pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.19154 · v3 · pith:FIAV5MASnew · submitted 2024-03-28 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

STaR-GATE: Teaching Language Models to Ask Clarifying Questions

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords questionslanguagemodelquestionerresponsesbettermodelspreferences
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

When prompting language models to complete a task, users often leave important aspects unsaid. While asking questions could resolve this ambiguity (GATE; Li et al., 2023), models often struggle to ask good questions. We explore a language model's ability to self-improve (STaR; Zelikman et al., 2022) by rewarding the model for generating useful questions-a simple method we dub STaR-GATE. We generate a synthetic dataset of 25,500 unique persona-task prompts to simulate conversations between a pretrained language model-the Questioner-and a Roleplayer whose preferences are unknown to the Questioner. By asking questions, the Questioner elicits preferences from the Roleplayer. The Questioner is iteratively finetuned on questions that increase the probability of high-quality responses to the task, which are generated by an Oracle with access to the Roleplayer's latent preferences. After two iterations of self-improvement, the Questioner asks better questions, allowing it to generate responses that are preferred over responses from the initial model on 72% of tasks. Our results indicate that teaching a language model to ask better questions leads to better personalized responses.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond the Assistant Turn: User Turn Generation as a Probe of Interaction Awareness in Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    User-turn generation reveals that LLMs' interaction awareness is largely decoupled from task accuracy, remaining near zero in deterministic settings even as accuracy scales to 96.8% on GSM8K.

  2. ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked For

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ProactBench measures LLM conversational proactivity in three phases using 198 multi-agent dialogues and finds recovery behavior hard to predict from existing benchmarks.

  3. CA-BED: Conversation-Aware Bayesian Experimental Design

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CA-BED uses Bayesian experimental design and simulated conversation trees with LLM likelihoods to optimize multi-turn question selection, reporting 21.8% higher success rates than direct prompting on entity-deduction ...

  4. Alignment has a Fantasia Problem

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AI alignment must move beyond assuming users have fully formed goals and instead provide active cognitive support to help form and refine intent over time.

  5. Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instruction

    cs.CL 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces NoisyToolBench benchmark and Ask-when-Needed framework to improve LLM tool-use performance when user instructions are unclear or incomplete.

  6. Strategic Decision Support for AI Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper introduces an optimization framework for AI agents to strategically seek support, proving a threshold policy on support value and providing an online algorithm to control missed-support error without distrib...

  7. Coherence Maximization Improves Pluralistic Alignment

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ICM-inferred examples achieve gold-label performance across alignment benchmarks and generalize better when coherence is high even at fixed accuracy.

  8. When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Tools

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A tradeoff model shows generative AI can reduce bias against diverse preferences by strategically eliciting information instead of always inferring from majority patterns.

  9. Quantifying the Utility of User Simulators for Building Collaborative LLM Assistants

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fine-tuned simulators grounded in real human data produce LLM assistants that win more often against real users than those trained against role-playing simulators.

  10. BALAR : A Bayesian Agentic Loop for Active Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    BALAR is a task-agnostic Bayesian loop that maintains structured beliefs over latent states, selects questions via expected mutual information, and expands its state space when needed, delivering 14.6-38.5% accuracy g...

  11. Evidence-Based Intelligent Diagnostic and Therapeutic Visualization System with Large Language Models: Multi-Turn Interaction and Multimodal Treatment Plan Generation

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The system integrates a Neo4j knowledge graph, four-stage symptom matching with LLM verification, genetic-algorithm-optimized proactive questioning, and multimodal evidence-based visualizations to improve diagnostic t...