Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Mind the Gap: Securely modeling cyber risk based on security deviations from a peer group

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.04166 v1 pith:FC5WRAEO submitted 2024-02-06 cs.CR cs.CYecon.GNq-fin.ECstat.AP

Mind the Gap: Securely modeling cyber risk based on security deviations from a peer group

classification cs.CR cs.CYecon.GNq-fin.ECstat.AP
keywords riskcybersecuritydatapeersgroupindustryorganization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

There are two strategic and longstanding questions about cyber risk that organizations largely have been unable to answer: What is an organization's estimated risk exposure and how does its security compare with peers? Answering both requires industry-wide data on security posture, incidents, and losses that, until recently, have been too sensitive for organizations to share. Now, privacy enhancing technologies (PETs) such as cryptographic computing can enable the secure computation of aggregate cyber risk metrics from a peer group of organizations while leaving sensitive input data undisclosed. As these new aggregate data become available, analysts need ways to integrate them into cyber risk models that can produce more reliable risk assessments and allow comparison to a peer group. This paper proposes a new framework for benchmarking cyber posture against peers and estimating cyber risk within specific economic sectors using the new variables emerging from secure computations. We introduce a new top-line variable called the Defense Gap Index representing the weighted security gap between an organization and its peers that can be used to forecast an organization's own security risk based on historical industry data. We apply this approach in a specific sector using data collected from 25 large firms, in partnership with an industry ISAO, to build an industry risk model and provide tools back to participants to estimate their own risk exposure and privately compare their security posture with their peers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.