REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by
Out-of-equilibrium Chiral Magnetic Effect via Kubo formulas
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the midpoint of the Euclidean CME correlator gives a first lattice estimate of the out-of-equilibrium CME conductivity, suppressed below the QCD crossover and approaching the one-loop prediction at high temperature.
desk verdict A solid first lattice estimate of the out-of-equilibrium CME conductivity with a clean one-loop spectral function and honest caveats, but the suppression claim remains provisional until the disconnected term is bounded. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the retarded axial-vector propagator $G_R^{\mathrm{CME}}(t)$ defined by the response of the vector current to a time-dependent chiral chemical potential in a background magnetic field, related to conductivity by the Kubo formula $\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{neq}}_{\mathrm{CME}} = \lim_{B\to 0} (T/(eB C_{\mathrm{dof}})) \lim_{\omega\to 0} \rho_{\mathrm{CME}}(\omega)/\omega$. Because the lattice is Euclidean, the paper uses the spectral representation $G(\tau) = \int_0^\infty d\omega\, \rho(\omega) K(\tau,\omega)/\omega$, whose kernel at $\tau = 1/(2T)$ approaches a delta function as $T\to 0$; this is what makes the midpoint observable a conductivity proxy. The one-loop calculation uses free fermion propagators in a magnetic background, and the equality of the CME and CSE spectral functions at $\omega = 0$ is the mechanism behind the CME-CSE midpoint equality.
What would settle it
Recompute $\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{MP}}_{\mathrm{CME}}$ including the disconnected contribution on the same ensembles: if that contribution is comparable to the connected midpoint value at low temperature, the claimed suppression would be altered; alternatively, a continuum extrapolation of staggered data at fixed temperature would show whether the near-crossover rise is physical or a lattice artifact.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that $\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{MP}}_{\mathrm{CME}} = G(\tau T = 1/2)/(C_{\mathrm{dof}}\, eBT)$ is a usable first proxy for the out-of-equilibrium CME conductivity, and that gluonic interactions suppress this observable at low temperatures. At one loop, the spectral function is $\rho_{\mathrm{CME}}(\omega)/(eB) = \alpha(m/T)\,\omega\,\delta(\omega) + \Theta(\omega^2 - 4m^2)\, (m^2/\pi^2)\, \tanh(|\omega|/(4T))\, \sqrt{\omega^2 - 4m^2}/\omega$, with $\alpha(m/T) \to 1/(2\pi^2)$ in the massless limit; the delta-function part coincides with the CSE spectral function, which makes the Euclidean CME and CSE correlators equal at the midpoint at this order. Lattice data give $\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{MP}}_{\mathrm{CME}}$ well below the free-fermion value $1/(2\pi^2)$ for $T < T_c = 155$ MeV (and below the quenched transition near 270 MeV for Wilson fermions), with a pronounced increase near the crossover toward the one-loop prediction. The paper presents the low-temperature suppression as a new observation, in contrast with earlier two-color lattice results.
Load-bearing premise
The suppression claim rests on treating the omitted piece of the correlation function, the disconnected part, as negligible at the midpoint, and on reading finite-lattice-spacing staggered and Wilson data as representative of the continuum.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The midpoint observable $\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{MP}}_{\mathrm{CME}}$ can serve as a first quantitative estimate of the out-of-equilibrium CME conductivity across a wide temperature range without solving the full inverse spectral problem.
- At one-loop order the CME and CSE spectral functions coincide at $\omega = 0$, so the Euclidean CME and CSE correlators agree at the midpoint; the paper conjectures this equality extends to non-perturbative QCD.
- The suppression below $T_c$ shows that gluonic interactions, not free quarks in a magnetic field, control the CME response in the hadronic phase.
- The observable tracks the QCD crossover: it rises sharply near $T_c = 155$ MeV and approaches the one-loop prediction at high temperature, giving a clear benchmark for perturbative calculations.
Reading between the lines
- If the CME-CSE midpoint equality survives beyond one loop, the CME conductivity might be extracted from existing CSE lattice data, which avoids the noisiest part of the CME calculation.
- The low-temperature suppression implies that hadronic-phase CME currents in heavy-ion collisions are weaker than free-quark estimates; models using these lattice values would predict a smaller chiral magnetic signal near freeze-out.
- A direct test of the conjecture would be to include the disconnected contribution and reconstruct the full spectral function from $\tau$-dependent correlators; the paper explicitly leaves this to future work.
- The staggered lattice-artifact pattern (different behavior for $N_t = 6, 10$ versus $N_t = 8$) suggests the near-crossover rise should not be quoted quantitatively until a continuum extrapolation is performed.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This proceedings paper proposes a Kubo-formula framework for the out-of-equilibrium chiral magnetic effect. The authors derive a one-loop spectral function for the CME, introduce the Euclidean midpoint observable C^MP_CME = G(τT=1/2)/(C_dof eBT), and compute this observable on the lattice using quenched Wilson fermions and dynamical staggered fermions at the physical point. The central finding is that C^MP_CME is strongly suppressed at temperatures below T_c ≈ 155 MeV and rises near T_c toward the free-fermion value 1/(2π^2). The paper also points out a one-loop equality between the CME and CSE Euclidean correlators at the midpoint and conjectures that this equality may persist nonperturbatively.
Significance. If the result holds, the paper provides a first non-perturbative estimate of the out-of-equilibrium CME conductivity in QCD and establishes a useful analytic benchmark: the one-loop spectral function and the midpoint relation to the CSE. The lattice setup is validated by free-fermion crosschecks, the Wilson and staggered results are compared with each other, and the suppression below T_c is a genuinely new observation that contrasts with Ref. [12]. These are real strengths. However, the headline claim is provisional because two systematic effects are not controlled: the disconnected part of the correlator is omitted without an estimate, and the QCD data are shown only at finite lattice spacing without a continuum extrapolation.
major comments (3)
- [Sec. 3.1 / Eq. (16)] The central low-temperature suppression claim in Fig. 3 is based on a correlator that excludes the disconnected contribution G_disc defined in Eq. (16). The text states in Sec. 3.1 that this term was omitted because it is noisy, and that a precise analysis is deferred to an upcoming publication. Since C^MP_CME is defined through the full Euclidean correlator (14), an omitted contribution of comparable size at low T would directly change the magnitude and possibly the sign of the deviation shown in Fig. 3. No bound or estimate of G_disc is given. As written, the evidence therefore does not yet establish that gluonic interactions suppress the midpoint observable below the free-fermion value.
- [Sec. 4 / Fig. 3] The QCD results are presented at finite lattice spacing without a continuum extrapolation. The free-fermion checks in Fig. 1 show a non-monotonic approach to the continuum, and the text explicitly acknowledges that lattice artifacts differ between N_t = 6, 10 and N_t = 8. Consequently the observed suppression below T_c and the approach to 1/(2π^2) above T_c are finite-spacing results. Discretization effects could alter the quantitative comparison with the one-loop prediction, so the claim that C^MP_CME 'approaches the perturbation theory prediction' needs either a continuum extrapolation or a conservative systematic-error statement.
- [Sec. 2 / Eqs. (6), (10), (13)] There appears to be a normalization inconsistency between the spectral function (6) and the midpoint formula (13). Inserting the delta-function term of Eq. (6) into the spectral representation (10) at τT = 1/2 gives G/(C_dof eBT) = 2 α(m/T), i.e. 1/π^2 in the massless limit, while Eq. (13) yields 1/(2π^2) for m/T = 0. The paper states that Eq. (13) follows from Eq. (6), but the derivation is not shown and a direct evaluation gives a factor of two. This affects the analytic prediction used as the high-temperature benchmark in Fig. 3; the normalization of either ρ_CME or the kernel K(τ,ω) should be clarified.
minor comments (4)
- [Introduction] The sentence 'At various temperatures, using lattice simulations with quenched Wilson fermions and dynamical staggered quarks in QCD at the physical point' is a sentence fragment; it should be integrated into the preceding sentence.
- [Sec. 4] In the discussion of Fig. 1, the phrase 'lattices with N_t mod 4 = 0 are found to scale faster towards the continuum as lattices with N_t mod 4 = 2' appears to be missing 'than'; please rephrase.
- [Fig. 2 caption] The caption 'The (filled) open points correspond to the (positive) negative values of the correlator' is confusing; please state explicitly which symbol shape and color correspond to positive and negative values.
- [Sec. 5] The conjecture that the CME/CSE midpoint equality holds nonperturbatively would be easier to evaluate if the authors stated whether the equality is expected to hold for the connected part only or for the full correlator, given that the current lattice data omit the disconnected contribution.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the midpoint CME observable is computed directly on the lattice and compared to an independent analytic free-fermion benchmark, with no fitted parameter disguised as a prediction.
full rationale
The paper's central lattice claim, that C_CME^MP is suppressed below T_c and approaches the one-loop result above, is obtained from a direct lattice measurement of the Euclidean correlator (14), normalized by C_dof eBT. The one-loop spectral function (6) is derived analytically from free fermion propagators, and the free-field value (13) is used only as a benchmark; no parameter is fitted to the lattice data, so the comparison is not a fitted input called a prediction. The midpoint observable is introduced as a proxy following Ref. [12], and its relation to the conductivity is a stated approximation rather than a circular definition. The equality of CME and CSE correlators at the midpoint is derived from the independently computed spectral functions (6) and (9), and the non-perturbative extension is explicitly labeled a conjecture. Self-citations [6,8,19] concern operator definitions, the equilibrium absence of CME, and the CSE conductivity; none of these is the load-bearing input for the suppression observation. The omission of the disconnected part (16) is a systematic caveat that could affect the magnitude of the result, but it is not a circular step. No circularity is found.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption Linear response theory: the CME response to a time-dependent chiral chemical potential is given by the retarded axial-vector correlator (Eq. 1).
- standard math Kubo formula (Eq. 4) relating the out-of-equilibrium CME conductivity to the spectral function in the limits B→0, ω→0.
- standard math Spectral representation (Eq. 10) for the Euclidean correlator in terms of the spectral function.
- domain assumption Free fermion propagators in a background magnetic field for the one-loop contribution.
- standard math The midpoint kernel K(τ=1/(2T),ω) behaves as a Dirac delta as T→0, making the midpoint a proxy for the conductivity.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Out-of-equilibrium Chiral Magnetic Effect via Kubo formulas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FFYJ3CC5
@misc{pith2026250201155,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Out-of-equilibrium Chiral Magnetic Effect via Kubo formulas},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FFYJ3CC5}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01155}
}
read the original abstract
In this proceedings article, we present the first steps towards the determination of the out-of-equilibrium conductivity of the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) in the presence of strong interactions. Using linear response theory, we obtain an analytical expression for the spectral function associated with this effect at one-loop in perturbation theory. In addition, we provide a first estimate of the CME conductivity by calculating the associated Euclidean correlator using quenched Wilson fermions and dynamical staggered fermions in physical Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) simulations. In particular, we focus on the midpoint of the correlator, which can be used as a proxy of the full conductivity. We present results in a wide range of temperatures, showing how this observable is suppressed at low temperatures, while at high temperatures it approaches the perturbation theory prediction.
Figures
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Lattice QCD Study of Anomalous Transport Phenomena in Strongly Interacting Matter
First physical-point lattice QCD calculation of the Chiral Separation Effect conductivity, a zero equilibrium Chiral Magnetic Effect with conserved currents, and a localized equilibrium CME in inhomogeneous fields.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[12]
Out-of-equilibrium chiral magnetic effect from simulations on Euclidean lattices,
P. V. Buividovich, “Out-of-equilibrium chiral magnetic effect from simulations on Euclidean lattices,”Phys. Rev. D110 no. 9, (2024) 094508,arXiv:2404.14263 [hep-lat]
arXiv 2024
-
[1]
K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, “The Chiral Magnetic Effect,”Phys. Rev. D 78(2008) 074033,arXiv:0808.3382 [hep-ph]
arXiv 2008
-
[2]
Observation of the chiral magnetic effect in ZrTe5,
Q. Li, D. E. Kharzeev, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, I. Pletikosic, A. V. Fedorov, R. D. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, and T. Valla, “Observation of the chiral magnetic effect in ZrTe5,” Nature Phys.12(2016) 550–554,arXiv:1412.6543 [cond-mat.str-el] . 8 Out-of-equilibrium Chiral Magnetic Effect via Kubo formulas E. Garnacho-Velasco
arXiv 2016
-
[3]
Chiral Magnetic Effect in Heavy Ion Collisions: The Present and Future,
D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, and P. Tribedy, “Chiral Magnetic Effect in Heavy Ion Collisions: The Present and Future,”arXiv:2405.05427 [nucl-th]
-
[4]
QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review,
G. Endrődi, “QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.141(2025) 104153,arXiv:2406.19780 [hep-lat]
arXiv 2025
-
[5]
Generalized Bloch theorem and chiral transport phenomena,
N. Yamamoto, “Generalized Bloch theorem and chiral transport phenomena,”Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 8, (2015) 085011,arXiv:1502.01547 [cond-mat.mes-hall]
arXiv 2015
-
[6]
On the absence of the chiral magnetic effect in equilibrium QCD,
B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, and G. Markó, “On the absence of the chiral magnetic effect in equilibrium QCD,”JHEP 09 (2024) 092,arXiv:2405.09484 [hep-lat]
arXiv 2024
-
[7]
Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,
P. Adhikariet al., “Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,” arXiv:2412.18632 [nucl-th]
Show all 20 references
-
[8]
Localized Chiral Magnetic Effect in equilibrium QCD,
B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, G. Markó, and A. D. M. Valois, “Localized Chiral Magnetic Effect in equilibrium QCD,”arXiv:2409.17616 [hep-lat]
-
[9]
Chiral Magnetic conductivity,
D. E. Kharzeev and H. J. Warringa, “Chiral Magnetic conductivity,”Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 034028, arXiv:0907.5007 [hep-ph]
2009 arXiv
-
[10]
Some Field Theoretic Issues Regarding the Chiral Magnetic Effect,
D. Hou, H. Liu, and H.-c. Ren, “Some Field Theoretic Issues Regarding the Chiral Magnetic Effect,”JHEP 05 (2011) 046,arXiv:1103.2035 [hep-ph]
2011 arXiv
-
[11]
Chiral magnetic effect out of equilibrium,
C. Banerjee, M. Lewkowicz, and M. A. Zubkov, “Chiral magnetic effect out of equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 7, (2022) 074508,arXiv:2206.11819 [hep-ph]
2022 arXiv
-
[13]
Lattice study of the electromagnetic conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma in an external magnetic field,
N. Astrakhantsev, V. V. Braguta, M. D’Elia, A. Y. Kotov, A. A. Nikolaev, and F. Sanfilippo, “Lattice study of the electromagnetic conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma in an external magnetic field,”Phys. Rev. D102 no. 5, (2020) 054516,arXiv:1910.08516 [hep-lat]
2020 arXiv
-
[14]
Electrical conductivity of the Quark-Gluon Plasma in the presence of strong magnetic fields,
G. Almirante, N. Astrakhantsev, V. V. Braguta, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, M. Naviglio, F. Sanfilippo, and A. Trunin, “Electrical conductivity of the Quark-Gluon Plasma in the presence of strong magnetic fields,”arXiv:2406.18504 [hep-lat]
-
[15]
Magnetic-Field-Induced insulator-conductor transition in SU(2) quenched lattice gauge theory,
P. V. Buividovich, M. N. Chernodub, D. E. Kharzeev, T. Kalaydzhyan, E. V. Luschevskaya, and M. I. Polikarpov, “Magnetic-Field-Induced insulator-conductor transition in SU(2) quenched lattice gauge theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 132001,arXiv:1003.2180 [hep-lat]
2010 arXiv
-
[16]
Transport coefficients in high temperature gauge theories. 1. Leading log results,
P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, “Transport coefficients in high temperature gauge theories. 1. Leading log results,”JHEP 11 (2000) 001,arXiv:hep-ph/0010177
2000 arXiv
-
[17]
Quantum anomalies in dense matter,
D. T. Son and A. R. Zhitnitsky, “Quantum anomalies in dense matter,”Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 074018,arXiv:hep-ph/0405216. 9 Out-of-equilibrium Chiral Magnetic Effect via Kubo formulas E. Garnacho-Velasco
2004 arXiv
-
[18]
Anomalous axion interactions and topological currents in dense matter,
M. A. Metlitski and A. R. Zhitnitsky, “Anomalous axion interactions and topological currents in dense matter,”Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 045011,arXiv:hep-ph/0505072
2005 arXiv
-
[19]
The chiral separation effect from lattice QCD at the physical point,
B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, and G. Markó, “The chiral separation effect from lattice QCD at the physical point,”JHEP 02 (2024) 142,arXiv:2312.02945 [hep-lat]
2024 arXiv
-
[20]
The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields,
G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schäfer, and K. K. Szabó, “The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields,”JHEP 02(2012) 044, arXiv:1111.4956 [hep-lat] . 10
2012 arXiv
Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.