Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hard-constraining Neumann boundary conditions in physics-informed neural networks via Fourier feature embeddings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.01093 v1 pith:F6WW2GPU submitted 2025-04-01 cs.LG cs.AIphysics.comp-ph

classification cs.LGcs.AIphysics.comp-ph
keywords conditionsboundaryneumannembeddingsfeaturefourierfrequencyhigh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a novel approach to hard-constrain Neumann boundary conditions in physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) using Fourier feature embeddings. Neumann boundary conditions are used to described critical processes in various application, yet they are more challenging to hard-constrain in PINNs than Dirichlet conditions. Our method employs specific Fourier feature embeddings to directly incorporate Neumann boundary conditions into the neural network's architecture instead of learning them. The embedding can be naturally extended by high frequency modes to better capture high frequency phenomena. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through experiments on a diffusion problem, for which our method outperforms existing hard-constraining methods and classical PINNs, particularly in multiscale and high frequency scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Finite basis physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for viscous fluid flow in highly perforated domains

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Combining finite basis PINNs with hard boundary constraints keeps Stokes-flow errors near one percent as the number of perforations grows to 100.

Pith tools