REVIEW 3 cited by
Addressing "Documentation Debt" in Machine Learning Research: A Retrospective Datasheet for BookCorpus
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent literature has underscored the importance of dataset documentation work for machine learning, and part of this work involves addressing "documentation debt" for datasets that have been used widely but documented sparsely. This paper aims to help address documentation debt for BookCorpus, a popular text dataset for training large language models. Notably, researchers have used BookCorpus to train OpenAI's GPT-N models and Google's BERT models, even though little to no documentation exists about the dataset's motivation, composition, collection process, etc. We offer a preliminary datasheet that provides key context and information about BookCorpus, highlighting several notable deficiencies. In particular, we find evidence that (1) BookCorpus likely violates copyright restrictions for many books, (2) BookCorpus contains thousands of duplicated books, and (3) BookCorpus exhibits significant skews in genre representation. We also find hints of other potential deficiencies that call for future research, including problematic content, potential skews in religious representation, and lopsided author contributions. While more work remains, this initial effort to provide a datasheet for BookCorpus adds to growing literature that urges more careful and systematic documentation for machine learning datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Certified Mitigation of Worst-Case LLM Copyright Infringement
BloomScrub detects long verbatim quotes from a protected corpus with a Bloom filter, rewrites them iteratively, and abstains when needed, certifying that no quote longer than the threshold is emitted.
-
Bridging the Data Provenance Gap Across Text, Speech and Video
A manual audit of nearly 4,000 text, speech, and video datasets finds AI training data increasingly comes from web and social media sources, carries hidden non-commercial restrictions, and remains Western-centric with...
-
One Documentation Does Not Fit All: Case Study of TensorFlow Documentation
TensorFlow's documentation does not effectively support its target users: 64.3% of documentation-related Stack Overflow questions are triggered by inadequate or non-generalizable examples, and user profiles do not dif...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.