pith. sign in

arxiv: 2201.11706 · v2 · pith:F5MWPYRTnew · submitted 2022-01-27 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CV

A Systematic Study of Bias Amplification

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CV
keywords amplificationbiasmodeltrainingmembershipwhenbiasesdata
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent research suggests that predictions made by machine-learning models can amplify biases present in the training data. When a model amplifies bias, it makes certain predictions at a higher rate for some groups than expected based on training-data statistics. Mitigating such bias amplification requires a deep understanding of the mechanics in modern machine learning that give rise to that amplification. We perform the first systematic, controlled study into when and how bias amplification occurs. To enable this study, we design a simple image-classification problem in which we can tightly control (synthetic) biases. Our study of this problem reveals that the strength of bias amplification is correlated to measures such as model accuracy, model capacity, model overconfidence, and amount of training data. We also find that bias amplification can vary greatly during training. Finally, we find that bias amplification may depend on the difficulty of the classification task relative to the difficulty of recognizing group membership: bias amplification appears to occur primarily when it is easier to recognize group membership than class membership. Our results suggest best practices for training machine-learning models that we hope will help pave the way for the development of better mitigation strategies. Code can be found at https://github.com/facebookresearch/cv_bias_amplification.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling

    cs.CL 2023-04 accept novelty 8.0

    Pythia releases 16 identically trained LLMs with full checkpoints and data tools to study training dynamics, scaling, memorization, and bias in language models.

  2. No Safe Dose: How Training Data Drives Unsafe Image Generation

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proportion of unsafe images in training data directly increases unsafe outputs in text-to-image models, independent of absolute count, with complementary risk reduction from safer text encoders.

  3. Bias in the Tails: How Name-conditioned Evaluative Framing in Resume Summaries Destabilizes LLM-based Hiring

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM resume summaries exhibit name-conditioned evaluative bias concentrated in distribution tails, transforming directional harm into symmetric instability that may evade conventional fairness audits.

  4. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis

    cs.LG 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Representations learned by large AI models are converging toward a shared statistical model of reality.