Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

ZipIt! Merging Models from Different Tasks without Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.03053 v3 pith:FNJTUALT submitted 2023-05-04 cs.CV cs.LG

ZipIt! Merging Models from Different Tasks without Training

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords modelsmodelmergingtrainedaccounttasktaskswithout
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Typical deep visual recognition models are capable of performing the one task they were trained on. In this paper, we tackle the extremely difficult problem of combining distinct models with different initializations, each solving a separate task, into one multi-task model without any additional training. Prior work in model merging permutes one model to the space of the other then averages them together. While this works for models trained on the same task, we find that this fails to account for the differences in models trained on disjoint tasks. Thus, we introduce "ZipIt!", a general method for merging two arbitrary models of the same architecture that incorporates two simple strategies. First, in order to account for features that aren't shared between models, we expand the model merging problem to allow for merging features within each model by defining a general "zip" operation. Second, we add support for partially zipping the models up until a specified layer, naturally creating a multi-head model. We find that these two changes combined account for 20-60% improvement over prior work, making it more feasible to merge models trained on disjoint tasks without retraining.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Structural Symmetries: Linear Mode Connectivity via Neuron Identifiability

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Neural networks admit large families of approximately equivalent solutions via neuron identifiability even without structural symmetry, enabling linear low-loss merging paths without prior alignment.

  2. Task Prompt Vectors: Effective Initialization through Multi-Task Soft-Prompt Transfer

    cs.CL 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Task prompt vectors, formed by subtracting random initialization from tuned soft prompts, support low-resource initialization and arithmetic combination across tasks on 12 NLU datasets while remaining independent of i...

  3. STaR-Quant: State-Time Consistent Post-Training Quantization for Diffusion Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    STaR-Quant provides a state-time consistent PTQ framework for DLLMs using SGAT and TAC to improve low-bit weight-activation quantization.

  4. PivotMerge: Bridging Heterogeneous Multimodal Pre-training via Post-Alignment Model Merging

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PivotMerge merges heterogeneous multimodal pre-trained models via shared-space decomposition to filter conflicts and layer-wise weights based on alignment contributions, outperforming baselines on multimodal benchmarks.

  5. PivotMerge: Bridging Heterogeneous Multimodal Pre-training via Post-Alignment Model Merging

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PivotMerge merges post-alignment cross-modal projectors from heterogeneous MLLM pre-training via shared-space filtering and layer-wise weights, beating prior merging baselines on multimodal benchmarks.

  6. Rethinking Heterogeneous LLM Merging: A Weighted Model Averaging Perspective

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    After truncating or expanding checkpoints to a shared shape, small-ratio weight averaging slightly improves average benchmark scores over strong Qwen sources, but headline gains are inflated by per-task best-ratio selection.

  7. MOMO: Mars Orbital Model Foundation Model for Mars Orbital Applications

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MOMO merges sensor-specific models from three Mars orbital instruments at matched validation loss stages to form a foundation model that outperforms ImageNet, Earth observation, sensor-specific, and supervised baselin...

  8. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis

    cs.LG 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Representations learned by large AI models are converging toward a shared statistical model of reality.