Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Whispering Experts: Neural Interventions for Toxicity Mitigation in Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.12824 v1 pith:FNMRPS4E submitted 2024-07-02 cs.CL cs.AI

Whispering Experts: Neural Interventions for Toxicity Mitigation in Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords toxicauralanguagemodelstoxicitytimesabilitycontent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

An important issue with Large Language Models (LLMs) is their undesired ability to generate toxic language. In this work, we show that the neurons responsible for toxicity can be determined by their power to discriminate toxic sentences, and that toxic language can be mitigated by reducing their activation levels proportionally to this power. We propose AUROC adaptation (AurA), an intervention that can be applied to any pre-trained LLM to mitigate toxicity. As the intervention is proportional to the ability of each neuron to discriminate toxic content, it is free of any model-dependent hyperparameters. We show that AurA can achieve up to $2.2 \times$ reduction in toxicity with only a $0.72$ perplexity increase. We also show that AurA is effective with models of different scale (from 1.5B to 40B parameters), and its effectiveness in mitigating toxic language, while preserving common-sense zero-shot abilities, holds across all scales. AurA can be combined with pre-prompting strategies, boosting its average mitigation potential from $1.28\times$ to $2.35\times$. Moreover, AurA can counteract adversarial pre-prompts that maliciously elicit toxic content, making it an effective method for deploying safer and less toxic models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Neurons Speak in Ranges: Breaking Free from Discrete Neuronal Attribution

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Neurons exhibit concept-conditioned activation ranges forming Gaussian-like distributions with minimal overlap, and range-based interventions via NeuronLens outperform neuron-level masking in targeted manipulation wit...

  2. Concept Removal for Frontier Image Generative Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A transcoder-based in-place replacement of the bottleneck layer enables selective concept removal in modern diffusion and autoregressive image models without degrading output quality.

  3. Where to Steer: Input-Dependent Layer Selection for Steering Improves LLM Alignment

    cs.LG 2026-04 accept novelty 6.0

    Learning an input-conditioned mapping from embeddings to the best single steering layer (W2S) consistently beats fixed-layer CAA and L2S on 13 behaviors for two LLMs, in- and out-of-distribution.