Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

Reggeization in Color

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In non-planar QCD, the t-channel color projection of Regge cut contributions yields closed matrix evolution equations, including a new 6×6 equation for the decupleton channel.

desk verdict New matrix evolution equations for high-multiplicity Regge color channels, built on a real method, but the load-bearing one-loop derivation is summarized rather than shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09692 v1 pith:FCDGDQBH submitted 2024-11-14 hep-ph hep-thnucl-th

Anjie Gao , Ian Moult , Sanjay Raman , Gregory Ridgway , Iain W. Stewart This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords ReggelimitcutsGlauberSCETrapidityrenormalizationgroupcolorprojectiontriple-GlauberexchangedecupletonBFKLequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that Regge cuts, the corrections that break the simple power-law Regge behavior of scattering amplitudes beyond the planar limit, can be organized and resummed using color projection in the t channel together with rapidity renormalization group equations in Glauber SCET. Its central new results are the first closed evolution equations for three-Glauber color channels in QCD with $SU(N_c)$: a 6×6 matrix equation for the decupleton channel $\text{10}\oplus\overline{\text{10}}$, a 2×2 matrix equation for the triantapenton channel $\text{35}\oplus\overline{\text{35}}$, and a scalar equation for the tetrahexaconton channel $\text{64}$, along with a scalar odderon equation reproduced as a cross-check. The equations are universal in the sense that they do not depend on which external particles are scattered; the external states only select which rows and columns of the matrices are probed. If correct, this gives a systematic way to handle color representations that appear with multiplicity greater than one in the t channel, a problem that begins at three-Glauber exchange and has not been treated before.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the rapidity anomalous dimension matrix $\Gamma$ of the Glauber SCET factorization, in particular the triple-Glauber block $\gamma(3,3)$ (three Glaubers evolve into three Glaubers) and the transition $\gamma(2,3)$ (two Glaubers evolve into three). These are extracted from the seven one-loop collinear graphs using the color unravelling identity $[T^A,T^B]=if^{ABC}T^C$, which rewrites every non-planar color factor into a fundamental basis of horizontal and vertical line objects. After decomposing the product of three Glauber color octets into irreducible representations $8\otimes 8\otimes 8$, the same-dimensional copies of an irrep are organized by orthogonal projectors, and the color factors $C^\beta_{\alpha,H_{ij}}$ become matrices $M^R_{H_{ij}}$ acting in the internal multiplicity space. The resulting equations have the BFKL form but carry this extra matrix structure, which is what encodes the mixing of identical irreps.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop rapidity-divergent corrections to triple-Glauber exchange with an independent regulator and color-basis choice; the appearance of any eighth divergent diagram, or of a color structure that cannot be reduced to the three $H_{ij}$ forms plus the identity, would change $\gamma(3,3)$ and $\gamma(2,3)$ and falsify the matrix equations. Alternatively, an independent four-loop full-color calculation of the $\text{10}\oplus\overline{\text{10}}$ contribution to $gg\to gg$ that disagrees with the iterated 6×6 equation would settle the matter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the factorization of forward scattering into collinear impact factors and a soft function in Glauber SCET, the paper computes the one-loop rapidity-divergent corrections to triple-Glauber exchange, namely one planar and six non-planar collinear graphs. By unravelling their color structures with the identity $[T^A,T^B]=if^{ABC}T^C$ into a fundamental basis, it reads off the rapidity anomalous dimensions $\gamma(3,3)$ and $\gamma(2,3)$. The novel step is to project these universal anomalous dimensions onto t-channel irreducible representations by internal color projectors rather than by projecting through the external particles. For the decupleton this produces a closed 6×6 BFKL-type evolution equation whose matrices $M^{\text{10}\oplus\overline{\text{10}}}_{H_{ij}}$ are related by an $SO(6)$ rotation $R$ with $R^3=1$; for $N_c=3$ two of the six entries decouple, leaving the four physical copies. Iterating the equation once and twice and projecting onto gluon-gluon scattering reproduces the known three- and four-loop results for these channels, which the paper presents as a nontrivial check.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the seven one-loop collinear diagrams shown in Fig. 3 are the complete set of rapidity-divergent corrections to triple-Glauber exchange and that the color unravelling identity rewrites every one of their color factors into the same fundamental basis without missing terms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The decupleton channel $\text{10}\oplus\overline{\text{10}}$ obeys a closed 6×6 evolution equation, so all large logarithms in that color channel are summed by a single matrix RGE rather than by separate scalar equations per copy.
  • For $N_c=3$, two of the six decupleton copies decouple and only four are physically accessible through gluon-gluon scattering, showing that the multiplicity of an irrep translates directly into the dimension of the evolution matrix.
  • The $\text{35}\oplus\overline{\text{35}}$ channel obeys a 2×2 equation and the $\text{64}$ channel a scalar equation; both can only be excited by scattering states with more than one particle per collinear direction, so they provide predictions for multi-particle forward scattering.
  • At large $N_c$ the decupleton evolution closes to an all-order form, so the amplitude is proportional to a sum over three dipole-like combinations $(s/-t)^{\omega_G(q_\perp-\ell_{i\perp})+\omega_G(\ell_{i\perp})}$.
  • The same EFT organization applies to generic non-planar Reggeization and extends beyond the single-gap case to multi-Regge kinematics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the internal-projection method should generalize to $N$-Glauber exchange, giving a hierarchy of closed matrix RGEs indexed by Glauber number and irrep multiplicity; the decupleton example suggests the matrices will often be built from a small set of $H_{ij}$ generators.
  • Editorial inference: if the 6×6 decupleton matrix has distinct eigenvalues at finite $N_c$, the six copies Reggeize with different effective exponents, lifting the degeneracy that is automatic in the planar limit and possibly producing observable signatures in processes sensitive to the $\text{10}\oplus\overline{\text{10}}$ channel.
  • Editorial inference: the coincidence that $K_{TC}$ equals the Wilson-line $1\to 3$ Reggeon kernel suggests a dictionary between Glauber-SCET rapidity anomalous dimensions and Reggeon-field-theory Hamiltonians; making that dictionary explicit could decide which of the two schemes for the three-loop gluon Regge trajectory is natural in the EFT.
  • Editorial inference: applying the same equations to small-$x$ evolution for multi-jet final states might yield observable consequences for the $\text{35}\oplus\overline{\text{35}}$ and $\text{64}$ channels that are invisible in $2\to 2$ scattering.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Glauber-SCET framework for Regge-limit scattering and applies it to triple-Glauber exchange. Starting from the factorization of K→K forward amplitudes, it computes the one-loop rapidity anomalous dimensions γ(3,3) and γ(2,3) from one planar and six non-planar collinear graphs, then uses internal color projections to derive BFKL-type rapidity evolution equations that are closed within specific t-channel color irreps. The headline results are a 6×6 evolution equation for the 10⊕10 'decupleton' channel, a 2×2 equation for the 35⊕35 'triantapenton' channel, and a scalar equation for the 64 'tetrahexaconton' channel, together with a scalar odderon equation. The equations are cross-checked against published four-loop Wilson-line results for gluon-gluon scattering in the decupleton channel and against the independent odderon amplitude.

Significance. If the derived evolution equations are correct, they supply a concrete organizational principle for non-planar Regge cuts and, for the first time, closed matrix equations for color channels with multiplicity larger than one. The paper's strongest assets are its use of a published, independently checkable factorization framework [38] and the nontrivial cross-checks: the odderon and 10⊕10 projections are iterated to three and four loops and match the independent Wilson-line results of Ref. [34], and the extracted 2→3 kernel K_TC coincides with the 1→3 Wilson-line kernel of Ref. [30]. These checks give real support to the central derivation. The explicit matrices and the large-N_c closed form in Sec. 4.2.3 are also concrete, falsifiable predictions that can be tested by future amplitude computations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.1] The completeness of Fig. 3 is load-bearing but is not demonstrated. The text states in Sec. 3.1 that 'the details of the calculations are similar to [38]' and simply presents the final 1/η expressions in Eqs. (3.5)-(3.9). Since every later equation, including the 6×6 decupleton equation (4.19) and the 2×2 triantapenton equation (4.33), is obtained by projecting the γ(3,3) and γ(2,3) extracted from these graphs, the paper needs either a derivation of the seven graphs, a systematic enumeration argument showing that no other one-loop collinear topology produces a 1/η divergence, or an appendix with the complete calculation. As written, a missing diagram would alter the coefficients of K_NF and K_TC in Eq. (3.11) and hence all projected equations.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.10)] The graphical 'unravelling' identity is the second load-bearing step, but it is not stated algebraically for most of its lines. The third and fifth lines in Eq. (3.10) are especially ambiguous: they contain unlabeled additional diagrams and an explicit −N_c/2 term whose tensor structure is not written. Because Eq. (3.11) and the color factors C_Hij and C_TC in Eq. (3.12) are read off from this decomposition, the N_c-suppressed terms must be reproducible by an explicit fundamental-basis identity. Without an algebraic statement of each line of Eq. (3.10), a recoupling error in the non-planar graphs CNP4-CNP6 cannot be excluded by inspection.
  3. [Sec. 4.2] The 6×6 matrices M_Hij in Eqs. (4.11)-(4.13) are quoted from the ColorMath decomposition without showing the projection algebra or the chosen multiplet basis. The cross-check against Ref. [34] is valuable but only tests the gg-projected combination, which for N_c=3 lives in the 4-dimensional physical subspace and does not verify the two decoupled directions or the unprojected matrix elements. Since the paper's central claim is a closed matrix equation, the full matrix structure should be supported by either an explicit construction of the projector basis, a supplementary notebook, or additional external-state projections that probe the remaining components.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The word 'refferred' appears in the first paragraph and should be corrected to 'referred'.
  2. [Sec. 4.2.3 and Sec. 5] The text uses 'decoupletons' in Sec. 5 and in Sec. 4.2; the intended term is 'decupletons' as used elsewhere.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.2] The statement that two of the six decuplet copies decouple for N_c=3 would benefit from an explicit explanation of why the last component of V_g in Eq. (4.10) vanishes and how the dashed-line block separation in R follows from that; the current text states this but does not show the mechanism.
  4. [Sec. 4.3] The 35⊕35 and 64 equations are presented without any numerical or analytic cross-check. A short consistency test, even a two-loop iteration projected onto a formal state that has nonzero overlap, would make these new results easier to trust.
  5. [General notation] The shorthand notation in Eq. (3.11) and the graphical equations (3.14)-(3.15) is dense; a table defining ℓ⊥, k⊥, the color indices α, β, and the products ⊗i would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the evolution equations are derived from EFT calculations and checked against independent Wilson-line results.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is top-down: the rapidity anomalous dimensions gamma(3,3) and gamma(2,3) are extracted by matching the 1/eta poles of the one-loop collinear graphs in Fig. 3 against the tree-level triple-Glauber amplitude, giving Eq. (3.11); the Sec. 4 evolution equations are then obtained by projecting the same anomalous dimensions onto irreps via Eqs. (4.6) and (4.7). None of these steps fits a parameter to the quantity being predicted: the 6x6 decuplet, 2x2 triantapenton, and scalar 64 equations are projections of the computed anomalous dimensions, not outputs of a fit. The self-citation to Ref. [38] (same authors) supplies the Glauber-SCET factorization and the calculational method, as in 'Since the details of the calculations are similar to [38], we simply present the final results' (Sec. 3.1), but Ref. [38] is a published, independently checkable framework and does not assume the new matrix equations derived here; thus it is not load-bearing circularity. Strong independent anchors exist: the odderon and 10+10bar cross-checks against App. D of Ref. [34] (Falcioni et al.) at three and four loops, and the stated coincidence of K_TC with the Wilson-line 1-to-3 kernel of Ref. [30] (Caron-Huot et al.). The main unsupported step is the assertion that Fig. 3 lists all rapidity-divergent one-loop collinear graphs and that Eq. (3.10) correctly unravels all color factors; this is a completeness and correctness risk rather than a circularity, because the missing piece is diagram enumeration and color recoupling, not an input being repackaged as the output. I therefore score 1 for a minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the only inputs are standard EFT ingredients and representation theory. The main nontrivial axioms are the completeness of the diagram set and the universality of the anomalous dimension.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The forward scattering amplitude factorizes into collinear impact factors and a soft function as in Eq. (2.1), with the rapidity RGE structure of Eq. (2.6) and ZS = ZJ^-1.
    Inherited from the Glauber SCET framework of Rothstein-Stewart [39] and the authors' prior paper [38]; central to extracting anomalous dimensions from collinear loops.
  • domain assumption The rapidity anomalous dimension Γ is independent of the external scattering states κ and κ'.
    Used to compute with quark-antiquark states and then apply to gluon-gluon projections; stated in Sec. 2 and used throughout Sec. 3.
  • standard math The decomposition of three t-channel gluons into orthogonal multiplet bases of Ref. [52] is complete and correctly implemented by the ColorMath package.
    Used in Sec. 4 to compute the matrices M_Hij and the external vectors V^R_κ.
  • ad hoc to paper The one planar and six non-planar graphs in Fig. 3 exhaust the one-loop rapidity-divergent collinear corrections to triple-Glauber exchange.
    No proof of completeness is given; if a diagram is missing, the rapidity RGE changes. This is a load-bearing premise for all subsequent results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reggeization in Color." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FCDGDQBH

@misc{pith2026241109692,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reggeization in Color},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FCDGDQBH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09692}
}
abstract

In the high energy limit, $s\gg -t$, amplitudes in planar gauge theories Reggeize, with power law behavior $\big( \frac{s}{-t} \big)^{\alpha(t)}$ governed by the Regge trajectory $\alpha(t)$. Beyond the planar limit this simplicity is violated by "Regge cuts", for which practical organizational principles are still being developed. We use a top-down effective field theory organization based on color projection in the $t$ channel and rapidity evolution equations for collinear impact factors, to sum large $s\gg -t$ logarithms for Regge cut contributions. The results are matrix equations which are closed within a given color channel. To illustrate the method we derive in QCD with $SU(N_c)$ for the first time a closed 6$\times$6 evolution equation for the "decupletons" in the $\text{10}\oplus\overline{\text{10}}$ Regge color channel, a 2$\times$2 evolution equation for the "triantapentons" in the $\text{35}\oplus\overline{\text{35}}$ color channel, and a scalar evolution equation for the "tetrahexaconton" in the 64 color channel. More broadly, our approach allows us to describe generic Reggeization phenomena in non-planar gauge theories, providing valuable data for the all loop structure of amplitudes beyond the planar limit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Collinear Factorization Violation and Reggeization

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Collinear-factorization-violating contributions from a single Glauber gluon factor into collinear and soft subgraphs, and their leading rapidity logarithms exponentiate via the gluon Regge trajectory.

  2. Energy-Energy Correlator at Hadron Colliders: Celestial Blocks and Singularities

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First analytic leading-order calculation of the full-angle energy-energy correlator in hadron collisions, with celestial block decomposition and Regge-limit factorization.

  3. The Two-Loop Lipatov Vertex in QCD

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The two-loop Reggeon-gluon-Reggeon (Lipatov) vertex in QCD is determined in dimensional regularization through finite terms and expressed in single-valued polylogarithms.

  4. Factorization of elastic, single, and double diffractive $pp$ scattering

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SCET with Glauber operators factorizes elastic/single/double diffractive pp scattering, proving non-universality of hadronic functions versus ep while rapidity anomalous dimensions remain universal.

  5. Identifying regions for asymptotic expansions of amplitudes: fundamentals and recent advances

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review of region identification in the method of regions, classifying regions into facet and hidden types and presenting recent all-loop results and conjectures.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [34]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy, and L. Vernazza, Scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit and the soft anomalous dimension through four loops , JHEP 03 (2022) 053, [arXiv:2111.10664]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [38]

    A. Gao, I. Moult, S. Raman, G. Ridgway, and I. W. Stewart, A collinear perspective on the Regge limit, JHEP 05 (2024) 328, [ arXiv:2401.00931]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [30]

    Caron-Huot, E

    S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi, and L. Vernazza, Two-parton scattering in the high-energy limit , arXiv:1701.05241

    arXiv

  4. [1]

    Gell-Mann, M

    M. Gell-Mann, M. Goldberger, F. Low, E. Marx, and F. Zachariasen, Elementary Particles of Conventional Field Theory as Regge Poles. III , Phys. Rev. 133 (1964), no. 1B B145–B160

    work page 1964

  5. [2]

    Mandelstam, Non-Regge Terms in the Vector-Spinor Theory , Phys

    S. Mandelstam, Non-Regge Terms in the Vector-Spinor Theory , Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) B949–B954

    work page 1965

  6. [3]

    B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, Theory of Fermion Exchange in Massive Quantum Electrodynamics at High-Energy. 1., Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 369–378

    work page 1976

  7. [4]

    M. T. Grisaru, H. J. Schnitzer, and H.-S. Tsao, Reggeization of elementary particles in renormalizable gauge theories - vectors and spinors , Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 4498–4509

    work page 1973

  8. [5]

    V. S. Fadin, E. A. Kuraev, and L. N. Lipatov, On the Pomeranchuk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories, Phys. Lett. B60 (1975) 50–52

    work page 1975

Show all 65 references
  1. [6]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, Multi - Reggeon Processes in the Yang-Mills Theory , Sov. Phys. JETP 44 (1976) 443–450. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.71,840(1976)]

    1976

  2. [7]

    L. N. Lipatov, Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuum Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 23 (1976) 338–345. [Yad. Fiz.23,642(1976)]

    1976

  3. [8]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 199–204. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.72,377(1977)]

    1977

  4. [9]

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28 (1978) 822–829. [Yad. Fiz.28,1597(1978)]

    1978

  5. [10]

    L. N. Lipatov, The Bare Pomeron in Quantum Chromodynamics , Sov. Phys. JETP 63 (1986) 904–912. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.90,1536(1986)]. – 24 –

    1986

  6. [11]

    L. N. Lipatov, Gauge invariant effective action for high-energy processes in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B452 (1995) 369–400, [ hep-ph/9502308]

    1995 arXiv

  7. [12]

    J. M. Drummond, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops , Nucl. Phys. B795 (2008) 385–408, [ arXiv:0707.0243]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [13]

    G. P. Korchemsky, Exact scattering amplitudes in conformal fishnet theory , arXiv:1812.06997

    arXiv

  9. [14]

    Amati, A

    D. Amati, A. Stanghellini, and S. Fubini, Theory of high-energy scattering and multiple production , Nuovo Cim. 26 (1962) 896–954

    1962

  10. [15]

    Mandelstam, Cuts in the Angular Momentum Plane

    S. Mandelstam, Cuts in the Angular Momentum Plane. 2 , Nuovo Cim. 30 (1963) 1148–1162

    1963

  11. [16]

    J. B. Bronzan and R. L. Sugar, Regge Behavior of Spontaneously Broken Nonabelian Gauge Theory. 2., Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 2813

    1978

  12. [17]

    J. B. Bronzan and R. L. Sugar, Regge Behavior of Spontaneously Broken Nonabelian Gauge Theory , Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 585

    1978

  13. [18]

    Kwiecinski and M

    J. Kwiecinski and M. Praszalowicz, REGGE BEHA VIOR OF SYMMETRIC OCTET EXCHANGE AMPLITUDE FOR GLUON - GLUON SCATTERING , Acta Phys. Polon. B12 (1981) 103

    1981

  14. [19]

    Praszalowicz, REGGE LIMIT IN QCD , Acta Phys

    M. Praszalowicz, REGGE LIMIT IN QCD , Acta Phys. Polon. B12 (1981) 773–791

    1981

  15. [20]

    B. L. Ioffe, V. S. Fadin, and L. N. Lipatov, Quantum chromodynamics: Perturbative and nonperturbative aspects, vol. 30. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010

    2010

  16. [21]

    V. N. Gribov, A REGGEON DIAGRAM TECHNIQUE , Sov. Phys. JETP 26 (1968) 414–422. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.53,654(1967)]

    1968

  17. [22]

    Keppeler and M

    S. Keppeler and M. Sjodahl, Orthogonal multiplet bases in SU(Nc) color space , JHEP 09 (2012) 124, [arXiv:1207.0609]

    2012 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Del Duca and E

    V. Del Duca and E. W. N. Glover, The High-energy limit of QCD at two loops , JHEP 10 (2001) 035, [hep-ph/0109028]

    2001 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, L. Magnea, and C. D. White, An infrared approach to Reggeization, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 071104, [ arXiv:1108.5947]

    2012 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, L. Magnea, and C. D. White, The Infrared structure of gauge theory amplitudes in the high-energy limit , JHEP 12 (2011) 021, [ arXiv:1109.3581]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [26]

    Del Duca, G

    V. Del Duca, G. Falcioni, L. Magnea, and L. Vernazza, High-energy QCD amplitudes at two loops and beyond, Phys. Lett. B732 (2014) 233–240, [ arXiv:1311.0304]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [27]

    Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize? , JHEP 05 (2015) 093, [ arXiv:1309.6521]

    S. Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize? , JHEP 05 (2015) 093, [ arXiv:1309.6521]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Del Duca, G

    V. Del Duca, G. Falcioni, L. Magnea, and L. Vernazza, Analyzing high-energy factorization beyond next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy, JHEP 02 (2015) 029, [ arXiv:1409.8330]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [29]

    V. S. Fadin, Particularities of the NNLLA BFKL , AIP Conf. Proc. 1819 (2017), no. 1 060003, [arXiv:1612.04481]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Caron-Huot, E

    S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi, J. Reichel, and L. Vernazza, Infrared singularities of QCD scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit to all orders , JHEP 03 (2018) 098, [ arXiv:1711.04850]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [32]

    V. S. Fadin and L. N. Lipatov, Reggeon cuts in QCD amplitudes with negative signature , Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018), no. 6 439, [ arXiv:1712.09805]. – 25 –

    2018 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy, and L. Vernazza, Disentangling the Regge Cut and Regge Pole in Perturbative QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), no. 13 132001, [ arXiv:2112.11098]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, C. Milloy, and L. Vernazza, Climbing three-Reggeon ladders: four-loop amplitudes in the high-energy limit in full colour , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) L111501, [arXiv:2012.00613]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Del Duca, R

    V. Del Duca, R. Marzucca, and B. Verbeek, The gluon Regge trajectory at three loops from planar Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 01 (2022) 149, [ arXiv:2111.14265]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel, and L. Tancredi, Three-loop gluon scattering in QCD and the gluon Regge trajectory , arXiv:2112.11097

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    I. Z. Rothstein and I. W. Stewart, An Effective Field Theory for Forward Scattering and Factorization Violation, JHEP 08 (2016) 025, [ arXiv:1601.04695]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, and M. E. Luke, Summing Sudakov logarithms in B → Xsγ in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D63 (2000) 014006, [ hep-ph/0005275]

    2000 arXiv

  33. [41]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 114020, [ hep-ph/0011336]

    2001 arXiv

  34. [42]

    C. W. Bauer and I. W. Stewart, Invariant operators in collinear effective theory , Phys. Lett. B516 (2001) 134–142, [ hep-ph/0107001]

    2001 arXiv

  35. [43]

    C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 054022, [ hep-ph/0109045]

    2002 arXiv

  36. [44]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein, The Rapidity Renormalization Group , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 151601, [ arXiv:1104.0881]

    2012 arXiv

  37. [45]

    J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein, A Formalism for the Systematic Treatment of Rapidity Logarithms in Quantum Field Theory , JHEP 05 (2012) 084, [ arXiv:1202.0814]

    2012 arXiv

  38. [46]

    V. S. Fadin and L. N. Lipatov, Radiative corrections to QCD scattering amplitudes in a multi - Regge kinematics, Nucl. Phys. B406 (1993) 259–292

    1993

  39. [47]

    V. S. Fadin, R. Fiore, and A. Quartarolo, Quark contribution to the reggeon - reggeon - gluon vertex in QCD , Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 5893–5901, [ hep-th/9405127]

    1994 arXiv

  40. [48]

    V. S. Fadin, R. Fiore, and A. Quartarolo, Radiative corrections to quark quark reggeon vertex in QCD, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 2265–2276, [ hep-ph/9310252]

    1994 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Del Duca and C

    V. Del Duca and C. R. Schmidt, Virtual next-to-leading corrections to the impact factors in the high-energy limit, Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 4069–4079, [ hep-ph/9711309]

    1998 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel, and L. Tancredi, Three-loop helicity amplitudes for quark-gluon scattering in QCD , JHEP 12 (2022) 082, [ arXiv:2207.03503]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Beneke, P

    M. Beneke, P. Falgari, and C. Schwinn, Soft radiation in heavy-particle pair production: All-order colour structure and two-loop anomalous dimension , Nucl. Phys. B828 (2010) 69–101, [arXiv:0907.1443]. – 26 –

    2010 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Sjodahl and J

    M. Sjodahl and J. Thor´ en,Decomposing color structure into multiplet bases , JHEP 09 (2015) 055, [arXiv:1507.03814]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Sj¨ odahl,ColorMath - A package for color summed calculations in SU(Nc) , Eur

    M. Sj¨ odahl,ColorMath - A package for color summed calculations in SU(Nc) , Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013), no. 2 2310, [ arXiv:1211.2099]

    2013 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kwiecinski and M

    J. Kwiecinski and M. Praszalowicz, Three Gluon Integral Equation and Odd c Singlet Regge Singularities in QCD , Phys. Lett. 94B (1980) 413–416

    1980

  47. [55]

    V. S. Fadin, R. Fiore, M. G. Kozlov, and A. V. Reznichenko, Proof of the multi-Regge form of QCD amplitudes with gluon exchanges in the NLA , Phys. Lett. B639 (2006) 74–81, [ hep-ph/0602006]

    2006 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Bartels, L

    J. Bartels, L. N. Lipatov, and A. Sabio Vera, BFKL Pomeron, Reggeized gluons and Bern-Dixon-Smirnov amplitudes , Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 045002, [ arXiv:0802.2065]

    2009 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Bartels, L

    J. Bartels, L. N. Lipatov, and A. Sabio Vera, N=4 supersymmetric Yang Mills scattering amplitudes at high energies: The Regge cut contribution , Eur. Phys. J. C65 (2010) 587–605, [arXiv:0807.0894]

    2010 arXiv

  50. [58]

    L. J. Dixon, C. Duhr, and J. Pennington, Single-valued harmonic polylogarithms and the multi-Regge limit, JHEP 10 (2012) 074, [ arXiv:1207.0186]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Basso, S

    B. Basso, S. Caron-Huot, and A. Sever, Adjoint BFKL at finite coupling: a short-cut from the collinear limit, JHEP 01 (2015) 027, [ arXiv:1407.3766]

    2015 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Bargheer, G

    T. Bargheer, G. Papathanasiou, and V. Schomerus, The Two-Loop Symbol of all Multi-Regge Regions, JHEP 05 (2016) 012, [ arXiv:1512.07620]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Del Duca, S

    V. Del Duca, S. Druc, J. Drummond, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, R. Marzucca, G. Papathanasiou, and B. Verbeek, Multi-Regge kinematics and the moduli space of Riemann spheres with marked points , JHEP 08 (2016) 152, [ arXiv:1606.08807]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Bargheer, Systematics of the Multi-Regge Three-Loop Symbol , JHEP 11 (2017) 077, [arXiv:1606.07640]

    T. Bargheer, Systematics of the Multi-Regge Three-Loop Symbol , JHEP 11 (2017) 077, [arXiv:1606.07640]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, R. Marzucca, and B. Verbeek, The analytic structure and the transcendental weight of the BFKL ladder at NLL accuracy , JHEP 10 (2017) 001, [ arXiv:1705.10163]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and B. Penante, All two-loop MHV remainder functions in multi-Regge kinematics, JHEP 01 (2019) 162, [ arXiv:1811.10398]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Del Duca, S

    V. Del Duca, S. Druc, J. Drummond, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, R. Marzucca, G. Papathanasiou, and B. Verbeek, The seven-gluon amplitude in multi-Regge kinematics beyond leading logarithmic accuracy, JHEP 06 (2018) 116, [ arXiv:1801.10605]. – 27 –

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.