Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantifying the Benefit of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.10578 v2 pith:FMPJ2HZJ submitted 2023-04-17 cs.DL cs.AIcs.CYphysics.data-anphysics.soc-ph

classification cs.DLcs.AIcs.CYphysics.data-anphysics.soc-ph
keywords researchscientificbenefitdisciplinesacrosspotentialscienceartificial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) revolution has the potential to change almost every line of work. As AI capabilities continue to improve in accuracy, robustness, and reach, AI may outperform and even replace human experts across many valuable tasks. Despite enormous effort devoted to understanding the impact of AI on labor and the economy and AI's recent successes in accelerating scientific discovery and progress, we lack a systematic understanding of how AI advances may benefit scientific research across disciplines and fields. Here, drawing from the literature on the future of work and the science of science, we develop a measurement framework to estimate both the direct use of AI and the potential benefit of AI in scientific research, applying natural language processing techniques to 74.6 million publications and 7.1 million patents. We find that the use of AI in research is widespread throughout the sciences, growing especially rapidly since 2015, and papers that use AI exhibit a citation premium, more likely to be highly cited both within and outside their disciplines. Moreover, our analysis reveals considerable potential for AI to benefit numerous scientific fields, yet a notable disconnect exists between AI education and its research applications, highlighting a mismatch between the supply of AI expertise and its demand in research. Lastly, we examine demographic disparities in AI's benefits across scientific disciplines and find that disciplines with a higher proportion of women or Black scientists tend to be associated with less benefit, suggesting that AI's growing impact on research may further exacerbate existing inequalities in science. As the connection between AI and scientific research deepens, our findings may become increasingly important, with implications for the equity and sustainability of the research enterprise.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging AI and Science: Implications from a Large-Scale Literature Analysis of AI4Science

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using LLM-extracted labels from 162,656 papers, this analysis shows that AI4Science connections are sparse and uneven, with a few hub areas dominating while many scientific problems and AI methods remain weakly linked.

Pith tools