Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Girl Has A Name, And It's ... Adversarial Authorship Attribution for Deobfuscation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.11849 v1 pith:F55J7MBI submitted 2022-03-22 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords authorshipattributionadversarialobfuscationadversariallyapproachesdeobfuscationtrained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in natural language processing have enabled powerful privacy-invasive authorship attribution. To counter authorship attribution, researchers have proposed a variety of rule-based and learning-based text obfuscation approaches. However, existing authorship obfuscation approaches do not consider the adversarial threat model. Specifically, they are not evaluated against adversarially trained authorship attributors that are aware of potential obfuscation. To fill this gap, we investigate the problem of adversarial authorship attribution for deobfuscation. We show that adversarially trained authorship attributors are able to degrade the effectiveness of existing obfuscators from 20-30% to 5-10%. We also evaluate the effectiveness of adversarial training when the attributor makes incorrect assumptions about whether and which obfuscator was used. While there is a a clear degradation in attribution accuracy, it is noteworthy that this degradation is still at or above the attribution accuracy of the attributor that is not adversarially trained at all. Our results underline the need for stronger obfuscation approaches that are resistant to deobfuscation

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools