pith. sign in

arxiv: 1803.05252 · v2 · pith:FA4DDW6Anew · submitted 2018-03-14 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.DM· math.AC· math.RA

Algebraic Machine Learning

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.DMmath.ACmath.RA
keywords learningalgebraicerrordataminimizationrepresentationtrainingdataset
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Machine learning algorithms use error function minimization to fit a large set of parameters in a preexisting model. However, error minimization eventually leads to a memorization of the training dataset, losing the ability to generalize to other datasets. To achieve generalization something else is needed, for example a regularization method or stopping the training when error in a validation dataset is minimal. Here we propose a different approach to learning and generalization that is parameter-free, fully discrete and that does not use function minimization. We use the training data to find an algebraic representation with minimal size and maximal freedom, explicitly expressed as a product of irreducible components. This algebraic representation is shown to directly generalize, giving high accuracy in test data, more so the smaller the representation. We prove that the number of generalizing representations can be very large and the algebra only needs to find one. We also derive and test a relationship between compression and error rate. We give results for a simple problem solved step by step, hand-written character recognition, and the Queens Completion problem as an example of unsupervised learning. As an alternative to statistical learning, algebraic learning may offer advantages in combining bottom-up and top-down information, formal concept derivation from data and large-scale parallelization.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Algebraic Machine Learning for Small-to-Medium Datasets Is Competitive against Strong Standard Baselines

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AML outperforms cross-validated baselines including CNNs on 50-2000 example image datasets and is comparable to XGBoost/LightGBM on tabular data using only training data and no task-dependent hyperparameters.