Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The stability of long-range order in disordered systems: A generalized Ding-Zhuang argument

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In three or more dimensions, weak disorder fails to destroy long-range order whenever the clean system has a Peierls condition and a local symmetry.

desk verdict A serious and readable generalization of the Ding-Zhuang argument, but the local-symmetry axiom as stated is too weak to support the chaining estimate; the main theorem needs a compatibility condition or a strengthened axiom. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11445 v1 pith:FGCNIYZW submitted 2025-07-15 math-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechmath.MPmath.PR

Yejia Chen , Jianwen Zhou , Ruifeng Liu , Hai-Jun Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechmath.MPmath.PR MSC 82B2082B2682B44
keywords disorderedsystemslong-rangeorderDing-ZhuangargumentPirogov-SinaitheoryPeierlsconditionrandom-fieldIsingmodelquencheddisorderGibbsstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks when long-range order in a lattice spin system survives the addition of frozen-in randomness. It claims that in dimensions $d \ge 3$, order persists at low temperature and weak disorder provided two conditions hold: the disorder-free model has a Peierls condition (an excitation of size $n$ costs at least $\rho n$ energy) and the disorder is almost invariant under local maps that swap ground states. The proof turns the Ding-Zhuang multiscale argument into a general theorem, Theorem 15, integrated with the Pirogov-Sinai contour representation. The payoff is a single checkable criterion that reproduces and unifies known results for random-field, random-bond, hard-core, and continuous-spin disordered models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the local symmetry operation (Definition 4): for any two ground states $b_{k_1}, b_{k_2}$ and any finite region $\Lambda$, there is a pair of transformations $(\bar\tau_\Lambda, \tau_\Lambda)$ acting on spins inside $\Lambda$ and on quenched parameters in a slightly enlarged region. The transformation must be local, injective, Lipschitz, and quasi-invariant in two senses: it changes the Hamiltonian only along the internal boundary of $\Lambda$ (energy quasi-invariance), and it pushes forward the i.i.d. disorder measure to itself up to boundary effects (measure quasi-invariance). The Ding-Zhuang argument—a multiscale Peierls-type proof for disordered systems—uses these symmetries to compare partition functions of contour interiors with ground-state references, bounding three random events—$F^c$, $I^c$, and $F^{\mathrm{int}}$—by subgaussian concentration and a coarse-grained chaining estimate. The output is an exponential decay bound on the probability of contours, which beats the entropy of contour counting and produces the long-range order of Theorem 15.

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier would be a Hamiltonian on $\mathbb{Z}^3$ that satisfies the Peierls condition and the local-symmetry axioms of Definition 4 but whose low-temperature Gibbs measures show no magnetization exceeding $1/2$ at arbitrarily small disorder variance—e.g., a numerical study of the quenched Fredrickson-Andersen 1-blocked model, whose hard-core limit the paper claims is ordered; observing no ordered phase there would contradict the theorem's prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 15 states that for a statistical mechanical system on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ with $d \ge 3$ whose disorder-free Hamiltonian satisfies the Peierls condition and admits a local symmetric operation, there are constants $T_0>0$ and $\varepsilon_0>0$ such that for $T<T_0$ and $\varepsilon<\varepsilon_0$ the system has at least $N_g$ distinct $\eta$-covariant Gibbs measures $\{\mu^k_\eta\}_{k=1}^{N_g}$. For almost every disorder realization each such measure is ordered: the limiting density of sites where the spin equals the ground-state value $b_k$ exceeds $1/2$. Conceptually the paper establishes a stability criterion: a Peierls energy condition plus an approximate local symmetry of the disorder distribution guarantees persistence of long-range order and phase coexistence. The criterion is then checked on a diverse set of models, including random-field Ising and Potts models, the Edwards-Anderson model, a quenched Fredrickson-Andersen 1-blocked model, hard-core models on several three-dimensional lattices, and continuous-spin variants such as the anisotropic Heisenberg model.

Load-bearing premise

The whole theorem rests on the existence, for every finite region, of a local transformation of spins and disorder that almost preserves both the Hamiltonian and the disorder distribution while swapping the ground states; if the random-field distribution or the couplings lack such a symmetry, or boundary errors accumulate, the theorem gives nothing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any model in the class, the number of coexisting low-temperature Gibbs states is at least the number of periodic ground states, so the theorem turns ground-state counting into a phase-coexistence statement.
  • In dimensions $d\ge 3$, order and phase coexistence are stable under small disorder for all models satisfying the two axioms, giving a uniform reason for phenomena previously proved model by model.
  • The local symmetry need not be a global symmetry of the clean model; translations, reflections, and cyclic permutations of internal states all qualify, as the applications to the antiferromagnetic and hard-core models show.
  • When the random field that couples to the order parameter is absent and only bond disorder is present, the dimension restriction relaxes to $d\ge 2$ (Remark 2), so the mechanism distinguishes random fields from random bonds.
  • For continuous-spin models, the same conclusion holds once the state space is partitioned into ground-state and metastable regions and the extended Peierls condition (Definition 9) and local symmetry (Definition 10) are satisfied.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The axioms might be checkable for models the paper does not treat, such as random-field clock or $O(n)$ models with discrete spin partitions, provided a suitable map $\bar\tau_\Lambda$ can be built; this is an extrapolation of the stated theorem, not a claim of the paper.
  • The measure quasi-invariance condition is essentially an exact local symmetry of the disorder law; physical disorder distributions that are only approximately symmetric on larger scales would need a quantitative stability analysis, which the paper leaves implicit.
  • Because the proof uses subgaussian concentration of the disorder, it likely extends to weakly dependent disorder with finite-range correlations by modifying the chaining step; again, the authors do not make this claim.
  • The theorem can be read as a design principle: a material with a clean model satisfying the Peierls condition and with disorder generated by a locally symmetric random process should keep its ordered phase, which could inform experiments on disordered magnets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general framework for proving persistence of long-range order in disordered lattice systems, axiomatizing the Ding-Zhuang method through a Peierls condition and a local-symmetry condition. The main result, Theorem 15, asserts that in dimensions d≥3, for sufficiently low temperature and weak disorder, a system with N_g ground states admits at least N_g distinct η-covariant Gibbs measures, each with the corresponding ground-state probability bounded below by 1/2. The proof combines Pirogov-Sinai contour/polymer representations with concentration inequalities and a multiscale chaining argument. The framework is then applied to the random-field Ising and Potts models, an extended Edwards-Anderson model, a quenched Fredrickson-Andersen model, hard-core models on several lattices, and continuous-spin versions of the Ising and anisotropic Heisenberg models.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, the paper delivers a useful unifying scheme: it recovers the Ding-Zhuang results for RFIM/RFPM and extends the method, in a single axiomatic setup, to bond disorder, hard-core models, other lattice structures, and continuous spin spaces. The explicit construction of local symmetries in Section 6 is a strength, as is the careful use of concentration and chaining estimates. The price of the generality is that the local-symmetry axiom (Definition 4) is strong and model-specific; the paper does not derive it from weaker structural conditions, and the theorem is vacuous when no such transformation exists. The central proof, however, currently contains load-bearing gaps that must be repaired before the theorem can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Lemma 8 and Eq. (38)] The identity (τ_{Λ1}η)_s=(τ_{Λ2}η)_s for all s∈Λ′ is not a consequence of Definition 4. Definition 4 supplies, separately for each finite region Λ, a local transformation τ_Λ, and Section 4.1 explicitly constructs τ_intγ as a composition over the components of intγ; two different contours can therefore induce different transformations on a common overlap. Since Lemma 8 is the subgaussian input for the chaining argument in Proposition 14, the proof of Theorem 15 currently rests on an unstated cross-region compatibility property. Adding a compatibility axiom—for example, requiring that all τ_Λ are restrictions of one global local symmetry—would close the gap, and the applications in Section 6, which use global spin flips or translations, would satisfy such an axiom.
  2. [Section 4.4, Proposition 14, Eq. (65)] The displayed bound P(...) ≤ exp(−ρ²/(128Cν n^{2−d/(d−1)})) does not decay in n for d≥3; as n→∞ the right-hand side tends to 1, so the subsequent summation over n cannot be made arbitrarily small. The exponent appears to have been inverted: combining the preceding line n²/diam(C0(n))² with the isoperimetric inequality would yield a bound of the form exp(−c n^{d/(d−1)}) or at least exp(−cn). Please correct the displayed inequality and verify the constants in the final summation, since this is the step that makes Proposition 14 valid.
  3. [Section 5.1, proof of Theorem 15, around Eq. (71)] The line 'Since Ξ^{k0}_{τintγ0 η,Λ}/Ξ^{k0}_{η,Λ}=Z^{k0}_{τintγ0 η,Λ}/Z^{k0}_{η,Λ}' is inconsistent with the definition of Ξ in Proposition 1, which contains the η-dependent prefactor exp[(e_g|Λ|+S^k_Λ(η))/T]. The quotient of the Ξ's differs from the quotient of the Z's by the factor exp[(S^k_Λ(τintγη)−S^k_Λ(η))/T], and this additional factor is not controlled by the event F_int, which only bounds the Z-ratio. The derivation of the contour-occurrence estimate exp(−ρ|γ̄|/4T) therefore needs to be reworked or the definitions adjusted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (19)] The compatibility condition repeats 'γ≥γ′' twice; it should read 'γ≥γ′ or γ′≥γ'.
  2. [Section 4.2, Proposition 6 and Corollary 7] The probability tail bounds in (34) and the surrounding text omit the factor 2 present in Theorems 2 and 3, and the symbol ν is used for both the bounded and Gaussian cases; the notation should be aligned.
  3. [Section 5.1, proof of Theorem 15] The line 'P(η∈ Fc ∩ Ic ∩ Fint) ≥ 1−3ρ > 3/4' overloads ρ, which is already the Peierls constant; a separate tolerance parameter should be used.
  4. [Section 6.3, Eqs. (95)–(96)] The random-field notation is inconsistent: the text uses η^{Γ,b}_s, η^b,Γ_s, and η^c_s for what appears to be the same quantity; define one symbol and use it throughout.
  5. [Section 6.4] There are typos such as 'we can also generated the four sublattice', and the description of the sublattices for the hexagonal close-packed lattice would benefit from a clearer definition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Theorem 15 is an axiomatic derivation from the Peierls condition and an explicit local-symmetry condition; the applications verify the axioms directly, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Theorem 15, takes as explicit inputs the Peierls condition (Definition 2) and local symmetry with energy and measure quasi-invariance (Definitions 4 and 10), then derives coexistence of Gibbs measures via contour expansion, subgaussian concentration, and chaining. The proof is not circular: the local-symmetry axiom does not itself assert the existence of multiple Gibbs measures or the bound (66), and the conclusion is obtained by estimating contour probabilities through Proposition 6, Corollary 7, and Proposition 14. The model applications in Section 6 verify the axioms for each Hamiltonian (e.g., (84)-(85), (89)-(90), (93), (97)) rather than fitting parameters to the desired conclusion. The paper's citations to Ding-Zhuang [32], Fisher-Froehlich-Spencer [33], and Affonso-Bissacot-Maia [42] are external prior work, not self-citations of the present authors, and are used for technical estimates or motivation rather than as load-bearing proof of the theorem. Some steps are deferred (for instance, Lemma 10's proof is referenced to [42], and Remark 3 leaves an extension to the reader), but deferring a proof is an omission, not a circular reduction. The skeptical concern that Definition 4 may not imply the cross-region compatibility used in Lemma 8 is a potential correctness gap in the general framework, not an instance of a prediction being equivalent to its input by construction; therefore it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem is conditional on the Peierls condition and the local symmetry condition, both treated as domain assumptions. The proof additionally relies on standard concentration inequalities, chaining bounds, geometric contour-counting estimates, and the existence of η-covariant Gibbs measures, all invoked from the literature or standard results. No free parameters are fitted; the constants T_0 and ε_0 are existence thresholds. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Peierls condition (Definition 2): finite number of periodic local ground states and an energy gap ρ>0 for every contour.
    The main theorem assumes this for the unperturbed Hamiltonian; each application in Section 6 verifies it. The proof uses it to control contour weights and to get exponential decay of contour probabilities.
  • domain assumption Local symmetry condition (Definition 4): existence of local transformations τ̄_Λ on spins and τ_Λ on quenched parameters satisfying locality, injectivity, energy quasi-invariance, regularity, and measure quasi-invariance.
    This is the central structural assumption; Steps 2 and 3 of Section 4 depend on it. It restricts the class of disordered systems, e.g., to symmetric random field distributions or to models with translation or sublattice symmetries.
  • domain assumption The quenched parameters ω are i.i.d., either Gaussian or bounded with |ω|≤1, mean zero and variance ε²; the field η is a local Lipschitz function of ω with Eη=0 and η(0)=0.
    Section 2 sets these hypotheses; they are needed for the subgaussian concentration bounds in Section 4.2 and for the small-variance control of disorder.
  • standard math Standard concentration inequalities (McDiarmid, Gaussian concentration, Proposition 4) and the chaining tail inequality (Theorem 9).
    Cited from [40] and partially proved in Section 4.2; used throughout Section 4 to control the probability of fluctuation-stabilized contours and internal regions.
  • standard math Geometric estimates: Lemma 16 (contour counting), Lemma 10 and Proposition 11 (coarse-graining), and the isoperimetric inequality of [44, Cor. B.80].
    Lemma 16 is proved in Appendix A; Lemma 10 and Proposition 11 are deferred to [42]. These bound the covering number and diameter in the chaining argument.
  • standard math Existence of η-covariant Gibbs measures and the ergodic theorem for i.i.d. disorder.
    Invoked at the start of Section 5 and at the end of the proof of Theorem 15, following [29,45].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The stability of long-range order in disordered systems: A generalized Ding-Zhuang argument." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FGCNIYZW

@misc{pith2026250711445,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The stability of long-range order in disordered systems: A generalized Ding-Zhuang argument},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FGCNIYZW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11445}
}
abstract

The stability of long-range order against quenched disorder is a central problem in statistical mechanics. This paper develops a generalized framework extending the Ding-Zhuang method and integrated with the Pirogov-Sinai framework, establishing a systematic scheme for studying phase transitions of long-range order in disordered systems. We axiomatize the Ding-Zhuang approach into a theoretical framework consisting of the Peierls condition and a local symmetry condition. For systems in dimensions $d \geq 3$ satisfying these conditions, we prove the persistence of long-range order at low temperatures and under weak disorder, with multiple coexisting distinct Gibbs states. The framework's versatility is demonstrated for diverse models, providing a systematic extension of Peierls methods to disordered systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thermodynamic phase transitions in lattice spin systems with severe kinetic constraints: Numerical simulation results

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Numerical simulations show that the K=1 Fredrickson-Andersen kinetic model on 2D and 3D lattices exhibits a site-percolation universality collapse transition and a ground-state crystal-to-glass transition driven by ki...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society32(3), 477–481 (1936) https://doi.org/10

    Peierls, R.: On Ising’s model of Ferromagnetism. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society32(3), 477–481 (1936) https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0305004100019174 38

    work page 1936

  2. [2]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics40(1), 75–82 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01614098

    Malyshev, V.A.: Phase transitions of classical Heisenberg ferromagnets with arbi- trary parameter of anisotropy. Communications in Mathematical Physics40(1), 75–82 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01614098

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01614098 1975

  3. [3]

    Journal of Functional Analysis28(2), 145–167 (1978) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0022-1236(78)90082-4

    van Beijeren, H., Sylvester, G.S.: Phase transitions for continuous-spin Ising ferro- magnets. Journal of Functional Analysis28(2), 145–167 (1978) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0022-1236(78)90082-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-1236(78)90082-4 1978

  4. [4]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics14(3), 195–204 (1969) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645420

    Robinson, D.W.: A proof of the existence of phase transitions in the anisotropic Heisenberg model. Communications in Mathematical Physics14(3), 195–204 (1969) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645420

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01645420 1969

  5. [5]

    Journal of the European Math- ematical Society27(4), 1679–1714 (2024) https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1529

    Affonso, L., Bissacot, R., Endo, E.O., Handa, S.: Long-range Ising models: Contours, phase transitions and decaying fields. Journal of the European Math- ematical Society27(4), 1679–1714 (2024) https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1529

    work page doi:10.4171/jems/1529 2024

  6. [6]

    Theoreti- cal and Mathematical Physics25(3), 1185–1192 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01040127

    Pirogov, S.A., Sinai, Y.G.: Phase diagrams of classical lattice systems. Theoreti- cal and Mathematical Physics25(3), 1185–1192 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01040127

    work page 1975

  7. [7]

    Theoretical and Mathematical Physics26(1), 39–49 (1976) https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01038255

    Pirogov, S.A., Sinai, Ya.G.: Phase diagrams of classical lattice systems con- tinuation. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics26(1), 39–49 (1976) https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01038255

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01038255 1976

  8. [8]

    Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics93(4), 559–581 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01212295

    Zahradn ´ ık, M.: An alternate version of Pirogov-Sinai theory. Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics93(4), 559–581 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01212295

    work page 1984

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Proba- bility Theory and Related Fields176(3-4), 851–895 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Helmuth, T., Perkins, W., Regts, G.: Algorithmic Pirogov–Sinai theory. Proba- bility Theory and Related Fields176(3-4), 851–895 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00440-019-00928-y

    2020

  2. [10]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics50(1), 79–95 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608557

    Fr¨ ohlich, J., Simon, B., Spencer, T.: Infrared bounds, phase transitions and con- tinuous symmetry breaking. Communications in Mathematical Physics50(1), 79–95 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608557

    1976 doi

  3. [11]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General22(1), 465–489 (1980) https://doi.org/10

    Baxter, R.J., Enting, I.G., Tsang, S.K.: Hard-square lattice gas. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General22(1), 465–489 (1980) https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF01012867

    1980

  4. [12]

    Sherman, S.: Combinatorial aspects of the Ising model for ferromagnetism. I. a conjecture of feynman on paths and graphs. Journal of Mathematical Physics 1(3), 202–217 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1703653

    1960 doi

  5. [13]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General13(3), 61–70 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/3/007 39

    Baxter, R.J.: Hard Hexagons: Exact Solution. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General13(3), 61–70 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/3/007 39

    1980 doi

  6. [14]

    Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6(23), 445 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/6/23/005

    Baxter, R.J.: Potts model at the critical temperature. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6(23), 445 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/6/23/005

    1973 doi

  7. [15]

    arXiv e-prints (arXiv:1611.09877), 1611–09877 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.1611.09877 arXiv:1611.09877 [math.PR]

    Duminil-Copin, H., Gagnebin, M., Harel, M., Manolescu, I., Tassion, V.: Discon- tinuity of the phase transition for the planar random-cluster and Potts models with q>4. arXiv e-prints (arXiv:1611.09877), 1611–09877 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.1611.09877 arXiv:1611.0...

    2016 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics349(1), 47–107 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00220-016-2759-8

    Duminil-Copin, H., Sidoravicius, V., Tassion, V.: Continuity of the Phase Tran- sition for Planar Random-Cluster and Potts Models with$${1\le q\le 4}$$. Communications in Mathematical Physics349(1), 47–107 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00220-016-2759-8

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    Kac, M., Ward, J.C.: A combinatorial solution of the two-dimensional ising model. Phys. Rev.88, 1332–1337 (1952) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.88.1332

    1952 doi

  10. [18]

    Physical Review Letters35(21), 1399–1401 (1975) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1399

    Imry, Y., Ma, S.-k.: Random-Field Instability of the Ordered State of Continuous Symmetry. Physical Review Letters35(21), 1399–1401 (1975) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1399

    1975 doi

  11. [19]

    Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics12(18), 729 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/12/18/006

    S Fishman, A Aharony: Random field effects in disordered anisotropic anti- ferromagnets. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics12(18), 729 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/12/18/006

    1979 doi

  12. [20]

    Europhysics Letters (EPL)5(2), 129–133 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1209/ 0295-5075/5/2/007

    Fernandez, J.F.: Random Fields Generated by Dilution in Zero External Field. Europhysics Letters (EPL)5(2), 129–133 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1209/ 0295-5075/5/2/007

    1988

  13. [21]

    Cao, M.S., Machta, J.: Migdal-kadanoff study of the random-field ising model. Phys. Rev. B48, 3177–3182 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.3177

    1993 doi

  14. [22]

    Physical Review Letters74(7), 1178–1181 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.74.1178

    Kirkpatrick, T.R., Belitz, D.: Anderson-Mott Transition as a Random-Field Prob- lem. Physical Review Letters74(7), 1178–1181 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.74.1178

    1995

  15. [23]

    Fytas, N.G., Mart ´ ın-Mayor, V.: Universality in the three-dimensional random- field ising model110(22), 227201 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110. 227201

    doi

  16. [24]

    Condensed Matter Physics17(4), 43003 (2014) https:// doi.org/10.5488/CMP.17.43003

    Theodorakis, P.E., Fytas, N.G.: Random-field ising model: Insight from zero- temperature simulations. Condensed Matter Physics17(4), 43003 (2014) https:// doi.org/10.5488/CMP.17.43003 . PACS: 05.50.+q, 75.10.Hk, 64.60.Cn, 75.10.Nr

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    Physical Review B88(17), 174408 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.88.174408 40

    Ahrens, B., Xiao, J., Hartmann, A.K., Katzgraber, H.G.: Diluted antiferromag- nets in a field seem to be in a different universality class than the random-field Ising model. Physical Review B88(17), 174408 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.88.174408 40

    2013

  18. [26]

    Physical Review B35(4), 2098–2101 (1987)

    Graham, J.T., Maliepaard, M., Page, J.H., Smith, S.R.P., Taylor, D.R.: Random- Field Effects on Ising Jahn-Teller Phase Transitions. Physical Review B35(4), 2098–2101 (1987). Accessed 2024-11-20

    1987

  19. [27]

    Physical Review Letters58(18), 1865–1868 (1987) https://doi.org/10

    Dierker, S.B., Wiltzius, P.: Random-field Transition of a Binary Liquid in a Porous Medium. Physical Review Letters58(18), 1865–1868 (1987) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.58.1865

    1987

  20. [28]

    Physical Review Letters 53(13), 1236–1239 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1236

    Hall, C.K., Shirley, A.I., Sahni, P.S.: Hydrogen in Niobium-Molybdenum Alloys: A Realistic Example of a Random-Field Ising Model. Physical Review Letters 53(13), 1236–1239 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1236

    1984 doi

  21. [29]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics130(3), 489– 528 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096933

    Aizenman, M., Wehr, J.: Rounding Effects of Quenched Randomness on First- Order Phase Transitions. Communications in Mathematical Physics130(3), 489– 528 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096933

    1990 doi

  22. [30]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics98(2), 145–176 (1985) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01220505

    Imbrie, J.Z.: The ground state of the three-dimensional random-field Ising model. Communications in Mathematical Physics98(2), 145–176 (1985) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01220505

    1985 doi

  23. [31]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics116(4), 539–572 (1988) https://doi

    Bricmont, J., Kupiainen, A.: Phase transition in the 3d random field Ising model. Communications in Mathematical Physics116(4), 539–572 (1988) https://doi. org/10.1007/BF01224901

    1988 doi

  24. [32]

    Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics77(1), 37–51 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1002/cpa.22127

    Ding, J., Zhuang, Z.: Long range order for random field Ising and Potts models. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics77(1), 37–51 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1002/cpa.22127

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    Journal of Statistical Physics34(5-6), 863–870 (1984) https://doi.org/10

    Fisher, D.S., Fr¨ ohlich, J., Spencer, T.: The Ising model in a random magnetic field. Journal of Statistical Physics34(5-6), 863–870 (1984) https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF01009445

    1984

  26. [34]

    arXiv (2025)

    Ding, J., Huang, F., Maia, J.: Phase Transitions in Low-Dimensional Long-Range Random Field Ising Models. arXiv (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412. 19281

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    Inventiones mathe- maticae238(1), 247–281 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-024-01283-z

    Ding, J., Liu, Y., Xia, A.: Long range order for three-dimensional random field Ising model throughout the entire low temperature regime. Inventiones mathe- maticae238(1), 247–281 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-024-01283-z

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    arXiv e-prints (arXiv:2310.12141), 2310–12141 (2023) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.12141 arXiv:2310.12141 [math.PR]

    Ding, J., Huang, F., Xia, A.: A phase transition and critical phenomenon for the two-dimensional random field Ising model. arXiv e-prints (arXiv:2310.12141), 2310–12141 (2023) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.12141 arXiv:2310.12141 [math.PR]

    2023 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Functional Analysis and Its Applications2(4), 302– 312 (1969) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075682

    Dobrushin, R.L.: The problem of uniqueness of a gibbsian random field and the 41 problem of phase transitions. Functional Analysis and Its Applications2(4), 302– 312 (1969) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075682

    1969 doi

  30. [38]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics36(2), 91–114 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646324

    Heilmann, O.J.: The use of reflection as symmetry operation in connection with Peierls’ argument. Communications in Mathematical Physics36(2), 91–114 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646324

    1974 doi

  31. [39]

    Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento Series 23(3), 95–98 (1972) https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF02770519

    Heilmann, O.J.: Existence of phase transitions in certain lattice gases with repul- sive potential. Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento Series 23(3), 95–98 (1972) https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF02770519

    1972 doi

  32. [40]

    Lecture notes in progress, available at https://web.math.princeton.edu/ rvan/APC550.pdf (2016)

    Handel, R.: Probability in High Dimension. Lecture notes in progress, available at https://web.math.princeton.edu/ rvan/APC550.pdf (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Studden)

    Rice, J.R.: Tchebycheff systems: With applications in analysis and statistics (samuel karlin and william J. Studden). SIAM Review9(2), 257–258 (1967) https://doi.org/10.1137/1009050 https://doi.org/10.1137/1009050

    1967 doi

  34. [42]

    arXiv (2024)

    Affonso, L., Bissacot, R., Maia, J.: Phase Transitions in Multidimensional Long- Range Random Field Ising Models. arXiv (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2307.14150

    2024 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    arXiv (2024)

    Maia, J.: Phase Transitions in Ising Models: The Semi-infinite with Decaying Field and the Random Field Long-range. arXiv (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2403.04921

    2024 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Friedli, S., Velenik, Y.: Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Systems: A Concrete Mathematical Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316882603

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Physical Review Letters76(25), 4821–4824 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.76.4821

    Newman, C.M., Stein, D.L.: Spatial Inhomogeneity and Thermodynamic Chaos. Physical Review Letters76(25), 4821–4824 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.76.4821

    1996

  38. [46]

    Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13(21), 4071 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/13/21/012

    Nishimori, H.: Exact results and critical properties of the ising model with com- peting interactions. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13(21), 4071 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/13/21/012

    1980 doi

  39. [47]

    Progress of Theoretical Physics66(4), 1169–1181 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.66.1169

    Nishimori, H.: Internal Energy, Specific Heat and Correlation Function of the Bond-Random Ising Model. Progress of Theoretical Physics66(4), 1169–1181 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.66.1169

    1981 doi

  40. [48]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General15(2), 75–80 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/15/2/005

    Horiguchi, T., Morita, T.: Existence of the ferromagnetic phase in a random- bond Ising model on the square lattice. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General15(2), 75–80 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/15/2/005

    1982 doi

  41. [49]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics26(2), 102–108 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645697 43

    Bortz, A.B., Griffiths, R.B.: Phase transitions in anisotropic classical Heisenberg 42 ferromagnets. Communications in Mathematical Physics26(2), 102–108 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645697 43

    1972 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.