically, we show that our method is effective in enhancing cluster-level group representativity fairness significantly at low impact on cluster coherence.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.